1. BRAHMAJALA-SUTRA.

The first product.

1. Like this I heard. At one time, the Blessed One was walking on the road between Rajagaha and Nalanda, together with the great bhikkhu, about five hundred. At that time there were Suppiya pagans traveling on the road between Rajagaha and Nalanda along with Brahmadatta youth disciples. Suppiya, a pagan master, uses numerous means of destroying the Buddha, destroying the Dharma, destroying the rascals, and the followers of the Brahminatta Supramya, the Brahmadatta youth, use countless means to praise the Buddha, praising the Buddha. , praise the Sangha. So both teachers said the words are completely contrasting each other while walking behind the Buddha and them bhikkhus.

2. Then the Blessed One rested for a night at Ambalatthikà, the king's lodge, with them Bhikkhus. Suppiya, a foreign heir, also spent one night at Ambalatthikà, the king's holiday home, along with his disciples, the Brahmadatta youth. Here, the Suppiya pagan also used countless means to destroy the Buddha, destroy the French, destroy the ramp, and the disciple of the foreigner Suppiya, the Brahmadatta youth, used a variety of means praised the Buddha praised by the French, praised by the Sangha. Thus the two teachers said the contrasting words while walking behind the bhikkhu and the bhikkhus.

3. And when the night was over, a large number of monks, after awakening, sat in a roundabout and the following story was discussed between the monks.

- Hey, sage, it's wonderful! Hey saints, so rare! The Blessed One, the All-Knowing One, the Arhat, the Noble One, knows the wrong tendency of being. Suppiya, this exorcist who uses countless means to destroy the Buddha, destroy the Dharma, destroy the monk. Suppiya, a Brahminatta young disciple, used many means, praised the Buddha, praised the Dharma, praised the Dharma. Thus both teachers said the words are completely contrasted while walking behind the bhikkhu and they bhikkhus.

4. At that time, the Blessed One was told the story was going on between the monks, and they came in a circle and sat down on the prepared space. After sitting down, the Blessed One said to the bhikkhus:

"What is the matter, monks, while you sit in this place? What has been left unfinished?

Hearing this, the Billion-World Vision:

- The Blessed One! Here, when the night is over, we wake up and sit in the circle and between us, the following story is said: "Hey, sage, it's wonderful! Hey saints, so rare! The Blessed One, the All-Knowing One, the Arhat, the Noble One, knows the wrong tendency of being. Suppiya, this exorcist who uses countless means to destroy the Buddha, destroy the Dharma, destroy the monk. Suppiya, a Brahminatta young disciple, used many means, praised the Buddha, praised the Dharma, praised the Dharma. So both teachers said the words are completely contrasted while walking behind the bhikkhus and they bhikkhus. " Well, that's the story we're halfway through when the Blessed One comes!

5. - If the monks destroy me, destroy the French or destroy the monks, you do not have to cause birth, heart disease, anger, the mind sorrow. Be it, if some people destroy Me, destroy the Fa or destroy the rampant, and if you give birth to anger, anger, mindset sorrow, that time will be harmful to you. If someone breaks My name, destroys the Dharma or discards the Sangha, and if you are angry and sorrowful, can you tell that their words are right or wrong?

- Lord, can not be!

"Monks, when someone cancels me, destroy the Dharma or destroy the monks, you have to say the truth is not true: -" Like this, this point is not true. real; Like this, this point is not accurate; this is not between us; This does not happen between us. "

6. Bhikkhus, if someone praised Me, praised the French, or praised the monks, the time should not be happy, happy, the heart should not be interested. Now, monks, if one prays, we praise the Dharma or Praise the monks, but if you rejoice, joy and enjoyment will be harmful to you. If you praise me, Praise the Dharma, or Praise the monks, your time to acknowledge what is true is true: "Like this, this point is true, like that. This is exactly the point, this has come between us, this has happened between us. "

7. Monks, it is only the matter is not important, small, only in the precepts that ordinary people praise me. Monks, what is the matter is not important, small, only the precepts that ordinary people praise the Tathagata?

(Category)

Gotama Sa Gotama abandoned killing, avoid the killing, leave the staff, the sword, know the precious, have compassion, live mercy to the happiness of all beings and sentient beings. - Monks, it is the wisdom of the hypocrites.

Simon Gotama abandoned the donation, away from the donation, not only give the given things, only the things given, pure life without purse robbers. - Bhikkhus, that is the praise of Tathagata of ordinary people.

Gotama abandoned the wrong way, pure life practice, live liberation, renunciation despicable despotism. O bhikkhus, that is the praise of the wisdom of the ordinary people.

Satan saves the lie, avoids lying, speaks truthful words, y only in truth, sure, trustworthy, not deceiving, not against the promise to life. O bhikkhus, that is the praise of the wisdom of the ordinary people.

Gotama refuses to speak double-edged, avoiding speaking double-edged; Listen to this place, do not go to the place to give birth to these people; Listen to what is there, do not go tell these people to divide the other. Thus Satma Gotama lives in harmony with the distractions, the growth of the harmony, the joy in harmony, the words that lead to harmony. O bhikkhus, that is the praise of the wisdom of the ordinary people.

The monks, Sa-Gotama abandoned the words of evil, away from evil words, words are not guilty, beautiful, cute, sympathetic to the heart, elegant, pleasing many people, please many, Gotama Said say such words. O bhikkhus, that is the praise of the wisdom of the ordinary people.

Monks, Saudama Gotama renounce the saying, shy away from the saying, say the right time, say the words honest, say the meaningful words, say the words of the Dharma, say the words about the Law, say the words worth keeping, the words timely, logical, coherent system, useful. - Bhikkhus, that is the praise of Tathagata of ordinary people.

10. Sa-Gotama does not harm seeds and plants; Gotama daily, do not eat at night, give up not eat at night, give up not eat non-time. Gotama refused to go to see dancing, singing, music, drama. Gotama surrendered no jewelery, perfume, oil and fashion. Gotama refused to use a high bed and a big bed. Gotama refuses to accept gold and silver. Gotama refused to accept the seeds. Gotama refuses to accept raw meat. Gotama refused to accept women, girls. Gotama refuses to accept girls and boys. Gotama refuses to accept sheep and goats. Gotama refuses to accept poultry and pigs. Gotama refused to accept elephants, cows, horses and mares. Gotama refused to accept the land of the land. Gotama refuses to send a broker or broker himself. Gotama refused to trade. Gotama surrendered the scams by weight, money and measurements. Gotama abandoned the mischief, such as bribery, fraud, fraud. Gotama refuses to hurt, kill, arrest, rob, rob, loot. - Bhikkhus, that is the praise of Tathagata of ordinary people.

(Middle)

11. While some Sa-ard, Brahmins have eaten the food offered by the credit, are still alive harming the seeds and trees. As seeds from the roots of birth, seeds from the branch of birth, seed from the birthplace, seeds from the extracts of the seedling and fifth from the seeds of birth. Sa-Gotama does not harm seeds or trees. - Monks, so the ordinary people praise the wisdom of the Lai.

12. While some of Sa-ard, Brahmins, who have eaten the food offered by the credit, are still alive and store and enjoy the objects. Storage of food, storage of beverages, storage of fabrics, storage of vehicles, storage of furniture, storage of perfumes, storing of cosmetics. Sa Gotama then abandoned not store the objects. - Monks, so the ordinary people praise the wisdom of the Lai.

13. While some of Sa-ard, Brahmins, who have used dishes made by donations, are still living in unaccompanied minors such as dancing, singing, music, drama, beat the drum, play the drum, play the fairy fairy, the martial arts, elephant fight, horse fighting, buffalo fighting, bullfighting, goat fighting, sheep fighting, chicken fighting, quails, sticks , wrestling, fighting fake, arrayed, maneuvered, military. Sa Gotama has abandoned the wrong kind of dukkha as above. - Monks, so the ordinary people praise the wisdom of the Lai.

14. While some Sa-ard, Brahmins have used dishes made by donations, still live card games and entertainment such as squares flag squares, ten squares flag aerial games, on the ground, only steps into the box with the right step, the game toss cards and then shoot but do not let the cards fall, playing dice, playing, writing hands, play ball, play trumpet play car, play small arcade, play misspelling on the air or on the back, play guess, play mimic. Gotama Gotama gave up playing cards and other types of entertainment as above. - Monks, so the ordinary people praise the wisdom of the Lai.

15. While some of Sa-ard, Brahmins, who use donated food, still live on high beds and large beds such as armchairs, benches, wool mattresses. , multicolored sheets, white woolen blankets, embroidered cotton blankets, cotton mattresses, mattresses embroidered with animals, feather blankets on either side, feather blankets on one side, quilted blankets, quilted blankets silk, large rugs that can hold up to sixteen dancers, elephant cushions, horse cushions, car cushions, mattresses made of leather laurel wore stitched together, cushioned leather mattresses called kadali, The bench has a red knee. Gotama Gotama did not use the high beds and big beds as above. - Monks, so the ordinary people praise the wisdom of the Lai.

16. While some Sa-ard, Brahmins have used dishes made by donations, they still live on jewelry and cosmetics. Apply oil, massage, bathe, shake hands and feet, mirrors, face creams, wreaths and cheeks, face powder, facial wraps, bracelets, wigs on the head, embroidered sandals, headscarves, pearls, bows, white cloth with long fringed edges. Gotama Gotama then abandoned the use of jewelry and cosmetics as above. O bhikkhus, such as ordinary people complained about the Tathagata.

17. While some of Sa-ard, Brahmins, who have been using donations of food, still speak of vain, ordinary stories like the story of kings, the story of the story of the soldiers, the horror stories, the story of the war, the story of the food, the story of the drink, the story of the cloth, the story of the bed , the story of the wreath, the story of the people, the story of the car, the story of the village, the story of the city, the story of the city, the story of the country, the sentence the story of the man, the story of the hero, the story of the roadside, the story of the water, the story of the dead, the story of the state of the world, the state of the ocean, the story of existence and non-existence. Sa Gotama refused to say these useless, trivial stories. - Monks, so the ordinary people praise the wisdom of the Lai.

18. While some Sa-subjects, Ba-la-oil have used dishes offered by donations, are still discussing the dispute, as saying: "You do not know this law and law, I know France. and this law. How can you know this law and the law? You have committed wrong view, I just right view right; my words are compatible, your words are not compatible; Your speech is not compatible, what is said before you said later, what is said after you said before, your opinion was rejected; Your speech has been challenged; You have been defeated. Come and release the word; If possible, try to escape the mystery. " Sa Gotama has abandoned the arguments discussed above. - Monks, so the ordinary people praise the wisdom of the Lai.

19. While some of Sa-ard, Brahmins have eaten the food offered by the credit, are still alive to give the news, or do themselves as brokers, as for the kings, for the the king's servant, the brahmins, the brahmins, the householders, the young men and say, "Go to that place, go to that place. Take this one, bring this to the other. " Gotama Gotama gave up the news and made himself a broker. Thus, as the phu phu thuy Lai.

20. While some of Sa-ard, Brahmins, who have used dishes made by donations, still live the deceitful, libelous, suggestive, detestable, benefit. Got Sa Gotama then abandoned do not cheat and flattery as above. O bhikkhus, such as ordinary people complained about Tathagata.

(The world)

21. While some Sa-subjects, Brahmins, oil used dishes offered donations, still self-supporting by the mischievous, such as generals, limbs, generals, dream body, body, mice bite, fire, scoop, use sprays, etc ... into the fire, rice husk, rice, rice, oil, blood, Department of geography, department of dreaming, department of blessing, department of evil spirits, faculty of charms in the house of the earth, solid department, poison department, scorpion department, department of birds, guess the number, the fire department, the bird's voice. Sa Gotama away from the misconceptions above. - Bhikkhus, such as the gentleman praised the wisdom of the Tathagata.

22. While some Sa-ard, Brahmins, who have used dishes made by donations, still feed on evil spirits, such as seeing pearls, pants, general sword, general arrow, general bow, general weapons, general women, general men, general youth, general female, male servant general, female servants, general elephant, general horse, buffaloes, male bulls, general bulls, goat's generals, general sheep, general poultry, general cun quail, general gecko, general long ear, general ghost, general animal. Sa Gotama then abandoned the evil network mentioned above.

- Bhikkhus, such as the gentleman praised the wisdom of the Tathagata.

23. While some of Sa-ard, Brahmins, who have eaten the food offered by the offerings, still feed themselves with evil spirits as predicted: the king will advance, the king will retreat. The the native king will attack, the foreign king will rotten; foreign king will attack, the native king will rotten; the king will win the battle, the foreign king will be defeated; the king will win the battle, the king will be defeated. So there will be victory for this side, there will be failure for the other side. Sa Gotama then abandoned the evil network mentioned above.

- Bhikkhus, such as the gentleman praised the wisdom of the Tathagata.

24. While some Sa-ard, Brahmins, who have used the dishes offered by donations, still feed themselves with evil spirits as predicted to have a lunar eclipse, there will be food; the moon, the sun will follow the right path, the moon, the sun will go beyond the right path, the stars will follow the right path, the stars will go outside the right path, there will be meteors, there will be fire there will be earthquakes, there will be thunderstorms, the moon, the sun, the stars will rise, will dive, will fade, will light, the lunar eclipse will have results like this, the real will have the same results. In this case, the sun will be on the right path, and the sun will go out on the right path, and the stars will follow. The pathway will be like this, the meteor will have results like this, fire directions will have results like this, earthquakes will have results like this, thunderstorms will have results like this, the moon, the sun, the stars rise, will have results like this. Got Sa-Gotama away, not self-supporting with the above evil. - Bhikkhus, such as the gentleman praised the wisdom of the Tathagata.

25. While some Sa-subjects, Brahmins, oil used dishes provided by donations, still feed themselves with evil as predicted will be more rain, will be the season, will lose the season, will be safe, there will be danger, there will be illness, there will be no illness, or do the job like counting on the finger, accounting, large numbers, make letters, follow love. Sa Gotama away from the above misconduct. - Bhikkhus, such as the gentleman praised the wisdom of the Tathagata.

26. While some Sa-ard, Brahmins, who have used food credit for offerings, still self-supporting with evil. Set a good day for the bride or groom, choose a good time to meditate, choose a good time to split, pick a good time to collect debt, choose a good time to borrow or spend money, use charm to help The lucky ones use charms to make people risky, use spells to abort them, use spells to sharpen their tongues, use spells to make jaws not move, use spells to make people fall off, Use charms to make the deaf ear, ask the mirror, ask the bridegroom, girls, ask the angel to bless, worship the sun, worship the place, spit fire, Siri bridge god. Sa Gotama away from the evil network mentioned above. - Bhikkhus, such as the gentleman praised the wisdom of the Tathagata.

27. While some Sa-ard, Brahmins, who have eaten the food offered by donations, still feed on evil spirits by using magic to calm themselves, so as not to do promised things, to be sheltered in the lands, to be prosperous, to be impotent, to find good land to build a house, to pray for new homes, ritual washing, sacrifice, make vomiting, excretion of dirt on top, secretion of dirt below, reflux in the head, oil in the ear, eye drops, drug through the nose, eye medication, oil For eye, eye pain, as a physician dissection, healing children, for medicines made of root crops, prevent the effectiveness of drugs. Sa Gotama away from the evil network mentioned above. - Bhikkhus, such as the gentleman praised the wisdom of the Tathagata.

Monks, these are not important matters, small, only the precepts that ordinary people use to praise the Tathagata.

28. The other monks, there are other, deep, difficult to penetrate, difficult to witness, tranquility, beauty, beyond the reach of logic, subtle only the new understanding. These Tathagata have self-certification, enlightenment and claims. And it is those who like true truth praise the new Lai said.

The monks, what are the deep-seated, hard to see, difficult to witness, tranquility, beautiful, can not understand by logic empty, delicate, only people can understand. These Tathagata have self-certification, enlightenment and proclaimed, and it is those who like true truth praise the new Tathagata?

(62 kinds of wrong views)

29. Monks, Brahmins, discuss the primordial past, approve of the primordial past, he goes back to the primordial past, promotes many false views , with eighteen arguments. And according to what, according to what, Sa-subjects, Brahman controversial side of the ancient past, approval of the ancient past, y on the primordial past, initiated Are different prejudices different from the eighteen arguments?

30. Monks, there are some Sa-subjects, brahmins, advocates Permanent position, accept that: "Ego for the world is permanent" with four arguments. And these Sa-subjects, brahmins, y, just what, the policy of Resolutions, and accept the self and the world is usually with four arguments?

31. By virtue of diligence, thanks to diligence, thanks to diligence, thanks to the arduous, thanks to the liberation, thanks to the mind, the mind entered the mind; When the mind entered, he remembered many past lives, such as a lifetime, two generations, three generations, four generations, five generations, ten generations, hundreds of generations, hundreds of thousands of generations, hundreds of generations. Thousands of life, countless hundreds of thousands of lives, remember: When born in that place, I lived with the name like this, they are like this, class like this, eat like this, life like this, life expectancy like this. From where I died, I was born again. At this place, I lived the name like this, they are like this, class like this, eat like this, pleasant life, like this life, like this. From where I die I was born here. " So he remembers many past lives, with features and details. He says, "The self and the world are permanent, unborn, as solid as a mountain, like a pillar; The other kind of sentient beings circulate reincarnation, dying again, but they are still resident. Why so? Because I am due to ardent heart, thanks to diligence, thanks to diligence, thanks to not liberated, thanks to the idea of ​​mind ... the other sentient beings are circulating reincarnation, dying again, but they are still resident " .

This is the first position, according to which, some of the monks, Brahmins, the Permanent Resident, accept the self and the world. is often.

32. In the second case, what are the Sa-subjects, brahmanas, what do they mean, the Resolutions, and the assumption that the self and the world are permanent?

The monks, in this life have Sa-or brahmana, thanks to one-sided diligence, thanks to diligence, thanks to not released by the mind, he remembered many past lives, such as a life after life, two into life again, three into life, ten lives into life; "When I was born in that place, I lived with the name like this, they were like this, class like this, eating like this, The other is the cycle of reincarnation, death and birth, but they are still permanent. "

It is the second position, that is, according to which, some of the Sa-ātā, brahmā, the policy of Resolving and accepting that the self and the world Often.

33. In the third case, what are the dharmas or Brahmins, what do they mean, the persistence policy, and the forest of the ego and the world are permanent?

The monks, in this life there is Sa-or brahmana, thanks to one-pointedly, thanks to diligence, due diligence, thanks to not liberated, thanks to mind memory, so the mind entered. When the mind enters, he remembers many past lives, such as ten lifeless lives, twenty lifetimes, thirty lifetimes, forty lifetimes, fifty lifetimes; "When I was born in that place, I lived with my name like this, and they were like this, class like this, like this longevity, longevity like this. From that place, die, I was born again. From that place, die, I was born again. Over there, I lived with the name like this, they are like this, class like this, eat like this, so happy life like this, life like this. From where I die, I was born in this place. " Thus he remembers many past lives with characteristics and details. He said, "The self and the world are permanent, unborn, as solid as a mountain, like a pillar; The other sentient beings are circulating reincarnation, dying again, however, they are permanent. Why so? Because I am so zealous ... so mindful of that. When the mind entered like that, I remember many past lives, like ten lives, miscarriage ... forty life into life. Remember: "When I was born in that place, I lived with a name like this ... I was born in this place." So he remembers many of his past lives with the characteristics and details. He said: "The ego and the world are permanent, unborn, firm as the mountain, stone pillars ... the other beings are flowing, samsara, dying, but they are still resident. "

The monks, it is the third position, according to which, according to them, a number of Sa-subjects, Brahman, the policy of permanent address, accept the self and the world.

34. In the fourth case, the Sa-subjects, Brahman y nothing, what basis, advocacy Standpoints, and accept the self and the world?

O bhikkhus, in life there is Sa-or Brahmin, as the reasoning, is the investigator. Because of the divisiveness of reason, and the detachment of judgment, he proclaims this: "The self and the world are permanent, unborn, firm as mountains, like pillars; The other time flowing reincarnation, dying again, but they still often.

This is the fourth position, according to which, according to that, some Sa-subjects, Brahman, the policy of permanent address, accept the self and the world is permanent. .

35. These bhikkhus, these Brahmanas, Brahmins, the Permanent Insurrectionist, accept the self and the world as permanent, with four arguments. If there are Brahmins, Brahmins who advocated permanent residence, accept that "the ego and the world are permanent," they will accept all four arguments, or one of the arguments on There is no other argument.

36. This monks, Tathagata wisdom is like this: "Such views, such attachments, such clinging, will lead to such animal realms, will make such destiny. . Tathagata knows this, He knows more, and He does not accept it. By not accepting the authority, the mind is calm. He knows the action, the eradication of the feelings, the sweetness, the dangers and the exhalation of them. Knowing this, the rate-pretentious, Tathagas are completely free, there is no clinging.

37. These attachments, the monks, are the deep-seated, difficult to see, difficult to witness, tranquility, beauty, beyond the reach of logic empty, delicate, only people with a new position can distinguish. These, the Tathagata triumphed, enlightened and declared; and it is those who like true truth praise the new Tathagata.

Second Order

1. Bhikkhus, there are Sa-subjects, brahmins, advocated a part of Permanent Essay, part of the irrelevance, the self and the world is usually for a class of beings. and impermanent to another class of beings, with four arguments. And these subjects, Brahmin, y, just what advocates a part of Permanent Essay, part An irrelevant comment, accept the self and the world is permanent for a class of beings and Impermanent to another class of beings, with four arguments?

2. Bhikkhus, there is a time to a certain period, after a very long time, this world is rotten. While the world is shifting, the most sentient beings pass through the realm of Abhassara. At that, these kinds of beings by thoughts, feed by joy, self-illumination, flight on air, live in glory, and live such a long time.

3. Bhikkhus, one time to a certain stage, after a very long time, this world is transformed into. While this world is transformed, Pham is shown, but empty. At that time, a charming, or life network has been, or blessing has been, the network from Quang Yin, birth through Pham is empty. He is there, by the idea of ​​living, fed by joy, self-illumination, astronaut on the air, living in glory, and live so for a long time.

4. At this point, after living so alone, the idea of ​​discouragement, not happy and expecting: "May have other sentient beings, also come here!" Now, other beings, or life network has been, or blessing has been, were destined together and from the body of the Optical Sun, born Pham cung to be friends with the other. Kinds of sentient beings are also sentient beings, fed by joy, self-illumination, flying astronauts, living in glory, and living like that, for quite a long time.

5. At that moment, the first monks, the first sentient beings think that: "I am the Brahma, Great Brahma, omnipotence, victory, the label, God, God Creator , Master of all beings, the Great God, all living beings, the Self, the ancestors of beings have and will be born. These beings are born by ourselves. Why so? Because it is our intention to start: May the other sentient beings also come here - It is because of my desire that these sentient beings come here. The following species also think like this: "He is the Brahma, the Great Brahma, the Almighty, the victory, the label, the God, the Creator, the Creator, The Lord of all life, the Self, the ancestors of beings have and will be born. We are born of this Brahman. Why? Because we saw this first born here.

6. Bhikkhus, that firstborn being is living longer, better form and more power. Later births are shorter, the appearance is less favorable and less privileged. O bhikkhus, this situation occurs. One of these beings, after leaving the other body, is born to this realm. When he came to this realm, he renounced his family, living without family. After the renunciation of family, living without family, he, thanks to zeal, thanks to diligence, thanks to diligence, thanks to no liberation, thanks mind memory, so the mind. When the mind enters the mind, he remembers the past life, not remembering beyond that life. He said: "The other is the Brahma, the Great Brahma, the Almighty, the Great, the Great, the Great, the Creator, the Creator, the Master, the Master, Self, The ancestors of beings are and will be born. We are born by the Brahma. He is permanent, permanent, permanent, not changed, permanent so forever. And we are born by this Brahma at this place. We are impermanent, unstoppable, underprivileged, and subject to change. "

It is the first case, that is, according to that, according to which some Sa-subjects, Brahmins, advocated a part of Permanent Essay, the ego and the world are permanent for one type of being and impermanent to another.

7. In the second case, there are Sa-subjects, Brahmins, y nothing, basis, advocated a part of Permanent comment, part of the irrelevance, the self and the world is often also for a class of beings and impermanence for another class of beings?

Monks, there are gods called Khiddàpadosikà (infected or sensual). These people live for a long time, passionate in lingerie. Because of the long life, love in the lap of lust, should be lost. Due to forgetfulness, the gods are born, leaving their bodies.

8. Bhikkhus, this situation occurs. One of the other sentient beings, when the birth of the body, abandoned this body, is born here. When he came to this place, he left home, left home, lived without family. After leaving home, abandon family, living without family, he thanks to one-sided, due diligence, thanks to diligence, thanks to no release, thanks to mind memory, so mind input. When the mind entered, he remembered the past life, not remember beyond that life.

9. He said: "The gods are not infected or sensual, they live for a long time not intoxicated in sexual pleasure. Because living for a long time not intoxicated in sexual pleasure, should not be lost memories. Because of their non-repudiation, the devas do not take birth to give up their bodies, live permanently, permanently, permanently, unchanged, permanently residing forever. And we have been infected by sensual pleasures, long live in ecstasy. Since we live long in love, we are lost. Due to the loss of mind, we abandon this body, live impermanent, unstable, undergoing life, subjected to the transformation and birth to this place.

This is the second case, according to which, according to it, some Sa-subjects, Brahmins, advocated a part of the Permanent Essay, the ego and the world are permanent for one type of being, and impermanent to another.

10. The third case, there are Sa-subjects, Brahmins, y nothing, basis, advocated a part of Permanent comment, part of the irrelevance, the self and the world is often with a class of beings, and impermanent for another class of beings?

The monks, there are the gods called Manopadosikà (infected or by the mind). They live by the jealousy of each other. Because of the longevity of each other, their minds hate one another. Because minds hate each other, their bodies are tired, their minds are tired. These divine beings are born to give up their bodies.

11. Bhikkhus, this situation occurs. One of these beings, when the birth of the body, is born to this realm. When he came to this place, he renounced his family, living without family. After leaving the family, living without family, he thanks to one-pointedly, thanks to diligence, thanks to diligence, thanks to no release, thanks to mind memory, so mind input. When the mind enters, he remembers the past life, but does not remember beyond that life.

12. He said: "The gods are not infected or by the mind, they live for a long time not cooked by jealousy. Because of their long life, they are not cooked by jealousy, their minds do not hate one another. Because their minds do not hate each other, their bodies are not tired, their minds are not tired. Those gods are not born to give up their bodies, live permanently, permanently, unchanged, permanent so forever. And we are either infected by our minds or we are living a long life, boiled by jealousy, so our minds hate one another. Because our minds hate each other, our bodies are tired and our mind is tired. We are born, renounce this body, live impermanence is not solid, long life, subject to the transformation and birth to this place.

It is the third case, that is, according to that, according to which some Sa-subjects, Brahman advocated part of the Permanent Essay, falls and the world is permanent for one type of being and impermanent to another.

13. In the fourth case, there are Sa-subjects, Brahmins, y only what, the basis of what is part of the Permanent Essay, part of the irrelevance, the self and the world is often for a class of beings and impermanent for another class of beings.

O bhikkhus, Sa-subject, or Brahmin is the reason, is the investigator. Due to the split of refutation and the dependence under investigation, he proclaims this: "The so-called eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body, Not permanent, not resident, changed. The so-called mind, the mind, the consciousness, the self is permanent, invariable, permanent, unchanged, always constant so forever.

It is the fourth case, according to which, according to it, some Sa-subjects, Brahmins, advocated a part of the Permanent Essay, the ego and the world are permanent for one type of being, and impermanent to another.

14. These monks, Brahmins, brahmins advocate a part of the Permanent Essay, an irreconcilable part of the self and the world, which is permanent with four arguments. If there are Sa-or Ba-la-subjects advocated Resolutions, accept the self and the world is permanent, they will accept all four arguments, or one of the arguments above, any other.

15. Bhikkhus, the Tathagata said: "Such prejudices, such attachments, such clinging, will lead to such animal realms, will make such destiny." As Hybrid wisdom as such, He is more insight, and He does not accept it. By not accepting the tri, inner peace is silenced. He knows the action, the eradication of the feelings, the sweetness, the dangers and the exhalation of them. Knowing this, the rate-pretentious, Tathagas are completely free, there is no clinging.

These, the monks, are the hard-to-see, difficult to witness, tranquility, beauty, beyond the reach of logic empty, delicate, only people with new knowledge can recognize. Those who like real truth praise as Lai said new.

16. Bhikkhus, there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-patriarch advocate Unqualified, accept the world is boundless Boundary with four arguments. And these Sa-subjects, Brahmins, y only what, grounds, advocates Endlessly discuss, accept the world is boundless boundless with four arguments?

17. Bhikkhus, here is Sa-or brahmana, thanks to the enthusiasm, thanks to diligence, due diligence, thanks to not released, thanks to mind memory, so the mind input. When the mind entered, he lived in his life with the idea that the world was a possession. He said, "This world is finite, there is a loop around. Why? For me, thanks to one-pointedness, thanks to diligence, thanks to diligence, thanks to no release, thanks to mind memory, so the mind input. When the mind enters, I live with the idea that the world is right. So I know that this world is finite, there is a loop around it. "

It is the first case, the only one, according to which, some of Sa-subject, Ba-la-subject advocate. record.

18. In the second case, there are Sa-subjects, Brahmins, y only what, basis, advocate Endless discussion, the world is boundless and boundless?

The monks, there are Sa-subject, Brahman, thanks to one-pointedly, thanks to diligence, thanks to diligence, thanks to not released, thanks to mind memory, so mind input. When the mind enters, he lives in his life with the idea of ​​the world being boundless. He said: "The world is boundless, there is no limit." Those Sa-subjects, Brahmins said: "This world is full, with a detour around," they said not true. This world is boundless, there is no limit. Why so? Because of one-pointedness, diligence, thanks to diligence, thanks to not liberated, thanks to mind memory, so the mind entered. When the mind enters, I live with the idea that the world is boundless. So I know: "The world is boundless, there is no limit."

This is the second case, he just like that, based on that, there are some Sa-subject, Brahmin policy advocates. record.

19. In the third case, there are Sa-subjects, Brahmins, y only what, basis, advocate Endless discussion, the world is boundless boundless?

The monks, there is Sa-or brahmana, thanks to one-pointedly, thanks to diligence, thanks to the introspection, thanks to the liberation, thanks to mind memory, so the mind entered. When the mind enters the mind, he lives in the world with the thought that the world is perfection, above, and below, and the world is infinite toward the horizontal. He said: "This world is boundless and boundless." Sa-subjects, Brahman subjects said: "This world is good, with a detour around, then they say not true." Sa-subjects, Brahman subjects said: "This world is boundless without limits, they say not true. This world is both endowed and infinite. Why so? Because, I ask one-pointedly, thanks to diligence, thanks to diligence, thanks to no release, thanks to mind memory, so the mind entered. When the mind entered, I live in my life with thought, the world is on the right side, the bottom, and the world is boundless on the horizontal. So I know: "This world is both infinite and infinite."

This is the third case, just like that, based on that, some Sa-subjects, brahmins advocate the Noble Endless, the world is boundless. .

20. In the fourth case, there are Sa-subjects, Brahmins, y only what, basis, advocate Endless discussion, the world is boundless boundless?

O bhikkhus, there is Sa-or Brahmin as the reasoning, as the investigator. Because of the split of deduction and the discretion of judgment, he proclaims: "This world is not perpetuated, nor is it boundless. Those Sa-subjects, Brahman said: "This world is boundary limited," they say is not true. Again, Sa-subjects, Brahman said: "This world is boundless without limit" they also said not true. Again, Sa-subjects, Brahman said: "This world is both boundless and boundless," they also said not true. This world is neither endowed nor infinite.

21. These monks, these Sa-subjects, brahmins advocated the Noble Noble argument with four arguments. If there are Sa-subjects or Brahmins advocate the editorial Noble, accept the world is boundless, they will accept all four arguments, or one of the arguments above, but not any other arguments.

22. Bhikkhus, such as intellectual Hyung such as this: "Such views, such attachments, such clinging, will lead to such animal realms, will make such destiny. . As Hybrid wisdom as such. He is more insightful, and he does not accept it. By not accepting the authority, the mind is quiet. He is like the wisdom of action, the eradication of the feelings, the sweetness, the dangers and the exhalation of them. Through the knowledge of this, the rate-pretentious, Tathagata is completely free, there is no clinging.

These, the monks, are the deep-seated, hard to see, difficult to witness, tranquility, wonderful, beyond the reach of logic empty, delicate, only people can understand. These Tathagata self-insight, enlightenment and legend; And it is those who like true truth praise the new Tathagata.

23. Monks, there are some Sa-subjects, brahmins advocated Persuasion. When asked about this issue or other problem using the ego as eel scramble with four arguments. And these Sa-subjects, Brahmin, y nothing, what grounds, disgraced arguments, when asked this problem or other problems using slurred ego as eel with four arguments challenge?

24. Bhikkhus, here there is no Sa-or-Brahman is not known as "This is good" not as real "This is not good." He thinks: I do not know the truth: "This is good", not as real know: "This is not good" and if I answer: "This is good" or I replied: "This is not good" sex, greed, hatred or hatred, arise in me. If sexual desire, greed, hatred or hatred arise in me, then I may be wrong. If I am wrong, I am troubled. If I get depressed, it becomes a hindrance for me. - So, for fear of mistakes, because of aversion to mistakes, he does not reply: "This is good", also did not answer: "This is akusala " When asked about this or other issues, he used slang as eel: "I do not say that. I do not say that like that. I'm not saying that otherwise. I did not say it was not.

It is the first case, y is just that, so based on that, some Sa-subjects, Brahmin advocated Persuasion, when asked this issue or other issues. Use the echoes as eel.

25. In the second case, there are Sa-subjects, Brahmins, y only what, the basis of advocacy arguments, when asked this problem or other problems using slope bending like the eel?

"Monks or Brahmins, here is not known as" This is good ", not as real" This is not good ". He thinks: I do not really know: "This is good", not as real know: "This is not good." Because I do not really know: "This is good", not as real "This is not good". And if I say, "This is good," or I say, "This is unwholesome", sex, greed, hatred or hatred, arise in me. If lust, greed, anger or hatred arise in me, so I can cling. If I cling, I'm depressed. If I'm depressed, it's a hindrance to me

Thus, for fear of grasping, because of aversion to clinging, he does not reply: "This is good", also did not answer: "This is not good." Asked about this or another problem, he used the eagle-like slang: "I'm not saying that. I do not say that like that. I'm not saying that otherwise. I did not say it was not. I'm not saying it's not like that. " This is the second case, he just so, so based on that, some Sa-subjects, Brahmin advocated Persuasion, when asked about this problem or problem. Other, the use of bending eel as the eagle.

26. In the third case, there are Sa-subjects, Brahmins, y only what, the basis of advocacy arguments, when asked this problem or other problems using slang bending like the eel?

"Monks or Brahmins do not know the truth here." This is good, "not as real" This is not good. " He thinks: I do not really know: "This is good", not as real know: "This is not good." Because I do not really know "This is good", not as real "This is not good" and if I answer: "This is good" or reply: "This is not good", there are Sa- Brahmins, scholarly, delicate, argumentative, disputed as split hair, these people go here and there, like to break the wrong view with their wisdom, they can quizzes, quizzes and quizzes. If they are, question, torture me, I can not answer them. If I can not answer them, I'm troubled. If I am bothered as a hindrance for me - So, for fear of being challenged, He does not reply: "This is good", also did not reply. "This is unwholesome." Asked about this or another problem, he used the eagle-like slang: "I'm not saying that. I do not say that like that. I'm not saying that otherwise. I did not say it was not. I'm not saying it's not like that. " - This is the third case, he just so, based on this, some Sa-subject, disguised arguments, when asked this issue or other problems using the words puppet screeched like an eel. I'm not saying it's not like that. " - This is the third case, he just so, based on this, some Sa-subject, disguised arguments, when asked this issue or other problems using the words puppet screeched like an eel. I'm not saying it's not like that. " - This is the third case, he just so, based on this, some Sa-subject, disguised arguments, when asked this issue or other problems using the words puppet screeched like an eel.

27. In the fourth case, there are Sa-subjects, Brahmins, y only what, the basis of the policy advocated arguments, when asked this issue or other problems using slurred bending like the eel?

The monks, here are Sa-subject, Brahmin foolish fool. This, because of foolishness, when asked about the issue or other problem, uses the ego-like slang: "You ask me if there is a different world?" If I think "Yes another world, "I can reply to him:" There is another world. " But I do not say that. I do not say that like that. I'm not saying that otherwise. I did not say it was not. I'm not saying it's not like that. If you ask me, "There is no other world?" If I thought, "There is no other world," I can reply to him, "There is no other world." But I do not say that. I do not say that like that. I'm not saying that otherwise. I did not say it was not. I'm not saying it's not like that. If you ask me, "There is no other world?" (... as above ...) "There is also and no other world?" "There is neither nor is there no other world?", "There is a kind of sentient beings?" "There is no kind of birth phenomena?" "There are also and no kind of birth phenomena?" "There is neither nor no kind of birth phenomena?" , "There is a dormant result of good and evil kamma?", "There is no dutiful result of good and evil kamma?", "There is also and there is no dull result of good and evil actions? "," There is neither the nor the unadulterated result of good and evil actions? "," Tathagata exists after death? "," Tathagata does not exist after death? ", Tathagata has and does not exist after k hi die? "," Tathagata neither exist nor does not exist after death? ". He asked me that. If I think: "Tathagata does not exist nor does it exist after death." I can answer: "Tathagata does not exist nor does it exist after death." But I do not say that. I do not say that like that. I'm not saying that otherwise. I did not say it was not. I'm not saying it's not like that.

This is the fourth case, he just so, so based on that, some Sa-subjects, Brahmin advocated Persuasion, when asked this issue or other issues. Use the echoes as eel.

28. Monks, Brahmins, brahmins advocated Persecution. When asked about this or another problem, use the ego as eel scramble with four arguments. If there are Sa-or Ba-la-subjects advocated Persecution, when asked this issue or other problems using ego as eel slither, they will accept all four arguments or a In these arguments, there is no other argument.

29. The monks, Tathagata wisdom like this: "Such views, such attachments, such clinging, will lead to such a realm, will make such destiny. As Hybrid wisdom as such. You know more than that. And he does not accept it. By not accepting the authority, the mind is quiet. He is like the wisdom of action, the eradication of the feelings, the sweetness, the dangers and the exhalation of them. Through the knowledge of this, the rate-pretentious, Tathagata is completely free, there is no clinging.

These methods, the monks, are the deep-seated, difficult to see, difficult to witness, tranquility, beauty, beyond the reach of logic empty, delicate, only people with new knowledge can distinguish. These Tathagata have self-certification, enlightenment and legend. And it is those who like true truth praise the new Lai said.

30. Monks, there are some Sa-subjects, brahmins advocated infinite wisdom, self and the world of human beings with two arguments. And these Sa-subjects, Brahmin, he just what, grounds, advocated infinite, accept the self and the world by inhuman?

31. O bhikkhus, there are gods called mindless beings. When a memorial arises, the gods are born, renounce the body of their gods. O bhikkhus, this situation occurs. One of these beings, when the birth of the body of his gods, born back to this realm. When he came to this place, he left home, left home, lived without family. After leaving home, abandon family, live without family, he is due to enthusiasm, due diligence, thanks to diligence, thanks to not released, thanks mind memory, so the mind. He remembered when the memorial arises, do not remember beyond. He said: "Ego and the world by inhuman birth. Why so? Because I did not exist before, now I have. From where no status, I became a sentient beings.

This is the first case, he just like that, so based on that, some Sa-subject, Ba-la-subject advocated anthropological, self-acceptance and world by inhuman .

32. In the second case, the Sa-subjects, brahmanas, y nothing, base what, advocated infinite, accept the self and world by inhuman?

O bhikkhus, here is Sa-or Brahmin is the arguments, is the investigator. Due to the split of deduction and the discretion of judgment, he proclaims: "The self and the inhuman world."

This is the second case, he just so, based on such, some Sa-subject, Ba-la-dog advocated anthropological, self-acceptance and world by inhuman .

33. Monks, Brahmanas, brahmins advocated an infinite, self-acceptance, and the world was born of two human beings with two arguments. If there are Sa-subjects or Brahmins advocated Unconditionality, accept the self and the world by inhumanity, they will accept either of these arguments or one of the arguments above, Any other arguments.

34. The monks, Tathagata wisdom like this: "Such prejudices, such attachments, such clinging, will lead to such a realm, will make such destiny. As Hybrid wisdom as such, He is more insight, and He does not accept it. By not accepting the authority, the mind is quiet. He is like the wisdom of action, the eradication of the feelings, the sweetness, the dangers and the exhalation of them. Through such insight, the bhikkhus, the Tathagata is completely liberated, no clinging. These methods, the monks, are the deep-seated, difficult to see, difficult to witness, tranquility, beauty, beyond the reach of logic empty, delicate, only people with new knowledge can distinguish. The Tathagata has self-certified, enlightened and declared. And it is those who like true truth praise the new Lai said.

35. The monks, the Brahmanas, Brahmins discuss the primordial past, accept the past, the simplest past, suggest many different opinions with the difference. eighteen arguments. If monks or Brahmins discuss the ancient past, accept the past, the past, They will accept all of the above eighteen arguments or one of these arguments, in addition to no other argument.

36. These monks, as Hybrid wisdom like this: "Such prejudices, such attachments, such clinging, will lead to such an animal, will make such destiny." As Hybrid wisdom as such. You know more than that. And he does not accept it. By not accepting the authority, the mind is quiet. He is like the wisdom of action, the eradication of the feelings, the sweetness, the dangers and the exhalation of them. Through the knowledge of this, the rate-pretentious, Tathagata is completely free, there is no clinging.

These methods, the monks, are the deep-seated, difficult to see, difficult to witness, tranquility, beauty, beyond the reach of logic empty, delicate, only people with new knowledge can distinguish. These Tathagata have self-certification, enlightenment and legend. And it is those who like true truth praise the new Tathagata.

37. Now, bhikkhus, there are some Sa-subjects, Brahman discussing the future, agree on the future, y about the future, promotes many opinions different from the forty-four challenge. And these monks, Brahmins, y nothing, base, discussing the future, agree on the future, y about the future proponents of many different opinions with forty four Arguments?

38. Now, monks, Brahmins, brahmins advocated the idea after death, accept the ideal self after death with sixteen arguments. And these Sa-subjects, Brahman, he just what, base, advocated the idea after death, with sixteen arguments?

These people advocate: "Ego has sharp, no disease, after the death of the idea." They advocate: "The self is sharp and also has no color ...", "The self also has no color and no color ...", "Self is selfish ...", "Self is boundless ..." , "The self is boundless and boundless", "The self is neither boundless nor boundless ...", "The self is unreasonable ...", "The self is ideal ...". "The self is impermanent ...", "The self is immeasurable ...", "The self is pure ...", "The self is pure ...", "The self is miserable." They advocate: "The self is not suffering, no disease, after the death of the idea."

39. These monks, brahmanas, Brahmins advocated posthumous ideals after death, accept the ideal self after death with sixteen arguments. The monks, these Brahmanas or brahmanas advocate the idea of ​​death after death, they will accept all sixteen of these arguments, or one of the arguments above, in addition there is no argument. any more.

40. The monks, Tathagata wisdom like this: "Such prejudices, such attachments, will lead to such a beast, will make such destructive." As Hybrid wisdom as such, He is more insight, and He does not accept it. By not accepting the preliminary information, the mind is quiet. He is like the wisdom of action, the eradication of the feelings, the sweetness, the dangers and the exhalation of them. Through the knowledge of this, the rate-pretentious, Tathagata is completely free, there is no clinging. These methods, the monks, are the deep-seated, difficult to see, difficult to witness, tranquility, beauty, beyond the reach of logic empty, delicate, only people with new knowledge can distinguish. These Tathagata have self-certification, enlightenment and legend. And it is those who like true truth praise the new Tathagata.

The third recitation

1. Bhikkhus, there are some Sa-subjects, brahmins, advocates Unconscious after death, accept the self after death with eight arguments. And these Sa-subjects, Brahmins, y nothing, what base, advocate Unexplainable after death, accept the self after death with eight arguments?

2. These people advocate: "The self is sharp, no disease, after death no idea," "Ego has no identity ...", "Ego has sharp and not sharp ...", "Ban There are no colors and no colors ... "," Being right ... "," Being boundless ... "," Being boundless and boundless ... ". They accept the self is non-boundary and non-boundless, without disease, after death is not possible.

3. These monks, Brahmins, brahmins advocated Unconsciousness after death, accepting the idea of ​​self after death with eight arguments. - Monks, if there are any Sa-or Brahmins advocate Unconscious after death, accept the self is not thought after death, they will accept all eight arguments, or a In these arguments, there is no other argument.

4. bhikkhus. Hybrid wisdom like this: "Such prejudices, such attachments, such clinging, will lead to such animal realms, will make such destiny." As Hybrid wisdom as such. He is more insightful, and he does not accept it. By not accepting the authority, the mind is quiet. He is like the wisdom of action, the eradication of the feelings, the sweetness, the dangers and the exhalation of them. Through the knowledge of this, the rate-pretentious, Tathagata is completely free, there is no clinging.

These, the monks, are the deep-seated, difficult to see, difficult to witness, tranquility, wonderful, beyond the reach of logic, subtle, only people with knowledge can recognize. These Tathagata self-insight, enlightenment and legend; And it is those who like true truth praise the new Tathagata.

5. Bhikkhus, there are some Sa-subjects, Brahmins advocated Non-Concepts Africa Non-Imaginary after death, accept the non-ideal non-ideological fall with eight arguments. And these Sa-subjects, Brahmins, y anything, basis, non-concept of non-concept of non-thoughtless thoughts after death, accept the non-ideal non-ideal self with eight arguments?

6. Those who accept: "The identity is sharp, no disease, after death non-ideal non-ideal ...", "Self is colorless ...", " , "Self is non-material and non-material ...", "Self is selfish ...", "Self is boundless ...", "Self is boundless and boundless ...".

7. They accept that. Self is non-boundary and non-boundless, without disease, after death, non-existent, with eight arguments. Monks, if there are Sa-or Ba-la-subjects, non-idealistic non-ideological ideas, they will accept all eight arguments above, or one of the above arguments, any other.

8. These monks, as Hybrid wisdom like this: "Such prejudices, such attachments, will lead to such animal realms, will make such destiny." As Hybrid wisdom as such. He is more insightful, and he does not accept it. By not accepting the authority, the mind is quiet. He is like the wisdom of action, the eradication of the feelings, the sweetness, the dangers and the exhalation of them. Through the knowledge of this, the rate-pretentious, Tathagatas are completely free, no clinging. These, the monks, are the deep-seated, difficult to see, difficult to witness, tranquility, wonderful, beyond the reach of logic, subtle, only people with knowledge can recognize. These Tathagata self-insight, enlightenment and legend; And it is those who like true truth praise the new Tathagata.

9. Monks, there are some Sa-subjects, Brahmins, advocates Section of the destruction, attachment to the destruction, the loss, the destruction of beings with seven arguments. And these Sa-subjects, brahmins, y, just what, attaching to the destruction, the loss, the destruction of beings with seven arguments?

10. Bhikkhus, whether Sa-or Ba-la-subjects advocated theory and opinion: "Because this ego has sharp, four aggregates formed by parents, when the body Destroyed to destroy, after death is no longer, so this ego completely eliminated. Thus, some advocate the extinction, loss and destruction of sentient beings.

11. Another said, "Hey man, there is the ego as you say. I do not say that ego is not, but that ego is not completely destroyed. There is another self with nature, rúpa, sexual education, eating real food. That he did not know, he did not see. That self I know, I see. That self when decayed, decay destroyed, after death is no longer, so the ego is completely destroyed. So there are some who advocate the destruction, loss and destruction of sentient beings.

12. Another said, "Sir, there is this ego as he says. I do not say that ego is not. But such self is not completely destroyed. There is another self with nature, rúpa, by means of creation, every detail of hands and feet are full, without a base. That he did not know, he did not see. That self I know, I see. That self when the body is decayed, destroyed, after death is no longer, so it is completely destroyed. So there are some who advocate the destruction, loss and destruction of sentient beings.

13. Another said, "Sir, there is this ego as he says. I do not say that ego is not. But such self is not completely destroyed. There is still another self beyond all colors, eliminating the idea of ​​opposition, not memories of the ideal, perception is not boundless. Reach not boundless. That he did not know, he did not see. That self I know, I see. That self when decayed, decay destroyed, after death is no longer, so the ego is completely destroyed. So there are some who advocate the destruction, loss and destruction of sentient beings.

14. Another said, "Sir, there is this ego as he says. I do not say that ego is not. But such self is not completely destroyed. There is another self beyond all non-boundary, understand: Consciousness is boundless. Reaching to the boundless Consciousness. That he did not know, he did not see. That self I know, I see. That self when the body, destroyed, destroyed, after death is no more, so the ego is completely destroyed. So there are some who advocate the destruction, loss and destruction of sentient beings.

15. Another said, "Hey man, it is true that he is selfish. I do not say that ego is not. But such self is not completely destroyed. There is still another self beyond all consciousness, boundless understanding, understanding: no possession. Reach Indigenous Origin. That he did not know, he did not see. That self I know, I see. That self when the body is decayed, destroyed, after death is no longer, so it is completely destroyed. So there are some who advocate the destruction, loss and destruction of sentient beings.

16. Another said, "Sir, there is this ego as he says. I do not say that ego is not. But such self is not completely destroyed. There is another self beyond all Indigenous origin, understanding: This is the first, this is beautiful. Reaching the Phi phi phi idea of ​​origin. That he did not know, he did not see. That self I know, I see. That self when decayed, decay destroyed, after death is no longer, so the ego is completely destroyed. So there are some who advocate the destruction, loss and destruction of sentient beings.

17. These monks, Sa-subjects, Brahmins, advocated the section of destruction, the attachment to the destruction, loss, destruction of beings with seven arguments. The monks, if any of the monks or Brahmins advocated the section of the destruction, attached to the destruction, loss, destruction of sentient beings, they accept all seven arguments, or one of these arguments, besides no other argument.

18. Bhikkhus. Hybrid wisdom like this: "Such views, such attachments, will lead to such animal realms, will make such destiny." As Hybrid wisdom tri. Thus, he is more intellectual, and he does not accept it. By not accepting the authority, the mind is quiet. He is like the wisdom of action, the eradication of the feelings, the sweetness, the dangers and the exhalation of them. Through such insight, the bhikkhus, the Tathagata is completely liberated, no clinging. These, the monks, are the deep-seated, difficult to see, difficult to witness, tranquility, wonderful, beyond the reach of logic, subtle, only people with knowledge can recognize. These Tathagata self-certification, enlightenment and legend: and it is those who like true truth praise as Lai said.

19. Bhikkhus, there are some Sa-ard, Ba-la-oriented current Nirvana, the attachment to the present Nibbana of beings with five arguments. And these Sa-subjects, Brahmins, y, just what, the current policy Nirvana, accept the ultimate Nibbana of beings with five arguments?

20. Bhikkhus, Sa-or Brahman advocates and conception: "When this ego enjoy, full of five pleasures, so the self reaches the ultimate Niet The table of beings.

21. Another said, "Hey man, it was as if he had said it. I do not say that ego is not. But such ego, not fully attained to ultimate Nirvana. Why? Because the nature of sensual pleasure and impermanence, suffering, transformation. Because of their nature is the transformation, transformation, so good, bi, suffering, late, brain arises. When the ego separates the sensual pleasures, the evil deeds, attain and dwell on the first meditation; This meditation has a range, there are four, there is joy and there are lost, due to divorce. Thus, the ego attains the ultimate state of Nirvana. " Thus, there is the ultimate attainer of Nibbāna of the sentient beings.

22. Another said, "Sir, there is this ego as he says. I do not say that ego is not. But such ego, not fully attain to the present supreme Nirvana. Why? Because here the meditation has a range, there are four so called rough. When the ego has reached the level and reach, and reach the second meditation. This meditation interior calm, the most specialized scene, no games, not four, ecstatic by birth. Thus, the ego attains the ultimate state of Nirvana. " Thus, there is the ultimate attainer of Nibbāna of the sentient beings.

23. Another said, "Sir, there is this ego as he says. I do not say that ego is not. But such ego, not fully attain to the present supreme Nirvana. Why? Because here the mind is happy and excited so called crude. When the ego does not engage in joyfulness, shelter, mindfulness, mindfulness, and bliss, the saints call the meditation of mindfulness - attainment and retention of the third meditation. Thus, the ego attains the ultimate state of Nirvana. " Thus, there is the ultimate attainer of Nibbāna of sentient beings.

24. Another said, "Sir, there is this ego as he says. I do not say that ego is not. But such ego, not fully attained to the present supreme Nirvana. Why? Because here the mind of pleasant life should be called crude. When the ego fails to release and suffers, eradicate pleasure and advance, reach and rest on the fourth meditation. This meditation is not miserable, not lost, discharge pure thought. Thus, the ego attains the ultimate state of Nirvana. " Thus, there is the ultimate attainer of Nibbāna of the sentient beings.

25. These monks, these Sa-subjects, brahmins advocated the current Nirvana, the attachment to the present Nirvana of beings with five arguments. Monks, if there are Sa-ard, Brahman who advocates the current Nirvana, accept the ultimate present Nirvana of beings, these will accept all five arguments or one of the five arguments, and there is no other argument.

26. The monks, Tathagata wisdom like this: "Such views, such attachments will lead to such animal realms, will make such destiny. As Hybrid wisdom as such. He is more insightful, and he does not accept it. By not accepting the authority, the mind is quiet. He is like the wisdom of action, the eradication of the feelings, the sweetness, the dangers and the exhalation of them. Through such insight, bhikkhus, the Tathagata is completely liberated without attachment. These, the monks, are the deep-seated, difficult to see, difficult to witness, tranquility, wonderful, beyond the reach of logic, subtle, only people with knowledge can recognize. These Tathagata self-insight, enlightenment and legend; And it is those who like true truth praise the new Tathagata.

27. Now, monks, Brahmanas, Brahmins discuss the future, agree on the future, think about the future, will promote many wrong views with forty-four arguments. challenge. The monks, the Sa-or-Brahman, discussing the future, agree on the future, y about the future, promotes many different prejudices. They will accept forty or four of these arguments, or one of these arguments, in addition to no other argument.

28. The monks, Tathagata wisdom like this: "Such views, such attachments, will lead to such animal realms, will make such destiny. As Hybrid wisdom as such. He is more insightful, and he does not accept it. By not accepting the authority, the mind is quiet. He is the true wisdom of initiation, the eradication of the feelings, the sweetness, the danger and the output of them. Through such insight, the bhikkhus, the Tathagata is completely liberated, no clinging.

29. Monks, Brahmins, Brahmins discuss the primordial past and discuss the future, discuss the past and the future, accept the dark past. the future and the future, initiate many different views with sixty two arguments. Monks, Brahmins, Brahmins, discussion of the primordial past, discussion of the future, discussion of the past and the future, the view of the past and in the future, the past and the future, initiated many wrong views. They will accept the above sixty-two arguments, or one of these arguments, and no other argument.

30. Bhikkhus, such as wisdom like this: "Such prejudices, such attachments, will lead to such animal realms, will work into such destiny." As Hybrid wisdom as such. He is more insightful, and he does not accept it. By not accepting the authority, the mind is quiet. He is very understanding of the initiation of the eradication of the feelings, the sweetness, the dangers and the exhalation of them. Through such insight, the bhikkhus, the Tathagata is completely liberated, no clinging.

31. These things, the monks, are the deep-seated, difficult to see, difficult to witness, tranquility, wonderful, beyond the reach of logic empty, delicate, only people with a new position can receive know. These Tathagata self-certification, enlightenment and proclaimed, and it is those who like true truth praise as Lai said.

Conclude

32. The monks, here are the Sa-subjects, brahmins advocated Resolutions, accept the self and the world is permanent with four arguments. The policy is personal experience, is the unknown, not see, the sensation of the Sa-subject, Brahman, is the stimulation, oscillation, distortion of the dominant lust. .

33. It is here that monks and Brahmins advocate part of the Permanent Essay, a part of the Unsubmiling, the Self and the World, which is permanent for a particular being. and impermanent to another class of beings with four arguments. The policy is personal experience, is the unknown, not see, the sensation of the Sa-subject, Brahman, is the stimulation, oscillation, distortion of the dominant lust. .

34. Monks, here are the Sa-subject, Ba-la-patriarism The editor is incomprehensible, the world is boundless boundless with four arguments. The policy is personal experience, is the unknown, not see, the sensation of the Sa-subject, Brahman, is the vibration stimulation, distortion of the dominant lust.

35. The monks, here are the Sa-subject, Ba-la-subject advocated Persuasion. When asked about this issue or other problem using the ego as eel scramble with four arguments. The policy is personal experience, is the unknown, not see, the sensation of the Sa-subject, Brahman, is the stimulation, oscillation, distortion of the dominant lust. .

36. Here, monks, Brahmins, advocates of infinite wisdom, accept the self and the world by inhumanity with two arguments. The policy is personal experience, the unknown, the sensation of the Sa-subject, Brahman, the stimulation, oscillation, distortion of the dominant lust.

37. Here, monks, Brahmins, discussed the primordial past, agree on the primordial past, he goes back to the primordial past, promotes many ideas. difference is different from the eighteen arguments. The policy is personal experience, is the unknown, not see, the sensation of the Sa-subject, Brahman, is the stimulation, oscillation, distortion of the dominant lust. .

38. Now, monks, Brahmins, advocates the idea of ​​death after death, accepts the supposed self after death with sixteen arguments. This policy is personal experience, the unknown, not see, the sensation of the Sa-subject, Brahman, is the stimulation, distortion oscillations of the dominant lust.

39. Now, monks, Brahmins are advocates of Unconscious after death, accepting self after death with eight arguments. The policy is personal experience, is the unknown, not see, the sensation of the Sa-subject, Brahman, is the stimulation, oscillation, distortion of the dominant lust. .

40. Here, monks and Brahmins advocate the Non-Thought Non-Thought of Non-Thoughtlessness after death, accepting non-ideal non-ideal self after death with eight arguments. The policy is personal experience, is the unknown, not see, the sensation of the Sa-subject, Brahman, is the stimulation, oscillation, distortion of the dominant lust. .

41. The monks, here are the Sa-subject, Ba-la-subject advocated the section of destruction, attachment to the destruction, loss, destruction of beings with seven arguments. The policy is personal experience, is the unknown, not see, the sensation of the Sa-subject, Brahman, is the stimulation, oscillation, distortion of the dominant lust. .

42. Now, monks, there are Brahmanas, brahmanas, the current Nirvana, who are attached to the present existence of the nirvana of the beings with the five arguments. The policy is personal experience, is the unknown, not see, the sensation of the Sa-subject, Brahman, is the stimulation, oscillation, distortion of the dominant lust. .

43. Behold, the monks, Brahmins, discussing the future, agreeing on the future, thinking about the future, initiating many wrong views with forty four arguments. The policy is personal experience, is the unknown, not see, the sensation of the Sa-subject, Brahman, is the stimulation, oscillation, distortion of the dominant lust. .

44. It is here that monks, Brahmins, discussion of the past, the discussion of the future, discussion of the past and the future, the approval of the past and the future, he goes on about the past and the future, promotes many different views against sixty two arguments. The policy is personal experience, is the unknown, not see, the sensation of the Sa-subject, Brahman, is the stimulation, oscillation, distortion of the dominant lust. .

45. Monks, here are the Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, the policy of lodgings, accept the self and the world is permanent with four arguments. This principle arises because of the touch (of the sense organs).

46. ​​Now, monks, Brahmanas, who advocate part of the Permanent Essay, part of the Unitarian, accept the self and the world is permanent for a particular being. and impermanent to another class of beings with four arguments. This principle arises because of the touch (of the sense organs).

47. Monks, here are the Sa-subject, brahmins advocate Borderless Editor, the world is boundless boundless with four arguments. This principle arises because of the touch (of the sense organs).

48. The monks, here are the Sa-subject, Ba-la-subject advocated Persuasion. When asked about this issue or other problem using the ego as eel scramble with four arguments. This principle arises because of the touch (of the sense organs).

49. Here, monks, brahmanas, advocated infinite wisdom, accept the self and the world by inhumanity with two arguments. This principle arises because of the touch (of the sense organs).

50. Here, monks, Brahmins, discussed the primordial past, agree on the primordial past, point to the primordial past, suggest many ideas. difference is different from the eighteen arguments. This principle arises because of the touch (of the sense organs).

51. Now, monks, Brahmins, advocates the idea of ​​death after death, accepts the ideal self after dying with sixteen arguments. This principle arises because of the touch (of the sense organs).

52. Here, monks, Brahmins advocated Unconsciousness after death, accepting egoism after death with eight arguments. This principle arises because of the touch (of the sense organs).

53. Now, monks, Brahmins, advocates of the Non-Concepts of Non-Concepts, after death, accept the non-idealistic self after death with eight arguments. . This principle arises because of the touch (of the sense organs).

54. Monks, here are the Sa-subject, Brahmins advocated the section of destruction, attachment to the destruction, loss, destruction of beings with seven arguments. This principle arises because of the touch (of the sense organs).

55. Now, monks, here are the Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects current Nirvana, attachment to the present Nirvana of beings with five arguments. This principle arises because of the touch (of the sense organs).

56. O bhikkhus, here are the Brahmins, Brahmins, discussing the future, agreeing on the future, thinking about the future, initiating various wrong views with forty four arguments. This principle arises because of the touch (of the sense organs).

57. Now, monks, there are Brahmins, brahmins, discussion of the past, the discussion of the future, discussion of the past and the future, the approval of the past and the future, he goes on about the past and the future, promotes many different views against sixty two arguments. This principle arises because of the touch (of the sense organs).

58. Monks, here are the Sa-subjects, brahmins, the policy of Resolutions, accept the self and the world is often with four arguments. These people can not feel the policy, if there is no emotion.

59. Now, monks, Brahmanas here hold a part of the Permanent Essay, an irreconcilable part of the self and the world, which is permanent to a particular love and compassion for another class of beings with four arguments. These people can not feel the policy, if there is no emotion.

60. Monks, here are the Sa-subject, brahmins advocated the Noble Noble, the world is boundless boundless with four arguments. These people can not feel the policy, if there is no emotion.

61. The monks, here are the Sa-subject, Ba-la-subject advocated Persuasion. When asked about this issue or other problem using the ego as eel scramble with four arguments. These people can not feel the policy, if there is no emotion.

62. The monks, here are the Sa-subject, Ba-la-subjects, advocated infinite, accept the self and world by inhumanity with two arguments. They can not feel these feelings, if there is no emotion.

63. Behold, the monks, Brahmins, discuss the ancient past, agree on the ancient past, y about the primordial past, proposes many ideas. difference is different from the eighteen arguments. These people can not feel the policy, if there is no emotion.

64. Here, monks, brahmins, advocates the idea of ​​death after death, accepts the supposed self after dying with sixteen arguments. They can not feel these feelings, if there is no emotion.

65. Here, monks, Brahmins advocated unholy after death, accepting self after death with eight arguments. They can not feel these feelings, if there is no emotion.

66. The monks, Brahmins here advocate Phi Phi Nonconscious thought after death, accept the non-ideal non-ideal self after death with eight arguments. They can not feel these feelings, if there is no emotion.

67. Now, monks, Brahmins, advocated the section of Judaism, the attachment to the passing away, the disappearance, the destruction of sentient beings with seven arguments. These people can not feel the guidelines, on the other, if there is no emotion.

68. Now, monks, Brahmanas here are the current Nirvana, attaching themselves to the Nibbana at the presence of the five companions. They can not feel these feelings, if there is no emotion.

69. Behold, the monks, Brahmins, discussing the future, agreeing on the future, thinking about the future, initiating many wrong views with forty four arguments. They can not feel these feelings, if there is no emotion.

70. Monks, brahmanas here, discuss the primordial past, discuss the future, talk about the past and the future, agree on the past and the future, he goes on about the past and the future, promotes many different views against sixty two arguments. These people can not feel the policy, if there is no emotion.

71. There are monks, Brahmins, the layperson, the self, and the world, with four arguments; Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects advocated a part of Resolutions, a part of Unconventional Comment; Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, advocacy arguments; the Sa-subject, Ba-la-subjects, advocates Unconditional; The Sa-subject, Ba-la-subjects, discussion about the past, the Brahmins, Brahmins advocated the idea of ​​death after death, the Brahman, Brahmin policy Imagination after death; Sa-subjects, Brahman advocates Non-free thought Phi phi phi after death; the Sa-subject, Ba-la-subject advocated the section of destruction; the Sa-subject, Ba-la-subjects current policy Nirvana; Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject discussion about the primordial past; Sa-subjects, Ba-la-discussed discussion about the future, the approval of the past and the future, y on the primordial and future past, promotes many different prejudices against sixty two arguments. All of these have feelings (the above guidelines) due to the touch through six contacts. Endued with feeling that craving arises; by the charm of craving, starting players; by graceful, organic origin; by grace, birth, due to birth, old, dead, sorrow, bi, suffering, superior, brain arises. Monks, when the monk is aware of the initiation, the extermination, the sweetness, the danger and the exaltedness of the six places of origin, he will have an understanding beyond the things. on. by grace, birth, due to birth, old, dead, sorrow, bi, suffering, superior, brain arises. Monks, when the monk is aware of the initiation, the extermination, the sweetness, the danger and the exaltedness of the six places of origin, he will have an understanding beyond the things. on. by grace, birth, due to birth, old, dead, sorrow, bi, suffering, superior, brain arises. Monks, when the monk is aware of the initiation, the extermination, the sweetness, the danger and the exaltedness of the six places of origin, he will have an understanding beyond the things. on.

72. Bhikkhus, there are Brahmins, brahmanas discussing the ancient past, or discussing the future, or discussions about the past and the future, the approval of the past and the future, y in the past and the future, initiating various prejudices, all these are covered by the net of these sixty arguments, even if they jumped on They are still covered here.

And monks, such as skilled fishermen or fishermen, dangle the net on a small lake with narrow eyes. He thought, "Big fish in this small lake, all covered in this net, even if they jumped, they are still covered here." Likewise, monks, brahmanas, brahmanas, discussing the primordial past, or discussing the future, or discussion of the past and the future, agree about the past and the future, advocating many different prejudices, all of which are covered in the net of these sixty-two arguments; Even if there are leaps and bounds, they are still limited in the coverage.

73. The bhikkhus, the body of the Tathagata still exists, but what leads to another life has been terminated. When his body is still in the gods and humans can see the body. When the common body, the gods and humans can not see.

The bhikkhu, like a branch with a bunch, mango is cut off, all the mango stick to that branch is sharing the same fate with the other. Likewise, bhikkhus, the body of the Tathagata still exists, but what leads to another life is cut off. When his body is still in the gods and human beings can see the body. When the human body and the human race can not see.

74. When I heard that, great virtue Ananda White World:

- Wonderful, White World! Hell, White World! What is this discourse, White World?

- This Ananda, this method called "Advantage Hammock", so that serving; Called "French Hammam", so that the servants; Called "Pham Hamm", so do that serve; Called "Sword Sword", so that the servant; Called "Supreme Victory", so that the servants.

So religiously. The rate of bhikkhu praises the teachings of the Buddha. While this sutra is legend, a thousand worlds are vibrating. END=NAM MO SAKYAMUNI BUDDHA.( 3 TIMES ).VIETNAMESE  TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY=THICH CHAN TANH.THE MIND OF ENLIGHTENMENT.VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST NUN=GOLDEN LOTUS MONASTERY=AUSTRALIA,SYDNEY.23/3/2018.