Unrighteous Dao.VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY=THICH CHAN TANH.
Paṭisambhidāmagga
II- DISCUSSION ON VIEWPOINTS
IMPORT NOTES
In this thesis, the main types of misleading views mentioned in the Sutta are grouped and discussed under five headings or sections. The headings are:
i. the definition of a wrong view,
ii. On what basis are these perverted views?
iii. the means through which the wrong view is clung to
iv. Misleading views can be classified by type
v. how misleading views work
There is one last part, which is:
en. ways to get rid of wrong views
In these sections, the classification has many overlaps and interchanges.
The five main sections operate in a broad sense as follows:
(i) misleading interpretations are characteristic of misleading views, such as the 'I', 'mine', 'my self' assertion evoked from (ii) the year of assembly, then (iii) ) it acts like a bushy, hard to escape. (iv) For example, it is the misleading view of the ego ( sakkāyadiṭṭhi ) which (v) misinterprets the five assemblies for taking them as objects . (vi) Escaping from the wrong view is the witness of a path of entry.
The details that seem to be confused at first glance are all in this main model. Any conception of guessing that is heard can be analyzed by this method.
Not all the key facts about the false views contained in the Sutta are discussed here; for example, the detailed description of the egoistic view of certain masters speaks in the Sāmaññaphala ( Dhamma ) of Dīgha Nikāya (D sutta No. 2). The reason is that this thesis is not intended to describe the stated points, but aims to provide a way through which any misleading views can be classified; and because it follows the examples of the first of Dīgha Nikāya and the 102th of Majjhima Nikāya .
[DISCUSSION OF VIEW] « Diṭṭhikathā »
[In brief]
1. [135] What is perspective? How many kinds of background are views? How many types of opinion obsession? How many types of views are there? How many types of explanation are wrong because of opinion? What is the elimination of the basis of opinion?
I. What is perspective? Misunderstanding because misinterpretation is a viewpoint.
II. How many kinds of background are views? There are eight types.
III. How many types of opinion obsession? There are 18 types.
IV. How many types of views are there? There are 16 types.
V. How many types of explanation are wrong because of opinion? There are 300 types.
VI. What is the elimination of the basis of opinion? The path of entry is the ultimate destruction of the point of view.
[Part I]
2. What is a view that is misunderstood because of wrong interpretation?
Misunderstanding for misinterpreting an object like this: 'This is mine, this is me, this is my ego' (S xii 62, 5) is a misconception. Misunderstanding because of misinterpreting this experience : 'This is mine, this is me, this is my ego' is the viewpoint ... Misunderstanding for misinterpreting awareness ... [and so on. 198 ideas of 201 ideas listed in Argument I đ. 5, except for the last three (supernatural) influences, until] ... [136-8]. Misunderstanding because of wrong interpretation of old age and death like this: 'This is mine, this is me, this is my ego' is the wrong perspective.
A wrong view is a misunderstanding because of the wrong interpretation.
[Part II]
3. What are the eight types of fundamentals of opinion ?
Aggregates are the basis of opinion, ignorance is the basis of opinion, contact ..., perception ..., afferent on the object ..., without careful consideration * ..., you evil ..., learning from the heathen is the cornerstone of perspective.
These are the eight fundamental types of perspective.
[Part III]
5. What are eighteen types of obsession with views ?
Any point of view is the source of misleading views, dense forest, perspective constraints, perspective arrows, constraint of opinion, obstacle of opinion, implicit danger of opinion. point, tendency to sleep implicitly in opinion, scorching of opinion, fever (enthusiasm) of opinion, bottleneck of opinion, clinging to opinion, wrong interpretation of opinion, wrong understanding of opinion .
These are eighteen types of obsessive views. [139]
[Part IV]
6. What are the sixteen types of views ?
That is:
i. the point of contentment (pleasure)
ii. the idea of self,
iii. wrong views,
iv. ego viewpoint, *
v. eternal perspective based on ego
en. the view of cessation based on ego
vii. finite view
viii. finite past opinion
ix. finite future perspective
x. binding views [to cause damage]
xi. The concept of attachment to conceit 'I'
xii. the attitude tied to the 'My' conceit
xiii. The point of view is connected with undertakings about the ego
xiv. Perspective connected with the world guidelines
xv. the existing view [everlasting]
xvi. perspective does not exist [cessation]
These are sixteen types of views.
[Part V]
7. From a satisfactory point of view, how many aspects are wrongly interpreted?
From the perspective of self, is there any wrong interpretation in terms of how many?
... through the wrong perspective, ...?
... through the perspective of ego, ...?
... through an eternal perspective based on ego, ...?
... through the view of cessation based on ego, ...?
... through a finite point of view, ...?
... through a finite past viewpoint, ...?
... through a finite future perspective, ...?
... from the point of view of [damaging], ...?
... through the attitude of attachment to the conceit of 'I', ...?
... through the attitude attached to the 'My' conceit, ...?
... through the viewpoint associated with the policies of the ego, ...?
... through the viewpoint associated with world guidelines, ...?
... through the view of being [forever], ...?
Through the view of not being [cessation], is there any wrong interpretation according to how many aspects?
From a satisfying point of view, there is a misinterpretation of 35 aspects.
From the perspective of self, there is a wrong interpretation according to 20 aspects.
Through the wrong perspective, there are misinterpretations according to 10 aspects.
... from the perspective of ego, there is a wrong explanation according to 20 aspects.
... through an eternal perspective based on the ego, there is a wrong interpretation of 15 aspects.
... through the viewpoint of cessation based on ego, there is a wrong interpretation according to 5 aspects.
... through a finite perspective, there is a misinterpretation of the 50 aspects.
... through a finite past viewpoint, there are misinterpretations according to 18 aspects.
... from a finite future perspective, there is a misinterpretation of 44 aspects.
... from a binding point of view, there is a misinterpretation of 18 aspects.
... through the perspective of attachment to the 'I' conceit, there is an incorrect explanation according to the 18 aspects.
... through the attitude attached to the 'My' conceit, there is an incorrect interpretation of the 18 aspects.
... through the viewpoint associated with the undertakings on the ego, there are misinterpretations according to 20 aspects. [140]
... through the viewpoint associated with world guidelines, there are misinterpretations of the eight aspects.
... from the standpoint of being, there is a misinterpretation in one respect.
From a non-existent point of view, there is an incorrect interpretation of one aspect.
(i)
8. From the perspective of pleasure (pleasure), is there any misinterpretation under 35 ?
(1) 'Any straying and pitisukha arising due to the object's dependence on the object' (S iii 28), and any misguided awareness and any misleading explanation [about That complacent] is the wrong perspective. That view is not contentment, that satisfaction is not perspective; view is one and satisfaction is another; The view [with] contentment is called the contentive view (pleasure).
9. The view of satisfaction (pleasure) is the wrong perspective; The wrong view is the wrong view The person who has that mistaken view is wrong in his opinion. Should not practice with, loathe or revere the confused person in view. Why not? Because his position was contaminated.
10. Any greed for opinion is not an opinion, and a view is not greed; opinion is one and greed is another; The view [together with greed] is called greed for opinion. The person who has that viewpoint and that greed is the one who is burned by the [greedy] view. Offering an offering to a person who [greedy] that scorching view does not bring great merit or great benefit. Why not? Because his position was contaminated.
11. The point of satisfaction (pleasure) is the wrong perspective; people with wrong views will be born in two places, that is: hell or animal realms. When a person has a wrong view, verbal actions are performed and completed according to that false view, and any intentions, aspirations, aspirations and acts of fruiting he is all the states that lead to the unexpected, not to wish, to the unhappy welcome, to harm, and to suffering. Why? Because his position was contaminated.
12. As when nimba or kosataki seeds or bitter melon seeds are sown into wet soil and the seed absorbs any solid or liquid organic fertilizer there, [141] it all leads to bitter, sour, coming unsatisfied. Why? Because the seed has been contaminated, likewise, the wrong perspective will be born in two places; ... [repeated as above] ... Why is that? Because his position was contaminated.
13. The contentment (pleasure) is the wrong perspective. Misleading views are the source of the dense views and forests, [repeated as in e. 5] ... get it wrong because of perspective.
14-17. (2) - (5) Any pleasure and pleasure arises because it depends on experience ... [and so on, repeating e. 8 for the remaining four sets].
18-23. (6) - (11) Any pleasure and pleasure arises because it depends on the eyes ... [and so on, with the remaining senses].
24-29. (12) - (17) Any pleasure arises because it depends on the object of the eye ... [and so on, with each object of each of the remaining senses].
30-35. (18) - (23) Any pleasure and pleasure arises because of depending on awareness from the eyes ... [and so on, for each of the remaining six perceptions].
36-41. (24) - (29) Any pleasure and pleasure arises because it depends on eye contact ... [and so on, with each touch of each of the six senses].
42-47. (30) - (35) Any pitisukha and pitisukha arises due to the sensation caused by the contact of the being ... [and so on, for each of the remaining six types of sensations].
The contentment (pleasure) is the wrong perspective. Misleading views are the source of the bushy views and opinions, repeating as at the end. 9] ... misunderstood because of opinion. [143]
48. [Such misleading views] are ties to the mind obsessed in 18 respects [starting from the root to the views]. [But] there are constraints that are also false views, there are constraints which are not views.
What allegations are wrong views? The [wrong] view of self exists, and misunderstands gender and ritual. These are also false accusations.
What accusations are not views? The attachments of lust, of resistance, of conceit (pride), of cynicism, of desire to become, of jealousy, of insatiable desire, of tendency to sleep, of ignorance. .. These accusations are not views.
Through the view of satisfaction (pleasure), there is a wrong explanation according to 35 aspects.
(ii)
49. From the perspective of self, is there any wrong interpretation in terms of how many ?
Here a worldly ignorant person * does not respect the saints, knows nothing about the True Dharma of the saints, is not trained to follow the True Dharma of the saints, does not respect sages, do not know anything about the True Dharma of the sages, do not practice according to the True Dharma of the sages,
(1) consider the object to be a self, or (2) let the object have an object, or (3) the object is in the self, or (4) fall in the object; or (5) consider the experience to be a self, or (6) let the self experience, or (7) experience in the self, or (8) experience in the experience; or (9) consider consciousness to be a self, or (10) to a conscious self, or (11) to be aware of the self, or (12) to be aware; or (13) consider creating a mood as a self, or (14) for a self to create a mood, or (15) creating a mood within the self, or (16) a self in creating a mood; or (17) considering consciousness as self, or (18) giving consciousness to consciousness, or (19) awakening within self, or (20) falling in consciousness. (read S iii 46f.)
* 'secular' means creating many gonorrhea infections, and misconception; 'ignorance' means no chance to study the scriptures, no realization of high attainment [ Asḷ 348-349].
50. (1) How does he view objects as falls? There are people here who consider the title of earth meditation: 'What is the title of earth meditation? What we are, the meditation on earth is that ', and he sees the meditation on earth and falls the same way. Just as one sees that the flame of a lamp is lit and its color is the same, like 'What is the flame, [144] the color of the fire is that; What is the color of fire, the flame of that ', too, there are people here who see ... the same.
The point of view is misunderstanding because of misinterpretation. A view is not a foundation and a foundation is not a perspective; A view is one, a foundation is another. This view [along with] the foundation is the first type of perspective on the self to form an object.
51. The view of the self is a misleading view, ... [repeat dd 9-13].
52. [Such a false viewpoint] is a bondage to the mind ... [repetition. 48].
53-55. Someone here considered the meditation topic with water is falling ... [as in e. 50-52].
56-58. There are people here who consider the subject of meditation as fire ...
59-61. Someone here considered the topic of meditation by the wind as falling ...
62-64. Some people here consider the green meditation subject to fall ...
65-67. Some people here consider the yellow meditation subject a self ...
68-70. Some people here consider the red meditation subject to fall ...
71-73. Someone here considered the white meditation subject as the ego ...
He sees the object as a self like that.
There are people here who experience experience ... awareness ... creating mood ... consciousness as a self. He thinks 'This is my ego, but this self of mine has an object thanks to this object' and considers the self to have such an object. Just as a tree has shade, so he can say 'This is a tree, this is a shade; a tree is one, shade is another; but this tree has shade thanks to that shade 'and so it considers a tree to have shade, too, here someone sees ... an object.
The point of view is misunderstanding because of misinterpretation. A view is not a foundation and a foundation is not a perspective; A view is one, a foundation is another. This view [along with the ground] is the second type of perspective on the self as the foundation.
75. The views on self are misleading ...
76. [Such a wrong view] is a bondage to the mind ...
He considered the self to have an object like that. [145]
77. (3) How does he view objects in a self? There are people here who experience experience ... awareness ... creating mood ... consciousness as a self. He thinks' This is my ego, but this object is in that self and thus considers the object in the self. Just as a flower has a fragrance, so he can say 'This is a flower, this is a perfume; flowers are one, incense is another; but this incense is in this flower ', and thus considering the incense in the flower, too, here someone sees ... the object in the self.
Misunderstanding because misinterpretation is a viewpoint. A view is not a foundation and a foundation is not a perspective; A view is one, a foundation is another. This view [along with] the foundation is the third type of viewpoint about self that forms the foundation.
78. The view of self is misleading ...
79. [Such a wrong view] is a bondage to the mind ...
He sees objects in a self like that.
80. (4) How does he view self in objects? There are people here who experience experience ... awareness ... creating mood ... consciousness as a self. He thinks' This is my ego, but my ego is in this object and thus the self is in the object. Just like a gem stored in a box, so he can say 'This is a gem, this is a box; a gem is one, a box is another; but this gem is in this box, 'and so it looks like the gem is in the box, too, here someone sees ... falling in the object.
Misunderstanding because misinterpretation is a view ... This view [along with] the foundation is the fourth type of perspective on the self-centered object.
81. The views on self are misleading ...
82. [Such a wrong view] is a bondage to the mind ...
He considered falling in the object like that.
83. (5) How does he perceive experience as a self? Here some people consider the experience of being born from contact with the eyes, ... the experience of being born from touching the ears, ... the experience of being born from touching the nose, ... the experience of being born from touching the tongue, ... the experience of birth by contact with the body, ... the experience of birth by contact with the mind is falling [146] like this. "What is the experience of birth caused by contact with the mind? What we are, the experience of birth through contact with the mind is that ', and he considers the experience of birth by touching the mind and self to be the same. Like ... [for example, d. 50] ... too, there are people who ... look alike.
This view [along with] the foundation is the first type of perspective on empirical self to be the basis.
84. The views on self are misleading ...
85. [Such a wrong view] is a bondage to the mind ...
He sees that experience as a self like that.
86-88. (6) How does he perceive self as experience?
Someone here perceives consciousness ... creates mood ... consciousness ... the object is the self. He thinks 'This is my ego, but this self I have experienced by this experience' and thus considers the ego to be experienced. Like ... [completed as at dd 74-76 with the same example and appropriate changes].
He considered the ego to have such experience.
89-91. (7) How does he view experiences in self?
Someone here perceives consciousness ... creates mood ... consciousness ... the object is the self. He thinks 'This is my ego, but this experience is in this self' and thus considers the experience in the self. Like ... [let's take the example here. 77].
He sees that experience in the self like that.
92-94. (8) How does he see self in experience?
Someone here perceives consciousness ... creates mood ... consciousness ... the object is the self. He thinks 'This is my ego, but this my mine is in this experience' and thus considers the ego in experience. Like ... [let's take the example here. 80].
He sees the self in that experience.
95-97. (9) How does he see consciousness as a self? Here comes the perception of being born by contact with the eyes ... awareness being born by contact with the ears ... awareness being born by touching the nose ... awareness being born by touching the tongue ... getting consciousness born by contact with the body ... consciousness born by contact with the mind is falling like this ... [147]
He sees consciousness as a self like that.
98-100. (10) How does the person perceive the self to be aware?
There are people here who create moods ... consciousness ... objects ... that experience is self. He thinks 'This is my ego, but this self of mine is aware of this awareness' and thus considers the self to be aware. Like...
He considered the self to be aware like that.
101-103. (11) How does he view consciousness in self?
There are people here who create moods ... consciousness ... objects ... that experience is self. He thinks 'This is my ego, but this awareness is in this self' and thus considers consciousness in the self. Like...
He sees consciousness in the self like that.
104-106. (12) How does he perceive self in consciousness?
There are people here who create moods ... consciousness ... objects ... that experience is self. He thinks 'This is my ego, but this mine of mine is in this awareness' and thus considers the ego in consciousness. Like...
He sees that self in consciousness is like that.
107-109. (13) How does he view mood creation as a self? There are people here who consider the intention to be born by contact with the eyes ... the intention to be born by contact with the mind is to fall like this ... . Like...
He considered creating a mood like that.
110-112. (14) How does he perceive self?
There is someone who considers consciousness ... consciousness is self. He thinks that 'This is my ego, but this self of mine creates a mood by creating this mood' and thus considers the self to create mood. Like...
He considered the self has created such mood. [148]
113-115. (15) How does he consider creating mood in self?
There is someone who considers consciousness ... consciousness is self. He thinks that 'This is my ego, but these mood constructs are in this self' and thus considers creating mood in the self. Like...
He considered creating moods in the self like that.
116-118. (16) How does he perceive self in creating moods?
There is someone who considers consciousness ... consciousness is self. He thinks that 'This is my ego, but this self of mine is in these mood constructs' and thus considers the self in creating mood. Like...
He considered ego in creating mood like that.
119-121. (17) How does he consider consciousness to be self? Someone here perceives awareness from the eyes ... awareness from the ears ... awareness from the nose ... awareness from the tongue ... awareness from the body ... awareness from the mind is falling like this' If you know what you mean by that, you are that; What we are, we know from the mind what that is', and he considers awareness from the mind and self the same. Like a person seeing the flame of a lamp lit ...
He considered consciousness to be like that.
122-124. (18) How does he consider the self to be conscious?
There are people here who see objects ... experience ... perception ... create moods as a self. He thinks 'This is my ego, but this self of mine is awake by this consciousness' and thus considers the ego to be awake. Like having a tree ...
He considered the self to be like that.
125-127. (19) How does he consider consciousness in self?
There are people here who see the object ... creating the mood as a self. He thinks 'This is my ego, but this consciousness is in this self' and thus considers consciousness in the self. Like a fragrant flower ...
He considered consciousness in the self like that.
128. (20) How does he consider self to stay awake?
There are people here who see the object ... creating the mood as a self. He thinks 'This is my ego, but this my ego is in this consciousness' and thus considers [149] the ego in consciousness. It's like having a gem ... staying in the self.
He regarded the self in that way.
Misunderstanding because misinterpretation is a view ... This view [along with] the foundation is the fourth type of viewpoint on self-consciousness as the basis.
129. The idea of a self is a false view ... [as in e 9-13] ... misunderstood because of the views.
130. [Such a wrong view] is the attachment to the mind ... [as in e. 48] ... These accusations are not views.
He considered consciousness in the self like that.
From the perspective of self, there is an incorrect interpretation of these 20 aspects.
(iii)
131. From the wrong perspective, are there any incorrect interpretations of the 10 aspects ?
(1) No real experiments: this is a platform. Misunderstanding because of misinterpretation because misleading views perceive as such as views A view is not a foundation and a foundation is not a perspective; A view is one, a foundation is another. This view [along with] the foundation is the first type of perverted view with a false basis. (read D i 86).
132. A wrong view is a wrong view. You have ... [and so on. 9 until] ... misunderstood because of the views.
133. [Such a wrong view] is the attachment to the mind ... [and so on. 48 until] ... These accusations are not views.
134-136. (2) There is no offering: this is a foundation ...
137-139. (3) No sacrifice: this is a foundation ...
140-142. (4) There is no fruit of good and evil: this is a foundation ...
143-145. (5) Without this life: this is a foundation ...
146-148. (6) There is no afterlife: this is a foundation ...
149-151. (7) Without mother: this is a foundation ...
152-154. (8) Without father: this is a foundation ...
155-157. (9) No species of biochemistry *: this is a foundation ...
* opapathy .
158. (10) There is no virtue and brahmans of self-enlightenment through intuition and proclamation to this and the other world: this is a foundation ... This view [along with] the foundation is The tenth type of wrong perspective has a false basis.
159. A wrong view is a wrong view. People have ... misunderstood because of the views.
160. [Such misleading views] are ties to the mind ... These bonds are not views.
Through the wrong perspective, there are misinterpretations according to these 10 aspects.
(iv)
161. From the perspective of ego, is there any wrong explanation according to the 20 aspects ?
Here is a layman who lacks knowledge ... [and so on. 49] ... or (20) falling in consciousness.
162-222. (1) How does he view objects as falls? There are people here ... [repeating dll 50-130] ... [150]
From the perspective of ego, there is a wrong explanation according to these 20 aspects.
(v)
223. Through an eternal perspective based on the ego, is there any wrong interpretation according to 15 aspects ?
Here is a layman who lacks knowledge ... [and so on. 49] ...
(1) consider the self to be an object, or (2) the object to be in the self, or (3) to fall within the object; or (4) consider the self to be experienced, or (5) to experience in the self, or (6) to experience in self; or (7) considering the self to be aware, or (8) the consciousness within the self, or (9) the self within the consciousness; or (10) considers the self to create a mood, or (11) to create the mood within the self, or (12) the self to create the mood; or (13) considering the self to be awake, or (14) the consciousness within the self, or (15) the falling within the consciousness.
224-284. (1) How does he consider an object? There are people here ... [repeats 74-82, 86-94, 98-106, 110-118, 122-130] ...
From an eternal perspective based on the ego, there is a wrong interpretation of these 15 aspects.
(we)
285. From the viewpoint of cessation based on ego, there are five misleading interpretations ?
Here is a layman who lacks knowledge ... [and so on. 49] ... (1) treating an object as a self ... or (2) experience as a self ... or (3) perceiving a self ... or (4) creating a mood as a self ... or (5) awake is the self.
286-321. (1) How does he view objects as falls? There is someone here ... [repeats dd- 50-73, 83-85, 95-97, 107-109, 119-121] ...
Through the view of cessation based on ego, there is a misleading interpretation of these 5 aspects.
(vii)
322. Through a finite point of view [by seeing or rejecting], is there any misleading interpretation in 50 aspects?
From a hypothetical point of view by finite perspective, is there a misleading interpretation like 'How does this world last' [3] in many respects?
From a hypothetical viewpoint by a finite view, how many false interpretations are these 'This world does not last' in many ways?
From a hypothetical point of view by finite view, ... like this 'Does this world end [in space]'?
... like this 'this world has no end [in space]'?
... like this 'the same soul and body'?
... like this 'The soul is one, the body is another'?
... like this 'Tathagata exists after death'?
... like this 'Tathagata does not exist after death'?
... like this 'Is the Tathagata both existing and not existing after death'?
From the hypothetical viewpoint by finite view, there are many misleading interpretations like this 'How does the Tathagata both exist and not exist after death' in many respects?
From a hypothetical point of view by finite view, there is a misleading interpretation of five aspects [each of which is mentioned in the 10 cases mentioned above].
323. From a hypothetical viewpoint by a finite perspective, is there an erroneous interpretation like this 'In what ways does this world last' in 5 aspects?
(1) Misinterpretation because of misinterpretation like this 'Object is this world and this world lasts' is a viewpoint. Finite gets that assumption, so it's a finite assumption. That view is not the foundation and the foundation is not that view; A view is one, a foundation is another. This view [along with] the foundation is the first kind of finite assumption like this 'This world lasts forever'.
324. Limited assumptions are misleading; The wrong view is the wrong view ... [and so on. 9] ...
325. [Such a wrong view] is the attachment to the mind ... [and so on. 46] ... These accusations are not views.
326-328. (2) Misunderstanding because of misinterpretation like this 'Experience is this world and this world lasts' is a view ...
329-331. (3) ... like this 'Realizing that this world and this world lasts' ...
332-334. (4) ... like this 'Create the mood that this world and this world lasts' ...
335. (5) ... like this 'Consciousness is this world and this world endures' ... [152] This view [along with] the foundation is the kind of finite fifth viewpoint like this. 'This world lasts forever'.
336-337. The finite assumption is the misconception ...
There is a misinterpretation of the five aspects through a finite assumption view like 'This world lasts forever'.
338. From a hypothetical viewpoint by a finite view, there are misleading interpretations like this 'Which world does not last' in 5 aspects?
(6) Misunderstanding because of misinterpretation like this 'The object is this world and this world does not last' is a viewpoint. Finite is assumed by that perspective ... This view [along with] the foundation is the first type of perspective that assumes finality such as 'This world does not last'.
339-340. The finite assumption is the misconception ...
341-352. (7) - (10) Misunderstanding because of misinterpretation like this 'Experience is that this world and this world does not last' ... [and the like with the rest of the collection] ...
There is a misinterpretation of the 5 aspects through this finite assumption view like 'This world does not last'.
353. From a hypothetical viewpoint by a finite perspective, is there a misleading interpretation like 'What does this world have to end' in 5 aspects?
(11) There is someone who spreads (everywhere) to the limited green space. He thought that 'this world has an end, is limited', and knows such a limit. Misunderstanding because of this misinterpretation, 'What he or she cares about is the foundation and this world' is an opinion. Finality is assumed by that view. This point of view is not fundamental ... is the first of a finite assumption like 'This world has an end'.
354-355. Finite assumptions are misleading ... These constraints are not views.
356-357. (12) There is someone who spreads (everywhere) to the limited space of yellow ...
(13) Someone here spreads (everywhere) to the red space ...
(14) There is someone who spreads (everywhere) to the white space ...
(15) There is someone who spreads (everywhere) to the limited bright space ...
[153] There are misleading interpretations of the 5 aspects through this finite assumption view like 'This world has an end'.
358. From a hypothetical extremist viewpoint by a finite perspective, is there a misleading interpretation like this 'In this end of the world' in 5 aspects?
There is someone who spreads (everywhere) to the wide green space. He thought that 'this world has no end, infinity', and such infinite awareness. Misunderstanding because of wrong interpretations like this' What ... is the first viewpoint where finite assumptions like this' This world does not end '.
359-360. Finite assumptions are misleading ... These constraints are not views.
361-372. (17-20) There are people here who spread the word to the spacious space of yellow ... red ... white ... bright ...
There is a misleading interpretation of the 5 aspects through this finite assumption view like 'This world does not end'.
373. From the hypothetical viewpoint by finite view, there are misleading interpretations like this, 'In what ways is the soul and body the same' in 5 aspects?
(21) Misunderstanding because of misinterpretation like this' The body is the soul and the body; the same soul and body 'is a viewpoint. Finality is assumed by that view ... is the first view that finite assumption is like 'the soul and the body are the same'.
374-375. Finite assumptions are misleading ... These constraints are not views.
376-387. (22) - (25) Misunderstanding because of misinterpretation like this' Experience ... Awareness ... Creating mood ... Consciousness is this soul and body ...
There is a misleading interpretation of the five aspects through a finite assumption view like 'the same soul and body'.
388. From the presumptive viewpoint by a finite view, there are misleading interpretations like this 'What is the soul, and the body is another' in 5 aspects?
(26) Misunderstanding because of misinterpretation like this 'The body is this body, and the soul is not this body'; the soul is one, and the body is another 'is a viewpoint. Finality is assumed by that view ... is the first extreme view that assumes finality like 'the soul is one, and the body is the other'.
389-390. Finite assumptions are misleading ... These constraints are not views.
391-402. (27) - (30) Misunderstanding because of misinterpretation like this' Experience ... Awareness ... Creating mood ... Consciousness is this body, and soul is not this body ... . '[154]
There is a misleading interpretation of the five dimensions through such a limited assumption, that 'the soul is one, and the body is the other'.
403. From a hypothetical viewpoint by a finite perspective, there are misleading interpretations like this 'Tathagata exists after death' in 5 aspects?
(31) Misinterpretation because of misinterpretation like this' Here, only the object bears the concept of death; while Tathagata, when the body disintegrates, exists and exists and arises and arises' is a viewpoint. Finality is assumed by that view ... is the first extreme view that such finite assumption 'Tathagata exists after death'.
404-405. Finite assumptions are misleading ... These constraints are not views.
406-417. (32) - (35) Misunderstood because of misinterpretation like this' Only the experience ... the perception ... the mood ... the consciousness that brings death here, ...
There is a misleading interpretation of the 5 aspects through such a limited assumption like 'Tathagata exists after death'.
418. From a hypothetical point of view by finite recognition, there are misleading interpretations like this 'In what ways does Tathagata exist after death' in 5 aspects?
(36) Misinterpretation because of this misinterpretation 'Here, only the object bears the concept of death; Tathagata, when the body disintegrates, is destroyed, lost; Tathagata does not exist after death 'is a viewpoint. Finality is assumed by that view ... is the first view that finite assumption like 'Tathagata does not exist after death'.
419-420. Finite assumptions are misleading ... These constraints are not views.
421-432. (37) - (40) Misunderstanding because of misinterpretation like this' Only an experience ... a perception ... a mood ... a consciousness that brings death here ...
There is a misleading interpretation of the 5 aspects through a finite assumption view like 'Tathagata does not exist after death'.
433. From a hypothetical viewpoint by a finite perspective, there are misleading interpretations like this, 'In what ways are Tathagata both existing and non-existent after death' in 5 aspects?
(41) Misunderstanding because of misinterpretation like this' Here, only the object bears the concept of death; Tathagata, when the body disintegrates, both exist and non-existent 'are a viewpoint. Finality is assumed by that view ... is the first view that finite assumption like 'Tathagata both exists and does not exist after death'.
434-435. Finite assumptions are misleading ... These constraints are not views.
436-447. (42) - (45) Misunderstanding because of misinterpretation like this' Only the experience ... the awareness ... the mood ... the consciousness that brings death here ...
There is a misleading interpretation of the 5 aspects through such a limited assumption that 'Tathagata both exists and does not exist after death'.
448. Through a hypothetical viewpoint by a finite view, there is an erroneous interpretation like this, 'In what ways does the Tathagata both exist and not exist after death' in 5 aspects? [155]
(46) Misinterpretation because of this misinterpretation 'Here, only the object bears the concept of death; Tathagata, when the body disintegrates, neither existing nor non-existent 'is a viewpoint. Finality is assumed by that view ... is the first view that finite assumption like 'Tathagata neither exists nor does not exist after death'.
449-450. Finite assumptions are misleading ... These constraints are not views.
451-462. (47) - (50) Misunderstanding because of misinterpretation like this' Only an experience ... a perception ... a mood ... a consciousness that brings death here ...
There is a misleading interpretation of the 5 aspects through a finite assumption view like 'Tathagata neither exists nor does it exist after death'.
There is a misinterpretation of 50 aspects through a finite assumption view.
(viii)
463. Through the viewpoint, there are misleading interpretations of the past finite in 18 aspects? (Read Brahmajālasutta « D 40-41 » ).
There are four types of perpetual and partial non-permanent advocates, four types of partial and non-permanent advocates, four types of partial and partial marginal advocates, four types of quirky apocryphal eel, and the two types of people who advocate things to happen for no apparent reason.
There is a misleading interpretation of past finite in these 18 aspects.
(ix)
464. From this perspective, is there any misleading interpretation of future finite in terms of 44? (Read Brahmajālasutta « D i 41-42 » ).
There are sixteen types of conscious advocates, eight types of non-cognitive advocates, eight types of conscious and non-cognitive advocates, seven types of advocates of cessation, and five types of people. Nibbana advocates right here and right now.
There is a misleading interpretation of future finite in these 44 aspects.
(x)
465. From the perspective, are there any false interpretations bound by 18?
Any point of view is the source that leads to the point of view, ... [repeat đ 5] ... misunderstood because of the point.
From a standpoint, there is an erroneous interpretation that is bound by these 18 aspects.
(xi)
466. From what point of view, are there any misleading interpretations bound to the 'I' side in 18 ?
(1) Misinterpretation because of misinterpretation as 'I' is a view attached to the 'I' conceit. This view is not fundamental ... [156] is the first view bound to the 'I' conceit.
467-468. The binding attitude with the 'I' conceit is a misguided view ... These bonds are not an opinion.
469-470. (2) Misinterpretation because of misinterpretation as 'I' is a binding concept with the 'I' conceit ...
471-515. (3) ... nose ... (4) ... tongue ... (5) ... body ... (6) ... mind ... (7) tangible object ... (8) ... sound ... (9) ... smell ... (10) ... taste ... (11) ... touching objects ... (12) ... the object of the mind ... (13) ... awareness from the eyes ... (14) ... awareness from the ears ... (15) ... awareness from the nose ... (16). ... awareness from tongue ... (17) ... awareness from body ...
516-518. (18) Misinterpretation because of misinterpretation of cognitive meaning that 'I' is a view attached to the 'I' side ...
From the point of view, there is a misinterpretation bound to the 'I' conceit in these 18 aspects.
(xii)
519. In what ways is there a misleading interpretation, which is bound to the 'My' self ?
(1) Misunderstanding because the wrong interpretation of 'mine' is a view attached to the 'mine' side. That view is not fundamental ... is the first view bound to the 'My' conceit.
520-521. The view attached to the 'mine' conceit is a misguided view ... These bindings are not an opinion.
522-524. (2) Misunderstanding because the wrong interpretation of 'mine' is a view attached to the 'mine' side ...
525-569. (3) ... nose ... [and so on 479-515]
570-572. (18) Misunderstanding because of misinterpretation as 'mine' is a view attached to 'mine' ...
From the point of view, there is a misinterpretation bound to the 'My' self in these 18 aspects.
(xiii)
573-654. From the standpoint, what are the 20 misleading interpretations associated with self-advocacy ?
Here a lay ignorant ... [repeats as at dd 49-130] ... [157]
There is a misinterpretation associated with self-advocates in these 20 aspects.
(xiv)
655-657. From the perspective of linking with world guidelines, what are the 8 wrong interpretations ?
(1) Misinterpretation because of misinterpretation like this 'Ego and this world is permanent' is a view associated with world policy. That view is not fundamental ... These bonds are not views.
658-660. (2) Misinterpretation because of misinterpretation like this 'Ego and this world is permanent' is a view associated with the world policy ...
661-663. (3) ... like this 'Ego and this world are both permanent and non-lasting ...'
664-666. (4) ... like this 'Ego and this world are neither permanent nor eternal' ...
667-669. (5) ... like this 'The self and the world are finite' ...
670-672. (6) ... like this 'Ego and this world are infinite' ...
673-675. (7) ... like this 'The ego and the world are both finite and infinite' ...
676-678. (8) ... like this 'The ego and the world are neither finite nor infinite' ...
These accusations are not views.
From a perspective, there is a misinterpretation associated with the world in these 8 aspects.
(xv)
679. Wrong explanation by hesitation * is a view of being [enduring].
* d. The upcoming 701 talks more about this hesitation ( oliyana ).
(xvi)
680. Wrong interpretation by going too far * is the view of non-existence [cessation].
* d. The upcoming 701 talks more about this atidhāvana .
[ PROJECT CLASSIFICATION ]
681. How many types of opinion (xv) about existence and how many types of opinion (xvi) do not exist are (i) misinterpreted in 35 respects through the concept of pleasure (sweetness)?
How many types of viewpoint (xv) about being exist and how many kinds of viewpoints (xvi) that are non-existent are (ii) misinterpreting in 20 aspects through the perspective of self?
How many kinds of views about existence and how many types of cessation views are misinterpreted in 10 aspects through misleading views?
How many perspectives on existence ...
How many types of opinion (xv) about existence and how many types of opinion (xvi) that do not exist are (xiv) misinterpreted in 8 aspects through the viewpoint connected with the world policy?
682. (i) Misinterpretation in 35 respects through the view of pleasure (sweetness) may [all] be both (xv) the point of view or (xvi) the point of not being.
683. (ii) Misinterpretation according to 20 aspects through the views of the self is 15 types (xv) of existing views and 5 types (xvi) of non-existent views.
684. (iii) Misinterpretation in 10 respects through a perverted view that all (xvi) views do not exist.
685. (iv) Misrepresentation according to 20 aspects through the ego viewpoint is 15 types (xv) of existing views and 5 types (xvi) of non-existent views.
686. (v) Wrong interpretation in 15 respects through a permanent perspective based on the ego [158] means that all (xvi) opinions do not exist.
687. (vi) Misinterpretation according to the 5 aspects through the view that cessation is based on ego is all (xvi) opinions do not exist.
688. (vii) [Wrong interpretation in 50 respects:]
(1) Misinterpretation in 5 respects through a finite assumption view like this: 'This world is eternal' is all (xv) existing opinions.
(2) Misinterpreting in 5 respects through a finite assumption view like this: 'This world is not permanent' is that all (xvi) views do not exist.
689. (3) Misinterpretation in 5 respects through a finite assumption view like this: 'This world is finite' can be both [all] (xv) existing views or (xvi) views not existing.
(4) Misinterpretation in 5 respects through a finite assumption view like this: 'This world is infinite' can be both [all] (xv) existing views or (xvi) non-existent views property.
690. (5) Misinterpretation in 5 respects through a finite hypothesis like this: 'The soul and the body are the same' are all (xvi) opinions that do not exist.
(6) Misinterpretation in 5 respects through this finite assumption view: 'The soul is one, this body is the other' is all (xv) of the existing viewpoint.
691. (7) Misinterpretation in 5 respects through a finite assumption view like this: 'Tathagata exists after death' is all (xv) existing opinions.
(8) Misinterpretation according to 5 aspects through such a limited assumption view: 'Tathagata does not exist after death' is all (xvi) opinion does not exist.
(9) Misinterpretation in 5 respects through this finite assumption view: 'Tathagata is both present and not present after death' may [all] be (xv) existing views or (xvi) opinion does not exist.
(10) Misinterpretation in 5 respects through this finite assumption view: 'Tathagata does not exist, nor does it not exist after death' can be both [all] (xv) views. exist or (xvi) opinion does not exist.
692. (viii) Misinterpretation according to 18 aspects through past finite points of view may [all] be both (xv) existing views or (xvi) non-existent views.
693. (ix) Misinterpretation according to 44 aspects through the future finite view may [all] be both (xv) the existing view or (xvi) the non-existent view.
694. (x) Misinterpretation according to 18 aspects through binding terms may [all] be both (xv) existing views or (xvi) non-existent views.
695. (xi) Misinterpretation according to the 18 aspects through a view of attachment to 'I' means that all (xvi) views do not exist.
696. (xii) Misinterpretation according to the 18 aspects through the point of view attached to 'mine' is all (xv) of the existing viewpoint.
697. (xiii) The wrong explanation from 20 aspects through the perspective associated with the self is 15 types (xv) of existing views and 5 types (xvi) of non-existent views.
698. (xiv) Wrong interpretation of the eight aspects through a world-connected viewpoint can [all] be both (xv) an existing view or (xvi) a non-existent view.
699. All points of view are (i) pleasure satisfying (sweet taste).
All points of view are (ii) the perspective of self.
All views are (iii) misleading views.
All views are (iv) an ego view.
All views are (vii) finite assumptions [by endorsement or refusal]. [159]
All views are (x) the binding views.
All points of view are (xiii) points of view connected with self-centered policies.
700. Opinions exist, and perspectives don't:
Those who like reasoning [only] take this pair as a basis;
Because they do not know about cessation, This is where the world goes wrong in consciousness. [4]
[Part VI]
701. Bhikkhus, there are two types of points of view, and when gods and humans are obsessed with them, some are hesitant, some are too overdone: only those who have wisdom can see clearly.
'And what does it taste like? The devas and human beings love to be, to enjoy with being, to rejoice in being. When teaching the True Dharma to them to stop becoming (existing), their minds are not penetrating, not settling, unstable, and even determined. There is a certain hesitation like that.
'And what does it taste like? Some people are ashamed, humiliated, and feel disgusted by the very self, and they rejoice over not being like this: 'Dear Sir, when this body breaks down, this self is cut off, ceased, there is no more existence after death, that is tranquility, that is supreme, that is the truth '. It tastes so overdone.
'And can anyone see clearly how? There are monks here who see things as they are. After seeing things as it is, he went down the path to boring it, to the end of his desire, to the end of elimination of greed for it. People with intellectual property clearly see that.
'Ai, thanks to seeing things as they are
And can overcome that reality
Make sure * it is true
He was liberated because the desire to become now exhausted
He knows all that is, so no more
The desire to become or crave for cessation,
Then with the cessation becomes of that which is
That monk is no longer born of death. (It 43) [160]
* Although this verse is taken from Itivuttaka 's 43rd sutta , the version of Paṭisambhidhāmagga written as yathābhūte adhimuccanti: sure it is true. In Itivuttaka , the original text of this verse is yathābhūte vimuccanti, but Itivuttaka 's commentary says that it must be understood that vimuccanti is adhimuccanti to match Paṭisambhidhāmagga as I have translated it. Read Peter Masefield, The Itivuttaka , PTS [Oxford, 2000], page 46, note 104.
702. Three types of people have wrong views, three types of people have correct views.
What three types of people have mistaken views? Masters of other denominations, their disciples and anyone who has a wrong view. These are the three types of people with the wrong view.
What three types of people have correct views? Buddhas, their disciples and anyone who has right understanding. These are the three types of people who have the correct view.
703.
The poor * is known
When out of anger, hatred And rude arrogance, in the view of that person Sin and dishonesty (Sn 116) A saintly being known as the pure man He purifies himself out of wrath and hatred, their views are accurate and gentle.
* vasala . The English version of outcasting (the outcast) was wrong, I changed it to outcaste and translated it as a mean man. Read PED on page 604.
704. There are three kinds of mistaken views; Correct views have three types.
What three types of viewpoints are confused? 'This is mine' is a misconception. 'This is Me' is a misconception. 'This is my ego' is a mistaken view. These are the three types of misconceptions.
What three types of views are correct? ' This is not mine ' is an exact view. ' This is not Me ' is an exact view. ' This is not my ego ' is an exact view. These are the three correct types of views.
705. What is 'this is mine'? How many views fall into this category? What kind of finite viewpoints are these related to?
What is this 'Me'? How many views fall into this category? What kind of finite viewpoints are these related to?
What is this 'my ego'? How many views fall into this category? What kind of finite viewpoints are these related to?
'This is mine': is (viii) the idea of past finite. There are 18 views of this type. These views are associated with the past finite.
'This is Me': is (ix) the idea of future finite. There are 44 points of view of this type. These views are associated with future finite types. [161]
'This is my ego': is (ii) a view of the ego with 20 foundations and an egoist view with 20 foundations. This self-centered view leads sixty-two types of perspective. Are these views related to past and future finite types?
706. 'O bhikkhus, who have found the end of their lives in Me, they have the [righteous] view. Of those [righteous] views, there are five types of people who find their life's end here [right here in the world], there are five types of people who find their life's end [in four scenes] Precepts] after renouncing this life.
What five types of people find the end of their lives here? That is: one who will be reborn at most seven times ( sattakkhattuparama ), who is born from one holy family to another holy family ( kolankola ), who is born only once ( ekabījin ), a one-time return ( sakadāgāmin ) , and the Arahant in this life here and now. These are the five types of people who find the end of their lives here [right in this world].
What five types of people find their life after renouncing this life? These are: nibbana witnesses at the beginning of their next life ( antarāparinibbāyin ), nibbana witnesses in the second half of their next life ( upahaccaparinibbāyin ), nibbana witnesses who do not need to push ( asaṅkhāraparinibbāyin ), nibbana witnesses need to promote ( sasaṅkhāraparinibbāyin ), * who goes upstream to the highest realms of Chu Thien ( uddahaṁsota-akaniṭṭhagāmin ). These are the five types of people who find the end of their lives after renouncing this life (A v 119).
* Both asaṅkhāra 'without impulse' and sasaṅkhāra 'needing to push' are not in the PED dictionary of PTS. Only asaṅkhāra is included in the Critical Pali Dictionary . Read Ñāṇamoli , The Guide , [Oxford, 1977], e. 443/3 and 945, pages 108 and 246. Found in Dhs đ. 146. Mr. Buddhaghosa explained this meaning at Aḷs page 156 or The Expositor I, II p. 207.
'Monks, those who fully believe in Me, have all entered the family. Among those who enter the stream, there are five types of people who find their life's end here [right in this world], there are five types of people who find their life's end after giving up this life.
'What five types of people find the end of their lives here? That is: the one who will be reborn at most seven times, the one born from one holy family to another holy family, one who will be reborn only once, the One Returned One, and the Arahant in this life here and now now. These are the five types of people who find the end of their lives here [right in this world].
'What five types of people find their life after renouncing this life? Are: nibbana witnesses in the first part of their next life, nibbana witnesses in the second half of their next life, nibbana witnesses do not need to push, nibbana witnesses need to push, people go against the current towards the highest realms of Chu Thien. These are the five types of people who find the end of their lives after giving up this life.
'Monks, those who fully believe in Me, have all entered the family. Among those who enter the family, there are five types of people who find their life's end here [right in this world], there are five types of people who find their life's end after giving up this life. ' (A v 120).
TERMINATE THE DISCUSSION OF VIEWPOINTS. END=NAM MO SHAKYAMUNI BUDDHA.( 3 TIMES ).WORLD VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST ORDER=VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST NUN=THICH CHAN TANH.AUSTRALIA,SYDNEY.10/9/2019.
 |
No comments:
Post a Comment