General Buddhism: Class 9 - Episode 3 - Nhon Minh Luan (memorize)

Universal Buddhist Studies

SRAMANA. Thich Thien Hoa.VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY=THICH CHAN TANH.

- o0o -

Ninth Course

(DUY TH Learning and NHON MINH LUAN)

- o0o -

Episode THREE

KNOWLEDGE ATTRACTION LEARNING.

HE THIEN THAN Bodhisattva created his comment
HUYEN TRANG The shaman translates Sanskrit into Chinese characters.
Mr. DUONG MEMBERS easily
recaptured Sa subjects THUY THIEN HOA translated Vietnamese words and turns.

NHON MINH LUAN

REPETITION

(If you want to learn Nhon in a way that is easy to understand, you must first memorize the following nouns)

Nhon minh chief justice theory, the content has three parts (tam chi): Ton, Nhon and Du.

Fear "Ton" has nine errors:

There are 4 errors in "Nhon", divided into 3 parts:

Fear has 10 errors, divided into 2 parts:

QUANTITY ARCHITECTURE

NHON MINH DISCUSS FROM WHERE IS THERE?

Before the time of Buddha Shakyamuni's birth (it is not clear how many years it is true), in India there are many
pagan sects , contested by theory. Mr. Tuc Mien Tien was one of the
Patriarchs of the sects, establishing this logic, to reject the religions. This method is
creditable and effective in that period.

When Buddha was born, see Nhon intelligence is a subject of logic has rules, just right of small and trendy,
get public recognition, so the Buddha also used the way this argument to reject the pagan heresy
brought Secretarial physical.

After Buddha passed
away , about 600 years, with Ma and Long Ma, two Bodhisattvas were born in India, collected, divided into five parts: Ton, Nhon, Du, Hiep, Ket.

Later on, Mr. Chen Na Bodhisattva, reformed, established Nhon in three parts: Ton, Nhon, Di and wrote a series of "Nhon minh into chief theory". From Tran Na to the previous, people called: "Cổ Nhơn minh"; from Mr. Tran Na later: "Tan Nhon minh".

In the Tang dynasty, Mr. Huyen Trang, a French magician (Chinese) went to India to study Buddhism,
very adept in this subject. He has repeatedly discussed and used
this argument to make all India respect for 18 countries.

After returning home, he translated and spread the word in China.

Because of the demand of believers, I (Sa Mon Thich Thien Hoa) translated and annotated in Vietnamese.

WHY IS CALLING "NHON MINH INTEGRATE THEORETICAL?"

It is an ancient logic in Asia that is both logical, firm and regular.
The weak thing is to clearly know the "cause" or "the reason", the new logical
and righteous way of thinking, should be called "Nhon minh joins chief reasoning".

Because thanks to "Nhon", Ton was clearly recognized, thanks to "Nhon", he was able to establish Du. Because "Nhon" is so important
, it should be called "Nhơn minh", but not called "Tôn minh or D intelligent minh." Nhon minh is one
of the five intelligent.

CONTENT OF NHON MINH

The content of Nhon commentary is divided into 3 parts: Ton, Nhon and Du. According to Co Nhon minh, there are
2 more parts: Hiep and Ket are 5 parts:

A. TON

Pham said a sentence, or presented a theory, what the theory called Ton. Like saying, "I eat rice".

Ton has many names, like:

1. Tran ceiling (previous noun) also called: Huu phap, Tu minister, Department.

2. Post-mortal (noun after) also called: Dharma, Differential, Talent.

For example, say: I eat rice

I Tien Tran (noun before), Huu Phap, Tu Minister, Department.

Hau Tran Hau rice (noun after), French, Differential, Talent.

RESPECTED TON Y AND TON CAN

I. Religious medicine consists of 2 parts:

1. Pre-mortal: Righteousness, Distinct and Prime Minister

2. Post-mortal: Dharma, Power, and Difference.

II. Reversal. - Cổ Nhơn minh (from HE Trần Na to the former) took Tiền Trần as Tôn-y, Hậu Trần as Tôn-
Tôn.

Tan Nhue minh (from Tran Tran later on) gave Tien Tran and Hau Tran to sue Ton and
should be Ton y. The two events that are combined are called Religion.

FAST ERRORS ABOUT RELIGION

People of Ton must avoid the following nine errors, that the new Religion is right, qualified to
formulate his theory, or the doctrine of others. The nine errors include:

1. Show the amount of soy sauce . - Making religious, contrary to the feeling of money. As current money, everyone
knows that: Nose smell, ear sound etc ... Now again set the Ton that:

Ton:  1. My ears smell good

2. My eyes see the voice, etc.

Because saying so is contrary to the present understanding; As soon as he said it, he found himself wrong.
Sun was wrong, how to set up "Nhon" and "Du".

2. Proportion of similarities . - Making the Ton as opposed to "discriminating comparisons". According to the comparison
of his understanding : Every human being, everyone must die, as the ancestors died. And everything that has a
picture must be corrupted, just like how many things have been destroyed before. Now again established Ton that:

Ton:  1. I live forever and not die.

2. My house never fails.

Lap Ton is so contrary to the "discriminant comparison" of people, so there are errors.

3. Similarly self-taught . - Making the Ton, contrary to your doctrine of worship. Broadly speaking, it is contrary to the
nationalism, partisan, family, nation or a theory that they respect.

As in Buddhism says "Beings have karmic retribution". And say "There is a world of ecstasy in
the West and so on ...". We Buddhists have established the Ton that:

Ton:  1. Beings do not have samsara

2. There is no ecstasy.

Foreign Minister asked: "He said this, it is in conflict with his religion. So is he
right, or is his religion right? If his religion teaches the right way, then his words are wrong,
and his words are right, his religion is wrong. So which one do you recognize? ”
They don't need you and you lose.

4. The world is similar . - Making the Ton, contrary to the customs, practices and understandings of the world.
There are two classes of people in the world: educated and uneducated.

If for educated people we set up this Ton:

Ton:  1. Mr. Thien dragged Mr. Mango to die

2. Tuberculosis is not caused by germs.

Making the Sun like that, wrong with the world, with the well-educated (Science).
Because science (educated people) said "tuberculosis caused by bacteria", and did not recognize
Mr. Thien. We say that, they will be accused of being uneducated.

On the contrary, if the world of uneducated people, that we set up the Ton like this, also
similarly faulty world.

Religions:  1. No Gods ban ban the disaster.

2. Tuberculosis is caused by bacteria.

Therefore, the worldly people are uneducated, they believe in God blessing them and they do not know the germs.
Although we say yes, there is a lack of clever words, so they do not recognize.
Because they didn't recognize it, their next words were not valid, so they made the mistake of
"The same world".

5. Similar terminology . - Making the Ton that your last words contradicted with your previous
words. As established:

Ton:  1. How much is this item so cheap?

2. This man is blind but he can see everything.

Did not know how much is the price, why know cheap? If you are blind, why can you see something too?
My words contradict themselves. Seeing yourself is wrong, then whoever
admitted is right.

6. Special energy infinity . - Making the Ton that "nouns" on the other party do not recognize.
As for Buddhism or Science that makes the Ton like this:

Religions:  1. This world (previous noun) was created by the  God of Creation  (noun after).

2. Mr. Oi (previous noun) was beaten  by Torpedo  (noun after).

Buddhism and Science accept the World and Brother Oh; but never admitted to
"God of Creation" and "Heavenly Thunder". Because the opponent does not recognize it, it makes a "failed" error.

7. Distinctive real estate . - Making the Ton that the "previous noun" on the opponent does not recognize.
As for Buddhism and science, set up like this:

Religions:  1.  God of Creatures  (previous noun) gave birth to humans.

2.  Tai chi  (nouns before) born of everything.

Mankind and all things are two nouns, both Buddhism and science recognize: and
God of Creation and Taiji are two nouns before, Buddhism as well as science does not recognize, so it is error. "Unsuccessful".

8. Sentence infinity . - Making the Ton that "noun before" and "noun after", the other party
will not recognize. As for science, it is like this:

Religion:  1.  Brew god ,  Tai Chi  ie  Chon like.

2. The  God of Creatures  is  Tai Chi .

The Science side does not recognize the previous noun as "Coc Coc, Tai Chi or God of Creature" nor
does it recognize the following noun as "Chon as or Tai Ta". Any argument that the other party
does not understand, or understands without acknowledging, cannot reason. Should be "failed" error.

In short, these three failed mistakes (Goodbye, Distinctive Sentence and Failed Sentence) the other party did not understand,
or understood without acknowledging. By two causes:

1. Incorrect establishment.

2. Making correct but lacking in words, it makes a mistake.

9. Extremely consistent . - Making the Ton that coincides with the opponent's opinion. As established:

Ton:  1. Eat full stomach.

2. The drinking water is different.

The argument is because the two sides disagree. If the guests have recognized like me, but I
also made up more corrugated the more useless, so the error "consistent" (identical message).

In 9 errors of Ton, from 1 to 5 belongs to error "similar"; 6 to 8 belongs to the "Failed" error.
9th error because of duplication of message, so it is not effective. 9 errors about Ton Ton, explained already, now will say 14 errors about Ton Nhon.

LESSON LEARNING UNIVERSITY (AGAINST 9 CORRES ABOUT RELIGION)

You should consider carefully, the following sentences, for 9 errors in Ton, belong to what error?

1. My mother has no husband.

2. There is no Heaven and Earth Devil.

3. No Fruitfulness, Reincarnation.

4. No Heaven and Hell.

5. Heaven is born of all kinds.

6. Heaven does not reincarnate.

7. Intelligent birth of God falls.

8. Crumble to catch worms as its children.

9. Aromatic headphones.

10. Headphones sound, smell nose.

11. I am immortal.

12. How much is this thing so cheap.

13. This blind man, the chi also see.

14. Horses race underwater, ships run ashore.

B. SON

Nhon is the cause or reason. Every thing or sentence has a cause
or a reason.

As said: - Ton: I want to eat.

- Nhon: Because I'm so hungry (reason).

Any "Nhon" that has all the following three qualities is justified. On the contrary, if one,
two, or three are missing, then Nhon is at fault. 14 errors in Nhon later, also because of the lack of one, two or three of the following characteristics. So you should remember carefully the three properties of Nhon.

1. Turns out Ton Tanh . - Meaning: Cai Nhon must cover Ton (the first nature).

Nhu Lap:  - Ton: I want to eat.

- Nhon: Because I'm so hungry.

The "Because I'm hungry" Nhon, it covers Ton's previous noun "I want"; and also covered the following noun of Ton, "Eat rice".

Means: Because I'm hungry, "I want to"; and because I'm hungry, "I eat rice".

2. The properties of property . - Meaning that what Nhon decides must be completely or at least partly related to the example. It must be of the same nature as Đồng example (the
second nature of Nhơn).

TABLES

TON

- Ton: I want to eat rice

As established:

- Nhon: So hungry

- Example: Like Mr. A (hungry and want to eat)

"Like Mr. A" is an example. That means Mr. A is also "hungry" (Nhon), so he "wants to eat" (Ton).

Cai Nhon "because of hunger" is completely related to Ton and Dong instance (for example upon agreement).

3. Food products turn to nature . - This "Nhon" for the Example (example on the left side) must be completely
unrelated; meaning the nature of Nhon, must be completely not in the new example
(the third nature of Nhon).

TABLES

- Ton: I want to eat rice

As established:

- Nhon: So hungry

- Example: Like Mr. A (hungry, want to eat)

- Example: Like Mr. B (full of stomach that he does not want to eat)

Cai Nhon "because of hunger" is not completely unrelated to the metaphor; meaning: he B (Allure) was full (contrary to Nhon: hungry), so he did not want to eat (contrary to Ton: wanted to eat).

14 ERRORS ON NHON

Making "Nhon", to avoid 14 errors later, the "Nhon" is completely correct,
divided into 3 categories:

1. FOUR CORE FAULTS:

1. The sentence fails . - Making Nhon that neither owners nor guests recognize.

As established:

- Ton: Tiger cloud snake.

- Nhon: Because it has such legs (primitive)

Neither the owner nor the guests saw the "cobra with legs". Now again establishing Nhon "because it has legs",
so this Nhon has no success.

2. The most unsuccessful . - The founder of Nhon, must be recognized by both the owner and the guests, at least
one of the guests must have recognition, so that the new Nhon. Now this Nhon on the guest
does not recognize, so the error "Custom most unsuccessful". As for the Scientist, this is how it works:

As established:

- Ton: Crating without giving birth (eggs)

- Nhon: Because he took you so deeply.

According to Science said the amphet lays eggs in the nest, then catches the worm stuffed into it as bait, so that the female can hatch when feeding. Now setting up Nhon "catches the worm", the client side (Science) does not recognize it, so it fails.

3. Attendance failed . - What Nhon does not plan, so it fails. As far as seeing blind,
unknown whether it is fog or haze, again like this:

As established:

- Ton: There is a fire

- Nhon: Because there is blindness (haze).

If because of "haze," then this Sun has fire (right); If because of "cloud", then this Sun is not fire (not right).

This Nhon could be reversed like this:

As established:

- Ton: There is no fire

- Nhon: Because there is blindness (haze).

Because this Nhon can set up both Ton, both "has fire" and has "no fire", for
example , not fixed, so the error "failed."

4. Department of medicine failed . - Your base, the client does not recognize. As the Theocratic devotee
of Science or Buddhism made this way:

As established:  - Ton: Than born of all things

- Nhon: Because in my sutras I said that.

Must be followers of their Religion in order to recognize their sutras as true. As for science or Buddhism, do not recognize their scriptures, but based on that scripture to argue with people outside their religion, should have the error "Department of medicine failed."

A second example: According to Nhon minh, we set up this amount:

As established:  - Ton: Nowhere real.

- Nhon: Because everything is empty.

"No comments" faction, they do not recognize "is real nowhere". If with this faction, but set up such a Nhon, the fault "Department of medicine failed."

Four "failed" errors already mentioned, now we will talk about six "uncertain" errors.

II. SIX ERROR ERROR:

1. Czech uncertainty . - This Nhon is related to both example and metaphors, so it has an error of "unspecified"

TABLES

- Ton: Mr. A hurts

As established:  - Nhon: Because eating raw mangoes

- Example: Like Mr. B (eating raw mangoes and pain)

- Example: Like Mr. D (eating raw mango, no pain)

If it is said that Mr. A "because eating raw mangoes" is as painful as Mr. B's, why is Mr. D also "eating raw mangoes"
but not painful? Therefore, one can set up the guru in reverse:

- Ton: Mr. D doesn't hurt

- Nhon: for eating raw mangoes

As established:

- Example: Like Mr. D (eating raw and painless mangoes)

- Example: Like Mr. A (eating raw mangoes, pain)

One might say, "Is it because of eating raw mangoes" that hurt like Mr. A, or "because eating raw mangoes"
that it is not as painful as Mr. D's?

By establishing such uncertainty Nhon has an error.

2. Real plus uncertainty . - This is not related to Dong example.

TABLES

- Ton: The language is often longer

- Nhon: because of headphones

As established:  - Same example: As nowhere (ears do not listen)

- Example: Like grass (ear not hear).

Cai Nhon "because of this ear", for "Dong example" and "All examples", are not related at all, so we have an "uncertain" error. Because of this, one can repeat this way:

- Ton: Voices are impermanent

As established:  - Nhon: Because headphones

- For example: Like grass (impermanent)

- Example: As nowhere (often remains)

So, "because of headphones" and the voice is often like nothing? Or "because of the ear" and the
impermanent voice is like the grass? Therefore, this Nhon has an "uncertain" error.

3. The same product is the first part of the transfer, The wrong product is changed indefinitely:

TABLES

TON

- Ton: There is smoke there.

As established:  - Nhon: Because there is fire

- For example: - Like alcool wine fire (with fire, without smoke)

- Like fire in the kitchen (with fire, with smoke)

- Example: Like fire in the kitchen (with fire, with smoke).

If the Nhon "because there is fire", such as fire in the kitchen, then this Ton has "smoke"; also "because there is fire", such as fire wine, the Sun "smokeless". Because this Nhon, for Ton "smoky" or "smokeless" is not fixed, this Nhon has uncertain errors. Because one can do the opposite like this:

- Ton: There is no smoke

As established: - Nhon: Because there is fire

- Copper example: Like fire Alcool (with fire, without smoke)

- Example: Like fire in the kitchen (with fire, with smoke)

4. The most common food products change, The products change indefinitely:

This Nhon for example has to be partly involved, and for Dong example, it must be completely
involved, so this Nhon also has an "uncertain" error.

- Ton: The monkey climbs well

As established: - Nhon: Because there are two hands.

- Simile: Like apes

- Example: - Like a cow (without arms, without climbing)

- Like a snake (no hands, good tree climbing).

For example, Đồng Đồng must be completely related to Tôn and Nhơn; and the Paradox is completely
unrelated to Ton and Nhon, that's right.

Now this Nhon, for all examples are involved in one part. Therefore, the third nature of
Nhon is "The food is turned to nature", so it is faulty; because guests may ask back: "Because they have no hands, they
should climb as well as a snake"; or because he doesn't have a hand, "doesn't know how to plow a tree like a cow?"
Therefore, this Nhon has an "uncertain" error.

5. The first sentence of the uncertainty part:

This Nhon, for both Dong example and the allusion is only partially involved, so it is also "uncertain" error.

- Ton: The sound of impermanence

TABLES

As established:

- Nhon: Because the eyes cannot see

- Same example: - Tanh angry, sad etc ... (eyes do not see and impermanent)

TON

- Such as fields, houses, etc. (seeing and also impermanent)

- Example: - As Void (impermanent, eyes do not see)

- As awareness (often, eyes do not see)

The second example:

- Ton: Everyone has to die

- Nhon: Because of love

As established:

- Simultaneous example: - As holding animals (tangible example with death)

- Like sea water (tangible, not dead)

- Example: - As nowhere (invisible or dead)

- Like a wooden statue (tangible, not dead)

If this Nhon "is tangible", if the animal is needed, then this Ton is "dead", and the Nhon
"for tangible" such as water, then this Ton "does not die".

The average example is the opposite surface of Ton and Nhon, so we have to use things "not dead". (contrary to Ton) and "invisible" (contrary to Nhon) for example. - Now this paradox just left Nhon with half. Because the foreigner may ask again: so "nowhere, not dead" because of invisible? Or "wooden statues don't die" because they're tangible? Because tangible (wooden statues) invisible (nowhere) are not dead, so this Nhon is "uncertain" error.

6. Corresponding uncertain decisions:

Owner and guests set the opposite amount; but both have no fault, and decided to set up. But neither side can break the other.

- Ton: Frequent waves

Guest set up:

- Nhon: Because waves mean water

- Copper example: Like electricity.

- Ton: Waves are impermanent

Owner of demolition:

- Nhon: Because of pharmaceutical movement

- Simile: Like the wind.

These two amounts are very contradictory, but they all decide to establish. The guests still
recognize "motion waves", the owner also receives "waves ie water". But neither side
broke any side, so Nhon had the "uncertain" error. This is also because of the lack of clever words,
to make people submissive. In the past, someone said, "Whoever established it first is better."

It must be made like this:

- Ton: Waves are no longer normal

- Nhon: Because it is a dynamic wind

- Simile: Like the wind.

The 6 "Uncertain" errors are explained, now we will talk about 4 similar errors.

III. FOUR CORE CORE VI

1. France similar Prime Minister .

- Cai Nhơn left (contradictory) with the Prime Minister (white speech)
of the following noun.

- Ton: The wind is still there

As established:

- Nhon: Because there is such a move

- Same example: As nowhere

- Example: Like a wave.

If there is movement, how often is it; so this "active" Nhon, very contrary to the
"regular" sound, is the white word about Ton's later noun.

2. France difference is similar to Nhon .

- Cai Nhơn left (contradicted) with the promise (implied) of the following noun.

- Ton: Humans decide who to create (the promise is a god).

As established:

- Nhon: Because there is intelligence and eyes, ears, etc.

- Simile: Like children born to parents

In this Ton, the word "decision maker" is made by the founder of Ton, their implication is
to say: The creator is a God. And their implications for that God has three virtues later: 1. Omnipotent, 2. Often, 3. Single. But this Nhon is contrary (contradictory) to their implications:

1. If he created a human being with intelligence and eyes, etc., like a parent giving birth to a child; so the parents were "not omnipotent", because they were born with rebellious children to their parents, the god was also "not omnipotent" because of the creation of mankind and those who resisted the God. there, and among men, so many inequalities.

2. Parents who give birth to their children, who, until old age, die "not often"; so the God that has given
birth to humans, then he must also die, "not often left".

3. Parents born children, of course must have Grandfather, Grandmother gave birth to parents, so parents are not
"unique". So, that God created man, then he must also have a
bigger god born, so he is not "unique".

Therefore, this Nhon has an error that contradicts the promise (implication) of the following noun as "creator".

3. Property of self-similarity vi Nhon . - Cai Nhon contradicts the white words (self-appearance)
about Ton's previous noun.

- Ton: There must be an Invisible man creating the Universe

As established:

- Nhon: Because the Universe is so orderly

- Simile: Like an architect who makes a house.

Cai Nhon "Because the universe is orderly", very contrary to Ton's previous noun "Invisible Man". If invisible, how to create the universe is tangible and orderly? Must tangible things create tangible things. As an architect, a tangible house can be created for tangible things.

4. The legal difference is similar . - Cai Nhơn contrasts with the promise (implied) about
Ton's previous noun .

- Ton: There must be a creator of the universe

As established:

- Nhon: Because the universe is so ordered.

- Simile: Like a workman.

The founder of this amount, if he bluntly said, "There is a God," he was afraid that the opponent would not
recognize it, but must have the error "Distinctive failure", so they only spoke implicitly as "There is one God". . But their implication was to say, "He is a God"; and they give this God has 3 virtues: 1. Often, 2. Sublime, 3. Birth of all things.

But if He produced all things, then He must of course be
born and die by someone else ; not noble and often. Just like a home builder.

Because of this Nhon, contrary to the intention of the previous nouns, the error "similar". Foreign affairs can argue against that:

- Ton: That person must be born and die.

As established:

- Nhon: Because he gave birth to the universe.

- Simile: Like a workman.

14 errors about Tồn Nhơn, we explained already, the following will say 10 errors about T example.

ACADEMIC SUBSTITUTION (ADULT 14 ERROR ABOUT BENEFITS)

You should carefully review the amounts later, then point out: Ton's fault, Nhon's fault, and clearly state why

Amount I:

- Ton: Nhon decided to have a creator

- Nhon: Because there is intelligence and enough eyes, ears, etc.

- Same example: Like children, must have parents born.

Amount II:

- Ton: The wind is still there

- Nhon: Because there is such a move

- Same example: As nowhere

- Example: Like a wave

The third amount:

- Ton: There must be a One who gave birth to the universe

- Nhon: Because the universe is so orderly

- Simile: Like an architect who makes a house

Amount IV:

- Ton: There must be an invisible man creating the universe

- Nhon: Because the universe is so orderly

- Copper example: Like his life at home.

***

C. EXAMPLE

Any person who takes an object which the other party already knows and has recognized, to compare them
with an object that the other party has not known, or has not recognized, is called a "Du".

For example, when making the "Ton normal still", you must take all the things "often still" as Dong example;
on the contrary, all "impermanent" objects must be taken as examples.

For example, there are 10, divided into 2 categories:

I. SUPPORT EXAMPLE 5:

1. The legislative power failed. -  The female Nhon is to establish the Ton, so the Nhon is
"The legislative power" and the Ton is the "Legislative Department". This is the opposite of Nhon, so the error "failed".

As established:

- Ton: The horse runs well

- Nhon: Because there are four hooves

- Simile: Like a horse tiger

This Paragon is with Ton (running well), contrary to Nhon (lacking legs)

2. The legislature failed . - Nhon is Nang Lap but Ton is So Lap (made up). This example is in contrast
to Ton, so also the error "failed."

As established:

-  Ton: People can't fly.

- Nhon: Because of the lack of wings

- Simile: Like clouds (no wings, fly)

This Duure with Nhon (lack of wings) and left with Ton (not fly).

3. Sentence failed .

- This is the opposite of Ton and Nhon. Because of taking Dictation as an example, there is a "failed" error.

As established:

-  Ton: Normal language

- Nhon: Because headphones

- Copper example: Like tables and chairs.

Tables and chairs "impermanent" should be contrary to Ton, and "ears cannot be heard," so contrary to Nhon.

4. Invincible . - This Parable has no words of co-ordination to end to make it easier to understand.

As established:

-  Ton: One has to die

- Nhon: Because there is birth

- Copper example: Like birds, etc.

It should have said the synergies to end like this: "People have birth (Nhon) must have died
(Ton). Everything that has been born (Nhon) must have died (Ton), like birds etc ... ”it was
easy for people to understand at that time. This is just short that "like a bird"; makes people not understand: Like a bird with
two wings, or like a bird with a beak? should be fault "incompatible".

5. Inversion . - Example, ending synergies in reverse. Finishing to end the synergies, I must
say the first Nhon and then the second one.

As established:

-  Ton: One has to die

- Nhon: Because there is birth

- For example: Every animal that has birth (Nhon) must have died (Ton) like birds, etc.

Now the opposite ends in contrast, that is: Coordinate Ton before Nhon after.

As established:

-  Ton: One has to die

- Nhon: Because there is birth

- For example: Every mortal (Ton) must be born (Nhon) like a bird, etc.

Because everyone says "to have to die," everyone sees; also said "to die there must be born", people are
difficult to recognize.

II. EXAMPLE HAVE 5:

The average example is the opposite surface of Ton and Nhon, so it must be completely opposite of Ton and Nhon.

1. Department of Legislative Affairs . - This metaphor is not contrary to Ton

As established:

-  Ton: The voice is often there

- Nhon: Because it's invisible

- Same example: As nowhere

- Example: as mote (tangible mote and often still)

mote has a substance and often remains. If using mote as an example, then only contrary to
Nhon (invisible) but not contrary to Ton (usually) should be faulty.

2. Legislative control . - This metaphor is not contrary to Nhon

As established:

-  Ton: The voice is often there

- Nhon: Because it's invisible

- Same example: As nowhere

- Example: like lightning (invisible, unusual).

Using electric lightning as an example, it is only contrary to "Ton normally still", but not contrary to
"Nhon invisible", should be faulty.

3. Uncontrollable sentences . - The example is not contrary to Ton and Nhon. This error because of using Dong instance as an example.

As established :

- Ton: The person must die

- Nhon: Because there is birth

- For example: Like grass

- Example: as animals

The average example is the opposite of Ton and Nhon. Now using this metaphor is not contrary to Ton and
Nhon so it is at fault.

4. Real separation . - The paradigm has no end to separate Ton and Nhon

As established :

- Ton: The voice is often there

- Nhon: Because there is no substance

- Same example: What is invisible often, like nothingness

- Example: like tables and chairs

Regarding the Parable, there should also be a final ending to separate Ton and Nhon like so:

"Everything that is impermanent is shaped like a table and chair." Now just put off that:
"As tables and chairs" Make people do not understand: As tables and chairs have four legs? Or as tables and chairs are present?

Must note: Regarding the example, if there is a lack of synergies to end, then called "Invincible";
while in the For example, if there is a lack of synergies to end, it is called "disjointed".

5. Inversion . - The end of the Parable, to divorce Ton and Nhon, is joined in the opposite way.

As established:

-  Ton: Normal language

- Nhon: Because I am shy

- Same example: As nowhere

- For example: what is obstructing (Nhon) is impermanent (Ton) such as vase, table, etc.

Phàm word combination to end of The example is to say Ton before Nhon after, new agreement.
As said: "What impermanence (Ton), there are obstacles (Nhon) such as vase, table etc ...
" Now coordinated opposite Nhon before Ton after, so the error "Island Cup".

Note:  - About Dong instance, when finished, must say Nhon first and then Ton said. Otherwise, the error
"Reversal". About The example, when it is over, it must be said Ton first and then Nhon after. Otherwise, the error
"Island reversed". The 10 errors on Zhuge explained.

LESSONS LEARNED

You should carefully consider the following amounts: What error does Ton belong to? Nhon belongs to what error? And which fault belongs to Yu?

Amount I:

- Ton: People have to die

- Nhon: Because there is birth

- For example: Every human being must die, like a bird

- Example: Every human being is not dead, like nothingness

Amount II:

- Ton: The voice is often there

- Nhon: Because it's invisible

- Same example: As nowhere

- Example: Like mote

The third amount:

- Ton: The voice is often there

- Nhon: Because headphones

- Same example: As nowhere

- Example: Like lightning

Amount IV:

- Ton: One has to die

- Nhon: Because there is birth

- For example: Like grass

- Example: Like animals. Or make many other quantities

BENEFITS LEARNING NHON MINH LUAN

In the Mahayana Sutras, most Buddhas teach their disciples to know the Five Faculties (1. Inner Wisdom, 2. Nhon minh, etc.) in the process of conversion to gain many benefits. In Ngu minh, Nhon minh is one.

Knowing Nhon Minh should say little errors, solid logic, can convince the evil doctrine to bring about the right path.

Because of knowing Minh, we have learned the treatises in Buddhism. Because in the commentaries mostly used Nhon to set up the Chief Justice and break the heresy.

In short, Nhon Minh is a theory of logic, both for himself and for others. END=NAM MO SHAKYAMUNI BUDDHA.( 3 TIMES ).GOLDEN AMITABHA MONASTERY=VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST NUN=THICH CHAN TANH.AUSTRALIA,SYDNEY.17/2/2020.