Buddhism has the idealist or not?

 

Need to determine when to say the mind is kind of mind-oriented creation, to have the most thorough look of the Buddhist world view.

At present, not least when researchers learn about Buddhism often draw conclusions, Buddhism is idealistic. References are, in the United States, Buddha's doctrine necessarily idealistic created or tam about idealistic French consciousness, the great wall. Under them, Buddhism that are all from the mind that came out, the whole world around us is created by the mind, there is a real world, a world of independent objective existence to humans. So is the world, people are living with it is not there, it's just the product of the mind that the artifact, the existence of the present variables and it depends entirely on the mind.

However, we are still on slab, and not actually peeling description subtlety, marvelous micro of Buddha's teachings. According to philosophical tradition, the Division into idealist and materialist based on solving the basic problem of philosophy, problem thinking and existence. Materialism for that the nature of the physical world, the spirit is also a form of existence of matter ¹, is the product of the process of social development. Idealism, then the assertion to the contrary, the nature of the world is mental, the material world is formed depends and subject to the provisions of the spirit world.

First of all, when it discusses a possible conclusion, that the world consists of Buddhism and unknowingly, in terms of the self are the four great² charm, and the ruined charm also by removal, there not because of any supernatural forces would founder. Humans, too, human existence is due to the five aggregates (good, tho, thought, consciousness) form and transfer the work to reason. Therefore, the rush is based on a saying when yet find clear tops of sources to come to the conclusion the only Buddhist Center is not convinced.

Buddhist philosophy is the massive system filled with these exquisite, science and mystery. Thus, when research on any one point of Buddhism also need to review in a comprehensive manner and meticulous, if not just to see the trees without seeing the forest, and not holding out are spiritual tenets in Buddhism, Buddha home when talking about the mind need to see that not all centers are literally the same. In terms of depth psychology perspective, Buddhism had active mental dissection humans into many different level floor (this than any of the science, the school of modern psychology, considering both width and depth). The humiliation of the delegation, chon Tam Tam, Lu coast, hope, achievement Center, the starting center, a weak heart, Crystal buildup United Kingdom or the mind, each floor that ranks with a qualified, with a certain human circumstances that center that respectively. Therefore, when speaking French idealist van, or tam about Idealist , we can't rush the shooting rules that Buddhism denies the existence of a world wrestling itself that need to determine when to say the mind creates is geared to the kind of mind would, to have the most thorough look of the Buddhist world view.

The term necessarily or great wall of France here is understood as all compounded and General General, including France are formed from the operation of the whole question of consciousness and conscious early virulent, the existence of which are from the heart. The mind here is not about the evil nature of man, nor is it a psychological state of man, which is the center of thought, disappointed. Should the United States Strictly in Buddha, all phenomena born kill DD u from mind thought that out, or this is the mind because s/he was born. Therefore, when saying the great wall idealistic French created does not mean denying the existence of the objective world. Moreover, when talking about the world then Buddhism has pointed out very clearly to us that, there exists the existence of the physical world- wrestling itself, the existence of which is not dependent on the consciousness and the will of the people. The world that exists and the impact on people through the activity of the senses and the personal appreciation of each person, but the activity of the senses in every individual is not the same as the same direction on the subject, symbolic objects that are formed based on many factors such as; level of clarity in the activity of the senses, the culture, the level of concept and approach of each individual. Thus, the same object that contains the view and analyze differences from that form the different theory leads to the never-ending debate. The Buddha has shown that, when people are still accept the player, with the craving of their world, then how do they build should, for as the best ham in the world, then they do not escape, take the money, then that world is subject to the provisions of the money, the differences that do accept and craving in the different levels. Therefore, "all of France is due to the mind created: mind mastery, mind the artifacts. If we say or do with malevolence, suffering will follow me like rolling wheels according to drag cows ". Or "all the French who created by: mind mastery, mind the artifacts. If we say or do with the mind, then happiness will follow him as the ball does not leave the picture " .
  

Buddhism had acknowledged the existence of a material world itself-the world, the free world a resource it is that, without the impact of any one foreign world. And there are a variety of other world is the world due the mind created this world, because the mind master, in the formation of it then the mind by charm born artifacts role but that is not all, that with heart charm born of human consciousness that direction look about the world purity , but do also accept and craving should not see the world as truth that create work for themselves the Bourn, this depends on the operation of the Centre.

Different philosophers i. Kant, while affirming the existence of the material world itself (the world is full of truth) but Kant that i. can't live experience with it which only experience was in the phenomenal world. Admitted pure world is real, exist in themselves, it is the world that not everyone experiences. But not people helpless before it, to live with the thing itself , they must have the condition (in fact human beings always live with it but accept the human craving and can't recognize it, that same guy as Prince in France) is people need to come back with a hybrid an his , returns with a pure mind. By just after her return to France of his body, the new man end to all disputes, the craving and thereby also off shackles bind people with the brain gauge, back with the mind, humans look about the world no longer being defined by the capability of the personal property , in which people live to the world that it is. The Buddha points out, this Bhaggava, this was taught, was declared to be false, is empty, is a lie, the thing was the Sa-Ba-la-Mon Mon, denouncing the mistakes for that: Sa-keeper Gotama and disciple of Sa-keeper Gotama walked the wrong way. SA-keeper Gotama declare that anyone when it reached liberation picket "purity" then see the world is "impure". But As was not declared as such. The dress that As Lai claimed is that whenever a privileged realm "freed, purity," he saw that the world is "pure".

So, when the terms of a may not be attributed to Buddhist is idealistic and unscientific. The findings of a task should be created the universe in science as confirmed the correctness of the Buddhism, the accomplishments of science that becomes the evidence to say that, what the Buddha has to say over 2,555 in but no discrepancies. END=NAM MO SHAKYAMOUNI BUDDHA.( 3 TIMES ).VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY=THICH CHAN TANH.THE MIND OF ENLIGHTENMENT.VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST NUN=GOLDEN LOTUS MONASTERY=AUSTRALIA,SYDNEY.29/8/2017.