No-self" and to "outlaw" reasonable?

             

Buddha says: 'Monks, what human identity, past, future, present, either internal or external, gross or subtle, inferior and superior, far or near, must be consistent with the right knowledge as truth as follows: "This is not mine, this is not me, this is not my self." 

Selflessness is the concept describes the nature of reality. By the wisdom of the Buddha clearly see the nature of all phenomena (Buddhist scriptures called the law) is selfless, that man and the world is not the nature (no fixed nature, inherent), Can not free (no specific entity, inherent, not himself survive), conditioned by birth (formed from many conditions, factors), heterogeneity (always in a state of change, become different from the previous ones). Therefore in man nor a self-employed butcher (has jurisdiction, incorrect use), without a soul eternal, immutable. This is the truth, the truth of reality, the world and man which the Buddha found by a surrealistic insight rather than hypothetical, is not what the Buddha by thinking and imagining.

Selfless reasons the Buddha made it very clear in doing anattà Lakkhana Sutta (Discourse on or trading year under the economic III Saṁyutta equivalent of No. 5 in the Journal A jaw):

I heard something like this: One of the Buddha in Sarnath (Isipatana Migandhana), Banaras (Benares).

At that time the Buddha told the five bhikkhus (this time the five men were ordained to the Buddhist monks called them) that: 

- Hey Monks, this identity is selfless. If color is down, the color can not lead to suffering, and can expect that my identity is like this, my identity is not like this. This Monks, because identity is selfless, so great and lead to suffering can not expect that my identity is like this or my identity is not like this. 

- (Tho, perception, consciousness, similar to that). This, monks, feeling, perception, and consciousness is not self. If feeling, perception, and consciousness is down, the feeling, perception, and consciousness can not lead to suffering, and can expect that feeling, perception, volition, my understanding is like this, and hope that life, perception, my knowledge is not like this. Because of feeling, perception, and consciousness is selfless, so feeling, perception, volition, consciousness leads to suffering and can not expect that feeling, perception, and consciousness of me like this, and hope that feeling, perception, volition , my understanding is not like this.  

- Hey monks, the monks thought how, color is permanent or impermanent?

- Buddha, is impermanent.

- What is impermanent is suffering or pleasure?

- Buddha, is suffering.

- What is impermanent, suffering and subject to variable necrosis, have reasonably affordable when the shop was: This is mine, this is mine, this is my self?

- Buddha, no.

- Life, perception, consciousness is permanent or impermanent?

- Buddha, is impermanent.

- What is impermanent is suffering or pleasure?

- Buddha, is suffering.

- What is impermanent, suffering and subject to variable necrosis, have reasonably affordable when the shop was: This is mine, this is mine, this is my self?

- Buddha, no?

Therefore, the monks, what mortal identity, past, future, present, either internal or external, gross or subtle, inferior and superior, far or near, must be consistent with the right knowledge as true as follows: "This is not mine, this is not me, this is not my self."

- What life whatsoever, nothing great, nothing issue, what form, past, present, future, either internal or external, gross or subtle, inferior and superior, far or near, must be as real as consistent with the right knowledge follows: "This is not mine, this is not me, this is not my self."

- Hey monks, in fact, the Holy multicultural boring disciples to form, feeling, perception, and consciousness. Due to the boring, he dispassion, dispassion as he freed. When he knew that liberation was liberation. In place of liberation arises: "I have been liberated." He knew: Students took advantage, dignity, succeeded, to do done, no longer come back to this state again.    

Bhagavan such theories, five monks followers happy life Bhagavan taught words. While this teaching is to say, five monks were freed of defilements, no attachments. 

First Buddha declared to us that each factor contributes to human (physical body and psychological) as form, feeling, perception, knowledge which has no certain nature, inherent (wealth sabhava), no separate entities, heterogeneous (when like this, such as other, are constantly changing, depending on the conditions changed karmic), which means sharp selfless, selfless life , great selfless, selfless acts and selfless form. Lust is the physical body, life is sensation, perception is perception (flashback function, compare, compare and sort the images that receive mode to experience, knowledge, put to the concept) , acts as willpower, behavior, habits-habits, consciousness is aware through the senses eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body and mind (like mirror images), each of these elements which are not may fall (sovereign, soul) in it, each component also is not self (identity not fall and no fall in it; life is not falling and there is no fall in it; perception, same form). By themselves, each component can not exist, but it exists only by taking on other elements (relational interdependence), itself has no ego, not the ego, hence the five elements to this (five aggregates or psycho-physical body of man) course selflessness. By the selflessness it very often, or it may say so ephemeral that it self. Impermanence and selflessness are characteristics of reality only. Impermanence is characteristic in terms of time or on a phenomenon, selflessness is characteristic in terms of space or in nature. 

From the "selfless" in Pali is "anatta", where "Na" means "no" and "Atta" means "down". Font Atta (down) means two things: 1. I, I (personal pronoun first person singular refers to himself). 2. Is a noun means: Nga (I, I), the self, the soul (usually longer invisible entity in each existing forever, an eternal entity, permanent invariable). When transmitted to Chinese texts, the translators translated as "non-self" (no self) or "non-self" (not down).

"Fall" here means masters, sovereignty or self, an immortal soul (still exist after man dies snap some religious concepts and beliefs), is a real can exist independently, invariant and have ownership, has jurisdiction. Buddha said "Lust selflessness" means no ego identity (without sovereignty, self, soul) in it, not the fall colors. Feeling, perception, volition, consciousness and self.

After declaring: "Hey monk, color (sensation, perception, and consciousness) is selfless," Buddha explains: Because "if color (sensation, perception, and consciousness) is down, then excellent (sensation, perception, and consciousness) does not lead to suffering, and can expect excellent (sensation, perception, and consciousness) of me is like this, excellent (sensation, perception, and consciousness) my not like this. This Monks, because color (sensation, perception, and consciousness) is selfless, so great (sensation, perception, and consciousness) leads to suffering and can not expect excellent (sensation, perception, and consciousness) I mean like this, expect excellent (sensation, perception, and consciousness) of me not like this. "  

Hop to the five aggregates (form, feeling, perception, consciousness) or the physical body and the human psychological element no matter how spiritual or no self at all. If identity (the physical body) have the desired intersection may not change color, turning septic (not bad, not old, not dead, not sick ...). Because no sharp fall in it, fall color is not so color can not desire such as this one or others. People can not desire ageless physical body, not living forever dead, ill health forever, always beautiful but not bad ...). Similarly, because feeling (feeling) is selfless, so life is always changing: the sad, the happy, the suffering, the happiness, the comfort, the discomfort and so on. 

Humans can not feel any desire exists forever or desire to feel happy fun joy without sorrow. The feeling appears depending on the condition of conditions, including relations with the other components of the body, physical and human psychology (the feeling appears, then survive long or short changed, these feelings to some degree also influenced the impact of the physical body, the perception (idea), the will (act), cognitive (knowledge). And the perception (idea), the will (act), cognitive (knowledge) is selfless, so they are always changing, no permanent immutable, can not wish them like this or like that other, also can not expect them to last forever without change.

Next Buddha: What is impermanent, suffering and subject to damage variable is not reasonable when the shop was of me, are you, are self or my soul. Form, feeling, perception, volition, consciousness is impermanent, suffering and subject to the variable damage, so be consistent: That was not mine, that was not me, that was not the self or soul dozen.

Finally Buddha asserts again: "All what color, what life, what ideas, what issue, what form, past, present, future, either internal or external, gross or subtle, inferior and superior, far or near, must be consistent with the right knowledge as true as follows: "This is not mine, this is not me, this is not my self." This being said, not only does not have the ego in man five aggregates, which in addition to the five aggregates man nor any self. Because "form, feeling, perception, knowledge or external, gross or subtle, inferior and superior, far or near so. are not of me, not me, not my ego ", this meant that: 1. Personnel five aggregates no self or soul is outside the body (Some people think have a soul, the self within the body but also the soul of people think, the self that may be located inside or outside the body, such as when people die, for example, then fly out soul body) 2.Tha's (other people, not me), other beings and all the phenomena are no ego, no self, no soul, all are also selflessness, impermanence (Myth normal that each person has a soul, a separate self, mammals too, of the phenomena, too, are calculated and separate. The Buddha said that such notions are false wrong, wrong with the truth, because form, feeling, perception, and consciousness are five factors that make up the beings and all the other phenomena, which form, feeling, perception, knowledge that is selfless, impermanent).

  

Later Buddhism Development (Mahayana) construct philosophical emptiness (not counted) developed theory of Evolution count (*), Radio selfhood that Buddha taught. Philosophy calculated No mention of "selfless person" (no-self in man) called Born's not or not and "selfless approach" (selflessness where the phenomena outside human-objective world and selflessness where the views, opinions, theories, ideological doctrine, the practice ...), known as the French do not. 

Buddhism Development said that the holy monk witness only arahatship selfless witness (who does not), no proof of selflessness legal (not legal), which should still see the practice, that is legal subjects gallows. Hence the need to continue to practice selflessness factual or legal. However if carefully studied and found this ridiculous point. Mind saints Arhat the heart of non-discrimination, equality, such as, no longer human, falls, tough, try then do have something found legal subjects or objective world outside oneself, ie that there I (ego) with reference to the measures, see I (a self-entity) exist separately from the law? The body he has proof of what the Buddha taught, was accomplished selfless wisdom: Matter, feeling, perception, consciousness is selfless, so how can he still say the measures approved (the organic law enforcement down, seeing a bogus unrealized selfless approach). The approach as just that form, feeling, perception, knowledge alone. The world of phenomena from physics to psychology, from the physical to the spiritual are not out of form, feeling, perception, consciousness (the five aggregates). 

Apart form, feeling, perception, wake up, nothing more. So when the Buddha said selflessness (Originally in business) was told that nothing's selflessness and self (Buddha said form, feeling, perception, and consciousness are selfless); Buddha said or Dependent Origination said human birth is not legal and not. Arhat is the results have totally liberated ultimate liberation, "to do done, no longer back this state anymore (not recycled back to this world again)" (Word of the Buddha says in primitive about Arahats results). The Arahat be called holy Buddha uneducated, because no longer need to learn more, he has done the job to do, an end unless all is accepted, crazy idea, make an end to ignorance or, not still samsara.

Precisely at the latter part of texts Anatta thoughts, Buddha also says: 'Monks, what human identity, past, future, present, either internal or external, gross or subtle, inferior and superior, far or close, must be consistent with the right knowledge as true as follows: "This is not mine, this is not me, this is not my self."

- What life whatsoever, nothing great, nothing issue, what form, past, present, future, either internal or external, gross or subtle, inferior and superior, far or near, must be as real as consistent with the right knowledge follows: "This is not mine, this is not me, this is not my self."

Thus was too obvious, when saints as true disciples right knowledge consistent with the following: "This (form, feeling, perception, knowledge or external, gross or subtle, inferior and superior, far or near, in the past, the present or the future ...) is not my (ta), not me, not my ego, "he was also accomplished selfless wisdom, or, to Buddha Teacher Development is evidence Prajna mind, then he no longer clinging rightly and no longer craving (boring, dispassion), he freed, "When he knew that liberation was liberation. In place of liberation arises: "I have been liberated." He knew: Students took advantage, dignity, succeeded, to do done, no longer come back to this state again ", this is similar to the Heart Sutra says," renunciation crazy fantasies , Nibbana ". END=NAM MO SAKYAMUNI BUDDHA.( 3 TIMES ).VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY=THICH CHAN TANH.THE MIND OF ENLIGTHMENT.WORLD VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST ORDER=VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST NUN =GOLDEN LOTUS MONASTERY=AUSTRALIA,SYDNEY.2/12/2015.