CHAPTER I.

1. the EXISTENCE of a REAL FORK (Puggalakatha) .

Dew point of debate: "EGO" is the concept in a constant and absolute reality.

Comments : This concept of two sets of envoys VAJJIPUTTAKAS and SAMMMITIYAS, referred to as PUGGALAVĀDIN (those who believe that the existence of an "intersection" absolute and invariant). In Tibet the business the "intersection" is mentioned by the word "HOMO"; in the Marvelous French organ, "intersection" is mentioned in the "PUGGĀLĀṂ " replacing "ATTĀ" and some other words just for the soul.

I.-THE EIGHT ARGUMENTS DISMISSED THE NOTION THERE SOULS

ARGUMENT 1

a) how to define the way arguments in part.

(1) the THERAVĀDINS .-"FALL" was the concept in the sense an absolute reality and constant possession?

Puggalavadins:- Sir, rightly so.

Th:-There are people, at the same time, the world was also like a real concept in absolute and constant possession?

P:-no Sir, can't say so.

Th: Please acknowledge the contradictions in his arguments.

-If the "intersection" is the concept in the sense of a constant and absolute reality, Sir, you should also say that people, together, also in the sense of a real concept in absolute and constant possession!

-Then his concept had been wrong, that is, (1) we say "FALL" was the concept in the sense an absolute reality and constant friendship song (2) we say man, of the same world, not in the sense of a real concept in absolute and constant.

-If the following point (2) is not accepted, you should not accept the previous point (1).

-Ðang accept previous point (1) in the meantime.

-Back to deny the following point (2), so He made a mistake in allowing argued.

b)-replying to question enemy turn by arguing the four sides:

(2) Puggalavadins:- There are "intersection" is not like a real concept in absolute and constant possession?

Theravadins: -Yes, Sir.

P:-There must not be such a notion, be viewed as an absolute reality and constant possession?

Th:-no Sir, can't say so.

P:-so please please keep argument refuted:

-If people don't get the concept in the sense of a constant and absolute reality, Sir, you should also say that things are not like that concept, should be viewed as a constant and absolute reality.

-So, the views of Him were wrong, i.e.: 1) we said: "people don't get the concept in the sense of a real constant and absolute property", which we did not) said "things are not like that concept, is not viewed as a constant and absolute reality".

-If the point (2) is not accepted, then Sir, you also may not accept the point (1).

-While accepting the point (2), doesn't accept the point (1), so He made the mistake of allowing argued.

c) How you the enemy by allowing four arguments that examined:

(3) Puggalavadins: (continued) However, if You think that we have to accept the point (1) States that "people" are not opinions, in the sense of a real constant and absolute possession, but we also have to accept the point (2) claimed that "intersection" is such a concept, are viewed as (any) a constant and absolute reality. What is he, who has agreed to key clause that it was available in a negative question, certainly will be refused with the following arguments:

-If (1) "intersection" is not an actual meaning niệmtheo in absolute and constant, right off You also have to say that (2) "intersection", too, not the concept as any one taken in absolute and constant possession.

-What He admitted was a mistake, that is the point (1) is accepted, but the point (2) is not acceptable.

-If the point (2) is not accepted, then the point presume (1) also cannot be accepted.

-Here, He said that the point (1) is accepted, but the point (2) is not accepted; This tells the fallacy in his reasoning.

d) applying the way the minor premise in 4 sides:

(4) Puggalavadins:- (continued) If this is a rejected argument wrong, then please look into placing parallel issues in the main point of Mr. So follow us, point (1) is true, but the point (2) is false. Here we endorse those propositions, so our main concern was not to refute the arguments of Mr. He rejected us, but anyway we do not deserve to be dismissed. According to your argument if accepted conclusions (1), then we must also accept the point (2), we can not accept the truth of the thesis (1); and he said that we were wrong because we are accepting the point (1), whilst denying the point (2).

e) argued in part 4.

(5) Puggalavadins:- (continued) do not, I repeat, our conclusions will not be rejected like that

-That is, the main thesis of us forced me to accept the point. "Investors can conception like that..." in his opinion.

-A statement by him to that point (1) of duplication with the point I was rejected (2) is false.

-Because if I refute the point (2) then I also refute the point (1).

-I have to approve both or reject both. Arguments refuted in his argument is completely wrong. On the other hand, I still hold the proper point in the way arguments are also rightly so.

ARGUMENT 2

a) contrasting arguments Way of 5 parts:

(6) Puggalavadins: -There are people not be conception in the sense an absolute reality and constant possession?

Theravadins: -Sir, Yes ... (Continues as argument (1), objected to the question and replace the word "not" concept by the word "Authorised" concept.

b) replying to questions v n back according to France 4 statements:

(7) Th:-There must be human conception in the sense an absolute reality and constant possession?

P:-Sir, Yes ... (Continue as in answer to question enemy retort of arguments (1, oppose the question and replace the word "are" concept by the word "not" concept).

c) How your doctor again by enemy argues 4 sides:

(8) Th:-However, if You think that we must accept the conclusion that: "FALL" was the concept in the sense of a real constant and absolute possession, but we also have to accept the point for that. Humans are such concept, as any one taken in absolute and constant in any other property ... (Continue as in the enemy as you argued four right-hand side of the argument (1) response, people asked, and replaced the word "are" concept by the word "not" concept).

d) applying the way the minor premise as the four sides:

(9) Th:-(continued) If this is a rejected argument wrong, then please look into placing parallel issues in the main conclusions, therefore, according to the us, then the point (a) is true ("EGO" are not opinions ...) and point (b) is not true (the same Procedure that he, not the concept...). Here, we have the clause so we have no interest in the rejected by him for our point.

e) How the conclusion follows the four sides:

(10) Th:-(continued) do not, I repeat, we do not deserve to be dismissed by the arguments he has used to try to deny our point ... Thus, arguments to refute in his opinion is completely wrong.

ARGUMENT 3

(11) the Theravadins: -There must be human conception in the sense an absolute reality and constant possession?

Puggalavadins:- Sir, rightly so.

Th:-There are people, anywhere, also be the concept?

P:-no Sir, can't say so.

Th: so please refute the arguments noted the following:

If the man is a real sense in the concept of absolute and constant, right off You also have to recognize that people, any where, are also the concept in the sense that! So He made a mistake when He recognized the clause (A) that deny clause (C). If (C) wrong, (A) is also wrong.

ARGUMENT 4

(12) Th:-people are a real sense in the concept of absolute and constant possession?

P:-Sir, Yes.

Th:-There are people always are such non-sense concept.

P:-no Sir, can't say so. (Continue as above, replace the word "anywhere" by the word "always").

5 ARGUMENTS

(13) Th:-There are people ... each component (in colors) was the concept as a real sense in absolute and constant possession? (Continue as above, replace the word "always" by the word "each").

ARGUMENT 6

(14) P:-There must be no human concept (the island of the 3rd argument) ... where any such non-sense (replace the word "are" concept by the word "not" concept).

ARGUMENT 7

(15) P:-There must be no human concept (the island of four arguments) ... always under such meaning?

ARGUMENTS 8

(16) P:-There must be no human conception ... in each component in the sense as such?

II.-THE SURVEY BY COMPARISON

Comparison with other realities: FALL

(17) Th:-people are a real sense in the concept of absolute and constant, and Colors (rūpaṃ) was also the opinion like that?

P: Yes.

Th:-there must be an Identity and human reality is a different reality?

P: no, can't say so.

Th: Please record the arguments refuted: If People and is a real sense in the concept of absolute and constant, like then He should admit Who and sharp are two different realities. He made the mistake of accepting the point before which negates the point after. If the following points are not accepted, then the previous point also cannot be accepted. Says that People and identity, both of which are real is the concept in absolute and constant, but both are not real are distinguished as well, then it's wrong.

(18-73) The way similar arguments apply as related to the absolute reality and 55 other constants such as:

Tho. Idea Onions Formula	The aggregates (Khandha) else
Label of origin Turkish origin Billions of Total loss of Of Colors of Gerald of Divisions of origin The position of Exposure of Italy made France made	12 Parishes (Āyatana)
Label, Turkish, Male, Body, sex Colors, Flavor, taste, Tactile, Gerald world Label, Turkish, Male, were killed, the body of knowledge about Italy world Gender consciousness France world	18 World (Dhatu)
Label, Turkish, Male, were killed, the body of rights Feminist, Male Power, network Identity rights Lost, suffering, Only, favor, permissions Credit, tons of Wisdom, to determine the rights, Concepts, Rights Prophet taste, of the right Tools, the right tri tri	22 right (Indriya) (1)

(74) P:-There must be no human concept meaning an absolute reality and constant possession?

Th: Yes.

P:-is this The World religion has ever claimed this "Chu Bhikkhu on stilts, has the action to navigate to benefit themselves..."? and there are excellent conception in the sense an absolute reality and constant possession?

Th: Yes.

P:-There must be a real Identity in human remains is a different reality?

Th: no, can't say so.

P: Please record the arguments refuted: If The World religion has said "there are people who act to benefit themselves," and if the Colors are the conception is a constant and absolute reality, Sir, so You have to accept and Who are two different entities. He wrong to accept the truth of the previous point that negates the truth of lu n points. If the Colors and who does not is two different reality then you can't say that The World religion determine the sentence on related to "FALL". So You were wrong in allowing argued.

(75-129) The arguments are repeated consecutively by each alternative in absolute and constant friendship is told in section (18-73) for the "COLORS".

Compare with those taken in by similar methods:

(130) Th:-SAC (which he admits) is the concept as a constant and absolute reality. Life is so concept is a real Identity in Life and is a different reality?

P: Yes.

Th:-There must also be the concept as a constant and absolute reality, like the colors also are such a concept?

P: Yes.

Th:-then there are Colors is a reality, and the People in the other?

P: no, can't say that.

Th: Please record the arguments refuted: If both hue and Longevity are the conception is a constant and absolute reality and the life and that two different reality, then said a transparent, if the person and identity, both of which are real is a concept in constant and absolute ownership then, Sir, can be seen as two different reality is equivalent to each other. In his opinion the pair acknowledged "Colors-Shou" first, but does not acknowledge the "Who-following", is so very wrong. If he does not admit the following folder, then You also may not recognize the folder first. And he made the mistake of allowing argued.

(131-133) A similar argument with 3 remaining Aggregates, replacing the Shou (Sac-Idea, Colors-Colors,-).

(134) the switch pairs in the five aggregates and arguments as in the (130).

The life and
And Colors

The life and Ideas
And Tho

And life span
And Tho

The life and Consciousness
And Tho

Idea, Practice, in turn being replaced for Longevity.

(135) the next folder in Each of 12-18 and 22 right also argued as the 5 Aggregates.

Labels of origin and Turkish origin
And the label Of

etc. the first pair is in the analysis of the Origin and the last pair in the analysis of the rights is:

Furnished tri rights and of voters rights
And Tool tri power

(136) P:-SAC (which he admits) is the concept as a constant and absolute reality. There are Colors is a real-life is a reality, and the other not?

Th: Yes.

P:-is this The World religion has ever claimed to "Have the action to his favor towards"? There has to be a real concept of Identity in absolute and constant possession?

Th: Yes.

P:-so there are Colors is a reality in the other?

Th: no, can't say that.

P: Please record the arguments refuted: If life and is the concept in the sense that a constant and absolute reality, which is Life and two different reality, then why "intersection"-A from The World-religion often use-and not as two different reality? He made the mistake of allowing argued. Mr. chầp received truths of real couples in the first, but does not admit the truth of the real double in Monday were analyzed. If You refuse from the truth of the second pair, then Mr Gong should not accept the truth of the first pair were analyzed.

(This point is complete as in the arguments section (3-16).

(137) the formula arguments (Cakha) for all the other reality. As Aggregates Of...-investors can deal in this section have been addressed in part (131-135).

The comparison by the method divides the 4 arguments:

(138) Th:-There are "People" is a concept in constant and absolute ownership?

P: Yes.

Th:-(i) So there must be the person Best?

P: no, can't say that.

Th: Please record the arguments refuted: If the comment is accepted as truth, then You must also accept the following point. If You do not accept is the Best, then You should also not admit, the concept is a constant and absolute reality. So You were wrong in allowing argued.

(139) Th:-you have to accept the point before. (ii) now, there are People (like concept) in Colors? (iii) or the outside Colors? (iv) in Or in person?

P: no, can't say that.

Th: Please record the arguments refuted: If really "FELL" is the concept in the sense of a constant and absolute reality, Sir, you have to accept one of three conclusions on. He will make mistakes, if not able to accept one of three conclusions on this point (such as where and Who are the conception of how), then Sir, you do not so agree, the first point is Who was the concept in the sense of a pedigree in absolute and constant.

(140-141) The formula arguments continue to apply to all "absolute reality and constant possession" in the contact with "FALL" ... Is this The life? ... There are Labels of origin is Who?

(142) P:-There must be a sense conception of absolute reality and constant possession?

Th: Yes, don't be such a concept.

P:-(i) So there must be the person Best?

Th: no, can't say that.

P: Please record the arguments refuted: If People don't get the concept in the sense of a real constant and absolute owner as he has claimed, then He should accept that and People are two of the same reality. If You do not accept the comment points out, you should not accept the point before ...

(143) P:-There must be a sense conception of absolute reality and constant possession?

Th: Yes, not conception.

P:-(ii) There are People in Colors? (iii) or the outside Colors? (iv) in or in person?

Th: no, can't say that.

P: Please record the arguments refuted: If People don't get the concept in the sense of a constant and absolute reality, Sir, you should accept that was the concept (in combination with Colors) as you have mentioned in the comments on the other points. If one of the points could not be accepted, you should not accept the first point.

(This section and the previous section was complete as in section (3-16)).

(144-145) The formula argument is applied to continue as has been presented in (140-141).

These features are combined

(146) Th:-There are "People" is the concept in the sense an absolute reality and constant possession?

P: Yes.

Th:-Who is involved? Is absolute? Is the owner or coast funny? Is immortal? or belong to the world? useful general or turn General?

P: no, this cannot be confirmed as such. (Continues as part (1): "Please record the arguments refuted. ").

(147) P:-There are "People" not in the sense of a real concept in absolute and constant possession?

Th: Yes, rightly so.

P:-is this The World religion has ever suggested that "there are people who act to benefit themselves..."?

Th: Yes, rightly so.

P:-then Who is involved? Is absolute? Is the owner or coast funny? Is immortal? belong to the world? Useful general or turn General?

Th: no, these things can not identify as such.

P: Please record the arguments refuted here ... complete as in section (2) and (3-16).

Clearly defined the meaning of the concept

(148) Th:-"Who" is the concept, and on the contrary, there must be joint main concept, called the new People?

P:-Who are the opinion, on the contrary, the main part being the concept, sometimes called "the JUNCTION", which when not called "EGO".

Th:-are you also want to determine that: there are no people there and when People don't get the concept?

Th: no, can't say that ... (continue as before).

(149) Th:-"intersection" is a reality or non-reality?

P:-is a real reality, by contrast, means there is no part called, People Who.

Th:-are you also want to determine further that: "People in the definition part is real, no part is real".

P: no, can't say that.

(150) Th:-Who have existing or non existing?

P:-who shall present, by contrast, in the present, there are people there, when not when.

Th:-There are problems in The present tense, sometimes, sometimes not available?

P: no, can't say that.

(151)-the sentence questioned were restored with the above concept.

(152) Th:-There are People in, or is non-reality? (continue to answer as the previous section).

(153) Th:-There are People present, and conversely, there must be the existence is not all People?

P: Yes.

Th:-could You replace the text "not available" for the word "existence"?

P: no, can not be.

The survey according to the specified mode (paññati)

(154) Th:-is called the "intersection" because that person has, and in the realms of gender identity?

P: Yes.

Th:-is called the "intersection" because that person has and in the Education World?

P: no, can't say that.

(154a) Th:-is called "the ego" do they have and in the realms of gender identity?

P: Yes.

Th:-is called "The Fall" by having them Exercise and in the Education World?

P: no, can't say that.

(154b) Th:-is called the "intersection" because that person has no identity and in the infinite realms of Gender Identity?

P: Yes.

Th:-is called the "intersection" because that person has and in the Education World?

P: no, can't say that.

(154c) Th:-is called "The intersection" because they have no identity and in the infinite realms of Gender Identity?

P: Yes.

Th:-is called "The Fall" by having them Exercise and in the Education World?

P: no, can't say that.

(155) Th:-according to Him, called "FALL" by the person and in the realms of Gender Identity, called "FALL" because that person has no Identity and in the infinite realms. So there must be people in the world's best and then reborn in the myriad Colors?

P:-Vậng.

Th:-is called the "intersection" because due to the infinite realms of birth Identity in beings up?

P: no, can't say that.

The sentence questioned were restored, replacing the word "beings" (Satto) for the word "EGO".

(156) Th:-apply the two concepts of "Body" (Kāyo) and "I" (Kāyam); There is no separate section on the meaning of the symbol and the root causes?

P: Yes.

Th:-is the concept of "ego" (Puggalo) or "soul" (jivo) applies without distinction, in the same sense, similar to the symbol and the root causes?

P: Yes.

Th:-There are other "Body" with "ego"?

P: Yes.

Th:-"soul" is a reality, and the "Body" is a different reality?

P: no, can't say that.

Th: Please record the arguments refuted: If there is a plan to put the match between the "Body" and "his", between "ego" and "soul", and "other" Body with "ego", Sir, you should also accept "soul" is different from "his".

He mistakes when accepting (1) the similarity between "Physical" and "his" (2) the similarity between "ego" and "soul" (3) the differences between "Physical" and "ego" while (4) denying the differences between "I" and "soul".

If You have the Government received in point (4) shall not be accepted to the point (1, 2,3).

He could not accept the point (1, 2, 3) while again denying the point (4).

(157) P:-is the concept of "Body" and "his" are applied to the body without distinction of meaning, similar to the symbol and the root causes?

Th: Yes.

P:-is this The World religion has ever claimed that "Has the action to navigate to benefit themselves..."?

Th: Yes.

P:-so there is "Body" is a reality and the "ego" is a different reality?

Th: no, can't say that.

P: Please record the arguments refuted: If there is a similar and consistent between the "Body" and "his", and The religious World has ever claimed that: "there are people who act so toward themselves. "then, Sir, like, You should also accept" the body "is a reality and the" ego "is a different reality. He had been wrong to accept two points top and turned the point (3). If you can't accept the point (3) should not accept the two top point (full as post (3-16).).

The surveys are continuing on aspects of regeneration.

(158) Th:-is the person or the transfer of souls born from this world to another world and from another world to this world?

P: Yes.

Th:-main switch souls are born from this world to another world, and from another world to this world?

P: no, can't say so. (continue as above).

Th: so then there must be a spirit move born?

P: no, can't say so. (continue as above).

Th:-If so, there are no other souls and spirits moved born?

P: no, can't say that.

Th: so did that other souls or spirits, or not that soul, not another soul moved born?

P: no, can't say that.

(159) P:-affordable wrong when saying that "soul moving from this world to another world and from another world to this world"?

Th: Yes, talk like that is wrong.

P:-is this The World religion has ever suggested that "when a man of birth and death 7 times, (1) then end the suffering for the paragraph to take advantage of the threads".

Are there such trading post?

Th: Yes.

P:-then certainly llinh spirits moving from this world to another world and from another world to this world. Again, there are The religious World have ever disclosure two photocopies that only I could this, "Chu, is the reincarnation stilts Bhikkhu. Dew point start can not clearly state for the birth certificate be ignorance veil, thirsty craving bondage to Samsara, " (2). Are there such trading post?

Th: Yes.

P:-so, certainly the soul switch b. was mentioned.

(160) Th:-There are souls moving from this world to another world and from another world to this world?

P: Yes.

Th:-main switch souls are born?

P: no, can't say that ... (continue as above)

Th:-I would like to repeat the question.

P: Yes.

Th:-are there souls after is humanity becoming Divine?

P: Yes.

Th:-is that becoming a tributary State favoritism?

P: no, can't say that ... (continue as above)

Th:-(I repeat the question). Did that person become Chu?

P: Yes.

Th: so He had been wrong to have that person become the the celestial or heavenly Chu Chu became, again, from the Client with other genius becomes from people become human, and the soul that is converted.

Certainly if the soul, not a soul else, move them and when to other worlds, then there will be no death, no observation of birth? There, there, there is the fruit of the action. But when the real friendly and professional achievements are results that He thought that move was born. So is misleading.

(161) Th: the main character-is the soul which transferred from this world to another world or from another world to this world?

P: Yes.

Th:-There must be someone's humanity, and then became the evening massage (yakkha), hungry daemons Devil (peta), hell beings such as Eagle, camels, cows, Buffalo, pigs, no?

P: Yes.

Th:-is that became the evening massage ... Buffalo?

P: no, can't say that ... (continue as above).

Th:-I repeat the question: is that became the buffaloes?

P: Yes.

Th:-But all of this is human beings then become Buffalo, or buffalo and become human again, when the humanity is completely different with the buffaloes, however He had been wrong to that soul which transferred.

Make sure that if the soul that when Prince in this world and reborn to another world, then of course there is no death, there is the observation of birth. Yes, there are the fruit of the action, but when real friendly and professional achievements, that He thought that soul main switch b. it is misleading.

(162) Th:-He says that there are spirits turning b. .. So are there who is King then became Mrs.-la-Mon?

P: Yes.

Th:-King also that She-la-subjects that also?

P: no, can't say that ... (continue as above)

Are there people who then became King, and then become lower?

P: Yes.

Th:-There must a person is King at their recently born?

P: no, can't say that.

(Replace the word King in Ba-la-subjects ... and continue as above).

(163) Th:-he has said that the main spirit that moved so man, Penguin or Penguin legs, amputated or both limbs, ears, noses ordered atrophy sufferers, people with amputated thumb and big toe, who was qifu gangui concessions, also back the situation as before? Or is the person that directed or glossy ibis fingers like bat wings just like before? or are people with asthma, diabetes, tuberculosis, leprosy, leprosy (leprosy), before also being so? Or the damn fool, la, pig, water buffalo, the same as before?

P: no, can't say that.

(164) P:-there are no mistakes when stating that "the soul which transferred from this world to another world or from another world to this world"?

Th: Yes, it is so very wrong.

P:-But when a person has certified project save, especially in the realms of the human and Divine realms in natural regeneration, there are people he no longer ranks attend the save?

Th: Yes, it is still Expected to save steps.

P:-If the person is reborn in the celestial Contingency level is still a vassal state in the world, Sir, is certainly a useful reason to say that "the soul which transferred from this world into another world ... "

Th:-based on the theory that You give that person reaches Attend witness save when Prince in the humanity and then reborn in the Chu, there are political soul that moved from this world to another world from another world to this world in the same way?

P: Yes, rightly so.

Th:-A person who attended the save so when born into the world to the heavenly Divine also?

P: no, can't say that.

(165) Th:-main switch souls are born from this world to another world or from another world to this world?

P: Yes.

Th:-There are people not born different transfer is still available?

P: Yes.

Th:-If one hand amputated, legless ... If a sick person ... If a person is a species of beasts, then are they bullshit like in before?

P: no, can't say that.

(166) Th:-main switch souls are born?

P: Yes.

Th:-is the soul which transferred their own identity with students?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-(think again) is that soul main switch b. with colors?

P: Yes.

Th:-is the soul and the body are the same?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-is he moved with tho, with Ideas, with onions, with Consciousness?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-(think again) There are people born with Knowledge transfer?

P: Yes.

Th:-is the soul and the body the same?

P: no, can't say that.

(167) Th:-as you say, if the transfer of souls born ... Have to go soul born not with Life, not with Sharp, Thought, and Knowledge? (Because if no 5 then no human Aggregates).

P: no, can't say that ...

Th:-(think again). Not with Colors ... not with Formula?

P: Yes.

Th: so there is a real soul in the body longer is a different reality?

P: no, can't say that.

(168) Th:-according to Him, the transfer of souls born. ... There are also Outstanding transfer students?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-think again.

P: Yes.

Th:-But there are also souls which is the same as the body.

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-is tho, Thought, Action or Awareness also moved.

P: no, can't say that ...

Th:-think again. There are moved born?

P: Yes.

Th:-But there are also the soul the body itself?

P: no, can't say that ...

(169) Th:-so, according to Him, the transfer of souls born ... without the five aggregates are counting on turning born?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-think again.

P:-well, they moved.

Th:-then there must be a real soul in the body longer is a different reality?

P: no, can't say that.

(170) Th:-If the Fall was ruined when the aggregates, half-melted. That's a conclusion that the Buddha is often claimed. Also if there Fall ruined when the aggregates are destroyed, half-melted then Fell as the market oscillations (Often Biased).

III.-METABOLISM:

Continue the surveying of metabolic processing aspects.

(Translation: this chapter largely talk about How Your comment, so from here the word "soul" means the person, even though the letter more personal, ego is used with equivalent meaning in the psychological survey).

(171) Th:-is the new Identity defines constraints on the lady who?

P: Yes.

Th:-There are Colors is impermanent, vi, by charm born? They must be destroyed, dissolved, change, become unconscious perception?

P: Yes.

Th: so, there are people who also have all the features like?

P: no, can not i n the like.

(172) Th:-Or have to do slash on tho, Idea, new inventions, defines the person.

P: Yes. (Each of the aggregates are arguing keep as above).

Th:-there must a list aggregates would also be useful microbial, impermanence, because charm born?

They must be objective ruined, decayed, change, become unconscious perception?

P: Yes.

Th:-There are people who also have all such features?

P: no, can't say that.

(173) Th:-He says that "due to the new identity defines who built Lady. So are green Lady (nila) new inventions to the green "?

P: no, can't say that ...

Th:-Or have to slash colors yellow, red, white, visible or may not be, whether or not new resistance resistance mode defines the gold ... non resistant?

P: no, can't say that ...

(174) Th:-is the new Life by Lady prepared to people?

P: Yes.

Th:-is-life friendly Lady built by new defines people friendly?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-I would like to repeat the question.

P: Yes.

Th: so, is there a friendly life result, Hy results, stylishly, lost the happiness, the peace?

P:-No

Th:-I would like to repeat the question.

P: Yes.

Th:-But there must be people friendly also have allergic reactions such as Shu?

P: no, can't say that.

(175) Th:-If the new Life by Lady prepared to People, have to do real-life friendly new lady mode defines the real charity?

P: Yes, rightly so.

Th:-is the real-life charity have results and result possible Hy, possible, impossible, to deliver the suffering?

P: Yes.

Th:-But there are real friendly people also have allergic reactions to any such friendly fruits Shu?

P: no, can't say that.

(176) Th:-If a new invention by Life Lady defines who shall have to do countless new Life Lady mode defines The unconscious sign?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-I repeat, there are countless new inventions by the life Lady signed defining The Infinity sign?

P: Yes.

Th:-is the endless Life is impermanent, vi, by charm born? There is this Life was ruined, half-melted and changed?

P: Yes.

Th:-is the sign also has all the properties?

P: no, can't say that.

(177) Th:-is due to a lady in three other aggregates-Ideas, new inventions, defines the person?

P: Yes.

Th:-(survey of aggregates) are defined by the Formal friendly new lady built out of people friendly?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-is there a friendly form results, results, able to bring to the Club, Hy happy and at peace?

P: Yes.

Th: so, there are people who also have a friendly result like?

P: no, can't say that.

(178) Th:-He says that, because the new Protocol (Duchess) defines processing People. So there are real Knowledge goodness built by Lady new defines the real charity?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-(I repeat the question) have to do any processing that Protocol (Duchess) defines The real charity?

P: Yes.

Th: so there are real Knowledge goodness by the result and the result is he possible, possible Hy, possible, bring the pain?

P: Yes.

Th:-is any friendly People also have results like that.

P: no, can't say that.

(179) (survey of disabled sign also argues the same as above)

(180) Th:-should have said that the owner (1) . (Can see), because the label Lady?

P: Yes.

Th:-should have said that when the label kill the owner killed?

P: no, can't say that ...

(Pairs are applied for four parishes and Italian origin).

(181) Th:-should have said that The deviant comments by Lady Deviant comments?

P: Yes.

Th:-should have said that when you kill the ants Ant flaps Flaps were destroyed?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-again, should have said that a portion of the Bowl Ties the Lady to the destroyer leaders she was?

P: no, can't say that.

(182) Th:-Likewise, there must be the Chief Lady opinion, Chief Justice thinking ... The Chief Justice fixed modes that the Chief Justice opinion ... the Chief Justice not to?

P: Yes, rightly so.

Th:-again, when a Director would destroy the legitimacy in the bowl then he was also Director genera Lady?

P: no, can't say that.

(183) Th:-There is a new invention by Life and Lady out of people?

P: Yes.

Th:-so there is a new invention by the lady he defines two aggregates The stamens?

P: no, can't say that.

Th: there must be defined the mechanism-or The second due to slash and aggregates in the three remaining aggregates (Sac-Idea, Colors-Colors,-) or to the team by relying on the five aggregates?

P: no, can't say that.

(184) Th:-is due to Atrial, Label of new lady prepared to People not

P: Yes.

Th:-so there must be two of Lady then defines The binary mode?

P:-(continues as (183) with twelve parishes).

(185) Th:-is due to gender, new Atrium label Lady prepared to People not

P: Yes.

Th:-so there must be two world's Princess mode defines The second?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-is due to relying on world label or any other world in 18 world invention defines The right?

P: Yes.

Th:-could called 18 by 18 Lady about?

P: no, can't say that.

(186) Th:-is due to the right Atrium and the right Label Princess new inventions out of people?

P: Yes.

Th:-so there must be two rights on the Lady then defines The binary mode?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-is due to relying on the label right or any other rights of the 22 that defines rights of people?

P: Yes.

Th:-could called the Princess power by 22 to 22?

P: no, can't say that.

(187) Th:-is this due to a lady that aggregates defines The depth?

P: Yes.

Th:-so, there are certain constraints into The quarter finals due to relying on 4 aggregates?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-again as he has admitted in the previous question, there are certain institutions into The Team by taking refuge due to the 5 aggregates?

P: no, can't say that.

(188) Th:-There are only the best in recycling by 1 aggregates?

P: Yes.

Th:-so there are called The five because of the rebirth with the five aggregates?

P: no, can't say that.

(189) Th:-Due to excellent lady that defines People like Lady on that tree by defining tree? And by relying on new crops processing intentions out the tree's shadow, both the tree and the tree's shadow is impermanent, so there must be a new Identity defines constraints on the Lady and are both equally hue and is impermanent?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-there must be a real identity in the Best fitted by relying on that plan, being a different reality, just as a tree is a tree-and reality by relying on that tree are specified in other ch?

P: no, can't say that.

(190) Th:-is due to the new Identity defines constraints on the Lady Who, like the Lady in the country built by new rural people out? and if so have the right Colors is a reality, and Who is a real country-like the other is a reality, and People in other country?

P: no, can't say that.

(191) Th:-Or is this Newt as well in the United Kingdom, and the King is a different reality?

P: no, can't say that.

(192) Th:-Examination of the road is not the way the warden but warden is in the examination of the road is a reality, and the owners had the same colors? According to which Street clinic is a reality and the warden is a reality, there must be a real identity in the identity property is a different reality?

P: no, can't say that.

IV.-THE CONSCIOUSNESS:

(193) Th:-are prepared by each Person defines suicide na mind?

P: Yes.

Th: so there are from when a person born, old, terminal illness and death and then reborn as well by each survey na the mind?

P: no, can't say that.

(194) Th:-When a police Center in the process na mind being kicked, there are no mistakes when it says that "Suicide is the second heart close na na Center for monitoring other mind or an observation Center of na na"?

P: Yes, it's wrong.

Th: so-na second birth Center survey when kicked, there must also not wrong to say that "such is the male or female that is".

P:-this one could say so.

Th: Please record the arguments refuted:

The second contentious at COP who initiates, na if not to say that "the key is the first Center or na survey is a survey of other" na Sir, also can not say that when the police launch which contentious second mind na said that "such is the man" or "such is the woman". According to him, the problem before was not accepted but embraced the following problem, which is a mistake. If the problem cannot be accepted, not accepted the following problem. While He denied the issue which again accepts other problems, so He made a mistake in allowing argued.

(195) As himself, would be wrong to say that when police who run the contentious second na "it is suicide first or close to na na". So there should not be said to be with a close mind as such, which is na male or female, divine Lady of Holy, humanity or ranks or Chu?

P: Yes, it can. ..

(Continue to complete as part (194)).

V.-ACTIVE FORMULA:

(196)-there is no mistake to say that the soul and the People are like a real concept in absolute and constant possession?

Th: Yes, that is a mistake.

P:-There must not be the case when a person finds identity, meaning that their identity by saying that he found it best by what it means?

Th: Yes.

P:-But if so, definitely can say that Person was the concept in the sense an absolute reality and constant possession?

(The question was continued with the 4 remaining forms).

There are no circumstances when a person knows a thing, by the meaning of that, then that's you know that by itself the meaning of it? If so, then surely we can say that the concept is a real sense in absolute and constant.

(197) Th:-There must be a real concept People in absolute and constant.

P: Yes.

Th: so there is no case of a person who can't see colors by the sense of identity that he does not see that colors so by the meaning of it.

P: Yes.

Th:-so, then also means that people who are not in the sense of a real concept in absolute and constant.

(The same question was continued with the 4 remaining conscious and aware).

(198) P:-there is no mistake when saying that Someone is a real concept in absolute and constant possession?

Th: Yes, that is a mistake.

P:-is this The World religion has not been that.

-This "Chu Bhikkhu on stilts, with plain label, Superman. We see the life and death of beings. We value wisdom that, they lower people, beautiful people, topping guys, guys, the bad luck, misfortune are happy career " (1)

Are there such trading post?

Th: Yes.

P:-so, there are certainly People to be a real concept in absolute and constant possession?

(199) Th:-Lord protected his point by citing The words of world religion, have the right for that reason that he has determined that the person was a real concept in absolute and constant possession?

P: Yes.

Th:-with plain label, Superman, The World saw the respect and You also see people or the soul?

P:-He saw.

Th: so, is this is the best? Are the colors which are birth and death? And there are Colors which depending on the almond industry?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-I would like to repeat the question stated above.

P:-you see people.

Th: so who is the Best? There are People, such as the scenery is green, yellow, red, white? There are people who are perceived by the scenery? The contact with the label? There are people who go into the direction of the label?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-I would like to repeat the question above.

P:-The World ton saw both.

Th:-so there are both is scenery? Both are gender Identity? Both are blue, yellow, red, white? Both are perceived by the scenery? Both contact with the label? Both went on to reveal the brand leaders label? Both death and rebirth according to almond industry.

P: no, can't say that.

VI.-CAREER

(200) P:-There must be real friendly and professional career still available?

Th: Yes.

P:-is both the creator and the person instigated to create real enterprise friendly and industry still exist?

Th: no, can't say that ...

(201) Th: – postulation and industrial enterprises have any friendly still present, are you accept that someone created and who incited to create real enterprise friendly and professional as well as the present?

P: Yes.

Th:-so does when creating the enterprise known as the creator, or when tempted, then known as the person who incited, both still available?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-I would like to repeat the question.

P: Yes.

Th: but if a person creates karma and karma that belonged to other people, then there is no end to the suffering, no paragraph, no member of the President?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-If any friendly business and industry still exist, there are people who create career and who instigated the industry's existence?

P: Yes.

Th:-There are people present and the creator or instigated to create the career that also present?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-I repeat the question:-If there are any industrial and business friendly ...

P: Yes.

Th:-There are existing nirvana so people have created Nirvana and instigated people to create Nirvana?

P: no, can't say so. ...

Th: again, if the support also like him, there are existing local dynasty, who created great people and incited to create great, still available?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-or the ocean? Or mountain Tu-di, water, fire, air, grass, jungle existence? There are people who create things and instigated people to create things he also present?

P: no, can't say that.

Th: again, if anything the industry friendly and industry still exist and create the same people still exist, the solicitation is the career she is a reality and create career and who incited is a completely different reality?

P:-Not to say so.

(202) P:-results and real business friendly businesses still exist?

Th: Yes, the truth is like that.

P:-so there are people who enjoy the fruits of the industry's present?

Th: no, can't say so. ...

(203) Th:-acknowledge both the problem is truth, so there are people who enjoy the fruit is also creator of the industry?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-I would like to repeat the question.

P: Yes, it is exactly the same.

Th:-If the creator is the person entitled to the fruits, then there is no end to the suffering, the paragraph, and the reincarnation of the endless Member President?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-again, acknowledging both the problem is truth, so there are people who created the current industry and who enjoy the fruits of people's existence?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-There are existing Nirvana, and who enjoy the fruits of Nirvana are also present?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-Or have the ocean, mountains of water, fire, Tudi, air, grass, jungle existence and who enjoy the scenes she also present?

P: no, can't say that ...

Th:-Finally, there are the fruit of karma and the career of any charity is a reality that people enjoy the results is a different reality?

P: no, can't say that.

(204) P:-is happy the Sun is present?

Th: Yes, rightly so.

P: Yes, there are people who enjoy the happy realms are also present?

Th: no, can't say that ...

(205) Th:-you said that both issues are reasonable, so there are people who enjoy the happiness he still exist?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-I would like to repeat the question.

P: Yes.

Th:-If someone created and who enjoy the results so there is no end to the misery, the reincarnation or the thorough passage the President?

P: no, can't say that.

Th: again, the problem is both reasonable, there must be people present and who enjoy the fruits of people's existence?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-If that both happy the Sun and enjoy the happiness people are present, there are existing Nirvana and who enjoy the fruits of Nirvana are also present?

P: no, can't say that.

Th: again, if there is acknowledgment as above, there is the ocean, great location ... the grass tree, dense forest present then who enjoy the scenes she also present?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-happy realms of heaven is a reality and people enjoy happiness is a different reality?

P: no, can't say that.

(206) P:-happy human existence?

Th: Yes.

P:-There are people who enjoy the happiness of humanity as well as the present?

Th: no, can't say that.

(207) Th:-There are both happy humanity and who enjoy the happiness of humanity as well as the present?

P: Yes

Th: so, there are people who enjoy the happy stuff available?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-I would like to repeat the question.

P: Yes.

Th: so if someone created and who enjoy fruits such as the present, there must not be the end of the paragraph, not take advantage of the reincarnation and the President?

P: no, can't say that.

(The dialogue was continuing to complete as part (205) about happiness heaven realms)

(208) P:-are suffering in the realms of suffering still present.

Th: Yes.

P:-There are people who bear the suffering still present?

Th: no, can't say that.

(209)-are you endorse both this problem?

P: Yes.

Th: so, there are people who endure the suffering still present?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-I would like to repeat the question.

P: Yes.

Th:-If there is ngườitạo and who enjoy the fruits of this, there is no end to the misery, the passages make the reincarnation and the President?

(Continue to complete as part (205-207))

(210-211) Th:-are suffering in the hell still exist?

(Continues as complete part 204-205-207)

(212) Th:-There must be real friendly and professional career still available? And who created the industry's existence? Who instigated to create the industry still exist? And who enjoy the result's still available?

P: Yes.

Th:-There are people who create career just as people enjoy the fruits?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-I would like to repeat the question.

P: Yes.

Th: so there are happiness and suffering due to his self created?

P: no, can't say that.

Th: so in this acceptance He still agrees with the conclusion of my first point, there must be other creators with people that enjoy the fruits?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-I would like to repeat the question

P: Yes.

Th: so there are happiness and suffering by others created?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-As the admitted in the first point, have to do that and others create career, is that besides others enjoy the fruits?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-I would like to repeat the question.

P: Yes.

Th: so there are both happiness and suffering are due to his self created or created by others?

P: no, can't say so. ...

Th:-But his acknowledgment in the first point, there is not due to the people that create and enjoy the results, or is not due to one person created and others enjoy the fruits?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-I would like to repeat the question.

P:-well, not that person, and also not by two different people.

Th: so there are happy and not miserable because of his self created, nor generated by others?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-Finally, as acknowledgment of the first point, that is, in any industry and business, as well as the creator, who instigated the current still. I would like to ask You more about 4 further issues:

There are people who create career also affect results?
There are people who create career and who enjoy the result is two different people?
Are they the same as one or two different people?
Are they not the same as a, nor are two different people?

(He answered every one is) "Don't" (But I repeat the questions He answered) "well" I would ask him to add 4 more sentences:

There are happiness and suffering created by yourself?
They do other people created?
There are own created and developed by others created?
There are both not by themselves create and not because someone else created?

(And he is) Do not ...

(213) P:-There are existing business?

Th: Yes.

P:-is the person who created the current industry?

Th: no, can't say that.

(214) are both career and who created the current industry?

P: Yes, rightly so.

Th:-is the Creator who created the current industry?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-I would like to repeat the question.

P: Yes.

Th:-so, if someone created and the Creator who created the current industry, cóphải without the cessation of suffering, the birth, the thorough passage the President?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-again, because he voted for both in the first argument, is that both people and the Creator who created the industry still exist?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-Or are there Nirvana and the creator of Nirvana? Or the great venue ... thick forest and the creator of ... thick forest still exist?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-Or is this a reality and create a different reality?

P: no, can't say that.

(215) P:-is the fruit of industry still exist?

Th: Yes.

P:-There are people who enjoy it also present?

Th: no, can't say that.

(216) Th:-so, are you still maintain that there is the existence of both, and people enjoy the fruits?

P: Yes.

Th:-are there people enjoy the fruits and the Creator who enjoy the fruits?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-I would like to repeat the question.

P: Yes.

Th: well, if people enjoy the fruits and the Creator who enjoy the fruit, there is no end to the misery, the front piece of birth or the President?

According to Him, there are both the result and the person entitled to the fruits, so there is a real and who enjoy a different reality?

P: no, can't say so. (complete as above).

VII.-SPIRIT through CAPACITY(survey of people on mental aspect).

(217) P:-there is no mistake when it said that "People are the conception in the sense an absolute reality and constant possession?"

Th: Yes, so is misleading.

P:-so there is no person capable of culture by the mental capacity?

Th: Yes, Yes.

P:-If so, Sir, it's very useful when saying "Who are its opinions in the sense of a constant and absolute reality". Again, there are no who the Turkish pine, Tha mind, Student network, the label, and Smuggled to capitalize?

Th: Yes, Yes.

P:-If so, Sir, it's very useful when saying that "People are the conception in the sense of a constant and absolute reality".

(218) Th:-make sure that there are people capable of culture by the mental capacity, is it because the main reason of that which He says that "People are the conception in the sense of a real constant and absolute property"?

P: Yes.

Th:-There are people capable of culture by God then that person who, while not having the spirit through changes then why not?

P: no, can't say that ...

(The same landing problems continue with 5 spirit communion has been counting on).

VIII.-THE INTERROGATE FROM THE TRADING POST.

(219) P:-there is no mistake when saying that "People are the conception in the sense of a real constant and absolute property"?

Th: Yes, that is a mistake.

P:-There are no people would be called mom?

Th: Yes, Yes.

P:-If so, Sir, very useful when saying that "People are the conception in the sense of a constant and absolute reality". Again, there are no people would be called my father, no person would be called siblings happy Offense ranks, She-la, merchant, agriculture, slavery, spice, ranks, Chu heaven, humanity?

Th: Yes, Yes.

P:-If so, Sir, very useful when saying ". .. as the constant on the ... property".

(220)-Th: sure, there's the mother, the father, there is for that reason that You believe that there is an ego (human)?

P: Yes.

Th:-are there people not previously was the mother and later became a mom?

P: Yes.

Th:-There must be someone who is not, after becoming the new?

P: no, can't say that.

(These same questions are questions with "father", "mother" ... "Heavenly Divine .... Mankind "and answering as well as on).

Th:- Make sure that the owner's mother, is because of that reason that "People are the conception in the sense of a real constant and absolute property"?

P: Yes.

Th:-are there who formerly was the mother and later no longer are parents again?

P: Yes.

Th:-There must be someone who is before then is no longer the person anymore?

P: no, can't say that.

(These same questions are questions with "father", "mom" ... and how the answer as well as on).

(221) P:-there is no mistake when saying that "People are the conception in the sense of a real constant and absolute property"?

Th: Yes, so is misleading.

P:-so there is no real would like is Projected to save (who were each the first Saints, the way out)?

Th: Yes, there are degrees of Projections.

P:-If there is such a reality (Project level), then Sir, certainly very useful reason to accept the first premise. Again, there is no a real would like most hybrids, Any future steps, steps A-la-lưởng Han border freed, steps A-la-Chinese Wisdom freed, DAC hull number-by freed, by Chief Justice Ant release, through the rescue? by credit action freed?

Th: Yes, there are degrees.

P:-Sir, so sure very useful reason to accept the first premise.

(222) Th:-make sure that there is a real Project is saved, there is reason that you claim that "People are the conception in the sense of a real constant and absolute property"?

P: Yes.

Th:-the Project is not saved before, and now the Project level?

P: Yes, Yes.

Th:-the guys before who then now?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-again, make sure someone is there to save, Projections ranks thus that He confirmed that someone before the Project is saved, and then later is no longer the Reserve ranks to save again?

P: Yes.

Th:-There must be someone who is not and who is now?

P: no, can't say that.

(But the question interrogated with other, and replying to same as above).

(223) P:-If as you say, have the wrong for that "People are the conception as constant ..." there are no such concept was accepted as Four double (4, and four fruit), Eight of them (result)

Th: Yes, there are four Luu Eight of them.

P:-But say that, certainly very useful reason as saying that "People are the conception in the sense of a constant and absolute reality".

(224) Th:-make sure that there are four pairs, Eight of them, are key for that reason that He agreed the first premise?

P: Yes.

Th:-is due to the appearance of the Buddha that has four Luu Eight they appear?

P: Yes.

Th:-is due to the appearance of the Buddha which people appear?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-I would like to repeat the question.

P: Yes.

Th:-so when the Buddha entered Nirvana, there are "People were destroyed, so that no human entity existence?"

P: no, can't say that.

(225) Th:-He said that "People are the conception in the sense an absolute reality and constant, so there are people who are owners of micro (condition) do not"?

P: no, can't say that

Th:-who is micro?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-who are not both owners and wuwei (non owner, Africa wuwei)?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-I would like to repeat the question.

P: Yes.

Th:-is in part vi, part-ownership wuwei, also other third part rotation?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-I would like to repeat the question.

P: Yes.

Th:-but The World religion has not been declared "this Chu Bhikkhu on stilts, there are two types. What are the two? Useful microbial World and micro-world. Such is the sexes ".

Are there such trading post?

P: Yes.

Th:-If so, certainly the wrong when saying that "There is a part owner, is in part vi, and added another part is the third rotation".

(226) Th:-(continued) are you saying that people say that Africa, African ownership and wuwei? So there are owners of micro, wuwei, who are the different reality?

P: no, can't say that ...

Th:-are the aggregates is a useful microbial, Nirvana is the wuwei and is non-owner, Africa wuwei?

P: Yes.

Th:-are the aggregates, Nirvana and the three totally different reality?

P: no, can't say that.

(The last two questions are applied to each separate Aggregates-good, tho, Thought, consciousness).

(227) Th:-is the person's apparent engenders, the ruined and the family head who's clearly not?

P: Yes.

Th: so, who is the owner of the micro?

P: no, can't say that ...

Th:-The World religion once claimed: "this Chu Bhikkhu stilts, compounded micro has three special features: Leanne engenders clearly, the goal ruined the clarity and the family head is also clear." (1)

From here, if that's also owned three, then who is also compounded micro? There are three special names are not obvious in Person?

P: Yes, they are not clear.

Th: so, there are people who are unconscious behavior

P: no, can't say that ...

Th:-The World religion once claimed: "this Chu Bhikkhu stilts, France had three names: wuwei-the engenders is not clear, the goal ruined not clear and the family head was also not clear". If all this, as he says, not be owned "People" it is so.

(228) Th:-Who entered Nirvana, there is the existence of Nirvana or are people not present in Nirvana?

P:-the existence of nirvana.

Th:-so there are people who have a member who is President of the school fixed?

P: no, can't say that

Th:-There are people who entered Nirvana and not present in the Nirvana, then destroyed?

P: no, can't say that

(228a) Th:-People taking refuge on the status of the genus that are sustainable?

P:-sustainable People are making to property (Bhavạm)

Th:-is (the status of) ownership is impermanent, vi, being led by Princess charm, being disintegrates, fragmented, no longer being destroyed, lost, changes?

P: Yes.

Th:-who is also impermanent, vi, engenders do charm, Lady being disintegrates, fragmented, no longer being destroyed, lost, changes?

P: no, can't say that

(229) P:-there is no mistake when saying that "People are the conception in the sense of a real constant and absolute property"?

Th: Yes.

P:-There are no people who would are outlawed, then also know we are outlawed pit?

Th:- Well, there's you.

P:-If so, Sir, certainly very useful reason as saying that "People are the conception in the sense of a real constant and absolute property" ... and if a person is subject to the framework we're liable to know life expectancy. Do you agree this kite?

Really very useful reason as saying that "People are ... constant owners..."

(Same with infinite life sign-Africa tribe African suffering).

(230) Th:-I noted what he has endorsed. There is reason that you still believe that (Who was the concept in the sense an absolute reality and constant possession? "

P: Yes.

Th:-so, there are people who are outlawed, are outlawed pit they called, and who would not know then not called people?

P: no, can't say that.

Th: you deny this in cases of life and life span infinity sign?

P: Yes.

Th:-are you still awake because of the concept that voters should "be the conception in the sense an absolute reality and constant possession?"

P: Yes.

Th:-so there must be a real club life in and the form he is a true Prophet in the other?

P: no, can't say that ...

(The interview responses continue the same with life and life span infinity).

(231) P:-He refused to "Who is the concept in the sense of a real constant and absolute and finite". An affordable then no visualizations in the trunk?

Th: Yes, there's you

P:-Or there are no visualizations in the life expectancy, the mind in the mind, or the French in French?

Th: Yes, there's you.

P:-so, Sir, make sure that the arguments about the human person is the owner.

(232) Th:-make sure that there are people who are gathered on Satipatthana, did for that reason that He said that He is very useful when the concept of the human body?

P: Yes.

Th:-There must be called when People contemplate and not be called when no visualizations?

P: no, can't say that

(234) Th:-There are people who are a real sense conception in absolute and constant.

P: Yes.

Th:-is The World religion has not been declared.

"This Mogherajan,
Look at life is empty.
Always keep mindfulness.
Spit up fall options.
So beyond death.
Look so displaced
Death is not seen. "

Trading post must really have? (1)

P: Yes.

Th:-so then very wrong when saying that "People are the conception in the sense of a constant and absolute reality."

(235) Th:-here the visualizations?

P: Yes.

Th:-Person visualizations with Colors or Shades apart?

P:-with Colors.

Th:-There are lists and user be completely different?

P: no, can't say that

Th:-But if the visualizations in addition, there is a completely different list with relatives?

P: no, can't say that.

Th:-(please ask) are visualizations?

P: Yes.

Th:-Person visualizations life feeling by sense organs or outside the senses?

P:-They contemplate using the senses.

Th:-then as the body?

P: no, can't say that.

(236) P:-there is no mistake when saying that "People are the conception in the sense of a constant and absolute reality".

Th: Yes.

P:-is this The World religion is telling the truth, People say, right, speak true, no errors, no ambition?

Th: Yes.

P:-is this The World religion has ever claimed that "someone's actions geared to benefit themselves," must have real business article?

Th: Yes.

P:-so, be sure that person is the concept in the sense of a constant and absolute reality.

(237). Again, there are The religious World has ever claimed that this "Chu Bhikkhu stilts, a person appears in life, the appearance that brings happiness to the majority, for the majority, because compassion for life, for the benefit, for happiness, for peace and for the human and Divine..."? (1)

Are there such trading post?

Th: Yes.

P:-If so, certainly the person who is the concept in the sense of a constant and absolute reality.

(238) Th:-is The World religion has been that "all of France is falling." Are there such trading post?

P: Yes.

Th:-If so, then the very wrong when saying that People are a real sense conception in absolute and constant.

(239) ... Then again, The World religion has ever claimed that "she had no doubts, no pause, no one else on the coast, here is the thing. So as such, Kaccāyana, is the Chief of this voter opinion " (2). Are there such trading post?

P: Yes.

Th:-and so, truth is wrong lầmkhi says that "People are the conception in the sense of a constant and absolute reality".

(204) ... Again, there is Bhikkhu-stilts-ni Vajira has not been answered with such Evil.

"Why are people saying all the time.
Sees two-digit beings.
This affordable evil
People fall into deviant comments?
This reformed.
Beings are formed.
As the parts together.
The name of the car are speaking up
Also Aggregates together
Colloquially known beings.
Only the gauge was contentious.
Miserable existence, suffering.
In addition to suffering is not something being
In addition to suffering, not removal ". (3)

Are there such trading post?

P: Yes.

(241) Th:-again, have to Respect Author Ananda did not ever ask The religious World: "the world is empty, is not empty. The White World, so being told to. So how, the White World Religion, known as the empty world? " And there are The religious World has ever responded that "because of that, this is not the world, Ananda ego, and not in the ego, should the world be called inane. And what's this, Ananda, is not ego and not in the ego? Eye, this is not the ego, Ananda and not in the ego. The colors are not the ego, or not in the ego. The label is not the ego, or not in the ego. The label is not the ego, or not in the ego ... Due to the Italian coast, starting up the life feeling nothing, lost, suffering, or Africa, non-miserable life, he has no ego or not in the ego, and because of that, Ananda, there is This ego or not in the ego, should be called inane is the world "...? (1)

Are there such trading post?

P: Yes, so true horror article.

(242) th.-again, because He confirmed that "People are the conception in the sense of a real constant and absolute property" and we all know about the true ... of The World, there are The religious World has ever declared: "this Chu stilts, if ego Bhikkhu then that belongs in the fall? Or if something belongs to the ego, you have no ego? " In both cases, the men are answered "Yes Sir, rightly so, Bach World religion". But there are two: the ego and the ego belongs to get noticed in a way like the real thing and it's something no school? Then, have the opinion accept that "this world is also there, that I was there". After death we will become another person immortal, immortal, not change... "? (2)

Are there such trading post?

P: Yes, the article has truth as such.

(243) Th: again, The World religion has ever claimed "there are three, Leniya, this class is found in the world. What are the three? The first Catholic class prepared to fall is real, sustainable in this life, and then don't. The second Catholic class prepared to fall is real, both in this life and firmly to Ben's life after the ... the third Catholic class not prepared to fall is real, sustainable in this life, this life and sustainable future "? (3) There must be an economic post?

P: Yes, there is such a crap article.

Th:-is this The World religion has said about the proposed outdoor pot?

P: Yes.

Th: so, someone made the pot Ho theme?

P: no, can't say so.

Th:-... Finally, there are The religious World also talk about oil pot, the pot of honey, sugar, milk, ... bowl of rice, porridge pot?

P: Yes.

Th: porridge pot-that the school exists, eternal, immutable?

P: no, can't say so.

Th:-If so, definitely very wrong when saying that "People are the conception in the sense of a constant and absolute reality". END=NAM MO SAKYAMUNI BUDDHA.( 3 TIMES ).VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY=THICH CHAN TANH.THE MIND OF ENLIGHTENMENT.WORLD VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST ORDER=VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST NUN=GOLDEN LOTUS MONASTERY=AUSTRALIA,SYDNEY.29/1/2016.MHDT.