Chapter I (continued)

2. The SABOTAGE LEFT the FRUIT A-LA-HAN(Parihānikathā )

Dew point of debate: A A-la-Han can sabotage left fruition A-la-Han.

Comments: Because there are a number of passage such as This "Chu Bhikkhu on stilts, has two legal contacts to your Necro left of the Bhikkhu stilts are practice (1). There were five French stilts Bhikkhu schools of this contact to the ruined city of the absent from Bhikkhu stilts (2)" . Should a few denominational ministries such as Sammitiyas, Vajjputtiyas, Sabbattivadins and a couple of the sect in the Mahāsanghikas for that A-la-Han can result from A-la-Han. In this point, the Theravadins have posed these questions to questions to break the mistakes of the concerned Ministry.

I. -THE APPLICATION OF DEMONSTRATION:

(1) Th:-his notion that an A-la-Han can sabotage left fruition A-la-Han is synonymous with the recognition of the following: 1) the position he can sabotage left regardless of any place; 2) regardless of the time; 3) all A-la-Han likely ruined the taste results from the A-la-Han; 4) Locate A-la-Han likely ruined the taste results not only from A-la-Han, but also ruined the left all 4 results of 4; 5) like a fake head of wealth, if the ranks lost one of the four memory material, also still called fake Minister ranks, and if losing all four memory material, then this person is, according to him, will not be called fake Minister ranks.

II.-REACTION THEORY FOR BY COMPARING THE SCRIPTURES:

(6) If an A-la-Han can actually sabotage the Holy three-tiered fruits lower. -Real hybrid, hybrid and Most Save-is also likely to be absent from duty and the corresponding results also ruined the left as such.

(7) If an A-la-Han can sabotage left the fruit, and only retained the next lower, then in the same left ruined likely happen to the three results are low and if the position is Expected to be absent from duty effects save only is divine.

(8) If an A-la-Han can actually sabotage the fruits, who was admitted that had the paragraph to take advantage of the many afflictions than any one Saints property would, certainly also will be absent from the destructive results of equivalent property. Why deny the ability to sabotage left for the Saints (9-13) but accept it only with A-la-Han?

(14-20) If an A-la-Han can sabotage left fruition A-la-Han, who have reached the Holy Bowl, about noble Satipatthana, Quartet Principals need, iddhipada, Active, Active force, rather than spending the sense of Interior property, then why reject from the latter-day Saints can actually sabotage the result property?

(21-32) Similarly, if the four Soles: gauge, Episode, kill, A position that Administrators-la-more evidence of Han meets three result property, then why only the result tastes A-la-Han dynasty was actually vandalizing?

(33) He could not endorse the position A-la-Han, who take advantage of snippets and craving all the negativity bind another, can actually sabotage fruition A-la-Han, and while it still refuses that, Projections ranks who are dedicated, Body paragraphs can also sabotage left effects save, also rejected the other property , the ranks have been skeptical of the endless passages, the banned player, Ai, and Si (the evil), the degree to which no longer reborn into four evil leader back can actually sabotage result property.

(34) the same, you deny that ranks For lai, who take advantage of the Body paragraphs of opinion, skepticism, the banned player, strong Ai and rough yard can sabotage the most ripped off.

(35) Similarly, you deny that Any future ranks, who take advantage of the piece of fuselage, Skeptical, the banned player, craving and leave international can also sabotage left results. Any hybrid.

(36) Or admit Any hybrid ranks can actually sabotage the fruits, but cannot save Project ruined the ranks left, or.

(37) Most hybrids could not be ruined.

(38) Similarly, the most acknowledged hybrid can sabotage left the fruit, but the save project ranks cannot be absent from the destructive results.

(39) on the contrary, He could not attend the level concept that Liu, who take advantage of the Body paragraphs of opinion ... could not be absent from the results, meanwhile, for A-level la-Han, who take advantage of snippets and craving all the negativity, that You said that this level can actually sabotage the fruit A-la-Han.

(40-44) Similarly, could you just have a kind of concept in the Holy four floors could not be absent from the destructive results. Meanwhile the other Saints can actually sabotage their fruition?

(45) You accept all, the virtue of chastity in a tier A-la-Han: who has "Ðoạn take part in, cut off from the roots, make like tree trunks Tala, make impossible to present, make impossible to reborn in future start" (1) and also take advantage of the piece was all the rest as : Si, falls ...

(46) Who has food poisoning, Satipatthana, Quartet Principals need, iddhipada, Active, Active force, Sensory Loss.

(47) who "depart, depart, depart Si", "Who did what to do, put down", "ultimate victory", "cut the binding in the Huu", "people who have been freed by the Enlightenment," "people have filled up the River, down the side of the falling flag CU, spit," "people have profound suffering, take advantage of the Emperor Set piece food poisoning symptoms, Destroy the Roman Empire, the Emperor Dao achievement "," who was clearly the most significant French clear taillight lens, paragraphs make all France deserve to take advantage of the French Enlightenment, paragraph value for food poisoning symptoms, and improve the legal value for hone ". So, how can You possibly claim that an A-la-Han can sabotage left the fruit A-la-Han?

(48) as far as the arguments of his argumentation, the only "steps A-la-Liberation era of Han", then ruined the left result A-la-Han, also the "A-tier la-Chinese Africa liberation period(1) " does not sabotage left the fruit A-la-Han.

(49-51) I ask again, there are steps A-la-Liberation era of Han, who make the paragraph all negativity, who are mature in the liberation leaders, who expressed the French Enlightenment contact A-la-Han, has ruined the taste results from the A-la-Han?

(52-54) As he has acknowledged, steps A-la-African liberation era of Han, people gathered and expressed the French Enlightenment, not sabotage left the fruit A-la-Han. If you were admitted as for A-level la-Han during the rescue, who have all the morals, like the A-tier la-Chinese Africa forecast freed then this rank would not have ruined the taste results from the A-la-Han.

As such, very clear about symptoms reaches the A-la-Han, oil by food poisoning syndrome would also not be the sabotage left results.

(55) He can cite the A-la-Han would have ruined the taste results from the A-la-Han? Affordable Mr. Sāriputta? Or Mr. Moggallanā? Or Mr. Kassapa? Or Mr. Kaccayāha? Or Mr. Kotthita? Or Mr. Panthaka? With all the time, You recognize that that may not have ruined the taste results from the A-la-Han.

III.-PROOF FROM THE POST:

(56) He says that an A-la-Han can sabotage left fruition A-la-Han. But The World was ever religious dogma.

"Ug sa Mon preaching.
The high and low pathways
But to the other side,
No two roads
Yet shalt not think,
This sugar is just one "? (2)

Are there such trading post? Like He was in the wrong.

(57) ... Again, there must have the snippet take negativity reincarnation? There are The religious World has not been the theory that "People would take advantage of the paragraph was to take part, done what to do, no longer the reincarnation, cut the binding and no longer regenerate"? (3)

(58) ... Again, the point of You imply the redo what was already done. But this cannot be for steps A-la-Han is, because there are The religious World has not been that.

"The Bhikkhu stilts Kat
Investors can get.
No substances containing employment
You do not have
Like a stone Foundation,
Not been wind shake.
Likewise the whole diocese,
Colors, Taste, Sound, Aroma, Exposed.
France craving, craving the impossible
Not so dynamic,
Mind, no implications
The consistent option destructive destruction. " (4)

So there is no redo what was already done.

(59) S.V. S. M.:-according to him, the concept of we are (4 sectarian) is misleading. But there are The religious World has ever suggested that: "this, Chu has 5 stilts Bhikkhu France brought to the fallen for Bhikkhu stilts have proven time release. What is the year? Preferred work (body), fancy talk, preferred to sleep, not overpower, the disclosure in the eating ". (1)

So an A-la-Han can actually sabotage the fruits.

(60) Th:-but the steps A-la-han has delighted in France? If You deny, how she ruined the ranks left results are? If You agree, You have to recognize the ranks of A-la-Han is still dominated and bound by desire. This, of course, Mr. from abstaining.

(61) If an A-la-A-flavor fruit actually ruined the Han-Han, as he says, he still ranks dominated with or pitch or Deviant comments, with the releases of such schemes, saying further steps A-la-Han sui was still dominant hypnosis. If I ask him, steps A-la-han have also contained a substance in seven French custom hypnosis. (Craving, anger, Ego, Deviant, skeptical, craving, ignorance) or not? Of course you must refuse.

(62) Or if in the ruined the left result, according to him, he still ranks craving, believed to have souls, skeptical about banning offense.

(63) in fact, He admitted that an A-la-Han no longer contain substances, non-destructive, also did not take advantage of the paragraph also does not let go, don't let go of the release, nor binding, does not disperse well not clumped, which is just east of things no longer made career only.

So be sure not to say that "A-la-Han can sabotage left the fruit A-la-Han." (2)

3. SUBJECT MATTER LIFE HAPPY OFFENSE (Brahmacariyakathà)

Dew point of debate: No Offense lives on the Chu.

Comments: Living happy Offense (Brahmacariyavāsa) has two meanings: enlightenment of ethics and Credentials. Chu Thien do not gather the following form. But top form hinders them, except Chu Thien in the realms of the unconscious thought. But a couple of the sect as Sammitiyas, do not believe that the Gnostic results for Chu Sex world and the realms in the heavenly realms is higher than the Gender Identity and gender identity.

(1) Th:-you deny gathered life Violates on the Lettered, however He also deny they have the disadvantages of physical, spiritual or moral such as: some of the Chu Thien, then the moron, dumb, deaf, dumb, foolish, dumb people's language (gestures with hands) and can't afford to realize the meaning of the words would nice or bad far away. They are people who lack faith in Buddha, France, Increase, they could not hear The mantra That religion preaching can not raise the question (to the paragraph except skeptical) excited about the wedding, parties, the answer of him, which created the obstacle to the others due to their actions, due to negativity obstacle course , due to the result of the action. They have no faith, no purpose and wisdom, are not likely to find the path (Sammattam) by the charity thing. They killed my mother, killed my father, murdered the Holy Buddhist blood shots, ranks, broke the harmony Increase. They are contentious surveillance, theft, deviant sex, hope, thoroughly evil, evil, evil sâøn, and guns and ties the evil ants.

(2) on the other hand, He also said that Chu also bias the practice and have the virtue in contrast with these. So, why do you say that in the Chu Thien Hanh Pham lives there?

(3) Sammitiyas:-He kept such stance, presume he will deny that Chu Thien practice renunciation, abandoning the family, even medicine, bring the bowl, qifu gangui Chiping away, He also abstaining from the appearance of a Fully Enlightened Buddha or Buddha the Enlightened or independent from the two Australian Ðệ of The World have no respect on the Chu. So then where would life have happy Offense?

(4-7) Th:-we all agree that there is no such bias Lettered virtue as the gia, even medicine, bring the bowls, but are happy Offense life found only in places where these things are appearing (the family, bring a bowl ...)? And there is no happy Offense lives in the places where things don't get done? He said that the only places that have happy Offense life but when I asked, "does anyone have the new life export Violations, and no spice, then no Offense life happy?" ... Then you don't agree.

(8) again, He said that the only place where that appears new Buddhist Followers are happy Offense life, also where do not have schools of Buddhism appear then that there is no eternal life happy Offense? He hesitated in answering. The religious World of birth in Lumbini into Scouting under the Bodhi tree Zhuan Falun in Banares. There are in places that have happy Offense lives what others don't?

(9) I put a question about the contacts with the Ganges River Valley, where the gíac enlightenment of Buddha and independent from Chu

(10) in Magadhese, where there is the appearance of two Australian Ðệ.

(11) S:-you assert that violations of life are gathered in the realms of Chu, but He still denies that the celestial realms invisible idea Chu with.

Th:-This is just something that we have just mentioned and declined just as is the case in the human realms, where it has a life of Piracy, but in the place there are those benighted Savage, no confidence, no religious beliefs of male and female renunciation renunciation.

(12) S:-When it comes to the life of Piracy on the Chu, He said that "There are realms, there are no realms". So there are both this appears in the Chu heaven infinite ideas and this article both appear in the realms of the unconscious Bias and Lettered in both this appears in the Chu Huu Genius idea? If not, where would have happy Offense, where life does not have?

Th:-happy Offense life only appears in the Chu Huu Bias idea.

(13) Th-you acknowledge that happy Offense lives only in the realm of humanity.

S:-Only in some areas only, while other places don't have.

Th:-you want more broadly affordable that in local border where only the people sold, where no religion, no friendly female, also credits southern life-happy Offense? If not, how can you let that Offense life be gathered everywhere? Where in the human life happy Offense?

S:-Where the Ganges River Valley, not where the border of the prefecture.

(14) S:-But there are The religious World has ever declared: "this the Bhikkhu stilts, in three respects. The human species in Jambudika (Match match) winning than human Vengeance in the realms of Uttarakuruca (cu Luzhou) and Chu Thien in the Sun thirty three (Dao), what are the three? They are heroes, there are position and live happy Offense in this lifetime "? (1)

Are there such trading post? There are business article that doesn't say that, without life-happy Offense in the Chu?

Th:-is The World religion has not been declared in Savatthi: "here, life Offense be gathered"? And there is a statement that says that only in new life Savatthi Offense, while others don't have the Date, or life?

(15) again, Any future steps, who take advantage of the paragraph in "unlawful use" part Down, but not yet the paragraph in "upper part", when Prince used unlawful "here" and rebirth "in it", where the results of the career he's being run: "there" and just there, Mr. concept like that. So, how can you refuse the life from the Offense on the Chu?

(16) When Any such hybrid ranks a reborn "there" (NET Christian realms) "in which", the then most recent are burdened down, "in which he" clearly completely miserable spectacle, "in which" new paragraph excluding all smuggled or, and "there" new emperor, removal clear taillight food poisoning the market. So You explain what when that "no happy Offense life in the heavenly Divine"?

S:-because "here" (the human kind), then food poisoning symptoms, the longer the Holy "there" (NET Christian realms), then enjoy the results.

(17)-If You accept any future steps to enjoy the fruits "in which" by "syndrome here," then You have to accept the Save Project ranks entitled "here", by way of evidence "in which" (heavenly Divine realms). Similarly, You have to admit the most futuristic entitled "here" (the human kind) by proof of "there" (heavenly Divine realms).

Again He gave that Honor ranks save enjoy the fruits "here" by evidence "here" then You must also accept Any future Ranks entitled "there" by evidence "in which". Then again, He must also accept the most futuristic entitled "here". Therefore, you must accept the same with Any hybrid ranks entitled "be there" by evidence "in which".

(18) If You claimed that a Real hybrid tier member President in the world, reaching A result Director-la-Han in the pure land, will make the paragraph without leaders with evidence of contraband or, then You must also accept for a practice to enjoy the results of Projections, results For hybrid or A-la-Han.

Again, if You claim that a practice level to enjoy the results of Projections, results For hybrid and A-la-Han, and pirated or the paragraph, then you must accept for Real quadratic case, who was a member the President in this world and the privileged direction results A-la-Net Christian realms in the Han.

(19) He admitted that Any future ranks, when reborn "in which" did the work to be done in my lifetime, then the Offense He also must admit that ranks A-la-Han also reborn from this world to another world and from another world to this world within samsara. Of course He denied this. Then again, He could not recognize the virtue of a Real hybrid ranks and deny this ranks could not "put the full burden down" when he is reborn "there" (Net Christian realms), then you must accept he ranks must be set to Gnostic credentials the burden down.

(22) Similarly, any presence in the life of any other violations of reach's real future ranks, who have to reborn the last time, in which he ranks spectacle of suffering, Emperor chunk take contraband or, clear lens removal, food poisoning symptoms the cuu campus, He said that the need to gather evidence to reach A result la Han leaders (in the realms of heaven as Qian Chu Chu).

On the other hand you implicitly give that any future completely self in, not have to gather more (because he said that in the Chu Thien Hanh Pham lives there).

(21) S:-As the deer wounded by arrows, though it has run far, also were down because of the pain, also seemed to like that, any future steps, by Gnostic credentials "here" will result "in which".

Th: I painted Ocean injured by arrows, though it has run far, finally are down because of the pain. But there are degrees of Any hybrid, when using the "here" and enjoy the fruit "there", have endured the pain by the arrow as the deer?

S: no, can't say that.

4. SUBJECT MATTER of PURIFICATION (Odinisokathā)

Dew point of debate : Gathered impurities exclusion gradually (1) (partial)

Comments : This concept of Sammitiyas and some other factions, they said that when the Save and the Expected level of other Scriptures through meditation, enlightenment reached the Emperor Emperor, the gauge ... Exclusion of negativity has gradually, meaning that a little time i m.

(1-4) Theravadins:-as you said, You have this concept because when a people gathered to Honor them this evidence ranks, food poisoning, the Emperor Emperor chunk, gauge take three fucking end is opinion, Skepticism, About banning the same contact 3 fucking end. Moreover, this level of removal, Director of ethics, also exclude three fucking end and the contact.

But, You should also acknowledge the things He does in part level, abstaining from the Reserve ranks, part No, a part prove Holy enlightenment, then contact effects save, did not part, part futuristic furniture store with contact ... Attend tam lai, Liu Liu, also the second part shall not (1) a full belief section where Buddha, France, increasing, and part is not.

(5-8) Again, as You say, when a practice they rank results For lai, the spectacle of suffering Roman Empire, Roman Empire, Set this level eliminate rough, rough and floods a portion of the contact. More like an emperor, Emperor Dao Removal is also the other barrier segment and a portion of the contact.

So You should also acknowledge the things He does in part Ranks-abstaining from the ranks For lai, did not part, a part of them, a prime witness Into the world, and part is not.

(9-12) Again, as You say, when a practice to show the fruits of real suffering, profound set of hybrid, this segment take Steps be craving, subtle, and part of the contact. Furthermore, this evidence ranks food poisoning Kills God, the Emperor Dao, also other barriers make the paragraph and part of the contact. So You should also acknowledge the things He does Rank refuse the Holy part from the ranks of any hybrid, also not part, a part prove food poisoning, a privileged witness to the Holy World, contact Any hybrid fruit, did not part, part, the Saints In Any grade. Being the State Anything done, Any State, Any State, possession, In Any Complete (2) longer part is not.

(13-16) Again, as You say, when a practice to show results A-la-Han, Emperor and Imperial gauge lens clear, this paragraph ranks take Ai, Ai Invisible Colors, Fall, Launched the same ignorance and secluded part of the negativity, moreover this evidence ranks food poisoning Kills Emperor chunk also, leaders and take the obstacle course and a portion of the contact.

But you also have to admit-the things He declined the stepped part's ranks-A-la-Han, also the part did not, in part, the evidence of food poisoning, a privileged witness, to the Saints of the ranks A-la-Han, while the other part is not far off, in part, be, Si, part "done what to do", "put down" , "ultimate", "achieved the certificate of breaking are all tied up in the property", "biased", "tri-liberating spit the drains fitted CU, lower the flag falls", part spectacle of suffering, take advantage of the food poisoning syndrome, Set piece Removal and complete practice of ethics, through what it takes to make the piece smoothly, what it takes to make the paragraph development, what needs to be developed, the perception of what should be aware of, and part is not.

(17) Sammitiyas: -But if for my concept is not useful, why The World respect back that "little by little and little by little, the intellectual who purifies its own pollution in each of the surveys, like the grinding of his Golden mast trui silver? (1)

Are there such trading post? This article does not prove the concept is useful?

(18) Th:-But has The World ever respect that:

"Her Position thanks to the full
With Chief Justice initiatives throughout
So there are three French,
Investors can also completely abandon
Comments and body or
About banning the player nor
For the four fallen,
Completely free " (2)

Are there such trading post?

(19) again, The World religion has not been that:

This "Chu Bhikkhu stilts, when France label structure ceiling glass-discharge arises with Saints Ðệ, the position he knew the French would sire must be destroyed. Because the spectacle of French, this ranks radically paragraph three fucking end: Dear comments, skeptical and banned "? (3)

Are there such trading post? Therefore, you should not assume that a person who gathered for the gradual purification.

5. SUBJECT MATTER pollution PURIFICATION (Jahatikathà)

Dew point of debate : Divine Lady (4) eliminate the craving and anger.

Dew point references : This concept of Sammitiyas that a human wife testifying reached meditation, Holy Roman Empire understands and tr into a Real future, purification is craving and anger while he is just a human wife.

(1-2) Theravadins: -that a person purifies are craving and anger as divine. Due to the purification, purification, this person forever, no leftovers, except take the original and corruptions, craving purification by Holy, Holy purification by Dao, purification by France real estate, purifying while food poisoning symptoms result Any hybrid. This He must be rejected.

If You replace the word "purge" by the word "compressed" Ðè I also argued as on, and he also refused.

(3-4) A practice to show Any future results, he meets purification, then ride throughout the path of practice-on this point we agree. But there are human wife, too? He also rejected (not least I)

(5-6) But if You apply the word "purification", "compression Ðè" (in the sense of his limit), for the divine Lady, You must also apply for degrees are practiced to show Real results.

(7-8) By the way would (or any vehicle) which He said that the human wife of purification is craving and anger.

Sammitiyas: -By the way evidence reached the world best meditation (1)

Th:-is the path that made human beings take birth death round escape reincarnation, taken to Holy enlightenment moral syndrome? The way that the filter be Pirated or Unlawful use hypnosis-Options-the slopes of the Craft-be System-Ace-be-Boc Liu (2), have done clean are pollution and negativity?

On the other hand, there are avenues which could not achieve the purifying the polluted? Can you concept about the way that the human wife of purification is craving and anger?

(9-10) You agree that the road be gathered to clear Any fruition hybrid lens also has such characteristics. But you should also accept that the road depending on Colors also have qualities like (because he claimed by that route, human wife of purification as Any future steps of purification). But He acknowledged that the path to the contrary? So, by the similarity in the way of reasoning, He should find the opposite qualities of leadership are practiced by Any future steps (because he claimed the road Ranks real lai went to the food poisoning symptoms as human).

(11) He said that a human wife alive with the craving, just when food poisoning the Emperor become Holy in any level. Why not add to the fruit A-la-Han? Why just stop here?

You also accept that a person is practicing project saved for hybrid hybrid, at the same time, the DAC 3 equivalent results at the same time, and there is a combination of 3, 3, 3, 3 Life, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3 determine the Rights (of the 3).

(12) Or if this person is not privileged to be the fruit of real hybrids this way, by the way, that this unit reached fruition? Are you for that "by its leaders Real lai"?

However, You refuse the third guy to take advantage of snippets from the end-trunk, Skeptical, About banning Prime-subject to any future leaders. You must accept that human (because he no longer denies the other way that human craving and make the piece the wife, although for that to be The World religion claims that by "Dao attended the third guy she ends up, be purged".

(13) again, He refused to Rough and raw anger craving be purification by Any Director. But you must admit that, because there is The World of each religious dogma that "Results for lai is privileged by the reducing the craving and rough"? (3)

Following along with the acceptance of evidence reaching the four emperors of the divine Lady, You are still required to accept, though for Him from abstaining, a people when food poisoning symptoms are the four emperors, at the time, the Administration also achieved results in any position.

(14) S: But if my opinion was He denied, The World religion has ever claimed that "in the past, there are six Catholic position has the right to strip the ball, with introspection, this purification is the nủa and with the anger from abstaining, they escape the constraints of grid Craving and they gave birth to the world of Brahma. The disciples of this Catholic position 6 as well... " (1) . Are there such trading post?

(15) Yes, but The religious World has ever suggested that This "the Bhikkhu stilts, Sunetta direction, no network so long life, long live as such, but not freed from birth, death, and old sorrows, bi, suffering, favor, brain. I say: not yet freed from suffering. Because why? Because of that not yet enlightened, can not enter (Appativedhā) four France. What are the four French? The Bhikkhu stilts, because not enlightened, can not enter the Holy world, because not enlightened, can not enter the Saint; because enlightenment cannot enter the Holy wisdom; because enlightenment cannot enter the Holy freed This, the Bhikkhu stilts, the event is as follows: when the Saints about to be enlightened, to be able to enter; When certain Holy enlightenment to be able to enter; When Holy wisdom to be enlightened, to be able to enter; When the Saints get enlightenment, be able to enter to be cut is the owner, the rope brought to birth property (bhavanetti) are sections, not recycling ". (2)

Are there such trading post? If there is, it's not logical to say that "The Divine Lady of purification is craving and anger".

6. SUBJECT MATTER ALL EXISTING FRANCE (Sabbamatthītikathā )

Dew point of debate : All of France are all present in a way.

Comments : This concept of Sabbatthivadins, due to disputes on the passage "would be the past, present, future ...", all France's past, present, future (being run along with the aggregates, of life and personal experience) remained in the State, and therefore all France continues to the present.

ADJUST THE ÐỐN NOTION OF TIME ABSTRACT.

(1) the Theravādins: -Mr concept that "all" are available. Consequently, he will be more trouble in acknowledging the other, such as:

All are available everywhere (in the body), in all the time, in any way, in all the General, no mixers status not available, also called existence. The Chief Justice, under his false nhìa way back Holy Deviant comments, as well as the present.

(2) again, taking all the time, are you asserting that the past as the present, the future existence and currently also available. But the past was not lost, that is over, has changed, has vandalized, has completely ruined the pepper? So You say about past existence? Again, there are hybrid position is what engenders, yet not to, yet, not yet, not yet happened, yet the goal ruined? So You say its future existence?

At present, as you acknowledge, as the present and what is currently not yet destroy lost, yet difficult, yet fragmented, not yet, not yet changed, yet the goal ruined, yet completely objective. And the past Sir also retained, so the past was not lost, not yet been dispersed.

Then again, He said that the existing current, meaning that what is currently being, are coming, are going through, showing off, going, are goal ruined; and its hybrids, according to him, as well as the present, so the hybrid unit are also being, is to come, ... are objective.

Then again, He said that the past the present and the past has destroyed death, were dispersed ... was totally objective. And we at present, so the present also destroyed death, have also been dispersed ... has also completely objective.

Then again, He said that existing hybrid and the hybrid location yet less than engenders ... yet the goal. And currently available, so not currently engenders, yet to come ... not objective.

(3) have to Sharp the past still exist? He agreed but if You describe this Identity by words like "lost," "destroyed has ruined", "Hill" replaced, "has completely ruined the target", You can talk about the Colors of the past as the present? Best hybrid taste similar, is "not yet born" ... Colors can be told how the existence?

If say: colors in existence, which means colors at has not been vandalized, ... and pepper if Brilliantly the past still present, means that colors the past yet was ruined ... And if the colors in the present, means the current Identity engenders, is becoming, ... and if the existing hybrid unit Colors, which means Colors are also engenders hybrid position, is becoming ... Then again, if say the colors the past as the present, which means he has lost, the destroyer identity first tan, and if said that the colors in the existing colors in has also kill death, has also dashed, ... And if saying that existing hybrid taste sharp, sharp means hybrid position yet engenders, and if said that the current Best available yet also engenders.

(4) apply the same reasoning for one of the four other aggregates-tho, Thought, consciousness.

For example, if say that Consciousness the past as the present, which means this has destroyed death, dead, and if said current existing Form shall also mean the current Protocol has destroyed death, dead ...

And if saying that existing hybrid Location Awareness, which means this Knowledge yet engenders, yet become and if saying that current Knowledge available, also means that the current Protocol not yet engenders, yet become ...

(5) In saying "Aggregates" (1) where any arrangements would, if You use two words "aggregates" and "current" without distinction between them, which means You that both are identical to each other, identical to each other. So when He says:

-SAC aggregates currently kill, deny its current status, He also accepted that the Colors are not in the Best State aggregates.

-Similarly, when He says Sac aggregates currently kill, does not deny the current state of it, You also have to accept that Identity does not have aggregates in current state.

(6) S:-But in saying "white Cloth" that any arrangements would, He used the two words "Fabric" and "white" without distinction between them, which means You that both are identical to each other, identical to each other. So when He says:

-"white canvas", if "white" goes, you must accept the fabric she is no longer the fabric again.

-Similarly, when He says "white canvas", if "canvas" goes, He must also accept the fabric no longer white.

(7) Th:-If He still aggregates the Best qualities, He must also accept, Sắv aggregates is the school exists, sustainability, does not change. But He also knows that true then conversely, so can not say Colors aggregates retain Excellent properties.

(8) the Nirvana retains the status of Nirvana-this means Nirvana live, sustainability does not change. Similarly, Mr. pgải also accept in the case of aggregates, if You let that shit keep computer aggregates Identity of it.

Are you explained, because the Colors that Best properties still kept UAN UAN is impermanent, unsustainable, temporarily, change? You agree That you should admit the pilot ... like about Nirvana when He said: Nirvana still holds the status as Nirvana ...

(9) If He claims that "the past is present", means that the past is the past or the status status of the depositing, and when He declared that "the present future" He should say that the future is hybrid unit status, and once stated that "there currently available", You should also say that at present retains the current status.

(10) one of the verification of the this will complicate the verification when contacting the Division of time.

(11) If the past present and retains the status of depositing the past to live sustainably, and does not change. And with this point, as he admits is not true.

(12) When He said the current Nirvana and retains the status of Nirvana, Nirvana means the school exists, sustainable and does not change. As such, you must accept that sense if He affirms the past also similar (i.e. the past present). Or, if he does not believe that the past school survival, sustainable and does not change are the conception "the past present and still keep depositing State" then He notion of Nirvana, He must also imply Nirvana is impermanent, unsustainable.

(13-20) All the above points (9-12) the same applies to the French the past, the future and present DD c called "skandha":

If the Formula of the past as the present, still holds the status of depositing the same with thứac current and future position. So, with the one identified as such, will make more trouble the same determination when linked to two other divisions of the time. Then again, If Consciousness the past present and still keep depositing status, then this method is still viable, sustainable school and does not change. You must assume that this is not useful. When You say Nirvana present and keeping State ownership. When You say Nirvana present and still holds the status of Nirvana live, non-changing sustainable, You have to accept if You define consciousness the past also similarly. Or if he does not believe that past school survival Knowledge, sustainable and does not change, when He said that past Knowledge available and still holds the status of depositing then You say, Mr. Nirvana also imply nirvana is impermanent, not temporary and sustainable change.

(21) There is not a legal past is present? If You agree, you must refuse from his perspective on the past. If You believe that "there is no present past" then says "ties of quảr past" is misleading.

Again, there must be a hybrid position that France is not present. If You agree, then You must also waive his opinion about "the future present",-If You believe that "not existing" hybrid "has the existence of the future" is misleading.

(22) France would then become the futures position is at present? If You agree, He must also accept the hybrid unit identical to the French in France at present. Are You admit this? Then You must also accept a France which was the future, and then come in. Are you admit this? Then You must also accept a France that doesn't is future, not the present, do not become hybrids, not become present.

Similar reasoning as above for "existing" and "past".

Also, for the future, present and past: is the future position is becoming current, current is passed? If so, you must accept all three was determined, and in the process France became the other was formed again. If You accept this, then You must also accept the reverse of France he was the owner.

APPLY THE ITALY-ANNIVERSARY TIME INVESTORS CAN ADJUST THREAD ÐỐN.

(23) There are (all the conditions of the see as): label, scenery, lighting, Form Labels, attention in the past as the present tense? If You agree, He must also accept one sees past the object using the label to the past. Similarly for all the conditions of the other senses, the same as in the past: Turkish, Turkish official thinh, Scene, nowhere, attention; Male, scene divisions, Male formula, the atmosphere, the attention; Any damage, Loss, Scenes, consciousness, water quality, attention, feelings, consciousness, soil, attention; Italy, France, the memory of, Italy, attention such as in the last case: You have to admit is a person aware of the French scene of the past by the sense of the past.

(24) Similarly, if the conditions of the existing futures position awareness such as labels, scenery, lighting, form Labels, the attention, the one who can see the future by taste best hybrid unit label v. v. ..

(25) If He says that the events of the current shows and other existing knowledge, and he found the current Deeply with the label v. v. a. is also present, If He still maintains that the conditions of the past as the present perception, You also have to say that with the past, a person found to be Brilliantly the past.

(26) Similarly, as above with regard to the conditions of Knowledge.

(27) If You refuse that past Labels, scenery, past and past form labels are present, then the person can't see Colors quảr past with past Labels, like you must also reject, with the terms of the notice currently in existence, one does not see the current landscape with the current Label. Similarly for the other forms, too.

(28) the same argument for the find.

(29) There is Wisdom tri (Ñānaṃ) the past is still present? If You agree, You must also accept that the Department of intellectual property had been with the Wisdom of past Voter. And if You accept that. You must also accept that the Wisdom that voters are always a spectacle of suffering, take advantage of the Emperor, Episode clips hit Kill and practice Administrators (not by the current Wisdom).

(30) the same reasoning applies to intellectual property to the voters.

(31) There are still existing tri-Wisdom, or are proposing to service of Wisdom are manifested by the Wisdom of that? If You agree, You have to accept that the Wisdom of past voter are also present (§ 29) the Department of intellectual property was manifested by that past Wisdom. So, by the existing intellectual property Framework, clear lens, the Emperor is the Emperor, kill is achieved thorough, Imperial Administrators are mature. This very good niện not by all that past Wisdom (Wisdom tri) were influential in the reach of this rescue.

(32) The same reasoning presented transparently to extend to matters that He ideas about intellectual property existing tri.

(33) But He still believed that the progress of intellectual property the past is still present, it cannot manifest destiny of Wisdom by itself, then, surely the process of intellectual property the past can't be identified by current Wisdom-the-present. Moreover, If you can't get to know the gauge (§ 29-31) with the Wisdom of the past as the present, then, can he get to know Suffering by existing current Wisdom. That's OK is ridiculous.

(34) the intelligence unit and the current Wisdom is also comprehensive in the way arguments as above.

(35) There are the afflictions of the past Steps A-la-Han dynasty still exist? You agree ... But in the current tier A-la-Han. Craving, Si, falls, Deviant, skeptical, Kiss, Infinite, Endless, Yi Launched captain in time of the past, still available?

(36) Similarly, Mr Xia Fang portion that the 5 use too and knows the troubles still exist for Any future ranks, but this level is still Dear comments, Skeptical, the banned player, craving, and subtle corruption and unlawful, although no negativity in the past and no longer exist?

(37) Similarly, He argued that the unlawful use of the past like the raw, rough and still present with the most futuristic, but this level is still bound by the unlawful use, rough, coarse and?

(38) Similarly, He argued that past history and urban planner 3, and Si had the capacity gauge reborn into the scene still exist with the Expected level, but there are degrees of Projected saving is still bound by the unlawful use of that and the SIN?

(39) sure that the voracious Lady still craving the past present and there are people under the influence of craving? You agree That, if you craving the past is still present with A-la-Han, then the affordable steps still affected by that past craving? Same reasoning as for the unlawful use of other (35) 9.

(40-42) If He means that the wife of the still existing ones or the unlawful use of the past, He must also accept that the negativity or the unlawful use of the past are still available for anyone who has achieved one of the Holy and the floor so the unlawful use of this still exist where does Scripture in the current level.

(43-46) In contrast, if this could not have been for an A-la-Han, or one of the Saints, which at present is still linked to the unlawful use or have in the past. Similarly, this could not have been for the divine lady that still linked to to the unlawful use or have in the past.

(47) There to hand the past still exist? Then You must also admit that hands that grasp or let go out still present. Together, legs and toes, jump to, pull, knees up, step down, the hunger and thirst .... The current also affordable?

(48) There are relatives of the past still present? Then You also have to admit that the main body of the past still stand up, bow down, cut and ruined, as bait for the bearded vulture, as bait for the hawks past the fuselage also, poison gas, the flames can touch to the past stem. Past relatives still imprisoned with shackles, chains, break these, under arrest in the hamlet of Hamlet, the-city.

(49) are the other elements (of the past) such as; water, fire, wind still present. If You endorse. You must approve every component of the past still manifests itself.

(50) There are shades of past, future and aggregates the current, still available? If so, are there three aggregates. And if You believe that the five aggregates the past, future and present existence have accepted 15 aggregates.

(51) the same, You have to accept there are 3 Labels of origin,-36.

(52) Similarly, You have to accept there are 3 labels world-54.

(53) Similarly, You have to accept there are 3 labels right-66.

(54) are you given that The Kings Moved Into London in the past, in the present or in the future still exist? As such, there must be means to have all three move St. London United Kingdom live in the same time? Applying such reasoning to the Buddha Full.

(55) There is still the past still exist? You agree. So, to have the present is the past? He meets "the existence can be the past, may not be the past". But here, He has the distinction of the past could is the past is the past, and may not, therefore, the view of Him was wrong and Ngià has been rejected.

(56) the same, He would be complicated if the hybrid position that existing existence still possible and may not be.

(57) the same reasoning for the present.

(58) Similarly, if He accepts the current Nirvana, but the existence can be Nirvana, Nirvana is not possible, this means that nibbana is or may not be Nirvana, Nirvana is not is not is that Nirvana or nibbana.

(59) S:-there is no mistake when saying that "the past is present", "the future present"?

Th: Yes, talk like that is wrong.

S:-but The World religion has not been declared that "This means that there are Excellent, stilts Bhikkhu schools of what the past, future, present, in the civil or foreign, international, paralysis or crude or WINS, far or near, here called Sac aggregates. The stilts are what Life means, Bhikkhu........ think divine.. what action means ... What have the past means., the current cabinet or in the future, foreign, or international, paralysis or win rough, far or near, here called "aggregates Knowledge? (1)

So, certainly the past as the present, the future existence.

(60) Th:-but The World religion has not been declared that "this Chu this type, there are 3 stilts Bhikkhu, quotations, quotations route, highway design competition, no confusion, no confusion, no future confusion being the Samôn, Ba-la-Mon a rebuke, how are the three?"

a Voracious what sharp has passed,) has sections, has turned her Identity is confirmed, sabotage is "Thread ever had" is the title as the "Thread ever had" been set is "Thread ever had" not confirmed her Identity, is "we have" not confirmed "Will be". Along with the other aggregates.

b what best Chums birth, yet) is not yet available, he was confirmed as Sằc. "There will be" enacted by claiming as "will be", are set as "competition Will have" not confirmed her Identity as "existing", not confirmed is "Thread ever". Also with the other aggregates.

What colors are Divine beings), existing, confirmed her Identity as "existing", is claimed as the "there", "there is" competition, her Identity not confirmed is "Thread ever had" not been confirmed as "Will be". Also with the other aggregates.

The Bhikkhu on stilts, has three categories, revealing, exposing quotations, set route, no confusion, no previous confusion, not confused, the future is not confused, not the Sa, Ba-la-Mon a rebuke.

However, the population in Ukkali, the sermon during the rainy season, the settling of human reasoning, the false arguments, the working loads of fake comment owners who don't think 3 quotations, quotations route, this route set test does not deserve rebuke, not scorn. Because why? because of that fear of rebuke, the House, outrage, criticism? (2)

(61) again, there must have been no Phagguna stilts Bhikkhu asks the Buddha: "The World of the white label of religious schools of Mahayana Buddhism, the past, the President Park were absolutely, ended the contentious, had severed reincarnation, overcome all the suffering, the affordable Nh n he still exist? Or Turkish, Male, were killed, the body is still present ". And the Buddha answered: "this Phagguna, labels cannot exist, as well as whether any sense of Buddhist schools of the past nor can the present be"? (1)

Are there articles like? Therefore, it certainly can not say that: "the present", "past future present".

(62) then again, are you Nandaka once claimed that: "there in the past, that is the bad thing, now no longer in existence anymore, which is a good thing: and Si had in the past, that is the bad thing, now no longer in existence anymore, which is a good thing?" (2)

Are there articles like? Then it surely should not say "present past".

(63) S:-but, The World religion has not been declared that "this the Bhikkhu stilts, if for real Union, has participated; have the wedding, there are safety Conscious place charity, growth. Where was security, growth, excellent List place of birth. Where are contentious identity, place of growth. Where are the growth, a useful place to be reborn in the future. A useful place to be reborn in the future, place of birth, death in the future. ... The seat would be contentious, old, dead in the future, I say with a sense of place, there is suffering, there is the brain. The Bhikkhu Stilts, if for real emotions, private anniversary ... real ... real knowledge has participated, have had, Hy. ... have had, gauge, the brain behind "? (3)

Are there articles like? then there are not sure to claim that "the present future"?

(64) Th:-But there are The religious World have also not been declared that: "the stilts, if real group, the Bhikkhu does not have to take part, no Hy, no craving, no place to stay, an increase. The seat would not have an Official residence, a place not being Sharp. Where no birth, no Spot Colors the growth. The seat would not have Propelled growth, no Useful place in the future, it is reborn would not be reborn in the future Ownership does not have the place of birth, old age, death in the future. No place of birth, old age, dying in the future I say no Melancholy spot, no Suffering, no brain. The Bhikkhu stilts, if contact with real ... real anniversary Apr. ... Real knowledge, no join, no wedding, no. ... There is no melancholy, no suffering, no brain "?

Are there articles like? Then it surely that should not be said that "the present future".

7. SUBJECT MATTER AGGREGATES the PAST
(Atita Khandhākathā)

Dew point of debate : The past included in the Aggregates (and Colors) are still in existence.

Comments : This concept of the sect Sabbatthivadins that both the past and the future belongs to the aggregates is still present, as the aggregates and the elements of experience continues to hold that status.

(1) Sabbatthivadins:- If You confirm that the past in aggregates-as you are-concept must also acknowledge the past is still present. This He must be rejected. So the existence of the past just as in the case Of and About or all three: Aggregates, Of,. (1)

(2) again, if You believe that the hybrid unit consisting of aggregates as you are-concept must also admit the hybrid position still available. This He must be rejected. As such, the existence of hybrids just as in the case Of and About or all three: Aggregates, Of,.

(3) If He has that in the aggregates and present existence, then You must also accept that in the past included in the aggregates as well as the present. For the other existing elements (Made-about) is also similar.

(4) Similarly, with regard to UAN.

(5) again, if You believe that the past is composed of aggregates-or other factors or Of such-not available, then You must also accept the present included in the aggregates are also not available.

(6) Similarly, the future consists of Aggregates-Of-World ... and its hybrids are also not available.

(7) again, if You said that in the past formed Aggregates-Of-or all three: Aggregates, Of, World, then You must also admit that Colors the past present.

(8) And if He said that in the future will taste the aggregates ... then You also have to assume the position existing hybrid Identity.

(9) again, if You believe that the current Colors in the aggregates with other elements, and the existing current, then You must also accept that Colors the past, including in Colors, as well as the present aggregates.

(10) a similar reasoning, instead of "past" Best by "hybrid" position.

(11) again, if You believe that Colors the past existence as an aggregates, and the perception that the past nature does not exist, then You must also accept colors in existence as an aggregates and the current properties are also not available.

(12) Similarly, with regard to existing hybrid position and the nature of the position was not present.

(13) Similarly, replace the word "Lust" by one of the four list aggregates. If You believe that Knowledge of the past become a UAN, Made or About, then You must also accept that Form the past present.

(14) Similarly, if You believe that Consciousness constitutes a hybrid unit aggregates, then You must also accept that the Formula hybrid unit are present.

(15) again, if You believe that the current Protocol form a aggregates, with other factors, and this Knowledge available, then You must also admit that past Form, included in the Aggregates, or gender, as well as the present.

(16) Similarly, for Consciousness.

(17) Furthermore, if He claims that Knowledge of the past as an aggregates, or gender and this form is not available, then You must also accept that the current Form as an aggregates ... also do not exist.

(22) Similarly, for Consciousness.

(19) the Theravadins: -there is no mistake to say that the past and the future consists in Aggregates, Of, World not available?

S: Yes, so is misleading.

Th:-but The World religion has not been declared "this Chu, has three types of stilts Bhikkhu, quotations, quotations route, highway design competition, there is no confusion, the previous confusion, not confused, confused, no future no future confusion, being Samôn, Bàlamôn a rebuke, how are the three? (1) Divine (or aggregates would) what has passed, has passages, has turned her identity is confirmed, sabotage is the "has been" is claimed as the "has been" is the test set is the "best" he had ever had not been confirmed as "we have" not confirmed "will have" (2) Means (or aggregates would) not being , not yet available ... (3) attach himself (or an aggregates would) have being, existing "? (1)

Are there such trading post? Then make sure that the past and the future in Aggregates, Of, World still exist.

(20) S-but The World religion did not ever claim that. " This means that there are excellent, stilts Bhikkhu schools of what the past, future, present, in the rough or civil or foreign exchange, in fact, fallen or WINS, far or near, here called SAC aggregates. The stilts are what life means, Bhikkhu ... chums have the Idea what ... what action means voracious ... What have the past... " (2)

Are there such trading post?

Th: Yes.

S:-If so, certainly can not say that "the past and the future consists in aggregates" ... does not exist.

8. SUBJECT MATTER of the PAST and the FUTURE (Ekaccamatthītikathā)

Dew point of debate (i) a part of the past as the present, part No, (ii) an existing hybrid unit parts, one part is not.

Comments This conception of the sects: Sabbathivādins, especially the Kassapikasfaction, for that part of the past still exist in the present and the future will present for sure. Therefore, the Theravādins have put those questions like "is this the past..." for regulating the issue.

(1) the Theravādins:-are there the past existence? He responded, in part, the past still existing part is not. So then You have to confirm (in the equivalent term) part, then have sections, has been ruined, dead, completely dead, while a part is not being destroyed piece, not sabotage, not dead, not dead. However, He refused this.

(2) even more special, You must also admit that the legal personality of the past (real and friendly) likely to result without achievements part then the present one, the part is not-He denies this-and the legal personality of the past is likely to result, in part, and achievements were then present , part No, He also rejected this-Moreover, France the past without result (due to the mind, identity, and Nirvana), part of the then existing, not part-this He also refused. (2)

(3) again, according to the statement by Mr. Goto the past as the present part, so the section would then present, the does not?

Kassapikas: -The France in the past but have yet to present the achievements, and the France of the past that did not exist and the accomplishments.

Th:-But if You accept the existence of the France before then You must also accept the existence of the following features, as well as the existence of the French not for results. Then again, if the French would in the past have achievements that do not exist, then the French could not yet past achievement in the back, as well as for the French not to result (France signed infinity). Then again, He said that the France in the past that has not left the existing achievements, but there is the past so France could not say that already kill take? You agree to this? But you can't say that a France have both current tháivừa status has just destroyed.

(4) are you agree that the Legal Department in the past has not achievements, has been destroyed and that the left still available? Then You must also accept that the France in the past, have achievements have been destroyed, are still available. That's also the French the past not for results also still present.

On the other hand, if You claim that the France in the past had achievements, then destroyed, no longer available, then You must also accept that in the past, France has not yet destroyed, and achievements, also not available (here, there are inconsistencies with the first confirmation of him). Too faii for France not to result.

Or is there must the France in the past, not achievement, and then destroyed, left still available? And there are the French in the past, were destroyed, and achievement, not present? So, by the way, He also confirmed a couple of France in the past, the part has achievements, accomplishments, yet part and both are destroyed and then, there is the existence, in which part does not exist-He denies this.

(5) K:-wrong when you say that "The French quảr past accomplishments, yet still exist"?

Th: Yes, that is a mistake.

K:-There are no events in the past, which is not yet the achievement to achievement will give results?

Th: Yes, Yes.

K:-If so, certainly not wrong to say that: the French the past, yet still existing achievements.

Th:-to admit the France in the past will thus achievements to give results, can we say that the current still would not? He agreed, but certainly they will be achievements to give results, we can say that they are at present? If You accept this (the French the past is the current French then surely the France in the present will be objective, affordable not destructive existence?

(6) (i) For the question "have we Christians?", He responded, "in part, the present one, the part is not" him to admit one of the equivalent term "part was born, has been formed, happened, appeared" part is not. However, He refused this, based on the statement by him, there are certain birth will which the then existing, and the certain existing not French? You agree to this, so You have to accept that part of France in the hybrid unit will not beings, the remaining French part existing hybrid unit will not beings do not exist.

(7) according to his statement (ii) is the French hybrid position does exist, while France does not? He responded, "The France in the position of certain hybrid (will inevitably engenders) is available, also the legal uncertainty (will not bring forth) does not exist". Then He denied that the French legal uncertainty still existing futures position, although He has accepted this with half the previous clause in the answer. Then again, If the French position in any future plan does not exist, then the legal position of certain hybrid also is not present.

He said that the legal position of certain future will bring forth, then, is that you acknowledge the legal position that are not born again? You agree? So, can he say that France has not yet existing back engenders?

(8) Or, if the legal position of certain hybrid will being, yet engenders, as the present, the future indeterminate position France not yet born, as well as the present. Or again, if the hybrid unit will not beings French, yet engenders, not available, then You must also said that France will also not being present.

(9) K:-Have no mistakes when stating that: "The position of France, certain hybrid will bring forth the existence"?

Th: Yes, that is a mistake.

K:-But there are certain hybrid unit method will not being going on?

Th: Yes.

K:-so, be sure that the future position of the French will bring forth the existence.

(10) Th:-to admit that the French position, if the will being, happens, the France he present?

K: Yes, the France's existence.

Th:-to admit the France will happen, does the current in France?

K: no, the France's position in the future that do not belong to the present.

Th:-I would like to repeat the question.

K:-Yes (because if the France's present, they belong to the present).

Th:-And have to admit that the French will target existing ruined, is the France's existence?

K: no, can't say that.

Th:-but you have to admit this wasn't.

9. ADVICE THREADS of MANTRAS. (Satipatthānakathā)

Dew point of debate: all France's Anniversary.

Comments: Some sects such as Andhakas and then as Pubbaseliyas, Aparaseliyas, Rajagirikas and Siddhatthikas, there is the perception that all of France is the object being perceived by the mind which is Recited. Do they deduce from the trading post "Samyutta Notion Of" (Satipatthāna-Samyutta) have This "Chu Bhikkhu stilts, I will just give the person the beginnings and the ends of the French Notion of" (1) . To regulate this conception, the Theravādins have posed the following question.

(1) the Theravādins: -are all the French are getting th c form the Notion of origin?

Andhakas:- Yes, that's right.

Th:-If so, You must also acknowledge all the French are aware of Mantras, Mantras of rights form, Visual Mantras, Mantras, Mindfulness ... is "the only path", "brought to my snippet take advantage", "brought to the food poisoning syndrome", and "no scenes of Pirated Or Unlawful use hypnosis-Options-the slopes of the Craft-Be System-Ace-be-Boc archive , You have to accept that all France was aware form 10 headings such as: Buddhist Mantras, France, up, World, laboratory experiments, meditation, Mantras Of news, Electronic Concepts, Mantras, Recited the President involve NET Nirvana " (2) . But all this He declined.

(2) again, you must chầp like getting in the first identification of him, so the Anniversary also made Label-origin, Recite the right ... The President represents Nirvana. And if You really accept the above then You must also accept all for France was aware that my evidence statement.

(3) Similarly, with regard to the four other Civil parishes, five Foreign origin, take part, Si, falls, Deviant, Skeptical, Kiss, ample, very good Launcher, Lt, also the Anniversary of.

(4) So have to Recite Mantras and ngươc is back. Anniversary of the main Mantras? If You accept this, then You must also accept that one of the France was aware, was discussed, also become the Anniversary and Celebration of also becoming a in France.

He refused, So are you for that every French in France he became aware of Mantras, or vice versa? He agreed, so He must admit rẳng itself is the Anniversary of, but is not of Anniversary Celebrations.

(5) A:-so there is no mistake when saying: "all the French Notion of"?

Th: Yes, said such mistakes.

A:-But not by the Notion that because France was aware?

Th: Yes (by Reciting that the France was aware).

A:-If so, why can you reject my point that "all of France is aware of is the Notion of"?

Th:-If we assume that "due to the Notion that all the French are aware of, then there must be the right mindset is the Notion of"?

A: Yes.

Th:-due to the Exposure that the France was aware, so are all the France he called Contact made (phassapatthāna)? That is the opinion of Mr. Again, tho, Thought, Action, due to each French which aggregates awareness. Are all the French known as Tho, Thought of, ...? Therefore, for this You have to accept that.

(6) again, if his notion was steadily, then you must accept any comment beings would if Anniversary mature and solidly, the mindfulness have with that person.

Furthermore there are The religious World has ever claimed that "these are not immortal, the Bhikkhu on stilts, are no bulbous anniversary (Paribhunjati). These influences are immortal, the Bhikkhu stilts, as these make stems ". (1)

Are there such trading post? He recognized, but are all beings all enjoy being, evolution, practice, develop and mature in the French notion of fuselage? You still know that they don't have to be so.

(7) again, The World religion has not been declared that "there is a unique path, the Bhikkhu stilts, making the species are, pass the sorrows, termination miserable pros, the Chief accomplishment, enlightenment Nirvana tri. I.e. the four Anniversary of "? (2)

Are there such trading post? He admitted, but "all beings" has one and only one way? He was forced to accept that "all beings" cannot have a path.

(8) again, The World religion has ever claimed that "When London United Kingdom Holy degrees, the Bhikkhu on stilts, has seven treasures appear. What are the seven? Such is the Emerald treasure treasure jade, elephant ride, horses n treasure, the jewel as a treasure, a Pearl female treasure, treasure, treasure; This Move ranks, when stilts Bhikkhu schools of London, United Kingdom to the Holy birth, the seven treasure appear. When such as hybrid, A-level la-Han, the Chief Sensory class, the Bhikkhu on stilts, has seven treasures appear. What are the seven? Such is the notion of sensory, sensory, sensory Needs of French Scouts, sensory, Visual security Balloon Wedding spending, determine the sensory, sensory and discharge This chi. Chu Bhikkhu stilts when As lai, steps A-la-Han, Chief of the Institute of Visual creation of seven treasure appear. " (1).

Are there such trading post? He recognized but there is "all" become enlightened Notion, an element of the enlightenment when As hybrids appear? You know that the French cannot be the anniversary of the genus sense, however He also forced chầp to receive this.

(9) Finally, if all the French known as Anniversary of all France has to be equivalent to those of France in 37 relief aid products such as: the four Chief Needs, like Italy, Active right, Five Green, sensory Loss, bowl of legitimacy. With this affordable, You admit?

10. The EXISTENCE of the SUBJECT MATTER of FRANCE (Hevatthitikathā)

Dew point of debate: The current owners in this state that are not present in the other State.

Comments: This conception of the Andhakas, along with some other sects such as Pubaseliyas ... They said that all the French are both present in a moment such as the Colors and the list in the past, current or future position, on the other hand does not have in its future and present, as well as not present and future in the past. So, all of France just as the present part, and part is not available. Denominational Theravādins have posed these questions to freshen this concept.

(1) the Theravādins- There are the past still exist?

Andhakas: past-present in this state that are not present in the other State.

Th-according to him, there is no medium present just past existence? He refused, and then you confirm-that he Elects to confirm-And if that past primary still existing medium-medium not present, then the "present" is also the "non-existence" and conversely "not credible" as well as "existence", "is" is also "no" and conversely "there is" is also the "is" plan mechanism, both to the same things, the same sense, a root. Of course he does not accept this.

(2) Similarly, He argued that the hybrid position existing only in this state that are not present in the other State. This means that existing medium hybrid position, just not available. Here, prove the contradiction in his perspective.

(3) Similarly, currently existing only in this state that are not present in the other State; and he again crashed into the conflict as above.

(4) If the past just as he has opinions, then it is how, not present?

A:-the past just as the past, not the present as future, not as current.

Th:-but this is the same as in the saying of the Lord, and not two is the same, and so, He too was contradicted as above.

(5-6) Similarly, for the present, the future and the present and not present? Present in how existing and not existing?

(7)-so there is no mistake when it said "the past, the future or the present existing only in this state that are not present in the other State".

Th: Yes, so is misleading.

A:-according to him, the current as well as past and current position, its future existence as well as the past and present, and the present as well as past and future-with this affordable You admit? So, I'm sure very useful.

(8) Th:-There is still the Best available?

A: we present in this state that are not present in the other State.

Th:-here, He again encountered obstacles as "both are the same as the present and not present" and thus, He too was contradicted as above.

(9) the same applies with regard to 4 other aggregates: tho, Thought, consciousness.

(10-11) Again, based on the concept of this existing aggregates and how not to present how, when He responded: "A Sharp aggregates such as aggregates, available in four colors and status lists other aggregates do not present ..." then You also suffer from similar conflicts.

(12) A:-so there is no mistake when saying: "any aggregates would also only present in a State, did not present in the other State".

Th: Yes, so is misleading.

A:-But according to Him is that every existing aggregates in status as any of the aggregates in the four aggregates (existing Colors in a State such as Shou. ... Formula). So, I'm sure very useful reason that every existing only aggregates in its separate status, which is not present in the other State.END=NAM MO SAKYAMUNI BUDDHA.( 3 TIMES ).VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY=THICH CHAN TANH.THE MIND OF ENLIGHTENMENT.WORLD VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST ORDER=VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST NUN=GOLDEN LOTUS MONASTERY=AUSTRALIA,SYDNEY.29/1/2016.MHDT.