DISCUSSION OF realist .
BETA-DEPARTMENT OF
THE LEGISLATIVES CREATE THE STREETS OF THE HISTORY OF HOME PAGE
BETA-DEPARTMENT OF
THE LEGISLATIVES CREATE THE STREETS OF THE HISTORY OF HOME PAGE
SELF
- Where do all things come from and where will they go?
- What is all that is where from where to go and where to go?
- Kia rivers and mountains, this person, the house, etc., is not that all things?
- Not right. Keep an eye on the talks between the pilgrims and the Bhikkhuni Bhikkhuni. See the Greek king of the Diaspora, a general of Ascarians (Alexander 356-323 Ruled Northwest India at the upper Ngu Ha, around the middle of the second and third centuries BC).
One day, the king visits Sankheyya Temple to see the monk Na-Tien, the head of the temple. The king asked:
- Dai Dai Duc, what is your name?
- The Son of God is called Nathan. The naturists of the rampant also called Slaughter is Nathan. But it is a name, set out to distinguish one from the other, But in that name there is no "we" or "our".
The king is surprised to say to the people around him:
- Remember the words of the German Nazi said. You say there's no one in the name of Noah, can you believe it?
If you have finished, the king asked:
- Bach Dai Duc, if there is no "ta" in it when the host offers bowls, food, etc ... who admit? Who preserves moral, religious? Who meditates in meditation? Who practices in Nirvana? Who keeps the precepts? Who broke the world? Who created the karma? Who is suffering? If there is a killer Virtue does not commit murder? etc ...
hundred unclear, eager Venerable explains. Venerable, have you heard?
- Great King, heard clearly.
- That listener is not Nathaniel?
The king asked.
- Not. Na first
- Then who is Norwegian? Is the hair on his head not Nike?
- Not.
- Face, you, skin, your flesh is not Nathan?
- Not.
- Eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body, you mean it's not
Nair?
- Not.
- All of this is not Nordic?
- Not.
- Is there anything else that is Norwegian?
- Not.
- Why did the preamble to the great virtue tell me that people call Venerable NaHa, so Venerable lied?
Venerable Nathan slowly said:
- Great King! Did he come here by foot or by car?
I came by car, only when I entered here, I was walking.
Upon hearing the Venerable Naitha immediately distributed to the people around, Please remember, you said you came here by car, can believe it?
Venerable Na Na asked , "Your Emperor, Grand Master, told you to come by car, is that you say the truth?
- I'm telling the truth.
- Then let the monk know your car.
- Is the frame a car?
- Not.
- Is the axis a vehicle?
- Not.
- Is the cake a car?
- Not.
- carb, bucket, yoke, wire, is not it?
- Not.
- Or is the collection is the car?
- Not.
- Or besides these, there is something special does not stick to those things, called car?
- Not.
Venerable moment pause and then reply:
- Now, the proletarian monk asked all the things, and he replied that it was not a car. So, then, the king said to the monk, the monarch arrived by car. That is suspicious! Ask around to testify.
Through that intimate, intriguing conversation, enough to see that Nathan was just plain, not real Nathan; The car is just plain, no real car. So car, so mountain, river, trees, grass, people and things are the same.
They are false assumptions exist between the correlation, not true.
Did not really have any reason to ask, where did it come from and where to go, where ever, and ever lost. Who foolishly looked for an unrealistic Noah, an unreal vehicle, Consider where and where to go?
But why do we still see cars, see people, still see all the effects?
That's because of the change. The meridians are the meridians, but the car, the city, mountain, river, grass, micro, etc.? The coast is not the car, why combine, into a car; The coast is not human, why do people together? The cars are not combined into cars, the ones who are not human. So the stones together why not to cook?
Also, when things do not have to be combined, why not call it a car instead of a car? Things not people combined, why not call it non-human but called people? Whether say or say is not true. Because there are new car market, there are people who are new people, but not find cars, not how the car, The market did not find out, then how are people? So market or phi are due to the development. Nine is the way to go, the car is a way of life, mountains, rivers, people, things, etc., is the way to go. Out of consciousness, no matter exists, so the Sutra says: "Everything is perfection"; And was the way to go, then Nahu is only awake, the car is only awake, mountains, rivers, people, things are only awake. All is just awake. It is only the equanimity, not in the air, not in the past, not big not small, etc. As the ancient saying: "Unmatched nautical freedom tha mao, ancient ancient No matter the concept "(many worlds are on the top of the hairy, old memories are not leaving behind a concept).
But consciousness has two ways:
1. Causation of grace - there are enough new conditions exist, such as the rope exists due to charm combined, Usable, not like turtle hair, rabbit horn. Every existence in the world is the same, because the form of distinguishing the general, identity, mind, training in Tibet, many lifetimes into a family (gas, habits), inherent, Apparently enough of the generals as they were when they were recruited into the Dharma, and in that they distinguished themselves from the knowledgeable Analytic Knowledge and the Partisan object of perception. Ants, such parts as the charm. Here, all there is seen and seen, known and known, nothing else. Nothing is mountains, rivers, people, things. That is the charm.
2. Distinguish the variable - the things of the differential expectations turn out to be completely subjective illusions, such as bouncing the strings to mistakenly think of the serpent, or as the hysterical man sees the realm of change differently than Weekdays. Eke, Knowing the Part and Knowing Part of the above is not known as the fall and the dhamma and the body, but the ordinary human mind defines it as falling and dhamma, being and object. If the minister of this law is permanently engaged in the Tibetan form of the available seed, then when nails start to see the dharma.
What is differentiated by the variable is easy to change, remove, what the conditions are difficult to change the removal. And what comes out of one's own consciousness, called discord, is easy to change; What is more common in the minds of many common sentient beings, called serpents, is difficult to change.
All the generals we call existence, are the generals of consciousness in the two ways that turn out. That's the real thing. Saying that evolution is synonymous with saying "y awake". As the third recitation in this Commentary states: "Belgian medicine, The other methods of consciousness turn out to be, or arise.
There is no self-existence but only exists between relationships, between conditions, according to emptiness, which is called Dependent Origination or Pratyekabuddha. Renewed knowledge, y awakening also means the beginning. Saying y tha is the other way, the other is the only means, but said that only that is the formula, specify. Consciousness is one of the conditions for existence; But the consciousness is the special grace, the most obvious; So, here we do not say y forgiveness in general that straightforward "y awake, y awake", or "A-re-add originating".
To say that the change also has the special effect is to counter foreign diseases, to look back, to see himself who is the owner of all beings, such as revisited the face. From there, the wrong way of misunderstanding, causing the suffering, into the wisdom Bat-elegant, the scene of the scene, building the scene of peace and happiness.
Pure-mindedness, this is said in many suttas. Because Buddhism is the focus of the mind, mind is the heart of enlightenment, as the Dhammapada says: "Mind is the master, the mind leads the mind, the mind to create, say or do with mind pollution. Then suffering will come like a wheelchair followed the animal's foot pull ... "Or as the Huayen Flower said," Essentially, the mind creates. " The Mausolein said: "Due to self-attachment; The mind is outside the scene, the sight is not real; So say idealistic. " Confidential interpretation said: "The coast of the consciousness, the state of the consciousness" and know how many letters, letters, such as the alphabets, A-back, Si, visual consciousness, ear consciousness v. V. In the suttas is expressed as the origin of all things.
The Buddhist sects developed and systematized these minds, the most obvious being the Systematics, which transformed into the 75 dharmas in which the mind is essential. Coming to Du-old Grand Marxist system into 200 French, to Duy Tan to retreat to 100 French, including 5, in which the mind is the master.
Five hundred measures are:
1. Sắc is the general of conscious awareness, in addition to consciousness, there is no prime minister.
Mind is the essence of consciousness.
The mind is dependent, the subject of consciousness.
4. Incompatible is the shadow of Lust, Mind, Mind together.
Virtue is the real nature of consciousness.
100 dharmas are consciousness, connected with new consciousness.
Some people doubt that the other river when we have not born it already, When we die, it is still, so what is it called? Or as a computer, when science has not been created, nobody knows, when science is made and then people know, so called development?
Where is it that the other mountain when we have not born it already, when we die and it is still, so it is with whom? To whom Who knows it has? Who knows it still? If we live in the present and know the mountain river when we are not born, or after we die, then it is imaginary, imaginary is not foreign.
And on the other side of the mountain, there is a computer, is there a Nahuat, under the king's eye, or is there a car in the eye of Noah? If that were the same as that of Nahana under the eyes of the Di-lanadha, the possession of the car under the eyes of the Nazis, it was all due to the change.
Not a mountain, but a mountain. Not the river but the river, is the way. Not so that see, is the way.
To promote morality. Systematically, at the beginning of the fifth century AD, the Bodhisattva Bodhisattva based on the Mahayana Mahayana sutras, Confucianism, especially the lecture Du-Teacher, Hsuan-Hsieh, Mahayana, Bien Trung, etc. written 30 short chapters, but the content is very rich. It can be divided into the following four parts
.
- Part two: Teachings of the General, Y Y tha initiative.
Part three: Lecture on the Three Voices, ie awareness of nature, belonging to the Virtual identity.
- Part four: Lecture on the five years of spiritual development. Or in the past, there were many divisions, such as: In the thirty chapters, the first twenty-four lectures talked about General Duy, the twenty-fifth essay on the nature of Wisdom, the last five sayings of Consciousness.
In the first twenty-four; One half and a half said General Duy, twenty-two and a half days later, spoke about General Duy.
Three self-nature: The change of grievance, Y tha start and the sincere member means no meaning whatsoever "meaningless, fake, middle" in the proceedings in the Middle: "Cause of birth, France, , The name imitation, heraldic Middle name. The turning point of attachment law is "no," the mind, heart and the Y section of the original imaginary false "false". Virtuous feet truth as "middle".
Nagarjuna standing on the feet of no Prime Minister, Virtue Tanh that destroy the successor. Thich Nhat Thien stands on the Y consciousness to destroy the inheritance. Two remedies to cure a disease, illusion of self, legal.
Master Thich Thanh Bien because of disobeying affair, so to say all the dhamma are not. Protector Dharma Protector for the broken love agreement. So say all the dharma. Saying not to break, there is no purpose, to the same purpose of bringing people into the middle of the truth to enter the middle of the director, leaving the four shots.
Bat-elegant, but not meant to remain in place. If you stay in the wrong place, then you do not. Saying yes, but do not have to stay where the consciousness has. If you stay where the consciousness has, ie France. As in the Commentary, the second book says: "If accepting Wisdom is true, then it is no different to accept the situation, is also legal.
Thien Thod Bodhisattva finished writing thirty litigation This awareness at the end of his life, not promptly explained. The reason for the explanation as far as I can see today is that the ten commentators commented together.
In this ten Great Masters, Than Blessing, Blessed One is at the same time Thien Than, more than 100 years after Thien Than, there are eight Great Masters such as Duc Hue, An Hue, Nan-da, Tinh Nguyet, Thang Tran-na, Tri Nguyet and his disciple Tran-na are the Dharma protectors, together continue to explain, each ten books, ten people 100 books.
Xuanzang, after 16 years studying in India, returned to China with the meaning of 100 other essays, translating it into 10 volumes. In 10 of this book is mainly the meaning of the Dharma protectors, so say the 10th volume of the Commentary created by the Dharma Guard etc. Lord Hien, He presided over the Nepal-Nepalese Buddhist University at the time of his visit to India as a disciple of the Dharma Protector. Hien gave Hien Trang the subject of this subject.
Talking to the Tibetan Buddhist monk Xuanzang, the vast majority of people know, either through biography, through Journey to the West, or through the movie Journey to the West, the Tang Sutra. In any case, one sees him as a great man. The scholar Nguyen Hien Le wrote about him like this: "Having read his biography, we can see his example left for us to look without a trace. Other great men, except for some saints, may have room for anger, but he is frugal, brave, diligent, studious, polite, humble, pure and sacrificed.
He is not only a monk, a Bodhisattva in Buddhism, but also a historian, literature, psychology, Philosophy, etc., is great.
But there is one lesser known, that is his unprecedented translation work is no less than the risk of his unprecedented business.
Indeed, with Sanskrit so hard, the pattern was so difficult, the ethereal difficulty, that he translated more Buddhist texts than anyone.
From India he brought back 520 Chinese boxes containing 657 Buddhist Sanskrit texts. From the return of the country to the writing of the West, during 19 years of silent translation, he has translated 75 sets of 1,335 books, including the Dai Bat Dai 600 books, great Pi-she-sa comment 200 books, Du-Sun Teacher 100 books, Sentences 30 books, Hsuan Enlightenment 20 books, the 10th Book Commentary, etc. The
teachings of Mahayana Buddhism have three systems,
One is the "Dharmakaya Tue" system with the sutras such as Dai Bat Nha 600 books, etc. Two are the "Duy Thuc Fa" system with 100 monks and nuns, Thanh Duy Perceptions 10 books, etc. Three are the "Law of Vien Giac" with the Sutras, Chinese, French, Nirvana etc. In these three systems, Xuanzang translated nine out of ten The texts of the "Dharma Virtue Tue" and the "Dharma Vovinam." These two doctrines, however, are very different, but the purpose is the destruction of the Dharma, showing the real Middle General. As mentioned in the second book, "Minds, mental states, because of legal Y, should be as illusory, not real. Because of the disease except for real life, there is a scene outside the mind, Tam, should say Duy can. If the mind is real, It is no different than accepting the situation, is also France. The seventh verse says, "Previously speaking, the different formations were based on secular truth, not on the basis of right conception. In the sense of victory, the mind is speechless. So it is clear that the final meaning of Bat Nha and the yoga system is different.
It must have filled that spot, so Xuanzang translated both the Great Prajna and the Old Testament in a well-mannered, unobtrusive way.
This unmistakable attitude, he revealed when he was in India. At that time there was Professor Sujira Sun Zemin, who unleashed Dunhuang, who convened both the Chinese and Duogyo to write a 3,000-syllable, essay, to recite the lioness of Leo. Halo.
This Essential Commentary is the essay on the subject of Epidemiology, presenting the Method of Consciousness according to the doctrine of the Old Testament, with the new words, the simpler, the more meaningful, the opinions of the mixed masters Intricate, unspecified interrogation, sometimes hidden questions in the answers, use many Belgian names, try, so it is difficult to understand thoughtfully. True to the comments of the dissenting Criminality: "Great statue of the highest self, the most teaching natural language.
I translate this Essay, first of all because of the admiration of Xuanzang's likeness, and later to contribute with those who are studying or teaching. than. The Conscious Comment or Sentence can clarify the Buddhist verses in the Nikāya, A-jaw as the sentence: "Beings four ways to eat that exist. In it there is "real". Or "The action of Enlightenment", or "Feeling, Noon, awake", so the consciousness in the sentence is how? Do not read Thanh Duy The idea is hard to tell clearly.
Although I have put a lot of elaboration into this translation, but certainly not avoid many errors. Hopefully later, when I find out or thanks to Goodness Knowledge, I will revise for the better translation.
Seasonal PL PL 2539-1995
LIKE SIEUU
- What is all that is where from where to go and where to go?
- Kia rivers and mountains, this person, the house, etc., is not that all things?
- Not right. Keep an eye on the talks between the pilgrims and the Bhikkhuni Bhikkhuni. See the Greek king of the Diaspora, a general of Ascarians (Alexander 356-323 Ruled Northwest India at the upper Ngu Ha, around the middle of the second and third centuries BC).
One day, the king visits Sankheyya Temple to see the monk Na-Tien, the head of the temple. The king asked:
- Dai Dai Duc, what is your name?
- The Son of God is called Nathan. The naturists of the rampant also called Slaughter is Nathan. But it is a name, set out to distinguish one from the other, But in that name there is no "we" or "our".
The king is surprised to say to the people around him:
- Remember the words of the German Nazi said. You say there's no one in the name of Noah, can you believe it?
If you have finished, the king asked:
- Bach Dai Duc, if there is no "ta" in it when the host offers bowls, food, etc ... who admit? Who preserves moral, religious? Who meditates in meditation? Who practices in Nirvana? Who keeps the precepts? Who broke the world? Who created the karma? Who is suffering? If there is a killer Virtue does not commit murder? etc ...
hundred unclear, eager Venerable explains. Venerable, have you heard?
- Great King, heard clearly.
- That listener is not Nathaniel?
The king asked.
- Not. Na first
- Then who is Norwegian? Is the hair on his head not Nike?
- Not.
- Face, you, skin, your flesh is not Nathan?
- Not.
- Eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body, you mean it's not
Nair?
- Not.
- All of this is not Nordic?
- Not.
- Is there anything else that is Norwegian?
- Not.
- Why did the preamble to the great virtue tell me that people call Venerable NaHa, so Venerable lied?
Venerable Nathan slowly said:
- Great King! Did he come here by foot or by car?
I came by car, only when I entered here, I was walking.
Upon hearing the Venerable Naitha immediately distributed to the people around, Please remember, you said you came here by car, can believe it?
Venerable Na Na asked , "Your Emperor, Grand Master, told you to come by car, is that you say the truth?
- I'm telling the truth.
- Then let the monk know your car.
- Is the frame a car?
- Not.
- Is the axis a vehicle?
- Not.
- Is the cake a car?
- Not.
- carb, bucket, yoke, wire, is not it?
- Not.
- Or is the collection is the car?
- Not.
- Or besides these, there is something special does not stick to those things, called car?
- Not.
Venerable moment pause and then reply:
- Now, the proletarian monk asked all the things, and he replied that it was not a car. So, then, the king said to the monk, the monarch arrived by car. That is suspicious! Ask around to testify.
Through that intimate, intriguing conversation, enough to see that Nathan was just plain, not real Nathan; The car is just plain, no real car. So car, so mountain, river, trees, grass, people and things are the same.
They are false assumptions exist between the correlation, not true.
Did not really have any reason to ask, where did it come from and where to go, where ever, and ever lost. Who foolishly looked for an unrealistic Noah, an unreal vehicle, Consider where and where to go?
But why do we still see cars, see people, still see all the effects?
That's because of the change. The meridians are the meridians, but the car, the city, mountain, river, grass, micro, etc.? The coast is not the car, why combine, into a car; The coast is not human, why do people together? The cars are not combined into cars, the ones who are not human. So the stones together why not to cook?
Also, when things do not have to be combined, why not call it a car instead of a car? Things not people combined, why not call it non-human but called people? Whether say or say is not true. Because there are new car market, there are people who are new people, but not find cars, not how the car, The market did not find out, then how are people? So market or phi are due to the development. Nine is the way to go, the car is a way of life, mountains, rivers, people, things, etc., is the way to go. Out of consciousness, no matter exists, so the Sutra says: "Everything is perfection"; And was the way to go, then Nahu is only awake, the car is only awake, mountains, rivers, people, things are only awake. All is just awake. It is only the equanimity, not in the air, not in the past, not big not small, etc. As the ancient saying: "Unmatched nautical freedom tha mao, ancient ancient No matter the concept "(many worlds are on the top of the hairy, old memories are not leaving behind a concept).
But consciousness has two ways:
1. Causation of grace - there are enough new conditions exist, such as the rope exists due to charm combined, Usable, not like turtle hair, rabbit horn. Every existence in the world is the same, because the form of distinguishing the general, identity, mind, training in Tibet, many lifetimes into a family (gas, habits), inherent, Apparently enough of the generals as they were when they were recruited into the Dharma, and in that they distinguished themselves from the knowledgeable Analytic Knowledge and the Partisan object of perception. Ants, such parts as the charm. Here, all there is seen and seen, known and known, nothing else. Nothing is mountains, rivers, people, things. That is the charm.
2. Distinguish the variable - the things of the differential expectations turn out to be completely subjective illusions, such as bouncing the strings to mistakenly think of the serpent, or as the hysterical man sees the realm of change differently than Weekdays. Eke, Knowing the Part and Knowing Part of the above is not known as the fall and the dhamma and the body, but the ordinary human mind defines it as falling and dhamma, being and object. If the minister of this law is permanently engaged in the Tibetan form of the available seed, then when nails start to see the dharma.
What is differentiated by the variable is easy to change, remove, what the conditions are difficult to change the removal. And what comes out of one's own consciousness, called discord, is easy to change; What is more common in the minds of many common sentient beings, called serpents, is difficult to change.
All the generals we call existence, are the generals of consciousness in the two ways that turn out. That's the real thing. Saying that evolution is synonymous with saying "y awake". As the third recitation in this Commentary states: "Belgian medicine, The other methods of consciousness turn out to be, or arise.
There is no self-existence but only exists between relationships, between conditions, according to emptiness, which is called Dependent Origination or Pratyekabuddha. Renewed knowledge, y awakening also means the beginning. Saying y tha is the other way, the other is the only means, but said that only that is the formula, specify. Consciousness is one of the conditions for existence; But the consciousness is the special grace, the most obvious; So, here we do not say y forgiveness in general that straightforward "y awake, y awake", or "A-re-add originating".
To say that the change also has the special effect is to counter foreign diseases, to look back, to see himself who is the owner of all beings, such as revisited the face. From there, the wrong way of misunderstanding, causing the suffering, into the wisdom Bat-elegant, the scene of the scene, building the scene of peace and happiness.
Pure-mindedness, this is said in many suttas. Because Buddhism is the focus of the mind, mind is the heart of enlightenment, as the Dhammapada says: "Mind is the master, the mind leads the mind, the mind to create, say or do with mind pollution. Then suffering will come like a wheelchair followed the animal's foot pull ... "Or as the Huayen Flower said," Essentially, the mind creates. " The Mausolein said: "Due to self-attachment; The mind is outside the scene, the sight is not real; So say idealistic. " Confidential interpretation said: "The coast of the consciousness, the state of the consciousness" and know how many letters, letters, such as the alphabets, A-back, Si, visual consciousness, ear consciousness v. V. In the suttas is expressed as the origin of all things.
The Buddhist sects developed and systematized these minds, the most obvious being the Systematics, which transformed into the 75 dharmas in which the mind is essential. Coming to Du-old Grand Marxist system into 200 French, to Duy Tan to retreat to 100 French, including 5, in which the mind is the master.
Five hundred measures are:
1. Sắc is the general of conscious awareness, in addition to consciousness, there is no prime minister.
Mind is the essence of consciousness.
The mind is dependent, the subject of consciousness.
4. Incompatible is the shadow of Lust, Mind, Mind together.
Virtue is the real nature of consciousness.
100 dharmas are consciousness, connected with new consciousness.
Some people doubt that the other river when we have not born it already, When we die, it is still, so what is it called? Or as a computer, when science has not been created, nobody knows, when science is made and then people know, so called development?
Where is it that the other mountain when we have not born it already, when we die and it is still, so it is with whom? To whom Who knows it has? Who knows it still? If we live in the present and know the mountain river when we are not born, or after we die, then it is imaginary, imaginary is not foreign.
And on the other side of the mountain, there is a computer, is there a Nahuat, under the king's eye, or is there a car in the eye of Noah? If that were the same as that of Nahana under the eyes of the Di-lanadha, the possession of the car under the eyes of the Nazis, it was all due to the change.
Not a mountain, but a mountain. Not the river but the river, is the way. Not so that see, is the way.
To promote morality. Systematically, at the beginning of the fifth century AD, the Bodhisattva Bodhisattva based on the Mahayana Mahayana sutras, Confucianism, especially the lecture Du-Teacher, Hsuan-Hsieh, Mahayana, Bien Trung, etc. written 30 short chapters, but the content is very rich. It can be divided into the following four parts
.
- Part two: Teachings of the General, Y Y tha initiative.
Part three: Lecture on the Three Voices, ie awareness of nature, belonging to the Virtual identity.
- Part four: Lecture on the five years of spiritual development. Or in the past, there were many divisions, such as: In the thirty chapters, the first twenty-four lectures talked about General Duy, the twenty-fifth essay on the nature of Wisdom, the last five sayings of Consciousness.
In the first twenty-four; One half and a half said General Duy, twenty-two and a half days later, spoke about General Duy.
Three self-nature: The change of grievance, Y tha start and the sincere member means no meaning whatsoever "meaningless, fake, middle" in the proceedings in the Middle: "Cause of birth, France, , The name imitation, heraldic Middle name. The turning point of attachment law is "no," the mind, heart and the Y section of the original imaginary false "false". Virtuous feet truth as "middle".
Nagarjuna standing on the feet of no Prime Minister, Virtue Tanh that destroy the successor. Thich Nhat Thien stands on the Y consciousness to destroy the inheritance. Two remedies to cure a disease, illusion of self, legal.
Master Thich Thanh Bien because of disobeying affair, so to say all the dhamma are not. Protector Dharma Protector for the broken love agreement. So say all the dharma. Saying not to break, there is no purpose, to the same purpose of bringing people into the middle of the truth to enter the middle of the director, leaving the four shots.
Bat-elegant, but not meant to remain in place. If you stay in the wrong place, then you do not. Saying yes, but do not have to stay where the consciousness has. If you stay where the consciousness has, ie France. As in the Commentary, the second book says: "If accepting Wisdom is true, then it is no different to accept the situation, is also legal.
Thien Thod Bodhisattva finished writing thirty litigation This awareness at the end of his life, not promptly explained. The reason for the explanation as far as I can see today is that the ten commentators commented together.
In this ten Great Masters, Than Blessing, Blessed One is at the same time Thien Than, more than 100 years after Thien Than, there are eight Great Masters such as Duc Hue, An Hue, Nan-da, Tinh Nguyet, Thang Tran-na, Tri Nguyet and his disciple Tran-na are the Dharma protectors, together continue to explain, each ten books, ten people 100 books.
Xuanzang, after 16 years studying in India, returned to China with the meaning of 100 other essays, translating it into 10 volumes. In 10 of this book is mainly the meaning of the Dharma protectors, so say the 10th volume of the Commentary created by the Dharma Guard etc. Lord Hien, He presided over the Nepal-Nepalese Buddhist University at the time of his visit to India as a disciple of the Dharma Protector. Hien gave Hien Trang the subject of this subject.
Talking to the Tibetan Buddhist monk Xuanzang, the vast majority of people know, either through biography, through Journey to the West, or through the movie Journey to the West, the Tang Sutra. In any case, one sees him as a great man. The scholar Nguyen Hien Le wrote about him like this: "Having read his biography, we can see his example left for us to look without a trace. Other great men, except for some saints, may have room for anger, but he is frugal, brave, diligent, studious, polite, humble, pure and sacrificed.
He is not only a monk, a Bodhisattva in Buddhism, but also a historian, literature, psychology, Philosophy, etc., is great.
But there is one lesser known, that is his unprecedented translation work is no less than the risk of his unprecedented business.
Indeed, with Sanskrit so hard, the pattern was so difficult, the ethereal difficulty, that he translated more Buddhist texts than anyone.
From India he brought back 520 Chinese boxes containing 657 Buddhist Sanskrit texts. From the return of the country to the writing of the West, during 19 years of silent translation, he has translated 75 sets of 1,335 books, including the Dai Bat Dai 600 books, great Pi-she-sa comment 200 books, Du-Sun Teacher 100 books, Sentences 30 books, Hsuan Enlightenment 20 books, the 10th Book Commentary, etc. The
teachings of Mahayana Buddhism have three systems,
One is the "Dharmakaya Tue" system with the sutras such as Dai Bat Nha 600 books, etc. Two are the "Duy Thuc Fa" system with 100 monks and nuns, Thanh Duy Perceptions 10 books, etc. Three are the "Law of Vien Giac" with the Sutras, Chinese, French, Nirvana etc. In these three systems, Xuanzang translated nine out of ten The texts of the "Dharma Virtue Tue" and the "Dharma Vovinam." These two doctrines, however, are very different, but the purpose is the destruction of the Dharma, showing the real Middle General. As mentioned in the second book, "Minds, mental states, because of legal Y, should be as illusory, not real. Because of the disease except for real life, there is a scene outside the mind, Tam, should say Duy can. If the mind is real, It is no different than accepting the situation, is also France. The seventh verse says, "Previously speaking, the different formations were based on secular truth, not on the basis of right conception. In the sense of victory, the mind is speechless. So it is clear that the final meaning of Bat Nha and the yoga system is different.
It must have filled that spot, so Xuanzang translated both the Great Prajna and the Old Testament in a well-mannered, unobtrusive way.
This unmistakable attitude, he revealed when he was in India. At that time there was Professor Sujira Sun Zemin, who unleashed Dunhuang, who convened both the Chinese and Duogyo to write a 3,000-syllable, essay, to recite the lioness of Leo. Halo.
This Essential Commentary is the essay on the subject of Epidemiology, presenting the Method of Consciousness according to the doctrine of the Old Testament, with the new words, the simpler, the more meaningful, the opinions of the mixed masters Intricate, unspecified interrogation, sometimes hidden questions in the answers, use many Belgian names, try, so it is difficult to understand thoughtfully. True to the comments of the dissenting Criminality: "Great statue of the highest self, the most teaching natural language.
I translate this Essay, first of all because of the admiration of Xuanzang's likeness, and later to contribute with those who are studying or teaching. than. The Conscious Comment or Sentence can clarify the Buddhist verses in the Nikāya, A-jaw as the sentence: "Beings four ways to eat that exist. In it there is "real". Or "The action of Enlightenment", or "Feeling, Noon, awake", so the consciousness in the sentence is how? Do not read Thanh Duy The idea is hard to tell clearly.
Although I have put a lot of elaboration into this translation, but certainly not avoid many errors. Hopefully later, when I find out or thanks to Goodness Knowledge, I will revise for the better translation.
Seasonal PL PL 2539-1995
LIKE SIEUU
Consciousness
is the great knowing, by the knowledge, or by the knowledge (wholesome knowledge).
Only things that do not exist exist, only exist when they are sufficient, only exist between all relationships, this class is another, eternity, a condition for all, all one, all things. For one, one all. Do this one should have this, this one born the other, this one should not the other, this one kill the other kill. Such is the dependent origination, he exclaims. In that only the only one is the only, the only great, only incense, only ignorance, pure, pure ... as the ancient saying: "The most beautiful incense, immortality." He said: "Depending on the law, the legal world." (Any given a legal solution that is legal world law).
Consciousness is one of all things, But consciousness has the special ability to distinguish the other and know for yourself, it is the core in every being. It is this knowledge that makes the dharmas in the originality, unknown anonymity, infinite, infinite, infinite infinite infinite (in no air) emerges the natural state of the universe, Figure that state that pre-wove, create karma, tie it, causing suffering.
Other dharmas do not have this capacity, only consciousness has this capacity, so only speak formally and not just another.
"Duy means special, prevent outside; Consciousness means resolution, expressed inwardly.
Speaking of the main is to give a statement, wake up people to self-consciously mind your mind, look back at the natural power to turn it inside yourself to filter it, Cultivate it, repair it must be transformed to just benefit, not cause suffering.
Until the eight consciousness has been transformed into four minds, completely clear, the most rational, such as, the non-dual color, no sharpness, mind-free, mind free. Now there is no need, no need, or need anything, be afraid.
The potential hidden in the Buddha's words scattered in the Sutras, Bodhisattva Shakyamuni wrote the essay. It is due to reason, should be called Chengdu consciousness. On the contrary, it is precisely because of the comment of the Venerable One that the catechism was founded, that is, by the Ly dynasty, so called Thanh Duy. Again, ten commentators explain the 30 verses of Thich Nhat Hanh's discourse that form the Conscious Commentary. That's because the Church should be called Education.
Thanh Duy is also known as the Pure Land, because this essay clearly clarifies the doctrine of Consciousness.
After the study of India brought back to China (602-644), the Tibetan Tripitaka took the words of the ten Great Masters such as Dharma Protector, Duc Hue, An Hue .... Thich Nhat Than, then back up and translate the essay called The Ten Commandments, handed down to date.
DISCUSSED
DISCUSSION
Stick to the true nature, the purifier.
I am explaining his words now.
For the sake of benefitting. (1)
- Now to create this essay to make people confused and misunderstandings "not" (fall not, France) is back to understand correctly, understand correctly to remove the two objections. Because of self, the law should be born two full of obstacles, if the evidence falls, Dhamma is not the other, then the destruction of the other. Trick to kill because of the two winners. As the eradication of defilements is the thing that causes birth and continuity that the results of the feet of liberation, due to the killing of knowledge is the obstacle to the understanding of the situation, which is the result of Great Bodhi.
For revelation for the wrongdoer, the real dharma, the dharma consciousness, to make them realize the Second, do not know the true sense of Consciousness.
- There are people who love and confide in Consciousness, should or accept the external environment is like not not, or accept the context is not like a scene; Or accept the use of the other is the same; Or leave the mind, not own mind. By stopping such heterosexuals, make them understand the truth as profoundly profound knowledge, so create this Comment. (2)
I.
Q: If only consciousness, then why do people in the world and in the sacred say there is a fall and a dharma?
Chanting:
"By assuming the legal
fall has fallen legal.
They refocused,
Thuc Nang turn three.
It is meditation, privatization,
and wakefulness.
Comment: The world and the holy teachings say there is a fall and a dharma, just a false saying, not a true nature. Fall means owner, legal means to preserve. These two have the transformation figures appear. There are generals such as charming beings, false networks, etc., and so forth. There are generals such as Real, Duc, Kamma, etc. Aggregates
(*) Subsections, ordinal numbers, and " Ask - answer "is translated by the translator.
About, About v. V ... change means that depending on the test conditions set different generals.
Q: Such generals if hypothetical, then where to be hypothetical?
A. Such goons are dependent on the transformation of consciousness that is implicit.
- Consciousness is close, aware. This is where consciousness also includes mind, because it is the same.
- Turning means that the body changes into two similar parts, the Chess and the Part. For General and Ants to refute Self-proof part of the consciousness that arises, then take refuge in these two parts of Ants, which fall and fall. Fall and the other French leave two parts of Ants, there is no slate here (fake distinction).
Or because of internal transformation into external factors, because of the ability to distinguish the practice of the law, So when the beings arise immediately turn into generals of the fall, the French General. General in that way, but because of the difference that appears similar to the scene outside (the fake man). Kinds of love from the immeasurable to the present, the grace of the generosity of the fall, that is true, the legal. As dreamers, because of their dreams, they appear as generals in the minds of the outside world, and then depend on them to accept that they are external.
The true self, the dumbness of the attachment is not true, it only depends on the expectations that fabricated, so say it is fake (distinguish variable, fake). In fact, it is not true that there is a legal fall, but it seems that there is a dhamma manifested.
The situation according to expectations that fabricated not the same as consciousness, and internal content certainly depends on the charm, not unlike the scene. Thus, we can stop the two things is to accept the increase and accept the fall (France is not that it is true, it is accepting the content is not accept, it is accepting).
The innermost charge of the simulator, so it is only on the secular face, and the wake is the cheetah of the scene, so it also on the winning side (the ultimate cause). (3)
II. DIFFICULT
- How can you know that there are no externalities, only the innermost being as external, so there can not be true, legal?
- What is not possible to fall true?
There are three things to fall into. There are three things:
1. Falling can be permanent, Depending on where the cause of suffering, pleasant feeling.
2. Depression can be normal but the amount is uncertain, depending on the small body that it stretched or retract.
3. Depression can be normal but very subtle as a microscope, it silently translates in the body, making career contributions.
- The first fall is not true. Why? The fall is often constant, with the amount of nothing, then the fall does not follow the body to suffer. Falling is common, is the fall, the reason that fall does not move, so how can fall can follow the body to create karma?
Is the fall ego that is copper or other species? If one coincides, then when one's self is doing this, reasonably all the other beings' affairs do, when one is self-righteous, the other is all life. Escape, Is it justified that all the fallen angels of the other beings are free? If so, then make a big mistake. In other words, the falls of beings are the same throughout, then the body of the self is mixed together. Again, when one falls, one falls, because falling down together with other egoes in a non-separate place, is to be called all the ego, all the ego. If you think that the operation, the fruit bearing has its own property, should not make mistakes it is not true. Because the fallings of sentient beings have turned all over, the kamma, the fruit and the body have been together with the falling bodies of the companions of one, but if the fruit of the fruit of this fall is not fallen, then also Not right
When one's self is liberated, all of the other sentient beings' descent is liberated, because the practice coincides with all falls.
- Second fall is also irrational? Why, because attachment is permanent. Residents can not follow the body that stretch and withdraw. If it has stretched and retracted it does not differ from the wind in the tube, which can not be permanent. Falling under the body, the fall can be divided as the body, so how can accept as a can?
- The third fall is also irrational. Why ? Because the amount of falls is so small as a mote, how can falling can make a big body move? If the fall is small, but the week is very fast in the body, like the ring of fire, so as tuong it moves in the body, so that the fall is not one, not often, because of something that goes back, moving That's not usually the case.
- Then there are three ego:
1. Accept down News aggregates.
2. Fellowship.
3. The fall does not mean you do not have to leave the aggregates.
First, clinging to the aggregate, not right. Because that self should be like the aggregate, not usually, most. Again the form of the body is not self, because it is like the external body, there is fear.
Mind, the legal mind is not true, because the waiting for the coast, Tam, new born, it is not continuous continuous.
The law of incompatibility, other shades of legal photography, is not self, because it is like nothing, not sense of sense (not sense, not fall).
Second, clinging to the left, is also not true. Because of the separation of the aggregates, it is like nothingness, no action and the result.
Third, self-acceptance is not aggregates, not leaving the aggregates, also not true. Because the idea that the aggregate of the aggregate has been re-established, it is not like the aggregate of the aggregate, it is like a jar (the jar made of earth, the earth is empty, it does not leave the earth). Again, I can not say that self is self-immolation or self-immolation (ie, aggregates are conditioned beings, they leave the aggregates, they are unconditioned.) Here the five aggregates fall without the five aggregates. It can not be said to be self or non-self.
So, the passages of self-fall on failure.
- Back to the subject can be said to be there, is it thoughtful or not? If the fall is thought to be impermanent, because not always have thought, if the fall is not thoughtful, it is like nothing, can not work and life results. So that approach does not fall.
- The fall can be said to be true, Does it work or does not work? If there is a fall, it is like limbs, must be impermanent. If it does not work then falls like rabbit horn, not real self. So self-attachment is not aggregates, not leaving the aggregate failed.
- Back to the can be accepted as real, is it the scene of the predestined relationship? If it is not the scene of the predation, then how do you know it is true? If falls are the predestined landscape of an ants, then one should see an individual who is not a madman, because they know the truth (if there is true, then one who has fallen is an ants, That person knows the truth, not crazy island). If so, why is the acceptor fallen to be believed by the faithless selflessness and only say that people do not agree that: "Not to fall can be Nirvana, Those who are self-conceded slams birth and death, but where can wrong people have fallen to Nirvana, but the right view does not accept the fall of birth and death!
- Again the ants can not be true self, because it has predestination, like the charm of other dhamma. Again, the predestination of a certain anger is not self, because it is predestined, as dharmas, incense, etc. Therefore, the ants do not appreciate the true self, only the conditioned aggregates, and then Hope measured, attached to this one. (4)
III. TWO VEHICLES
- But there are two types of self-attachment:
1. Sentence.
2. Distinguish.
- The attachment to the birth sentence is that from selflessness to self-absorbed in the mind, it is born with the body, not waiting for heresy and evil new discrimination, Which is the carrier of the transfiguration, so called the Sentence of Birth.
This kind of Sentence has two: 1. The usual continuity, the seventh consciousness, of the part of the eighth consciousness, arises in the eighth form of consciousness on the seventh consciousness and accepts that self.
2. There is a discontinuity, the sixth consciousness into the five aggregates of aggregates, which are transformed into it, or the five aggregates of aggregates subject to it, or the conditioned states of each aggregates. Take that general made himself fall. These two things are so subtle ego sentence difficult to remove. Later in the period of cultivation, often practice the birth of non-conquer (the anthropic self, in the direction of the director of birth is not deeper in the guiding, so called unborn victory) thoroughly Can be eliminated.
Disagreement is also due to the power of the present condition outside, it is not the same birth with the body, but must wait for paganism and evil new distinction to arise, so called discrimination. This selfish distinction is only in consciousness. There are also two:
One is the cunning charm of talking about the five aggregates, and then arise on his own mind and distinguish between accepting that general made himself fall. Two is the evil heresy about the general, then he launched on his own mind, and distinguish between accepting that general made himself fall.
These two ego distinctions are so rough that they are easy to remove. During the development of faith, all laws are born without foot (the anthropic self), that can be eliminated.
All the ego for the five aggregates mentioned above, for the external aggregates of self-consciousness, whether or not, As for the five aggregates subjected to self-indulgence, there is no grasping, Also accept the clinging aggregates due to cause, he yelled to fall, the aggregate clay is real, but the coast does not come, because it is primordial coast, so also called outside the mind. The seventh of the eighth consciousness, the ego consciousness, is the eighth consciousness outside of the seventh consciousness, it is real, and the sixth eighth consciousness is unaware, ie, not. There is, or is not, the image of the aggregate of the aggregates subject to self-consciousness, the image is always there.
Should know the ego is attached to the five generations of aggregate aggregate impermanent hope that fall is. But these aggregates aggregates are from charm, They are just as illusory, because the wrong measurement of the five aggregates subject to clinging is self, that self is not true. So the Nehalem said: "Secret numbers should know, the ant's insights of Sa-subject, Ba-la-subjects in the world, all predestined under the five aggregates aggregates that arise."
(5) IV. EXPLANATION problem
Q: If not real down how the remembering, said, litigation, collective, grace, resentment?
A: It is true, as you accept, it has always been constant, then the same as before, the memory, know, chanting, grace, resentment can not be. Or before like the next time, the memory, know, chanting, grace, lust is always not; Because after the first, falls can not be so different. If you think that the first step after the translation, not falling, the reason is not true. Because of the absence, It should be as often as possible, do not leave, so it is not usually as used.
But each of them has the eighth, first and last name, and preserves the seed, that seed together with all the existing dharmas. Remembering, knowing, etc.
So, his last sentence was to blame for his apostles, not my apostles.
Q: If no real self, who created karma, who bear retribution?
A: It is true that as you accept, it did not translate as nothing, how can it create karmic retribution? If there is a change in translation is impermanent (not true).
But the sentient beings, due to the causal force of the mind, the center of continuity uninterrupted, should have the creation of karma and retribution. This is for no reason.
Q: If there is no, then what is birth and death in the animals? Who bored suffering to seek Nirvana?
A: It was as if you accept, it did not kill, so how can say it birth and death. Fallen as usual, nowhere is the suffering of the brain, there is nothing to be bored suffering suffering for Nirvana, so his words only harm him.
But the sentient beings, the body and mind continue to suffer from karma, there is the reincarnation of animals and bored suffering to seek Nirvana.
Therefore, it is necessary to know for sure that there is no real self, only consciousness, from moment to moment, from death after birth, consequence of cause and effect, In which to stick to the real fall. (6)
V.
FRIDAY - What outside reality there is no real law?
- Because the outside of consciousness as the pagan and other heirs accept, it is not true.
- France's outlaw why not?
The argument is: "Self is self," it uses the 23 measures as the great sense, etc. ... Three Dalits, lashes, mirrors (courage, hatred, greed, greed, hatred) Make up etc ... but the Enlightenment, etc., that by the three roots are slap-lashes, lamas, Me-ma, is true not fake, the amount of capture.
The opposite line is absurd. Why ? Because the Enlightenment, etc., because the three such roots constitute, it is like the army or the forest, is false, not real, how can we say that French is the current grasp?
Again the French Enlightenment ect ... if it is true then it is like the three root (Slaps, lashes, A-ma) is not composed of three roots. Back-slam ect. It is also the Great Enlightenment ... it is just as well as the Enlightenment ect ..., must be composed of three roots and also transformed impermanent as Enlightenment.
Again, the three roots are slap-bang, lama-ah, each has many functions, so it must also be many, because of the ability and the one. When the three bodies are all over, then when in a place to move the other time must also change, so it can not be different. As for the three things, the body and the general are different, then how to harmonize into a general? Because when it comes to convergence, as a general, with no harmony, can not be different. If you think that these three, but other generals, is contrary to the policy of the owner of the body and the general is one. Should be like general, silently one; Minister should be as, is clearly three. So it is not possible to say three things to one general.
Three things are different, Enlightenment etc ... is the sum. General and special one, so not one, not three. When these three things change if not harmonious to a general, then as if not transformed, how can we now see a form, etc.? If the three harmony into a general, then the original Prime Minister and the same must also lose it.
Can not say three things are two generals, is a total one, because the sum is special, the sum must also be three, so how to see one? If you think that three can have three generals mixed with difficulty, should see that one is not; Because there are three generals, one can not see that one, how to know three different things?
If there are three generals each, then each one can be sharp, v. V ... there is nothing to wait for three harmony. And each body should also have three generals, because it is the general.
Again, the Enlightenment, etc., are due to three compositions, one for each other without distinction, so the time of cause and effect, the five, five, each base is not different. Without distinction, one can perceive all the senses, or a scene that all senses are aware of, the present time manifested by the presence, the rate of unintentional, net, purifying Time is not wrong, so there is a big mistake.
So the knowledge of the law of the argument that it is unsuccessful
, it is only hope that the measure is OK. (7)
must win approval conclusion: "The strike means as fact, Germany etc ... much is real and true nature, represents the amount of capture".
- This attachment is not right. Why ? Because in the meanings, the ones that are permanent, if it can produce the result, are impermanent, because it has effect, as the fruit is born. If it does not bear the fruit, it can not leave the true nature, such as rabbit horn.
Again the impermanent, if there is a physical obstacle is the direction and the taste, if the direction and taste can be analyzed, like the army, the forest, not real nature, otherwise Concerned as the mind, mind, it can not leave the mind, mental property that is true.
The land, water, fire, wind of the dissertation is not afraid of, do not have to worry, because of the body touch, such as hard, wet, hot, enough). And the hard, wet, hot, the motions of the Thang dynasty, not without fear, Because of the body contact (earth), such as earth, water, fire, wind, (example). Land, water, fire, three things like blue etc. are all seen by the eye. Then according to the reason of this reprimand. So it is not true earth, water, fire, wind, hard, wet, etc. Is not separate, nor eyes to see the land, water, fire, real wind.
"In the real sense, the things that are flawed and often are, in fact, impermanent, because they have hardships, such as raw land, etc. in the Meanings, dhammas, dharmas, dharmas, dharmas, dharmas, dharmas, dharmas, dharmas, dhammas, ).
The second dissertation was accepted: Five meanings like Germany, Karma, etc. Do not shoot, It is true that it is not out of consciousness that has its own character, because it does not shoot into the body, such as the daughter of the stone girl. Indeed, German owl, etc., does not belong to the great nature, it is true that it does not have to leave the form itself, because it does not belong to the nature, such as flowers in the middle (for example ).
Again, the great nature of the Thang controversial: "Out side truth, Germany, etc. ... not own nature (religion), because they think that the true nature is not human, . Germany, etc., is not a true religion, because they think that the true nature is different from the truth, the German, etc., such as the absolute. As the great nature is not no, there is no need to have the true nature to make it, then why the truth, Germany v. V ... need to own the nature to make it available? If you leave the French still have their own nature, then should leave the French are not separate still have no identity. But that was not the case, why is it? So the knowledge of the nature of the dissertation is considered only by the measurement of damage.
"The homogeneity of truth, Germany, Karma, is different from real, German, Kamma," said the dissertation, "that probably is not true. Do not say that homosexuality is not the homogeneity of truth, Germany, because it can be separate from the real, such as Germany, for example.
Germany, etc., is not the real thing, Germany, etc., because it is different from the simplicity of truth, Germany, etc., such as Germany, Karma and Truth.
The homogeneity of soil, water, fire, wind for the earth, water, fire, wind, The standard here should know. As the homogeneity of the Real, etc. not alone in nature, etc., to make it homogeneous, then apart from "Truth" etc ... should not be alone in the nature of the Real to make real, Germany, the land of homosexuality. If you leave the truth of the true nature of the truth, the time out of phi The real nature of the uninhabited nature of phi phi. But that was not the case, why is it? So know "homosexuality", just a fabricated.
Again, the meaning of "harmony" of the thesis is certainly not true, because it is photographed in non-real things, etc., such as the absolutely not.
The other said that: "It is so ... by the amount of awareness," the reason it is not true, let alone the meaning of "harmony" that they are not aware of the amount, Where can you really be? Assuming that the expression "harmony" is the scene of awareness, then by reason, it is not true.
But the real meanings, etc., are not realities outside consciousness, because they are known to be known, such as tortoiseshell.
It is not the position of the eye, but it is not photographed in the mind of the condition of the body outside of consciousness, because it implies harmony, such as "grace" To the position of grace "synergistic owls" nor shooting into the position of the charm of the "harmony" in the form of "religious", because it assumes harmony (human) (enough).
Therefore, it is important to know the "truth of the meaning, etc." of the Thang dynasty is just a false expectation.
(8) - Again, there are people who have a "Great Self, which is real, is constantly changing, living beings." The other is also unreasonable. Why ? For if something is born, then surely that is impermanent, the impermanence is certainly not able to turn around, the unchanging is not true. And what can be normal, turn around, have all the capabilities, then it is reasonable that all over the place, all the time, and simultaneously all the law. And if you wait for the will and other conditions that can be born, it is contrary to the most human reason. Or other wants and conditions should also arise, because often there.
In addition, some people have a "Brahma", "time", "direction", "nature", "nature", " Enough of all abilities, all births. These passages are destroyed like this.
- There are people who accept the "sound" in the Vedic narrative is often, it can do quantitative to express the dharma. There are people who accept "All sounds are normal", just waiting to meet the charm that discovered, is capable of expressing.
Two ways of accepting the above sound are unreasonable. Why ?
Because the sound in Pentecost is capable of expressing it, it is not permanent, because it is capable of expressing (eg,) the sounds of others. Other sounds are not permanent, because they have to wait for new conditions, such as vases, dresses.
- There is a "super infidious" of the land, water, wind, fire is real, permanent, capable of being born rough, the rough is born not beyond the range of the kernel, So the roughness is impermanent, but it is true. "
This attachment is also unreasonable. Why ? Because of that, if there are directions, parts, such as ants, it may not be true. Without the direction, the taste, such as mind, mental, it can not gather around the birth of raw fruit. If it has produced the fruit, then it is the same as the fruit that was born.
The fruit of birth, not beyond the scope of the innermost being, is also called viharmas, not called rudoms, in which case rúpas are not rúpas such as labels, etc., and thus left. With his policy. If it is said that "the result is due to the quantity and virtue, it is not crude but as crude, recognizable," but the result is the same as the quantity of the innermost ones, , Not with coarse Or the micro and the rough, it is rough, co-located in the same place. If we say that "the color turns into the innermost parts of the cosmos, because the nucleus is not one, it can be called rough," so the time of the result is not one. The place of the innermost person is so different. This color does not turn out to be so sharp, so it is not the sharp sense. If the composite has many parts together, the coarse texture, many micro-particles are not small, enough to become the base and the scene, what is the result? Due to many components, it is not true. The time to know his attachment before the opposite.
The fruit and the kernel are stumbling blocks, not in the same position as the two ends. If the "fruit and the human enter together as the water into the sand, the drug into the copper"; Who accepts the sand and water to get water and medicine? Or the water that has taken up the sand, the grain of the sand, has changed apart, not one; Water co-medication, the water can be converted into gold, not a single, is common.
It is a rough piece, if it is one, then when one knows that part of it is to see all the other parts; Because this is the one, then it must be like this. If you do not accept that then the contrary, also accept such a contrary. So what the other accept, back and forth
failed. It is only by the expectation of measuring attachments. (9)
But the foreign religions have many types, but the legal (legal) is not allowed four things: Not one, often; Water co-medication, the water can be converted into gold, not a single, is common. It is a rough piece, if it is one, then when one knows that part of it is to see all the other parts; Because this is one, then the other must be like this. If you do not accept that then the contrary, also accept such a contrary. So what the other accept, back and forth failed. It is only by the expectation of measuring attachments. (9) But the foreign religions have many types, but the legal (legal) is not allowed four things: Not one, often; Water co-medication, the water can be converted into gold, not one, often. It is a rough piece, if it is one, then when one knows that part of it is to see all the other parts; Because this is one, then the other must be like this. If you do not accept that then the contrary, also accept such a contrary. So what the other accept, back and forth failed. It is only by the expectation of measuring attachments. (9) But the foreign religions have many types, but the legal (legal) is not allowed four things: That must be like this. If you do not accept that then the contrary, also accept such a contrary. So what the other accept, back and forth failed. It is only by the expectation of measuring attachments. (9) But the foreign religions have many types, but the legal (legal) is not allowed four things: That must be like this. If you do not accept that then the contrary, also accept such a contrary. So what the other accept, back and forth failed. It is only by the expectation of measuring attachments. (9) But the foreign religions have many types, but the legal (legal) is not allowed four things:
- One is the righteousness (the Enlightenment, etc. of the Commentary), with the emptiness (Evangelism only of the Commentary) can be just one, as the argument number. This attachment is absurd. Why? Because do not say all the measures are the same nature. If all the dhamma is the nature, it is the same nature, not the opposite to the three virtues (Tatras, Lashes, and Devas), each body is different And contrary to the world now see the different legal divergent. Again, if identity, etc., is the nature of identity, etc., then identity should not be green or yellow.
- Two is the acceptance of the law (real, Germany, the Karma of Thang Thuy) with the nature (the only nature of Thang Comment), as different, as the dissent Thang. This attachment is also unreasonable. Why ? For not to say that all the Dharma is non-existent. Just like a lost thing, there is nothing to know, It is contrary to "The owl" etc. It is not without its own, nor is it contrary to the present world that there are things. Again, if the colors are not tanh, then sharpness should be like the sound, not the sight of the eye.
- Third is to accept the same with the same nature as the same, as the infidels. This attachment is also unreasonable. Why ? Because one and the other is faulty like one and the other said above. Two different generals may be different. And if one and the other are homogeneous, fail. Do not say all the same legal way. Or one and the other is just not real fake but the real thing, the reason failed.
- Four are the same with Tanh is no different, as the Taoist outcast. This attachment is also unreasonable. Why ? Because no one is different with one and the other.
Words are no different than old speech or expression (negative or affirmative). If the expression is not to say both, but if the old is not accept it. The old also express the opposite fruit. The old non-expressive statements. Again, no other is contrary to the common understanding of the world of things have a different. And contrary to his policy (you). "Dhamma etc. so decisive yes".
So knowing that word is just the winding way to run erratically, those who have the right mind to accept. (10)
VI. FAITH THE LITIGATION OF JUDGMENTS
- Other heathen accept "to leave the real are the dhamma, incense, etc. ..." How these dharma does not have?
- Because of the legal, incense, incompatible and non-law of Theravada's acceptance, true is not true.
Because rúpa, etc., is covered by the Hinayana, which consists of two things: One is rúpa, which is made by the innermost.
The two colors are not obstacles, not because of the micro.
There are obstacles, certainly not true, because the micro-edge of the color is not true. Means that the micro if there is a concern as if the jar, is not true. If there are no obstacles, it is always like non-sharp, how can we gather as good as the bottle, shirt, etc.?
Again the micro if the direction and taste, then certainly can analyze, ie not real. If there is no direction and part, time as non-sharp, how to reconcile to rough, so that when the light shines, it appears shiny, as when the sun shines on the cylinder, shine and light two East, West? The east receives the light, the west emits the shadow, The spot where the light is received and the spot where the shadow appears is not the same, then the other pole is definitely in the direction and the position.
Again, when the eyes and body contact with objects such as walls, etc., only to see and touch this side, but not see and touch the other side, these objects by the very micro-harmony. So that is sure to have direction and taste.
Back to the micro, depending on where, sure there are on, under, East, West different. Otherwise, the extreme as the non-material no longer means the concert. Or assume that the extreme of intercourse intertwined, so not rough. Therefore, this microscope determines the direction and the taste. Again, there is an obstacle that is the main obstacle. If the micrometer has no direction and tastes, the color has the same impedance as the micrometer with no obstruction, But if there is no way to be shy, then no matter the color.
So, your micro is sure to have direction and taste. Because the direction and the part of the instant can be analyzed, it is possible to analyze the certainty is not true.
Consequently there is obstacle and there is no truth.
Q: Do not you have rupa as a clinic, that coast?
A: It is not without matter, but that identity is due to change. It means that consciousness, arising from the innermost powers within the consciousness, turns out to be similar in terms of eyes and matter, taking the general as its basis and the condition of the condition. But the canonical labels, at this stage, can not be known in terms of quantity, based only on the effect of its consciousness. And it is just a functional thing, not external.
Lust has external obstacles, In physics did not succeed, so it is only due to internal variable.
Due to the power of consciousness which is called consciousness, etc. It is the place where consciousness arises, etc. The condition of external attachment of consciousness is not true. Enlightenment is the charm of the predestination, that is, the lead that gives birth to it. You accept it as a predestined charm is not right, because it is not only the ability to arise, but also the predestination. Do not say the charm, etc. ... is also the charm of the coast of consciousness (Department of charm coast of consciousness must have two meanings: one is the ability to arise, two is the object for the condition. The ability to arise in consciousness, not the object of the five conditions, can not call the five grounds is the coast. If the five mean only one is called consciousness, which is called the Department of coast, then the coast, the coast also has the ability to arise, it is also supposed to be Coastal Charming?).
Or for the year of consciousness, atrophy, etc., it is only the color, it is only the charm of the harmony, the same is not true, because not the color, harmony is true. , Different from the micro. Because when analyzing the summary of the harmony, the condition of the harmony of the Prime Minister is very similar to the other that definitely does not arise again.
The harmony was not real, so it is impossible to say that it is the charm of the five consciousness. Do not say that the second moon can be conditioned in the fifth consciousness, (the second moon is blind, but it is only visible object), but it is not true, Fruition arise condition).
Again, the micro-positions in harmony are able to be conditioned for the five consciousness; Because in the five consciousness there is no superhuman form.
Again, there are no available microdata in harmony, for when it does not harmonize, there is no harmony.
Again not in the position of harmony with the non-harmonious, the form of the various micro-different. So in the position of harmony as well as not harmonious, the micro-point of identity etc ... is not the scene of the season of consciousness.
- There are people who accept "each of the core of identity, etc. ... when not in combination is not the scene of the coast of the five consciousness, but when in the position of reconciliation, in turn help each other arise roughly do the scenery condition Give. That really is the scene of the coast.
This attachment is not correct. Because in the position of reconciliation with the united, the form of micro is one. And because of the microscope of the vase, the tank, the same condition that the condition must be no different. And because of the location of the concert, each microscope was removed from its infinite round.
Again, not the prime minister of crude sub-prime minister. Do not say that the charm of these scenes grace the other scenes, a re-condition all conditions. Accept that there are so many micro-faults, so there are no real microscopic outside of the consciousness (but with a micro case outside the star?).
Therefore, it is clear that the same color from the self appeared to be the coast charm. Because the arbiter of that place arises, and carry the same generals.
But when it comes to customizations, the size of a spell is large, and not a single variable that causes multiple spheres to form an object.
Because people accept raw material is real, so the Buddha said the micro to make them analyze except, not the Buddha said the color is very real. The yogic monks use fictitious insight for the gross ruler, in turn analyzes, until it is not analyzed anymore, assuming it is extreme. Although micro is still in the direction and position, but can not be analyzed. If analyzed further, there will be almost no general appearance, no longer called rúpa, so vi is extremely boundary of identity.
Therefore, it is important to know that the hindrances are due to the transformation, not to the complexity of the universe.
Colors are not objectionable, because they are of the same kind, so it is not true. Or because not as disturbing as Mind, Mind, definitely not very sharp.
Shades have obstacles, appearances, judgment, There is no dark matter, there is no sharp case, there is no form that can tell that it is a material ritual?
(11) Q: "Shameless, uncharacteristic", is not it true?
A: They are not real. Why ? Because as the identity of the body, if it is true, then what is the nature? If we say that the body is not real, because the quantum can be analyzed to the micro, it can not be long, etc. .. If we say the body movement, is not true, because the medium There is no killing, no sense of moving, because the law of killing is self-kill, no need to wait for the new. Abandonment if you still have to wait for the destruction; If we say that there is a form that is not emblematic, not a form, but that it is not true, it is the mind that gives birth to the limb movement. Because that color is dynamic, It is destroyed as before. If the core of the movement is wind, but wind does not indicate, can not be called expression. Again, if the wind is the body, the exposure is not good evil character (but the good is good evil). Again, if it is incense, taste, it is not clear, due to exposure know. Therefore, the body is not real.
But because of the mind doing the cause, because of the manifestation of the appearance in the limbs, birth and destruction successive, moving from one location to another, like the action, express the mind, .
Verbal expression is not real sound, as the language, because the sound in a moment does not indicate anything, but many serial is not real. Again color has external obstacles that were previously destroyed. But the sixth mind where the essence turns out to sound, to kill successive, As tuong denote, pretending to say semicolon, is not unreasonable.
The expression was not real, then the colorlessness was not real. However, according to the aspiration of mind, there is a difference between good and evil, the name is emancipated. In neither logical nor. Meaningless here or y where the "growth" seed, which is capable of emanating the body and the evil good language that set. Or the place of "Concentration" current while meditation, is able to stop the evil body that set. So that's a fake.
Q: The Buddha said there are three karma. Now you do not like business, do not business?
A: This is not unbelief, but just say it is not very sharp. "Self centered" launched the body, called the body. "Fraternity" launched the language, called vocabulary. "Judge Judge" and "Judge Decisions" correspond to the idea, affect the mind, called the mind. "Self centered" originated in body, speech, artifact, called karma. Body and language are the path of Private Judgment and Private Decision. Again, the good and evil karmic retribution produces the fruit of the suffering of suffering, so should also be called virtue, which is called karma. Therefore, the seven karmas (karma of the three karmas, the four karmic karmas) are first to take the "Tu" as their nature. Or body expressions, not expressions (non-karma) due to "self centered" launched, say is karma. It is the path of "Tu" passing through, so called karma.
Therefore, it is important to know that there are no external colors, but only by the innermost being, such as external appearance. (12)
- Lawlessness is not true. Why ? Because of incompatible laws such as "Dac", "Dac" etc ... it is not like sharp, mind and mental, can have clear generals. There can be no other merits with other rúpa, rúpa and mental states that can work themselves. Therefore, you should know legal Immutable, not real. Only in the parts of Lust, Mind, and Emptiness that simulate, it definitely can not be different from rúpa, mind, and form, which is real, Like Sac, Mind (instance). Or because it is not photographed in the mind, mental and physical, not as virulent as the dharma absolutely not, so it certainly is not true. Or because it does not photograph into other dharmas, as with other dharmas, it is not possible.
Arguments: What, that (Hinayana) how to know "attainment", "other" difference with the mind, mind, own real real use?
She replied: Because of the speech. As Sutra says: "Daddy-old-la (ordinary, charming) achievement of good and evil, saints accomplish ten do not learn" (Eight chief, more subtle secret, intellectual mind). Saying again: "Risen births do not achieve Dhamma, the Arahants do not achieve affliction." The word "achievement" "not accomplished" here, is the expression of "attainment" and "immeasurable."
Essence - Business does not say: "Dac, Dac" differs from the rúpa, the real mind is real. So the above evidence fails. The Sutra also said: "Monarch achievements seven precious". Is it the achievement of the other and the unwitting? (The first five are forgive, the next two are unconscious). If you say that the seven are self-sufficiency, but pretend to be "accomplished", then the law of good and evil how not to accept the saying like that, is that real is "acquired"? If the seven treasures in the present moment can be attributed to "achievements", how can we know that good and evil are accomplished now? If you leave the present time good and evil is not true right. At present there are certainly good and evil seeds.
V ... "Dac" again for the French, what use to win? If it is "possible" to be the cause of the birth of the law, then it should be able to cause beings to initiate the lawless. Again all the inanimate objects that do not have "attainment" should not perish permanently, and things that have not been or have been lost may never be born permanently (but in fact it still arises). If told by the "birth sentence" as the cause that arises, the two birth (birth and birth) of us accept useless.
If you take the full three personality of good, evil, unscrupulous as the birth sentence, the good, the evil, the sign should start once, if other conditions have to wait for it to start, "Dac" becomes useless. If the "attained" for France, it is the cause not lost, the sentient beings by which the achievement of good and evil. But the good and evil do not leave the sentient beings. If you leave the situation is nothing real "attained." So "gain" for the dharma becomes useless.
"Dac" did not really have, then "the same" too. But the dhamma can be accomplished at the soul, but according to the simulator there are three achievements: one is the achievement; Second is self-achievement; Three is the current accomplishment. On the contrary, simulate the name "not accomplished". This type is many, but this position does not harm the perpetual gonorrhea or the premise of the three realms that simulate "emptiness" and called the "human nature" because it has not been achieved. The dhamma.
How do (Hinayana) know more than Sac, Mind, Tam, there is legal "homeland"? Because of the speech. As the canal said, "This is the celestial body, this is the common cause, until the broad" (the part between heaven and heaven, people and people).
Argument: This business does not say that the difference between the Sacred Heart, the mind has its own dharma, so the evidence is not successful.
If the field, the same language is the place where the "compatriots" that start, should know the "real". If the time is right, the grass should also have a share (by definition, only to talk about the species). Back to the "compatriots" that start to know the same language, the "homeland" should have another "other". But that was not the case, then how is that?
Again if told by the "homeland" as the new beginning of the co-operation, the desire to know, there is "the dharma." That is not right. Because of the habit of doing the same thing as starting the co-operation, it is necessary to have the legal "co-own" as the cause.
But the place of difference of body and mind is similar between beings that simulate "the same."
How do you know different from Sac, Mind, Tam have real "network root"? (Hinayana responds) Because of the speech. As the speech says: "There is vitality, heat and consciousness is three" (consciousness, ovulation, consciousness), should know the "root cause" is called vitality.
Argument: This business does not say that with the Sac, Mind is real, so the evidence is not successful.
In the former, the meaning of "hermaphrodite" is not known, so here there is no sense of existence, "because the source is a part of identity."
Again, if the "real life" is different from consciousness, then it is like feeling and think, etc. ..., not real "network basis".
Q: If there are no such three things, why the business has three words, ovulation, wake?
Argument: Because there is a difference in meaning, there are three, such as the four main paths.
Q: (There is no consciousness) is in the heartless, longevity and ovulation right?
A: Does not the Kinh do not say do not leave the body?
Question: If (do not leave the body like that), why call it statusless heart?
A: In the other position only kill the transfer of consciousness that is called heartless, not kill A-back-skin. The reason for this A-back, this will be clear. This A-da-da official enough to do the three realms, six animals, four species. It is the result of continuous darkness throughout the continuum, but do not have to deal with separate "real root" do?
But where the seed of the birth of this eighth consciousness, it is due to the differential function of karma leading to the place and exists in a certain time, That simulator is "network root" only.
How do (Hinayana) know two "mindlessness" (Mindlessness and Destiny) and the Iris Heaven is different from the Sacred, Mind, Concentration, true nature? (If there are not two without mind and the Immaculate Mind is not able to stop the Mind, the mind does not initiate (the master). If in the heartless, there is a real law different from Sac, Tam, able to prevent the Mind, the mind does not initiate, but called the mindless. If so, when the formless, there must be a separate form of Dhamma differs from Sacred, the Mind, the hindrance identity, which is called Infinite? Kia did not, then why is that?
Again, to prevent the mind, what need to be legal, such as dykes, the counterfeiter can also be obstructive. Meaning when the development, for the intention to have the work, boring Mind, mental rough, Tam mind, mental, mental, mental gradually subtle, it fires into the Underwriters, into the mind strongly dormant, due to the harm and crush that strain of mind. The temporal mind is temporarily out of place, and in that non-existing state of mind that simulates two mindless thoughts. Because this seed heals, it is also called healing.
The cultivator Unconscious first of all the fruit of the Imagination, the seed of the race, the way of sensation in the heavens in the sky, where the idea of coarseness based on the equation is no longer available. Right where in that department that is set to Imagine the Dependency of Formation, should be called Futures.
So know the three solutions "Unservice", "Breaking up", "Imagination Irritable" (Imaginary fruit) is not true.
(Exhausted one according to the Han). END=NAM MO CAKYA MOUNI BUDDHA.( 3 TIMES ).VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY=THICH CHAN TANH.THE MIND OF ENLIGHTENMENT.VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST NUN=GOLDEN LOTUS MONASTERY=AUSTRALIA,SYDNEY.4/4/2017.
is the great knowing, by the knowledge, or by the knowledge (wholesome knowledge).
Only things that do not exist exist, only exist when they are sufficient, only exist between all relationships, this class is another, eternity, a condition for all, all one, all things. For one, one all. Do this one should have this, this one born the other, this one should not the other, this one kill the other kill. Such is the dependent origination, he exclaims. In that only the only one is the only, the only great, only incense, only ignorance, pure, pure ... as the ancient saying: "The most beautiful incense, immortality." He said: "Depending on the law, the legal world." (Any given a legal solution that is legal world law).
Consciousness is one of all things, But consciousness has the special ability to distinguish the other and know for yourself, it is the core in every being. It is this knowledge that makes the dharmas in the originality, unknown anonymity, infinite, infinite, infinite infinite infinite (in no air) emerges the natural state of the universe, Figure that state that pre-wove, create karma, tie it, causing suffering.
Other dharmas do not have this capacity, only consciousness has this capacity, so only speak formally and not just another.
"Duy means special, prevent outside; Consciousness means resolution, expressed inwardly.
Speaking of the main is to give a statement, wake up people to self-consciously mind your mind, look back at the natural power to turn it inside yourself to filter it, Cultivate it, repair it must be transformed to just benefit, not cause suffering.
Until the eight consciousness has been transformed into four minds, completely clear, the most rational, such as, the non-dual color, no sharpness, mind-free, mind free. Now there is no need, no need, or need anything, be afraid.
The potential hidden in the Buddha's words scattered in the Sutras, Bodhisattva Shakyamuni wrote the essay. It is due to reason, should be called Chengdu consciousness. On the contrary, it is precisely because of the comment of the Venerable One that the catechism was founded, that is, by the Ly dynasty, so called Thanh Duy. Again, ten commentators explain the 30 verses of Thich Nhat Hanh's discourse that form the Conscious Commentary. That's because the Church should be called Education.
Thanh Duy is also known as the Pure Land, because this essay clearly clarifies the doctrine of Consciousness.
After the study of India brought back to China (602-644), the Tibetan Tripitaka took the words of the ten Great Masters such as Dharma Protector, Duc Hue, An Hue .... Thich Nhat Than, then back up and translate the essay called The Ten Commandments, handed down to date.
DISCUSSED
DISCUSSION
Stick to the true nature, the purifier.
I am explaining his words now.
For the sake of benefitting. (1)
- Now to create this essay to make people confused and misunderstandings "not" (fall not, France) is back to understand correctly, understand correctly to remove the two objections. Because of self, the law should be born two full of obstacles, if the evidence falls, Dhamma is not the other, then the destruction of the other. Trick to kill because of the two winners. As the eradication of defilements is the thing that causes birth and continuity that the results of the feet of liberation, due to the killing of knowledge is the obstacle to the understanding of the situation, which is the result of Great Bodhi.
For revelation for the wrongdoer, the real dharma, the dharma consciousness, to make them realize the Second, do not know the true sense of Consciousness.
- There are people who love and confide in Consciousness, should or accept the external environment is like not not, or accept the context is not like a scene; Or accept the use of the other is the same; Or leave the mind, not own mind. By stopping such heterosexuals, make them understand the truth as profoundly profound knowledge, so create this Comment. (2)
I.
Q: If only consciousness, then why do people in the world and in the sacred say there is a fall and a dharma?
Chanting:
"By assuming the legal
fall has fallen legal.
They refocused,
Thuc Nang turn three.
It is meditation, privatization,
and wakefulness.
Comment: The world and the holy teachings say there is a fall and a dharma, just a false saying, not a true nature. Fall means owner, legal means to preserve. These two have the transformation figures appear. There are generals such as charming beings, false networks, etc., and so forth. There are generals such as Real, Duc, Kamma, etc. Aggregates
(*) Subsections, ordinal numbers, and " Ask - answer "is translated by the translator.
About, About v. V ... change means that depending on the test conditions set different generals.
Q: Such generals if hypothetical, then where to be hypothetical?
A. Such goons are dependent on the transformation of consciousness that is implicit.
- Consciousness is close, aware. This is where consciousness also includes mind, because it is the same.
- Turning means that the body changes into two similar parts, the Chess and the Part. For General and Ants to refute Self-proof part of the consciousness that arises, then take refuge in these two parts of Ants, which fall and fall. Fall and the other French leave two parts of Ants, there is no slate here (fake distinction).
Or because of internal transformation into external factors, because of the ability to distinguish the practice of the law, So when the beings arise immediately turn into generals of the fall, the French General. General in that way, but because of the difference that appears similar to the scene outside (the fake man). Kinds of love from the immeasurable to the present, the grace of the generosity of the fall, that is true, the legal. As dreamers, because of their dreams, they appear as generals in the minds of the outside world, and then depend on them to accept that they are external.
The true self, the dumbness of the attachment is not true, it only depends on the expectations that fabricated, so say it is fake (distinguish variable, fake). In fact, it is not true that there is a legal fall, but it seems that there is a dhamma manifested.
The situation according to expectations that fabricated not the same as consciousness, and internal content certainly depends on the charm, not unlike the scene. Thus, we can stop the two things is to accept the increase and accept the fall (France is not that it is true, it is accepting the content is not accept, it is accepting).
The innermost charge of the simulator, so it is only on the secular face, and the wake is the cheetah of the scene, so it also on the winning side (the ultimate cause). (3)
II. DIFFICULT
- How can you know that there are no externalities, only the innermost being as external, so there can not be true, legal?
- What is not possible to fall true?
There are three things to fall into. There are three things:
1. Falling can be permanent, Depending on where the cause of suffering, pleasant feeling.
2. Depression can be normal but the amount is uncertain, depending on the small body that it stretched or retract.
3. Depression can be normal but very subtle as a microscope, it silently translates in the body, making career contributions.
- The first fall is not true. Why? The fall is often constant, with the amount of nothing, then the fall does not follow the body to suffer. Falling is common, is the fall, the reason that fall does not move, so how can fall can follow the body to create karma?
Is the fall ego that is copper or other species? If one coincides, then when one's self is doing this, reasonably all the other beings' affairs do, when one is self-righteous, the other is all life. Escape, Is it justified that all the fallen angels of the other beings are free? If so, then make a big mistake. In other words, the falls of beings are the same throughout, then the body of the self is mixed together. Again, when one falls, one falls, because falling down together with other egoes in a non-separate place, is to be called all the ego, all the ego. If you think that the operation, the fruit bearing has its own property, should not make mistakes it is not true. Because the fallings of sentient beings have turned all over, the kamma, the fruit and the body have been together with the falling bodies of the companions of one, but if the fruit of the fruit of this fall is not fallen, then also Not right
When one's self is liberated, all of the other sentient beings' descent is liberated, because the practice coincides with all falls.
- Second fall is also irrational? Why, because attachment is permanent. Residents can not follow the body that stretch and withdraw. If it has stretched and retracted it does not differ from the wind in the tube, which can not be permanent. Falling under the body, the fall can be divided as the body, so how can accept as a can?
- The third fall is also irrational. Why ? Because the amount of falls is so small as a mote, how can falling can make a big body move? If the fall is small, but the week is very fast in the body, like the ring of fire, so as tuong it moves in the body, so that the fall is not one, not often, because of something that goes back, moving That's not usually the case.
- Then there are three ego:
1. Accept down News aggregates.
2. Fellowship.
3. The fall does not mean you do not have to leave the aggregates.
First, clinging to the aggregate, not right. Because that self should be like the aggregate, not usually, most. Again the form of the body is not self, because it is like the external body, there is fear.
Mind, the legal mind is not true, because the waiting for the coast, Tam, new born, it is not continuous continuous.
The law of incompatibility, other shades of legal photography, is not self, because it is like nothing, not sense of sense (not sense, not fall).
Second, clinging to the left, is also not true. Because of the separation of the aggregates, it is like nothingness, no action and the result.
Third, self-acceptance is not aggregates, not leaving the aggregates, also not true. Because the idea that the aggregate of the aggregate has been re-established, it is not like the aggregate of the aggregate, it is like a jar (the jar made of earth, the earth is empty, it does not leave the earth). Again, I can not say that self is self-immolation or self-immolation (ie, aggregates are conditioned beings, they leave the aggregates, they are unconditioned.) Here the five aggregates fall without the five aggregates. It can not be said to be self or non-self.
So, the passages of self-fall on failure.
- Back to the subject can be said to be there, is it thoughtful or not? If the fall is thought to be impermanent, because not always have thought, if the fall is not thoughtful, it is like nothing, can not work and life results. So that approach does not fall.
- The fall can be said to be true, Does it work or does not work? If there is a fall, it is like limbs, must be impermanent. If it does not work then falls like rabbit horn, not real self. So self-attachment is not aggregates, not leaving the aggregate failed.
- Back to the can be accepted as real, is it the scene of the predestined relationship? If it is not the scene of the predation, then how do you know it is true? If falls are the predestined landscape of an ants, then one should see an individual who is not a madman, because they know the truth (if there is true, then one who has fallen is an ants, That person knows the truth, not crazy island). If so, why is the acceptor fallen to be believed by the faithless selflessness and only say that people do not agree that: "Not to fall can be Nirvana, Those who are self-conceded slams birth and death, but where can wrong people have fallen to Nirvana, but the right view does not accept the fall of birth and death!
- Again the ants can not be true self, because it has predestination, like the charm of other dhamma. Again, the predestination of a certain anger is not self, because it is predestined, as dharmas, incense, etc. Therefore, the ants do not appreciate the true self, only the conditioned aggregates, and then Hope measured, attached to this one. (4)
III. TWO VEHICLES
- But there are two types of self-attachment:
1. Sentence.
2. Distinguish.
- The attachment to the birth sentence is that from selflessness to self-absorbed in the mind, it is born with the body, not waiting for heresy and evil new discrimination, Which is the carrier of the transfiguration, so called the Sentence of Birth.
This kind of Sentence has two: 1. The usual continuity, the seventh consciousness, of the part of the eighth consciousness, arises in the eighth form of consciousness on the seventh consciousness and accepts that self.
2. There is a discontinuity, the sixth consciousness into the five aggregates of aggregates, which are transformed into it, or the five aggregates of aggregates subject to it, or the conditioned states of each aggregates. Take that general made himself fall. These two things are so subtle ego sentence difficult to remove. Later in the period of cultivation, often practice the birth of non-conquer (the anthropic self, in the direction of the director of birth is not deeper in the guiding, so called unborn victory) thoroughly Can be eliminated.
Disagreement is also due to the power of the present condition outside, it is not the same birth with the body, but must wait for paganism and evil new distinction to arise, so called discrimination. This selfish distinction is only in consciousness. There are also two:
One is the cunning charm of talking about the five aggregates, and then arise on his own mind and distinguish between accepting that general made himself fall. Two is the evil heresy about the general, then he launched on his own mind, and distinguish between accepting that general made himself fall.
These two ego distinctions are so rough that they are easy to remove. During the development of faith, all laws are born without foot (the anthropic self), that can be eliminated.
All the ego for the five aggregates mentioned above, for the external aggregates of self-consciousness, whether or not, As for the five aggregates subjected to self-indulgence, there is no grasping, Also accept the clinging aggregates due to cause, he yelled to fall, the aggregate clay is real, but the coast does not come, because it is primordial coast, so also called outside the mind. The seventh of the eighth consciousness, the ego consciousness, is the eighth consciousness outside of the seventh consciousness, it is real, and the sixth eighth consciousness is unaware, ie, not. There is, or is not, the image of the aggregate of the aggregates subject to self-consciousness, the image is always there.
Should know the ego is attached to the five generations of aggregate aggregate impermanent hope that fall is. But these aggregates aggregates are from charm, They are just as illusory, because the wrong measurement of the five aggregates subject to clinging is self, that self is not true. So the Nehalem said: "Secret numbers should know, the ant's insights of Sa-subject, Ba-la-subjects in the world, all predestined under the five aggregates aggregates that arise."
(5) IV. EXPLANATION problem
Q: If not real down how the remembering, said, litigation, collective, grace, resentment?
A: It is true, as you accept, it has always been constant, then the same as before, the memory, know, chanting, grace, resentment can not be. Or before like the next time, the memory, know, chanting, grace, lust is always not; Because after the first, falls can not be so different. If you think that the first step after the translation, not falling, the reason is not true. Because of the absence, It should be as often as possible, do not leave, so it is not usually as used.
But each of them has the eighth, first and last name, and preserves the seed, that seed together with all the existing dharmas. Remembering, knowing, etc.
So, his last sentence was to blame for his apostles, not my apostles.
Q: If no real self, who created karma, who bear retribution?
A: It is true that as you accept, it did not translate as nothing, how can it create karmic retribution? If there is a change in translation is impermanent (not true).
But the sentient beings, due to the causal force of the mind, the center of continuity uninterrupted, should have the creation of karma and retribution. This is for no reason.
Q: If there is no, then what is birth and death in the animals? Who bored suffering to seek Nirvana?
A: It was as if you accept, it did not kill, so how can say it birth and death. Fallen as usual, nowhere is the suffering of the brain, there is nothing to be bored suffering suffering for Nirvana, so his words only harm him.
But the sentient beings, the body and mind continue to suffer from karma, there is the reincarnation of animals and bored suffering to seek Nirvana.
Therefore, it is necessary to know for sure that there is no real self, only consciousness, from moment to moment, from death after birth, consequence of cause and effect, In which to stick to the real fall. (6)
V.
FRIDAY - What outside reality there is no real law?
- Because the outside of consciousness as the pagan and other heirs accept, it is not true.
- France's outlaw why not?
The argument is: "Self is self," it uses the 23 measures as the great sense, etc. ... Three Dalits, lashes, mirrors (courage, hatred, greed, greed, hatred) Make up etc ... but the Enlightenment, etc., that by the three roots are slap-lashes, lamas, Me-ma, is true not fake, the amount of capture.
The opposite line is absurd. Why ? Because the Enlightenment, etc., because the three such roots constitute, it is like the army or the forest, is false, not real, how can we say that French is the current grasp?
Again the French Enlightenment ect ... if it is true then it is like the three root (Slaps, lashes, A-ma) is not composed of three roots. Back-slam ect. It is also the Great Enlightenment ... it is just as well as the Enlightenment ect ..., must be composed of three roots and also transformed impermanent as Enlightenment.
Again, the three roots are slap-bang, lama-ah, each has many functions, so it must also be many, because of the ability and the one. When the three bodies are all over, then when in a place to move the other time must also change, so it can not be different. As for the three things, the body and the general are different, then how to harmonize into a general? Because when it comes to convergence, as a general, with no harmony, can not be different. If you think that these three, but other generals, is contrary to the policy of the owner of the body and the general is one. Should be like general, silently one; Minister should be as, is clearly three. So it is not possible to say three things to one general.
Three things are different, Enlightenment etc ... is the sum. General and special one, so not one, not three. When these three things change if not harmonious to a general, then as if not transformed, how can we now see a form, etc.? If the three harmony into a general, then the original Prime Minister and the same must also lose it.
Can not say three things are two generals, is a total one, because the sum is special, the sum must also be three, so how to see one? If you think that three can have three generals mixed with difficulty, should see that one is not; Because there are three generals, one can not see that one, how to know three different things?
If there are three generals each, then each one can be sharp, v. V ... there is nothing to wait for three harmony. And each body should also have three generals, because it is the general.
Again, the Enlightenment, etc., are due to three compositions, one for each other without distinction, so the time of cause and effect, the five, five, each base is not different. Without distinction, one can perceive all the senses, or a scene that all senses are aware of, the present time manifested by the presence, the rate of unintentional, net, purifying Time is not wrong, so there is a big mistake.
So the knowledge of the law of the argument that it is unsuccessful
, it is only hope that the measure is OK. (7)
must win approval conclusion: "The strike means as fact, Germany etc ... much is real and true nature, represents the amount of capture".
- This attachment is not right. Why ? Because in the meanings, the ones that are permanent, if it can produce the result, are impermanent, because it has effect, as the fruit is born. If it does not bear the fruit, it can not leave the true nature, such as rabbit horn.
Again the impermanent, if there is a physical obstacle is the direction and the taste, if the direction and taste can be analyzed, like the army, the forest, not real nature, otherwise Concerned as the mind, mind, it can not leave the mind, mental property that is true.
The land, water, fire, wind of the dissertation is not afraid of, do not have to worry, because of the body touch, such as hard, wet, hot, enough). And the hard, wet, hot, the motions of the Thang dynasty, not without fear, Because of the body contact (earth), such as earth, water, fire, wind, (example). Land, water, fire, three things like blue etc. are all seen by the eye. Then according to the reason of this reprimand. So it is not true earth, water, fire, wind, hard, wet, etc. Is not separate, nor eyes to see the land, water, fire, real wind.
"In the real sense, the things that are flawed and often are, in fact, impermanent, because they have hardships, such as raw land, etc. in the Meanings, dhammas, dharmas, dharmas, dharmas, dharmas, dharmas, dharmas, dharmas, dhammas, ).
The second dissertation was accepted: Five meanings like Germany, Karma, etc. Do not shoot, It is true that it is not out of consciousness that has its own character, because it does not shoot into the body, such as the daughter of the stone girl. Indeed, German owl, etc., does not belong to the great nature, it is true that it does not have to leave the form itself, because it does not belong to the nature, such as flowers in the middle (for example ).
Again, the great nature of the Thang controversial: "Out side truth, Germany, etc. ... not own nature (religion), because they think that the true nature is not human, . Germany, etc., is not a true religion, because they think that the true nature is different from the truth, the German, etc., such as the absolute. As the great nature is not no, there is no need to have the true nature to make it, then why the truth, Germany v. V ... need to own the nature to make it available? If you leave the French still have their own nature, then should leave the French are not separate still have no identity. But that was not the case, why is it? So the knowledge of the nature of the dissertation is considered only by the measurement of damage.
"The homogeneity of truth, Germany, Karma, is different from real, German, Kamma," said the dissertation, "that probably is not true. Do not say that homosexuality is not the homogeneity of truth, Germany, because it can be separate from the real, such as Germany, for example.
Germany, etc., is not the real thing, Germany, etc., because it is different from the simplicity of truth, Germany, etc., such as Germany, Karma and Truth.
The homogeneity of soil, water, fire, wind for the earth, water, fire, wind, The standard here should know. As the homogeneity of the Real, etc. not alone in nature, etc., to make it homogeneous, then apart from "Truth" etc ... should not be alone in the nature of the Real to make real, Germany, the land of homosexuality. If you leave the truth of the true nature of the truth, the time out of phi The real nature of the uninhabited nature of phi phi. But that was not the case, why is it? So know "homosexuality", just a fabricated.
Again, the meaning of "harmony" of the thesis is certainly not true, because it is photographed in non-real things, etc., such as the absolutely not.
The other said that: "It is so ... by the amount of awareness," the reason it is not true, let alone the meaning of "harmony" that they are not aware of the amount, Where can you really be? Assuming that the expression "harmony" is the scene of awareness, then by reason, it is not true.
But the real meanings, etc., are not realities outside consciousness, because they are known to be known, such as tortoiseshell.
It is not the position of the eye, but it is not photographed in the mind of the condition of the body outside of consciousness, because it implies harmony, such as "grace" To the position of grace "synergistic owls" nor shooting into the position of the charm of the "harmony" in the form of "religious", because it assumes harmony (human) (enough).
Therefore, it is important to know the "truth of the meaning, etc." of the Thang dynasty is just a false expectation.
(8) - Again, there are people who have a "Great Self, which is real, is constantly changing, living beings." The other is also unreasonable. Why ? For if something is born, then surely that is impermanent, the impermanence is certainly not able to turn around, the unchanging is not true. And what can be normal, turn around, have all the capabilities, then it is reasonable that all over the place, all the time, and simultaneously all the law. And if you wait for the will and other conditions that can be born, it is contrary to the most human reason. Or other wants and conditions should also arise, because often there.
In addition, some people have a "Brahma", "time", "direction", "nature", "nature", " Enough of all abilities, all births. These passages are destroyed like this.
- There are people who accept the "sound" in the Vedic narrative is often, it can do quantitative to express the dharma. There are people who accept "All sounds are normal", just waiting to meet the charm that discovered, is capable of expressing.
Two ways of accepting the above sound are unreasonable. Why ?
Because the sound in Pentecost is capable of expressing it, it is not permanent, because it is capable of expressing (eg,) the sounds of others. Other sounds are not permanent, because they have to wait for new conditions, such as vases, dresses.
- There is a "super infidious" of the land, water, wind, fire is real, permanent, capable of being born rough, the rough is born not beyond the range of the kernel, So the roughness is impermanent, but it is true. "
This attachment is also unreasonable. Why ? Because of that, if there are directions, parts, such as ants, it may not be true. Without the direction, the taste, such as mind, mental, it can not gather around the birth of raw fruit. If it has produced the fruit, then it is the same as the fruit that was born.
The fruit of birth, not beyond the scope of the innermost being, is also called viharmas, not called rudoms, in which case rúpas are not rúpas such as labels, etc., and thus left. With his policy. If it is said that "the result is due to the quantity and virtue, it is not crude but as crude, recognizable," but the result is the same as the quantity of the innermost ones, , Not with coarse Or the micro and the rough, it is rough, co-located in the same place. If we say that "the color turns into the innermost parts of the cosmos, because the nucleus is not one, it can be called rough," so the time of the result is not one. The place of the innermost person is so different. This color does not turn out to be so sharp, so it is not the sharp sense. If the composite has many parts together, the coarse texture, many micro-particles are not small, enough to become the base and the scene, what is the result? Due to many components, it is not true. The time to know his attachment before the opposite.
The fruit and the kernel are stumbling blocks, not in the same position as the two ends. If the "fruit and the human enter together as the water into the sand, the drug into the copper"; Who accepts the sand and water to get water and medicine? Or the water that has taken up the sand, the grain of the sand, has changed apart, not one; Water co-medication, the water can be converted into gold, not a single, is common.
It is a rough piece, if it is one, then when one knows that part of it is to see all the other parts; Because this is the one, then it must be like this. If you do not accept that then the contrary, also accept such a contrary. So what the other accept, back and forth
failed. It is only by the expectation of measuring attachments. (9)
But the foreign religions have many types, but the legal (legal) is not allowed four things: Not one, often; Water co-medication, the water can be converted into gold, not a single, is common. It is a rough piece, if it is one, then when one knows that part of it is to see all the other parts; Because this is one, then the other must be like this. If you do not accept that then the contrary, also accept such a contrary. So what the other accept, back and forth failed. It is only by the expectation of measuring attachments. (9) But the foreign religions have many types, but the legal (legal) is not allowed four things: Not one, often; Water co-medication, the water can be converted into gold, not one, often. It is a rough piece, if it is one, then when one knows that part of it is to see all the other parts; Because this is one, then the other must be like this. If you do not accept that then the contrary, also accept such a contrary. So what the other accept, back and forth failed. It is only by the expectation of measuring attachments. (9) But the foreign religions have many types, but the legal (legal) is not allowed four things: That must be like this. If you do not accept that then the contrary, also accept such a contrary. So what the other accept, back and forth failed. It is only by the expectation of measuring attachments. (9) But the foreign religions have many types, but the legal (legal) is not allowed four things: That must be like this. If you do not accept that then the contrary, also accept such a contrary. So what the other accept, back and forth failed. It is only by the expectation of measuring attachments. (9) But the foreign religions have many types, but the legal (legal) is not allowed four things:
- One is the righteousness (the Enlightenment, etc. of the Commentary), with the emptiness (Evangelism only of the Commentary) can be just one, as the argument number. This attachment is absurd. Why? Because do not say all the measures are the same nature. If all the dhamma is the nature, it is the same nature, not the opposite to the three virtues (Tatras, Lashes, and Devas), each body is different And contrary to the world now see the different legal divergent. Again, if identity, etc., is the nature of identity, etc., then identity should not be green or yellow.
- Two is the acceptance of the law (real, Germany, the Karma of Thang Thuy) with the nature (the only nature of Thang Comment), as different, as the dissent Thang. This attachment is also unreasonable. Why ? For not to say that all the Dharma is non-existent. Just like a lost thing, there is nothing to know, It is contrary to "The owl" etc. It is not without its own, nor is it contrary to the present world that there are things. Again, if the colors are not tanh, then sharpness should be like the sound, not the sight of the eye.
- Third is to accept the same with the same nature as the same, as the infidels. This attachment is also unreasonable. Why ? Because one and the other is faulty like one and the other said above. Two different generals may be different. And if one and the other are homogeneous, fail. Do not say all the same legal way. Or one and the other is just not real fake but the real thing, the reason failed.
- Four are the same with Tanh is no different, as the Taoist outcast. This attachment is also unreasonable. Why ? Because no one is different with one and the other.
Words are no different than old speech or expression (negative or affirmative). If the expression is not to say both, but if the old is not accept it. The old also express the opposite fruit. The old non-expressive statements. Again, no other is contrary to the common understanding of the world of things have a different. And contrary to his policy (you). "Dhamma etc. so decisive yes".
So knowing that word is just the winding way to run erratically, those who have the right mind to accept. (10)
VI. FAITH THE LITIGATION OF JUDGMENTS
- Other heathen accept "to leave the real are the dhamma, incense, etc. ..." How these dharma does not have?
- Because of the legal, incense, incompatible and non-law of Theravada's acceptance, true is not true.
Because rúpa, etc., is covered by the Hinayana, which consists of two things: One is rúpa, which is made by the innermost.
The two colors are not obstacles, not because of the micro.
There are obstacles, certainly not true, because the micro-edge of the color is not true. Means that the micro if there is a concern as if the jar, is not true. If there are no obstacles, it is always like non-sharp, how can we gather as good as the bottle, shirt, etc.?
Again the micro if the direction and taste, then certainly can analyze, ie not real. If there is no direction and part, time as non-sharp, how to reconcile to rough, so that when the light shines, it appears shiny, as when the sun shines on the cylinder, shine and light two East, West? The east receives the light, the west emits the shadow, The spot where the light is received and the spot where the shadow appears is not the same, then the other pole is definitely in the direction and the position.
Again, when the eyes and body contact with objects such as walls, etc., only to see and touch this side, but not see and touch the other side, these objects by the very micro-harmony. So that is sure to have direction and taste.
Back to the micro, depending on where, sure there are on, under, East, West different. Otherwise, the extreme as the non-material no longer means the concert. Or assume that the extreme of intercourse intertwined, so not rough. Therefore, this microscope determines the direction and the taste. Again, there is an obstacle that is the main obstacle. If the micrometer has no direction and tastes, the color has the same impedance as the micrometer with no obstruction, But if there is no way to be shy, then no matter the color.
So, your micro is sure to have direction and taste. Because the direction and the part of the instant can be analyzed, it is possible to analyze the certainty is not true.
Consequently there is obstacle and there is no truth.
Q: Do not you have rupa as a clinic, that coast?
A: It is not without matter, but that identity is due to change. It means that consciousness, arising from the innermost powers within the consciousness, turns out to be similar in terms of eyes and matter, taking the general as its basis and the condition of the condition. But the canonical labels, at this stage, can not be known in terms of quantity, based only on the effect of its consciousness. And it is just a functional thing, not external.
Lust has external obstacles, In physics did not succeed, so it is only due to internal variable.
Due to the power of consciousness which is called consciousness, etc. It is the place where consciousness arises, etc. The condition of external attachment of consciousness is not true. Enlightenment is the charm of the predestination, that is, the lead that gives birth to it. You accept it as a predestined charm is not right, because it is not only the ability to arise, but also the predestination. Do not say the charm, etc. ... is also the charm of the coast of consciousness (Department of charm coast of consciousness must have two meanings: one is the ability to arise, two is the object for the condition. The ability to arise in consciousness, not the object of the five conditions, can not call the five grounds is the coast. If the five mean only one is called consciousness, which is called the Department of coast, then the coast, the coast also has the ability to arise, it is also supposed to be Coastal Charming?).
Or for the year of consciousness, atrophy, etc., it is only the color, it is only the charm of the harmony, the same is not true, because not the color, harmony is true. , Different from the micro. Because when analyzing the summary of the harmony, the condition of the harmony of the Prime Minister is very similar to the other that definitely does not arise again.
The harmony was not real, so it is impossible to say that it is the charm of the five consciousness. Do not say that the second moon can be conditioned in the fifth consciousness, (the second moon is blind, but it is only visible object), but it is not true, Fruition arise condition).
Again, the micro-positions in harmony are able to be conditioned for the five consciousness; Because in the five consciousness there is no superhuman form.
Again, there are no available microdata in harmony, for when it does not harmonize, there is no harmony.
Again not in the position of harmony with the non-harmonious, the form of the various micro-different. So in the position of harmony as well as not harmonious, the micro-point of identity etc ... is not the scene of the season of consciousness.
- There are people who accept "each of the core of identity, etc. ... when not in combination is not the scene of the coast of the five consciousness, but when in the position of reconciliation, in turn help each other arise roughly do the scenery condition Give. That really is the scene of the coast.
This attachment is not correct. Because in the position of reconciliation with the united, the form of micro is one. And because of the microscope of the vase, the tank, the same condition that the condition must be no different. And because of the location of the concert, each microscope was removed from its infinite round.
Again, not the prime minister of crude sub-prime minister. Do not say that the charm of these scenes grace the other scenes, a re-condition all conditions. Accept that there are so many micro-faults, so there are no real microscopic outside of the consciousness (but with a micro case outside the star?).
Therefore, it is clear that the same color from the self appeared to be the coast charm. Because the arbiter of that place arises, and carry the same generals.
But when it comes to customizations, the size of a spell is large, and not a single variable that causes multiple spheres to form an object.
Because people accept raw material is real, so the Buddha said the micro to make them analyze except, not the Buddha said the color is very real. The yogic monks use fictitious insight for the gross ruler, in turn analyzes, until it is not analyzed anymore, assuming it is extreme. Although micro is still in the direction and position, but can not be analyzed. If analyzed further, there will be almost no general appearance, no longer called rúpa, so vi is extremely boundary of identity.
Therefore, it is important to know that the hindrances are due to the transformation, not to the complexity of the universe.
Colors are not objectionable, because they are of the same kind, so it is not true. Or because not as disturbing as Mind, Mind, definitely not very sharp.
Shades have obstacles, appearances, judgment, There is no dark matter, there is no sharp case, there is no form that can tell that it is a material ritual?
(11) Q: "Shameless, uncharacteristic", is not it true?
A: They are not real. Why ? Because as the identity of the body, if it is true, then what is the nature? If we say that the body is not real, because the quantum can be analyzed to the micro, it can not be long, etc. .. If we say the body movement, is not true, because the medium There is no killing, no sense of moving, because the law of killing is self-kill, no need to wait for the new. Abandonment if you still have to wait for the destruction; If we say that there is a form that is not emblematic, not a form, but that it is not true, it is the mind that gives birth to the limb movement. Because that color is dynamic, It is destroyed as before. If the core of the movement is wind, but wind does not indicate, can not be called expression. Again, if the wind is the body, the exposure is not good evil character (but the good is good evil). Again, if it is incense, taste, it is not clear, due to exposure know. Therefore, the body is not real.
But because of the mind doing the cause, because of the manifestation of the appearance in the limbs, birth and destruction successive, moving from one location to another, like the action, express the mind, .
Verbal expression is not real sound, as the language, because the sound in a moment does not indicate anything, but many serial is not real. Again color has external obstacles that were previously destroyed. But the sixth mind where the essence turns out to sound, to kill successive, As tuong denote, pretending to say semicolon, is not unreasonable.
The expression was not real, then the colorlessness was not real. However, according to the aspiration of mind, there is a difference between good and evil, the name is emancipated. In neither logical nor. Meaningless here or y where the "growth" seed, which is capable of emanating the body and the evil good language that set. Or the place of "Concentration" current while meditation, is able to stop the evil body that set. So that's a fake.
Q: The Buddha said there are three karma. Now you do not like business, do not business?
A: This is not unbelief, but just say it is not very sharp. "Self centered" launched the body, called the body. "Fraternity" launched the language, called vocabulary. "Judge Judge" and "Judge Decisions" correspond to the idea, affect the mind, called the mind. "Self centered" originated in body, speech, artifact, called karma. Body and language are the path of Private Judgment and Private Decision. Again, the good and evil karmic retribution produces the fruit of the suffering of suffering, so should also be called virtue, which is called karma. Therefore, the seven karmas (karma of the three karmas, the four karmic karmas) are first to take the "Tu" as their nature. Or body expressions, not expressions (non-karma) due to "self centered" launched, say is karma. It is the path of "Tu" passing through, so called karma.
Therefore, it is important to know that there are no external colors, but only by the innermost being, such as external appearance. (12)
- Lawlessness is not true. Why ? Because of incompatible laws such as "Dac", "Dac" etc ... it is not like sharp, mind and mental, can have clear generals. There can be no other merits with other rúpa, rúpa and mental states that can work themselves. Therefore, you should know legal Immutable, not real. Only in the parts of Lust, Mind, and Emptiness that simulate, it definitely can not be different from rúpa, mind, and form, which is real, Like Sac, Mind (instance). Or because it is not photographed in the mind, mental and physical, not as virulent as the dharma absolutely not, so it certainly is not true. Or because it does not photograph into other dharmas, as with other dharmas, it is not possible.
Arguments: What, that (Hinayana) how to know "attainment", "other" difference with the mind, mind, own real real use?
She replied: Because of the speech. As Sutra says: "Daddy-old-la (ordinary, charming) achievement of good and evil, saints accomplish ten do not learn" (Eight chief, more subtle secret, intellectual mind). Saying again: "Risen births do not achieve Dhamma, the Arahants do not achieve affliction." The word "achievement" "not accomplished" here, is the expression of "attainment" and "immeasurable."
Essence - Business does not say: "Dac, Dac" differs from the rúpa, the real mind is real. So the above evidence fails. The Sutra also said: "Monarch achievements seven precious". Is it the achievement of the other and the unwitting? (The first five are forgive, the next two are unconscious). If you say that the seven are self-sufficiency, but pretend to be "accomplished", then the law of good and evil how not to accept the saying like that, is that real is "acquired"? If the seven treasures in the present moment can be attributed to "achievements", how can we know that good and evil are accomplished now? If you leave the present time good and evil is not true right. At present there are certainly good and evil seeds.
V ... "Dac" again for the French, what use to win? If it is "possible" to be the cause of the birth of the law, then it should be able to cause beings to initiate the lawless. Again all the inanimate objects that do not have "attainment" should not perish permanently, and things that have not been or have been lost may never be born permanently (but in fact it still arises). If told by the "birth sentence" as the cause that arises, the two birth (birth and birth) of us accept useless.
If you take the full three personality of good, evil, unscrupulous as the birth sentence, the good, the evil, the sign should start once, if other conditions have to wait for it to start, "Dac" becomes useless. If the "attained" for France, it is the cause not lost, the sentient beings by which the achievement of good and evil. But the good and evil do not leave the sentient beings. If you leave the situation is nothing real "attained." So "gain" for the dharma becomes useless.
"Dac" did not really have, then "the same" too. But the dhamma can be accomplished at the soul, but according to the simulator there are three achievements: one is the achievement; Second is self-achievement; Three is the current accomplishment. On the contrary, simulate the name "not accomplished". This type is many, but this position does not harm the perpetual gonorrhea or the premise of the three realms that simulate "emptiness" and called the "human nature" because it has not been achieved. The dhamma.
How do (Hinayana) know more than Sac, Mind, Tam, there is legal "homeland"? Because of the speech. As the canal said, "This is the celestial body, this is the common cause, until the broad" (the part between heaven and heaven, people and people).
Argument: This business does not say that the difference between the Sacred Heart, the mind has its own dharma, so the evidence is not successful.
If the field, the same language is the place where the "compatriots" that start, should know the "real". If the time is right, the grass should also have a share (by definition, only to talk about the species). Back to the "compatriots" that start to know the same language, the "homeland" should have another "other". But that was not the case, then how is that?
Again if told by the "homeland" as the new beginning of the co-operation, the desire to know, there is "the dharma." That is not right. Because of the habit of doing the same thing as starting the co-operation, it is necessary to have the legal "co-own" as the cause.
But the place of difference of body and mind is similar between beings that simulate "the same."
How do you know different from Sac, Mind, Tam have real "network root"? (Hinayana responds) Because of the speech. As the speech says: "There is vitality, heat and consciousness is three" (consciousness, ovulation, consciousness), should know the "root cause" is called vitality.
Argument: This business does not say that with the Sac, Mind is real, so the evidence is not successful.
In the former, the meaning of "hermaphrodite" is not known, so here there is no sense of existence, "because the source is a part of identity."
Again, if the "real life" is different from consciousness, then it is like feeling and think, etc. ..., not real "network basis".
Q: If there are no such three things, why the business has three words, ovulation, wake?
Argument: Because there is a difference in meaning, there are three, such as the four main paths.
Q: (There is no consciousness) is in the heartless, longevity and ovulation right?
A: Does not the Kinh do not say do not leave the body?
Question: If (do not leave the body like that), why call it statusless heart?
A: In the other position only kill the transfer of consciousness that is called heartless, not kill A-back-skin. The reason for this A-back, this will be clear. This A-da-da official enough to do the three realms, six animals, four species. It is the result of continuous darkness throughout the continuum, but do not have to deal with separate "real root" do?
But where the seed of the birth of this eighth consciousness, it is due to the differential function of karma leading to the place and exists in a certain time, That simulator is "network root" only.
How do (Hinayana) know two "mindlessness" (Mindlessness and Destiny) and the Iris Heaven is different from the Sacred, Mind, Concentration, true nature? (If there are not two without mind and the Immaculate Mind is not able to stop the Mind, the mind does not initiate (the master). If in the heartless, there is a real law different from Sac, Tam, able to prevent the Mind, the mind does not initiate, but called the mindless. If so, when the formless, there must be a separate form of Dhamma differs from Sacred, the Mind, the hindrance identity, which is called Infinite? Kia did not, then why is that?
Again, to prevent the mind, what need to be legal, such as dykes, the counterfeiter can also be obstructive. Meaning when the development, for the intention to have the work, boring Mind, mental rough, Tam mind, mental, mental, mental gradually subtle, it fires into the Underwriters, into the mind strongly dormant, due to the harm and crush that strain of mind. The temporal mind is temporarily out of place, and in that non-existing state of mind that simulates two mindless thoughts. Because this seed heals, it is also called healing.
The cultivator Unconscious first of all the fruit of the Imagination, the seed of the race, the way of sensation in the heavens in the sky, where the idea of coarseness based on the equation is no longer available. Right where in that department that is set to Imagine the Dependency of Formation, should be called Futures.
So know the three solutions "Unservice", "Breaking up", "Imagination Irritable" (Imaginary fruit) is not true.
(Exhausted one according to the Han). END=NAM MO CAKYA MOUNI BUDDHA.( 3 TIMES ).VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY=THICH CHAN TANH.THE MIND OF ENLIGHTENMENT.VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST NUN=GOLDEN LOTUS MONASTERY=AUSTRALIA,SYDNEY.4/4/2017.
No comments:
Post a Comment