UNDERSTANDING OR TRAINING ABOUT KAMMA (Karma). 1. Wrong view or wrong first understanding: “All the Feelings that a person receives whether it is pleasant feeling, unpleasant feeling or not feeling are the results of past kamma. Anyone who thinks this is wrong view ”. Do you agree like that? I repeat, “The Feelings a person receives: The pleasant feeling, the feeling of suffering, or the unpleasant feeling are all results of past kamma. Whoever thinks this is wrong view ”. In order to understand this statement, you have to understand sensations or to understand all mental effects that are associated with kusala cittas, and they also go with kiriya (idealistic mind). ), arises in the Arahant mentality. As for the Feelings associated with Citta, this sentence is correct, isn't it? Right. Because, suppose I'm in pain here; and I experience pain as a result of past kamma. That is mind and fruit; this is true. But even while we are doing kusala or akusala deeds in the present, we have "akusala citta" and "akusala citta". In that wholesome and akusala cittas are available pleasurable feeling, unpleasant feeling, and not feeling. These feelings are not the result of past kamma, these feelings are what we create in the present. Mind arises in Buddhas and so does Arhat. They also have pleasant feeling, suffering (about body) or not feeling. Their Feelings or their experiences of Feelings are not the result of Karma. Thus, if you say that: The sensations: the suffering or the no-nonsense that a person has suffered is the result of past kamma then that is a wrong view. 2. Wrong view or second false understanding: "Stray Feelings, The suffering and the no-nons that we experience are created by the creator or God. “This means the Feelings one can experience are created by God. God creates joy, creates misery for them. If you have such a view then it is also a wrong view or a wrong understanding of Kamma. Indeed, to say: God creates joy, creates suffering is a misconception! 3.The third wrong view or misunderstanding: "All Feelings: the happiness, suffering, no sign that a person receives without cause, without any condition". No Feeling arises without conditions. All Feelings depend on predestined conditions. Without the cause (cause), without the condition (conditions), Feelings cannot arise. Say, "This person's happiness or suffering ... there are no conditions at all" That is a false statement. " Say, "Happy feeling, the suffering is "created by God or God" is also wrong. Because all things arise due to certain conditions, not created by God or God. Say, "Feelings arise for no cause or condition at all". It is also a false statement because "all things arise due to certain conditions but not by nature". The second misconception: "Feelings are created by God" and the third misconception: "Feelings arise without any conditions", These two conceptions are easy to understand, but misconceptions The first mistake: "The Feelings a person receives are the result of past Karma" is a bit difficult to understand. To understand this first concept you have to understand Abhidhamma. There is a very important, but also difficult to understand, passage: “I never taught that: The karma done can be destroyed without having to pay the results in this life, in the next life or in the next life. I think: this sentence is not too difficult to understand, we can understand like this: "Karma will not be destroyed without paying the effect", which means "when Karma has not returned, Karma has not ceased" and "after when the results have been paid, the karma will disappear ”, something like that. This is not difficult to understand. But the next sentence is very difficult to understand: "I do not teach that: You can make the created Karma stop without having to pay." This sentence means: "I do not teach that suffering can be stopped without having to pay the results of the kamma created". This means that before you stop suffering you must bear the consequences of it. This sentence made me think a lot. What a problem for me: "Before ending suffering, you have to bear the consequences of it ”. That means: "If you have not received the results of your created Karma, you cannot stop suffering." Or: If you want to stop suffering then you have to pay off all the results of Karma that you have created? Is that true? Then what does this sentence mean? I dont know! I want you to think about it. But don't think in this course. Think about it many times at home after this course, and I will give my opinion in the next session. When I read the above sentence, I did not understand, I read the Commentary. But the Commentary does not explain at all about this sentence. Notes keep quiet. I unfolded the Annotations to see. But the Legend also said nothing. Both the Annotations and the Annotations hurt me. As such, when I ask this question, I also make you suffer.END=NAM MO SHAKYAMUNI BUDDHA.( 3 TIMES ).GOLDEN AMITABHA MONASTERY=VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST NUN=THICH CHAN TANH.AUSTRALIA,SYDNEY.7/5/2021.VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY=VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST NUN=THICH CHAN TANH.