Scriptures 62 TYPES OF TRAINING. 29. This Male-stilts have Sa-subjects, Brahmins, discussing the past at first sight, prejudice about the past, and just about the past, suggesting many different views. , with eighteen arguments. And what y just according to what, based on what, the Sa-subjects, Brahmins discussing towards the primitive past, the opinion of the minimal past, y just about the primitive past, suggesting many different views different from the eighteen arguments? 30. This Male-stilts, there are a number of Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, the policy of Permanent Residence, accept that: "The ego of the world is often still" with four arguments. And these Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, y just what, what bases, advocates Permanent Comment, and accept the ego and the world is often with four arguments? 31. The Male-stilts, thanks to enthusiasm, thanks to diligence, thanks to diligence, thanks to not distraction, thanks to mindfulness of mindfulness, so the mind enters concentration; When the mind enters into samadhi, he remembers many past lives, such as one life, two generations, three generations, four generations, five generations, ten generations, one hundred generations, one hundred thousand generations, the countless hundred generations, thousands of generations, countless hundreds of thousands, remember: When I was born in that place, I lived with this name, my lineage like this, this class, eating like this, suffering from bliss. life like this, life like this. From that point on, I was born to another place. Over there, I lived a name like this, a family name like this, a class like this, eating like this, enjoying life, suffering like this, longevity like this. From there I died I was born here. ”Thus he remembers many past lives, with characteristics and details. He said:" The ego and the world are permanent, unborn, solid as a mountain, like a pillar of stone; There are other kinds of sentient beings in the period of reincarnation, death again and again, yet they still reside. Why so? Because I am due to enthusiasm, diligence, diligence, non-distraction, mindfulness of mindfulness ... and other types of sentiments circulate samsara, die again and again, yet they are often This is the Male-stilts that is the first stance, y only according to that, based on that, some of the Sa-subjects, Brahmins, advocates Permanent residence, and accept that the ego and the world is usually still 32. The second case, there are Sa-subjects, Brahmins just what, what bases, advocates Permanent residency, and accept that the ego and the world are often still Hey, the Male-stilts, in this life there are Sa-subjects or Ba-la-subjects, thanks to one-pointedness, thanks to diligence, thanks to diligence, thanks to not distraction, thanks to mindfulness, mind entering concentration, when mind enter samadhi, he remembers many past lives, such as one worldly life, two into kalastic lives, three into life-rending lives, ten into nirvana; Remember: "When I was born in that place, I lived with a name like this, family like this, class like this, eating like this, feeling like this ... The other kind of sentiments circulate samsara, die again and again, yet they still reside ". This Male-stilts, that is the second stance, y only according to that, based on that, some of the Sa-subjects, Brahmins, advocates Permanent residency and accept that, the ego and the world often still. 33. The third case, the Sa-subjects or Brahmins, what do y, what bases, advocates Permanent residence, and for the forest ego and the world is often still? This Male-stilts, in this life there are Sa-subjects or Ba-la-subjects, thanks to one-pointedness, thanks diligence, thanks to diligence, Thanks to not distraction, thanks to mindfulness of mindfulness, the mind enters concentration. When the mind enters into samadhi, he remembers many past lives, such as ten nirvana, twenty nonsense, thirty nirvana, forty kirvana, fifty nonsense; remember: "When I was born in that place, I lived with this name, this family line, this class, the blissful, the longevity like this, the longevity like this. From there, death. Go, I was born to that place again From that place, to die, I was born again to that place In that place, I lived with this name, family like this, class like this, Eat and drink like this, blissful, longevity like this, life like this. Death from there, I was born in this place. " Thus he remembers many past lives with features and details. He said: " The ego and the world are permanent, unborn, solid as a mountain, like a pillar; while the other kinds of sentient beings, they are reincarnated, die again and again, yet they still reside. Why so? Because I was zealous ... so the mind was like that. When the mind is like this, I remember many past lives, such as ten lives, ruined lives ... forty into paradoxes. "Remember:" When I was born in that place, I lived with a name like this. like this ... I was born in this place. "Thus he remembers many past lives with characteristics and details. He said:" The ego and the world are permanent, unborn, as solid as the mountain, the stone pillars ... and the other kinds of sentiments are in circulation, reincarnation, and die again and again, yet they still reside. "The Male-stilts, that's the third stance, he just follows, based on that, a number of Sa-subjects, Brahmins, advocates Permanent residence, accept the ego and the world often remains. 34. The fourth case, the Sa-subjects, Brahmins just what, what bases, advocates Permanent residence, and accept the ego and the world often still? This Male-stilts, in life there is Sa-subjects or Ba-la-subjects, is the inference house, is the investigator. Due to the split of inference, and subject to investigation, this person declares like this: "The ego and the world are permanent, unborn, solid as a mountain, like a pillar, and all kinds of things. other sentient beings in the cycle of reincarnation, death over and over again, still often ". This, the Male-stilts, that is the fourth stance, y only according to that, based on that, some Sa-subjects, Brahmins, advocates Permanent residence, accept the ego and the world is often still . 35. This Male-stilts, these Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, The policy of Permanent residence, ego-attachment and the world is often still, with the four arguments. If there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects who advocate Permanent Residence, accept that: "The ego and the world are still permanent", they will accept all four arguments above, or one of the above comments. Besides, there are no other arguments. 36. The Male-stilts, Tathagata wisdom like this: "These views, such attachments, such attachments, will lead to such animal realms, will constitute such fate" . The Tathagata knows so, He knows more than that, and He does not accept it. Thanks to not attaching to that perception, the inner witness was pure. He really knows the beginning, the eradication of sensations, their sweetness, their dangers and their departure. Thanks to this, the Male-stilts, Tathagata are completely freed, no attachment. 37. These dhammas, the monks, are deep, hard to see, difficult to see, tranquil, beautiful, beyond the reach of simple and delicate logic, only those with wisdom can distinguish. . These dhammas, the Tathagata conquered awareness, enlightenment and declaration; and it is those dhammas, those who like to truly praise the Tathagata speak. The second Liturgy 1. The Male-stilts, back there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, advocates part Permanent Comment, part impermanence, attaches the ego and the world is often still for a sentient class and impermanent with respect to another sentient class, with the four arguments. And those Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, what y just what, based on advocating part Permanent Comment, part impermanence, ego-attachment and the world is usually still for a sentient class and impermanence to another sentient class, with the four arguments? 2. Hey, monks, there was a time to a certain period, after a very long time, this world was transformed. While the world changed, most sentient beings were born through the Abhassara realm. There, these kinds of sentient beings are born of the will, fed by joy, radiating aura, traveling in space, living in glory, and living like that for quite a long time. 3. This, monks, there was a time to a certain period, after a very long time, this world turned into. While this world was transformed, Pham Cung was revealed, but it was empty. At that time, a sentient being, or the life expectancy has ended, or the blessing has ended, the common life from Quang Yin Thien, born through that empty Pham Cung. He is there, born of the will, sustaining his life with joy, radiating himself in aura, traveling in space, living in glory, and lived like that for quite a long time. 4. This position, in that place, after living for a long time alone, depressed, not happy and has expectations: "May there are other sentient beings, also come in this place!" At that time, other sentient beings, or their lifespans have ceased, or their blessings have ceased, are destined together and from the body of Quang Yin Thien, born through the Brahma Temple to be friends with the other sentient. The kinds of sentient beings there are also born by the will, fed by joy, radiating with light, traveling in space, living in glory, and living like that, for quite a long time. 5. At that time, the Male-stilts, the first sentient being born through thought: "I am Pham Thien, Dai Pham Thien, Almighty, Ultimate victory, Turning eyes, Venerable, God, Master Creation. , The birth master, the Great Exalted, Lord of all destinies, the Free One, the Patriarch of all beings has been and will be born. Those sentient beings are born of myself. Why so? Because it is because of our thoughts: May other sentient beings also come to this place - It is because of my wish that these sentient beings come to this place. "Later sentient beings also think like this: "He is Brahma, Great Brahma, Almighty, Supreme, Variant, Venerable, God, Master Creation, Birth Master, Great Exalted, Lord of all destinies, Self-Being, Patriarch sentient beings have been and will be born. We are born of this Brahma. Why? Because I have seen this pre-born here. And we are born later "6. The Male-on stilts, the first born sentient being lived longer, has a better appearance and is more powerful. More, less good form and less power. One of the sentient beings, after abandoning the other body, falls again to this realm. When he came to this realm, he left home, living without a family. After renouncing the family, living without family, he, thanks to enthusiasm, thanks to diligence, thanks to diligence, thanks not to distraction, thanks to mindfulness of mindfulness, so the mind enters concentration. When the mind enters into samadhi, he remembers that past life, not beyond that life. He said: "The other is Brahma, Great Brahma, Almighty, Supreme, Turning eye, Venerable, God, Creator, Creator of birth, Great Exalted, Lord of destiny, Who At Freedom, the Patriarch of all beings has been and will be born We are born of the Brahma, he is permanent, solid, permanent, unaltered, permanently residing like that. due to the Brahmin being born to this place. We are impermanent, not steadfast, This, monks, this incident happened. One of the other sentient beings, when falling, abandoned that body, was born again to this place. When he came to this place, he left home, abandoned his family, lived without a family. After leaving home, leaving the family, living without a family, he thanks to one-pointedness, diligence, thanks to diligence, thanks to not distraction, thanks to mindfulness and mindfulness, so the mind enters concentration. When the mind enters into samadhi, he remembers that past life, not beyond that life. 9. He said: "The gods are not infected or by sensual pleasures, they live for a long time without indulging in sensual pleasures. Because for a long time, they do not indulge in sensual pleasures, so they are not lost in thoughts. Thanks to their lack of mindfulness, these gods do not casually abandon their bodies, live permanently, firmly, permanently, without being changed, permanently residing like that. And we have been infected or by sensual pleasures, living for a long time indulging in pleasurable sensuality. Because we live for a long time indulging in sensual pleasures, we lose mindfulness. Due to mindlessness, we give up this body, live impermanent, unsteady, longevity, subject to the change and cascade of births to this place. "Hey, monks, that is the second case, y only according to that, based on that, a number of Sa-subjects, Brahmins, advocates part Permanent Comment, part impermanence, ego-attachment and the world are usually still for a sentient class. , and impermanence for a different sentient class 10. The third case, again there are Sa-subjects, Brahmins, what y just what, what grounds, advocates part Permanent residence, part Impermanence, ego-clinging and the world are usually still with a sentient class, and impermanence for another sentient class? there are devas called Manopadosikà (infected or by the mind). They live a long time cooked by jealousy between each other. Because of long life cooked by jealousy between each other, their minds resent each other. Because the mind hates each other, their bodies are tired, their minds tired. These gods fall to abandon this body of them. 11. This, Female-stilts, this incident happened. One of the other sentient beings, when falling, abandoning that body, is born again into this realm. When he came to this place, he left home, living without a family. After renouncing the family, living without a family, he thanks to one-pointedness, diligence, thanks to diligence, thanks to not distraction, thanks to mindfulness and mindfulness, so the mind enters concentration. When the mind enters into samadhi, he remembers that past life, but does not remember that life. 12. He said: " The gods are not infected or by the mind, they live for a long time indifferent to each other's jealousy. Because they lived for a long time and were unhappy with each other's jealousy, their minds did not resent each other. Since their minds do not hate each other, their bodies are not tired, their minds are not tired. Those gods do not casually give up on their bodies, live permanently steadfastly, permanently residing, unaltered, permanent like this forever. "And we are infected either by the mind, living for a long time. Due to each other's jealousy, the mind cites us to hate each other, Since our mind hates each other, our body is tired and our mind is tired. Solidity, life expectancy, subject to change and falls born to this place ". This, the Male-stilts, that is the third case, y only according to that, based on that, Some Sa-subjects, Brahmin advocates a part of the Permanent commentary, part of the impermanence, the attachment of the ego and the world are usually still for a sentient class and impermanent for another sentient class. . 13. The fourth case, again there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, what y just what, what base advocates part Permanent residence, part impermanence, ego-attachment and the world is often still the opposite with one sentient class and impermanent towards another. The Male-stilts, Sa-subjects, or Ba-la-subjects is the inference house, is the investigator. Due to the elusive split of inference and dependence on inquiry, this person declares like this: "The so-called eye, the ear, the nose, the tongue, the body, the ego is impermanent, not permanent, non-permanent, changed. The so-called mind, mind, consciousness, the ego is permanent, unchanging, permanent, unaltered, mortgage the world is boundless with four arguments? 17. The Male-stilts, here there is Sa-subjects or Ba-la-subjects, thanks to enthusiasm, thanks to diligence, thanks to diligence, thanks to not distracting, thanks to mindfulness of mindfulness, so the mind enters concentration. When the mind is in concentration, he lives in life with the thought that the world is boundless. He said, "This world is finite, there is a detour around. Why? Because I, through one-pointedness, diligence, through diligence, thanks to not distraction, through mindfulness, should When the mind is in samadhi, I live with the thought that the world is boundless. Hence I know that this world is boundless, there is a detour around ". This Male-stilts, that is the first case, y just according to that, based on that, a number of Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocates Huu Bien Infinite, mortgage the world is boundless and boundless. record. 18. The second case, there are Sa-subjects, Brahmins, What y indicates, what bases, advocates Huu Bien An infinite commentary, mortgaging the world is boundless and boundless? The Male-stilts, here are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, thanks to one mind, thanks to diligence, thanks diligence, thanks not distracting, thanks to mindfulness of mindfulness, so the mind enters concentration. When the mind entered samadhi, he lived in life with the world thought was boundless. He said: "This world is boundless, without limits". The Sa-subjects, Brahmins did say: "This world is boundless, there is a circle around", they say not true. This world is boundless, without limits. Why so? Because I rely on one-pointedness, diligence, diligence, non-distraction, and mindfulness of mindfulness, so the mind becomes samadhi. When my mind is in samadhi, I live with the thought that the world is boundless. Hence I know: "This world is boundless, without limits". Hey, monks, that is the second case, y just like that, based on that, there are some Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocates Huu Bien Infinite, mortgaging the world is boundless. 19. In the third case, there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, what are y, what bases, advocates Huu Bien Infinite comment, mortgage the world is boundless boundless? This Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects or Ba-la-subjects, thanks to one mind, thanks to diligence, thanks to diligence, thanks not distracting, thanks to mindfulness of mindfulness, so the mind enters concentration. When the mind is in samadhi, he lives in life with the thought that the world is boundless upwards, below and the world is boundless towards the surface. He said: "This world is boundless and boundless". The Sa-subjects, Brahmins did say: "This world is a finite, there is a circuit around, then they say not true". What Sa-Mon and Brahmins said: " This world is boundless with no limits, then they say it is not true. This world is both boundless and boundless. Why so? Because, thanks to one-pointedness, diligence, diligence, non-distraction, thanks to mindfulness and mindfulness, the mind enters concentration. When the mind is in samadhi, I live in life with the thought, the world is boundless upwards, below, and the world is boundless on the horizontal side. So I know: "This world is both boundless and boundless". This, the Male-stilts, that is the third case, just like that, based on that, some Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects advocate Huu Bien Bien, the world mortgage is boundless boundless. . 20. Case Wednesday, there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, what y just what, what bases, advocates Huu Bien Infinite comment, mortgage the world is boundless boundless? This Male-stilts, here are Sa-subjects or Ba-la-subjects are inference house, is an investigator. Due to the critical split of inference and discretionary discretion, this person declared the following: "This world is neither boundless nor boundless. Who said: "This world is bounded by boundaries", they say not true. Again the Sa-subjects, Brahmins said: "This world is boundless? limited "they also say not true. Again the Sa-subjects, Brahmins have said:" This world is both boundless and boundless ", they also say no. This world is not boundless, nor is it boundless 21. Hey, the Male-stilts, the Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects advocate Huu Bien Infinite text with four treatises. accept. If there are Sa-subjects or Ba-la-subjects who advocate Huu Bien Infinite comment, The world is boundless, they will accept all four of the above arguments, or one of the above arguments, in addition there is no other argument. 22. This, the Male-stilts, Tathagata wisdom like this: "These views, such attachments, such attachments, will lead to such animal realms, will constitute such fate" . Tathagata wisdom so. He understood more than that, and He did not accept it. Thanks to the non-attachment to that perception, the interior is purified. He truly knows the initiation, the eradication of sensations, their sweetness, their dangers, and their departure. Thanks to this wisdom, the Male-stilts, Tathagata are completely liberated, without attachment. These dhammas, the Male-stilts, are deep, hard to see, difficult to see, calm, wonderful, beyond the reach of fair, delicate logic, only wise people can perceive. These dhammas self-knowledge, enlightenment and legend; and it is those dhammas who like to truly praise the Tathagata talk about it. 23. This Male-stilts, there are a number of Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocacy Wei argues. When asked about this issue or another, use the rhetoric like an eel with the four arguments. And those Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, what y is, what bases, advocates of sophistry, when asked about this issue or another issue use the sophistry wriggling like eels with four arguments challenge? 24. Hey the Male-stilts, here there is Sa-subjects or Ba-la-subjects not as real as know "This is good" not as real know "This is unwholesome". He thought: I don't really know: "This is wholesome", not as real as know: "This is akusala" and if I answer: " This is wholesome "or I answer:" This is akusala ", sensual desire, craving, anger or hatred arises in me. If sex, greed, hatred or hatred arises in me, then I can suffer. If I make a mistake then I am depressed. If I am troubled it will become an obstacle to me - Thus, out of fear of mistakes, out of hatred of mistakes, he does not answer: "This is "This is akusala," nor did he answer: "This is akusala." When asked about this or another problem, he used the rhetoric like an eel: "I don't say so. I don't say like that. I do not say that is different. I am not saying it is not. I do not say it is not like that. "Hey, the Male-stilts, that is the first case, just like that, based on that, some Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocates Wei argument , When asked about this issue or another, use the excuses that crawl like an eel. 25. In the second case, there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, what y just what, according to the policy of Wei, when asked about this issue or another issue, use the sophistry like an eel? This Male-stilts, here have Sa-subjects or Ba-la-subjects, not as real as knowing "This is good", not as real as know "This is unwholesome". He thought: I do not really know: "This is good", not as real as know: "This is unwholesome". Because I do not know as true: "This is wholesome", not as real as knowing "This is unwholesome". And if I answer: "This is wholesome" or I answer: "This is akusala", sensual time, desire, anger or hatred, arises in me. If sex, greed, anger or hatred arises in me, then I can grasp. If I cling, then I get depressed. If I get depressed, it becomes an obstacle for me.So, out of fear of attachment, out of hatred of attachment, he neither answers: "This is goodness", nor does he answer: "This is akusala. ". When asked about one issue or another, he used the rhetoric like an eel: "I don't say so. I don't say that. I don't say that's different. I don't say so. It is not like that. I am not saying it is not like that ". This Male-stilts, that is the second case, just like that, based on that, some Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocates Wei argues, when asked about this issue or the problem another, use the sophistication that crawls like an eel. 26. Case third, there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, just what y, what grounds advocacy deception, When asked about this issue or another, use excuses that crawl like an eel? The Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects or Ba-la-subjects not as real as know "This is good", not as real as know "This is unwholesome". He thought: I do not really know: "This is good", not as real as know: "This is unwholesome". Because I don't really know "This is akusala", it is not as if I know "This is akusala" and if I answer: "This is akusala" or answer: "This is akusala", there are Sammas, Brahmin, savant, delicate, argumentative argument, argument like split hair, these people go here and there, as if they want to destroy wrong views with their wisdom, they can compete. , questioned and tortured me. If they competed, interrogated, or plagued me, I might not be able to answer them. If I can't answer them, then I get upset. If I have trouble becoming an obstacle for me - Thus, out of fear of being tested, out of disgust for trials, he does not answer: "This is goodness" nor answer. "This is unwholesome". When asked about one issue or another, he used the rhetoric like an eel: "I don't say so. I don't say that. I don't say that's different. I don't say so. It is not like that. I am not saying it is not like that ". Hey, monks, that is the third case, just like that, based on that, a number of Sa-subjects, advocating for a fallacy, when asked about this issue or another problem, use false words. she scrambled like an eel. 27. Case Wednesday, there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, what y just what, what bases Wei advocacy policy, When asked about this issue or another, use excuses that crawl like an eel? This Male-stilts, here there is Sa-subjects, stupid stupid Ba-la-subjects. This person, because of his dull stupidity, when asked this or another problem, immediately used the rhetoric like an eel: "You ask me if I have another world?" If I think "There is another world", I can answer you: "There is another world". But I don't say that. I don't say like that. I do not say that is different. I am not saying it is not. I don't say it's not like that. If you ask me: "Isn't there another world?" If I think: "There is no other world", I can reply to you: "There is no other world". But I don't say that. I don't say like that. I do not say that is different. I am not saying it is not. I don't say it's not like that. If you ask me "Isn't there another world?" (... as above ...) "There is also and also no other world?" "Neither is there nor there is no other world?", "Is there a sentient being?", "There is no sentient being?" "There is also or is there to be no sentient beings?" "Neither is there nor is there any kind of sentient beings arising?", "Is there the everlasting result of good and evil karma?", "There is no extreme result of good and evil karma?", "Also Is there and also no the ultimate result of good and evil karma? "," Neither are there and neither are there any supernatural results of good and evil deeds? "," Brahmin advocates Wei argument. When asked about one issue or another, use the fallacy rhetoric like an eel with the four arguments. If there are Samans or Brahmins who advocate for the fallacy, when asked about one question or another using the rhetoric like an eel, they will accept all four arguments above or one. in the above comments, in addition there is no other argument anymore. 29. The Male-stilts, Tathagata wisdom like this: "The views, such attachments, such attachments, will lead to the animal realm, will constitute such destiny". Tathagata wisdom so. He is more wise than that. And He does not accept that knowledge. Thanks to the non-attachment to that perception, the interior is purified. He truly knows the arising, the eradication of sensations, their sweetness, their dangers and their departure. Thanks to this wisdom, the Male-stilts, Tathagata are completely liberated, without attachment. These dhammas, the Male-stilts, are deep, hard to see, difficult to see, tranquil, beautiful, beyond the reach of simple and delicate logic, only those with wisdom can distinguish. These dhammas have self-knowledge, enlightenment and legends. And it is those dhammas who like to truly praise the Tathagata mentioned. 30. This Male-stilts, there are a number of Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocates No humanism, accept the ego and the world by inhuman birth with two arguments. And the Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, what y just what, what bases, advocates Nonhumanism, accept the ego and the world by inhumans? 31. This Male-stilts, there are gods called Non-sentient beings. When a thought arises, that time of the gods falls into existence, renouncing their celestial bodies. Hey, monks, This happened. One of those sentient beings, when falling, abandoned his body of gods, was born again into this realm. When he came to this place, he left home, abandoned his family, lived without a family. After leaving home, leaving the family, living without a family, he thanks to enthusiasm, diligence, through diligence, thanks not to distraction, thanks to mindfulness of mindfulness, so the mind enters concentration. He remembers when thoughts arise, do not remember any further. He said: "The ego and the world are inhuman. Why? Because I did not have before, now I have. From where the state is not, I become a sentient being". This Male-stilts, that is the first case, just like that, based on that, some Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects advocate No-cause, accept the ego and the world by inhumansanh. 32. The second case, the Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, what y just what, what bases, advocates No-reason, accept the ego and the world due to inhuman beings? This Male-stilts, here are Sa-subjects or Ba-la-subjects is the argumentator, is the investigator. Due to the critical split of inference and discretion according to investigation, he declared: "The ego and the world are inhuman." This, the Male-stilts, that is the second case, just like that, based on that, some Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects advocate No-cause, accept the ego and the world by inhuman . 33. This Male-on stilts, the Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocates No humanism, accept the ego and the world by inhuman birth with two arguments. If there are Sa-subjects or Brahmins who advocate No-cause, ego-clinging and the world due to inhuman beings, they will accept both the above or one of the above attachments. any other acceptance. 34. The Male-stilts, Tathagata wisdom like this: "The opinion that, the idea of ​​the primitive past, just about the primitive past, suggests many different opinions with the eighteen above-mentioned essays. This Male-stilts, if there are Sa-subjects or Brahmins discussing the primordial past, the opinion of the primitive past, just about the primitive past, suggesting many different opinions, they will accept all the eighteen arguments above or one of the above, in addition there will be no other argument. 36. The Male-stilts, Tathagata wisdom like this: "The views, such attachments, such attachments, will lead to such animal realms, will constitute such fate". Tathagata wisdom so. He is more wise than that. And He does not accept that knowledge. Thanks to the non-attachment to that perception, the interior is purified. He truly knows the arising, the eradication of sensations, their sweetness, their dangers and their departure. Thanks to that wisdom, This Male-stilts, Tathagata are completely liberated, no attachment. These dhammas, the Male-stilts, are deep, hard to see, difficult to see, tranquil, beautiful, beyond the reach of simple and delicate logic, only those with wisdom can distinguish. These dhammas have self-knowledge, enlightenment and legends. And it is these dhammas, those who truly praise the Tathagata talk about it. 37. The Male-stilts, there are some Sa-subjects, Brahmins discuss the future, accept the future, just about the future, suggest many different opinions with forty-four arguments. . And these Sa-subjects, Brahmins, y just what, what grounds, discuss the future, accept the future, just about the future suggest many different opinions with forty-four. Acceptance? 38. The Male-stilts, there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocacy of the idea after death, accept the thought ego after death with sixteen arguments. And these Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, what y just what, what grounds, advocate Huu idea after death, with sixteen arguments? These people advocate: "The ego has identity, there is no disease, after death there is thought". They advocate: "The ego has neither rupa nor rupa…", "Ego has neither rupa nor rupa…", "Ego is boundless ...", "Ego The ego is boundless ... "," The ego is both boundless and boundless "," Ego is neither boundless nor boundless ... "," The ego is unimaginative ... "," Self is a paranoia ... ". "Ego is pure misery ...", "Ego is immeasurable ...", "Ego is pure misery ...", "Ego is pure misery ...", "Ego is misery lost" . They advocate: "The ego is not incoherent, there is no disease, after death there is thought". 39. This Male-stilts, the Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject this idea after death, accept ego has thought after death with sixteen arguments. This Male-stilts, these Sa-subjects or Ba-la-subjects advocate Huu idea after death, they will accept all sixteen comments on, or one of the above, in addition there is no comment any other. 40. The Male-stilts, Tathagata wisdom like this: "The views, such attachments, will lead to such animal realms, will constitute such fate". As the Tathagata knows, He knows more than that, and He does not accept that knowledge. Thanks to not attaching to that precaution, the interior is pure. He truly knows the arising, the elimination of sensations, the sweetness, the dangers and their departure. Thanks to this wisdom, the Male-stilts, Tathagata are completely liberated, without attachment. These dhammas, the Male-stilts, are deep, hard to see, difficult to see, tranquil, beautiful, beyond the reach of simple and delicate logic, only those with wisdom can distinguish. These dhammas have self-knowledge, enlightenment and legends. And it is these dhammas, those who truly praise the Tathagata talk about it. The third Litigation 1. The Male-stilts, there are some Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, advocates No idea after death, accept no ego after death with eight comments. And these Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, what y just what, what grounds, advocate No idea after death, accept no ego after death with eight arguments accepted? 2. These people advocate: "The ego has identity, there is no disease, Ba-la-subject advocates Phi Non-Huu Thought Non-idealism after death, accept non-non-idealistic non-ideal with eight comments. And these Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, what y just, what bases, advocates Phi Non-Righteous thought after death, accept non-non-idealistic non-thoughtless ego with eight arguments? 6. These people accept: "The ego has materiality, there is no disease, after death, the ego is non-ideal ...", "The ego is formless ...", has form ... "," The ego is non-material and also non-form ... "," The ego is boundless ... "," The ego is boundless ... "," The ego is boundless and boundless ... ". 7. These people accept that. The ego is non-boundless and also boundless, without disease, after death, non-sensible non-idealistic, with eight arguments. Hey, monks, If there is Sa-subjects or Ba-la-subjects, non-idealistic non-idealism, they will accept all eight arguments above, or one of the above arguments, in addition there is no other argument anymore. 8. The Male-stilts, Tathagata wisdom like this: "The views, such attachments, will lead to the realms of such animals, will constitute such destiny". Tathagata wisdom so. He knows more than that, and He does not accept it. Thanks to the non-attachment to that perception, the interior is purified. He truly knows the arising, the eradication of sensations, their sweetness, their dangers and their departure. Thanks to this wisdom, the Male-stilts, Tathagata are completely liberated, without attachment. These dhammas, the Male-stilts, are deep, hard to see, difficult to see, calm, wonderful, beyond the reach of fair, delicate logic, only mindful people can perceive. These dhammas self-knowledge, enlightenment and legend; and it is those dhammas who like to truly praise the Tathagata talk about it. 9. This Male-stilts, there are some Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, advocate Paragraphs, attachment to the destruction, the loss, the destruction of the sentient species with seven arguments. And these Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, y just what, what grounds, attachment to destruction, destruction, destruction of sentient beings with seven arguments? 10. The Male-stilts, Sa-subjects or Ba-la-subject advocates the theory and opinions: "Because this ego has identity, by four great constituents, born by parents, when the body is destroyed. destruction annihilates, after death is no more, so this ego is like that completely cessation ". Thus some people advocate the cessation, destruction and destruction of sentient beings. 11. Another man said: "Hey man, there is an ego as you say. I am not saying that the ego does not exist, but that ego is not completely destroyed. There is another ego that has a natural nature. There is rupa, belonging to the sex world, eating the food of the real group, the ego you do not know, you do not see that ego I know, I see that ego when the body is destroyed, destroyed, after death There is no more, so that ego is completely ceased like that ". Thus some people advocate the destruction, destruction and destruction of sentient beings. 12. Another man said: "Hey man, there is the ego as you say. I am not saying that the ego is not. But that ego is not completely destroyed. There is another ego. Tanh Tanh, sharp, by the will of creation, all details of limbs are full, large and small are complete, without a single root. That ego you don't know, you don't see. That ego I know, I see. That ego when the body is destroyed, destroyed, after death is no more, so that ego is completely cessation. "Thus, there are some who advocate the cessation, destruction and destruction of species. 13. Another person said: "Hey man, really have that ego as you say. I am not saying that ego is not. But such ego is not completely ceased. There is another ego that is beyond all illusions, eliminating opposing thoughts, not reciting illusions, recognizing nothingness is boundless. Reached the limitless land. You don't know the ego, you don't see. That ego I know, I see. That ego, when the body is destroyed, is destroyed, and after death is no more, so that ego completely ceases. " Thus some people advocate the destruction, destruction and destruction of sentient beings. 14. Another man said, "Hey man, there is the ego as you say. I am not saying that the ego is not there. But that ego is not completely destroyed. There is another ego transcending. beyond all there is no limitlessness, perception: Consciousness is boundless. To attain boundless Consciousness He does not know, he does not see. That ego I know, I see. destroyed, destroyed, after death is no more, so that ego is completely ceased ". Thus some people advocate the destruction, destruction and destruction of sentient beings. 15. Another said: "Hey man, there is the ego as you say. I am not saying that the ego is not. But that ego is not completely destroyed. There is yet another ego beyond all boundless consciousness, understanding: there is no possessiveness. Reached Landlessness. That ego you don't know, you don't see. That ego I know, I see. That ego when the body is destroyed, destroyed, after death is no more, so that ego completely ceases. ”Thus, there are some who advocate the cessation, destruction and destruction of 16. Another being said: "Hey man, really have that ego as you say. I am not saying that ego is not. But such ego is not completely ceased. There is another ego beyond all possessions, understanding: This is tranquility, this is beautiful. Reached the non-non-fictional origin. That ego you don't know, you don't see. That ego I know, I see. That ego when the body is destroyed, destroyed and destroyed, after death is no more, inner peace. He truly knows the arising, the eradication of sensations, their sweetness, their dangers and their departure. Thanks to such wisdom, the Male-stilts, Tathagata are completely liberated, no attachment. These dhammas, the Male-stilts, are deep, hard to see, difficult to see, tranquil, beautiful, beyond the reach of fair and delicate logic, only those with wisdom can recognize. These dhammas self-witness, enlightenment and legend: and it is those dharma s that truly praise the Tathagata. 19. This Male-stilts, there are a number of Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocates Current Nirvana, attachment to the current ultimate Nirvana of the sentient species with the year of acceptance. And these Sa-subjects, Brahmin, y just what, what bases, advocates Current Nirvana, to accept the current ultimate Nirvana of the sentient being with the five arguments? 20. The Male-stilts, there are Sa-subjects or Ba-la-subjects advocates and conceptions: "When this ego enjoy, full of five sensual pleasures, so that ego reaches the ultimate Nirvana. The table of sentient beings ". 21. Another man said, "Hey man, there is the ego as you say. I am not saying that the ego is not there. But that ego is like that, not completely attaining the ultimate Nirvana. For that the nature of sensual pleasures and impermanence, suffering, and change, because their nature is transformative, transformative, so optimistic, compassionate, late, the brain arises. , separating the evil dhammas, attaining and settling into the first meditation; this meditation has reach, has four, there is joy and there is happiness, due to the separation of sensuality. ". Thus someone advocates the present Nirvana of the sentient being. 22. Another said: "Hey man, there is the ego as you say. I am not saying that the ego is not. But that ego is like that, not completely reaching the present ultimate Nirvana. Because here the meditation has range, there are four so it is called gross. When the ego has reach and four, attains and dwells the second meditation. scene, no range, no quartet, bliss due to being born. Thus, the ego reaches the present ultimate Nirvana ". Thus someone advocates the present ultimate Nirvana of the sentient being. 23. Another man said, "Hey man, there is the ego as you say. I am not saying that the ego is not. But that ego is like that, not completely reaching the present ultimate Nirvana. Why? Because here the mind is happy and agitated, so it is called grossness. When the ego does not greed, reside, mindfulness, righteous thoughts, the body enjoy bliss that the saints call Blissful memories - attain and abide the third meditation. Thus, the ego reaches the present ultimate Nirvana. "Thus, someone advocates the present ultimate Nirvana of sentient beings. 24. Another said," Hey sir, there is the ego. like he said. I am not saying that ego is not. But such ego, not completely attaining the present ultimate nirvana. Why? Because here, the mind feels so-called coarse. When the ego dissipates bliss and exasperates suffering, eliminates the former bliss and favors, attains and dwells in the fourth jhana. This meditation is not suffering, without straying, pure mindfulness. Thus, that ego reaches the ultimate nirvana ". Thus someone advocates the present Nirvana of the sentient being. 25. This Male-stilts, the Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects that advocate Current Nirvana, attaching to the current ultimate Nirvana of sentient beings with five arguments. This Male-stilts, if there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects who advocate the Current Nirvana, accept the current ultimate Nirvana of sentient beings, these will accept the whole year. above, or one of the five essays above, in addition there is no other argument. 26. The Male-stilts, Tathagata intellectual knowledge like this: "The opinion that, such attachments will lead to the realms of such animals, will constitute such destiny". Tathagata wisdom so. He knows more than that, and He does not accept it. Thanks to the non-attachment to that perception, the interior is purified. He is like the wisdom of training, the elimination of sensations, their sweetness, their dangers and their departure. Thanks to such wisdom, the Male-stilts, Tathagata are completely liberated without attachment. These dhammas, the Male-stilts, are deep, hard to see, difficult to see, tranquil, beautiful, beyond the reach of fair and delicate logic, only those with wisdom can recognize. These dhammas self-knowledge, enlightenment and legend; and it is those dhammas who like to truly praise the Tathagata talk about it. 27. The Male-stilts, the Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects discuss the future, accept the future, just about the future, will propose many different views with forty-four arguments. . The Male-stilts, the Sa-subjects or Ba-la-subjects do, discuss the future, accept the future, just about the future, suggest many different views. They will accept the forty-four arguments above, or one of the above, but there will be no other arguments. 28. The Male-stilts, Tathagata wisdom like this: "These views, such attachments, will lead to the realms of such animals, will become such destiny". Tathagata wisdom so. He knows more than that, and He does not accept it. Thanks to the non-attachment to that perception, the interior is purified. He is like the wisdom that the knowledge arises, the eradication of sensations, their sweetness, their dangers and their departure. Thanks to such wisdom, the Male-stilts, Tathagata are completely liberated, no attachment. 29. The Male-stilts, the Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects discuss the past and discuss the future, discuss the past and the future, the opinion of the past. and the future, just about the primitive past and the future, propose many different views with sixty-two arguments. This Male-stilts, the Sa-subjects or Ba-la-subjects, discuss the primitive past, discuss the future, discuss the primordial past and the future, the knowledge of the primordial past. and the future, referring to the primordial past and the future, proposing many different views. They will accept the sixty-two arguments above, or one of the above arguments, in addition there will be no other argument. 30. The Male-stilts, Tathagata wisdom like this: "The views, such attachments, will lead to such animal realms, will constitute such fate". Tathagata wisdom so. He knows more than that, and He does not accept it. Thanks to the non-attachment to that perception, the interior is purified. He truly knows the beginning of the eradication of sensations, their sweetness, their dangers and their departure. Thanks to such wisdom, the Male-stilts, Tathagata are completely liberated, no attachment. 31. These dhammas, the Male-stilts, are deep, hard to see, difficult to witness, tranquil, beautiful, beyond the reach of subtle and delicate logic, only those with wisdom can receive know. These dharma s are self-aware, enlightened and proclaimed, and it is those dharma s that truly praise the Tathagata. Conclusion 32. The Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects Permanent opinion, accept the ego and the world is resident with four arguments. That policy is the personal experience, the ignorance, the not seeing, the feeling of the Sa-subjects, the Brahmins, the stimulation, oscillation, distortion of those who are dominated by craving. . 33. This Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocates part of Permanent residence, a part of impermanence, ego-clinging, and the world are common to a sentient class and impermanent towards a sentient class different from the four arguments. That policy is personal experience, the ignorance, not seeing, the feeling of the Sa-subjects, the Brahmins, the stimulation, oscillation, and distortion of those who are dominated by craving. 34. This Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocates Huu Bien Bien, the world mortgage is boundless with four arguments accepted. That policy is personal experience, is the ignorance, not seeing, the feeling of the Sa-subjects, Brahmins, is the fluctuating, distorted stimulation of those who are dominated by craving. 35. This Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocacy Wei argues. When asked about this issue or another, use the rhetoric like an eel with the four arguments. That policy is the personal experience, the ignorance, the not seeing, the feeling of the Sa-subjects, the Brahmins, the stimulation, oscillation, distortion of those who are dominated by craving. . 36. This Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, advocates No humanism, accept the ego and the world by inhuman beings with two arguments. That policy is personal experience, is the ignorance, the feeling of the Sa-subjects, Brahmins, is the stimulation, oscillation, distortion of those who are dominated by craving. 37. The Male-stilts here, there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, discussing the primitive past, the opinion of the primitive past, just about the primitive past, suggesting many ideas. The difference between the eighteen arguments. That policy is personal experience, is the ignorance, not seeing, the feeling of the Sa-subjects, Brahmins, is the stimulation, the oscillation, misrepresentation of those who are dominated by craving. 38. This Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects Huu idea after death, accept ego has thought after death with sixteen arguments. That policy is personal experience, is the ignorance, not seeing, the feeling of the Sa-subjects, Brahmins, is the stimulation, distorting fluctuations of those who are dominated by craving. 39. The Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocates No idea after death, accept no ego after death with eight arguments accepted. That policy is the personal experience, the ignorance, the not seeing, the feeling of the Sa-subjects, the Brahmins, the stimulation, oscillation, distortion of those who are dominated by craving. . 40. The Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocates Phi Non-Huu thought after death, accept the non-non-non-idealistic ego after death with eight arguments. That policy is the personal experience, the ignorance, the not seeing, the feeling of the Sa-subjects, the Brahmins, the stimulation, oscillation, distortion of those who are dominated by craving. . 41. This Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocate Paragraphs, attachment to the destruction, loss, destruction of the sentient species with seven arguments. That policy is the personal experience, the ignorance, the not seeing, the feeling of the Sa-subjects, the Brahmins, the stimulation, oscillation and distortion of those who are dominated by craving. . 42. The Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocates At present Nirvana, attaching to the present Nirvana of sentient beings with five arguments. That policy is personal experience, is nothing That policy is the personal experience, the ignorance, the not seeing, the feeling of the Sa-subjects, the Brahmins, the stimulation, oscillation, distortion of those who are dominated by craving. . 41. This Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocate Paragraphs, attachment to the destruction, loss, destruction of the sentient species with seven arguments. That policy is the personal experience, the ignorance, the not seeing, the feeling of the Sa-subjects, the Brahmins, the stimulation, oscillation, distortion of those who are dominated by craving. . 42. The Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocates At present Nirvana, attaching to the present Nirvana of sentient beings with five arguments. That policy is personal experience, is nothing That policy is the personal experience, the ignorance, the not seeing, the feeling of the Sa-subjects, the Brahmins, the stimulation, oscillation, distortion of those who are dominated by craving. . 41. This Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocate Paragraphs, attachment to the destruction, loss, destruction of the sentient species with seven arguments. That policy is the personal experience, the ignorance, the not seeing, the feeling of the Sa-subjects, the Brahmins, the stimulation, oscillation, distortion of those who are dominated by craving. . 42. The Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocates At present Nirvana, attaching to the present Nirvana of sentient beings with five arguments. That policy is personal experience, is nothing misrepresentation of those who are dominated by craving. 41. The Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocacy Paragraphs, attachment to the destruction, destruction, destruction of the sentient species with seven arguments. That policy is the personal experience, the ignorance, the not seeing, the feeling of the Sa-subjects, the Brahmins, the stimulation, oscillation, distortion of those who are dominated by craving. . 42. The Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocates At present Nirvana, attaching to the present Nirvana of sentient beings with five arguments. That policy is personal experience, is nothing misrepresentation of those who are dominated by craving. 41. This Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocate Paragraphs, attachment to the destruction, loss, destruction of the sentient species with seven arguments. That policy is the personal experience, the ignorance, the not seeing, the feeling of the Sa-subjects, the Brahmins, the stimulation, oscillation, distortion of those who are dominated by craving. . 42. The Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocates At present Nirvana, attaching to the present Nirvana of sentient beings with five arguments. That policy is personal experience, is nothing is the ignorance, not seeing, the feeling of the Sa-subjects, Brahmins, is the stimulation, oscillation, distortion of those who are dominated by craving. 42. The Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocates At present Nirvana, attaching to the present Nirvana of sentient beings with five arguments. That policy is personal experience, is nothing is the ignorance, not seeing, the feeling of the Sa-subjects, Brahmins, is the stimulation, oscillation, distortion of those who are dominated by craving. 42. The Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocates At present Nirvana, attaching to the present Nirvana of sentient beings with five arguments. That policy is personal experience, is nothingknow, not see, the feeling of the Sa-subjects, Brahmin, is the stimulation, oscillation, distortion of those who are dominated by craving. 43. The Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Brahmins, discussing the future, the idea of ​​the future, just about the future, suggesting many different views with forty four arguments. That policy is personal experience, is the ignorance, not seeing, the feeling of the Sa-subjects, Brahmins, is the stimulation, oscillation, distortion of those who are dominated by craving. 44. The Male-stilts here, there are Sa-subjects, Brahmins, discussing the primitive past, discussing the future, discussing the past and the future, the opinion of the minimal past and the future, referring to the primordial past and the future, proposing many views other than the sixty-two arguments. That policy is personal experience, is ignorance, not seeing, the feeling of the Sa-subjects, Brahmins, is the stimulation, oscillation, distortion of those who are dominated by craving. 45. This Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, advocates Permanent residence, accept the ego and the world is permanent with four arguments. That policy arises due to the contact (of the roots). 46. ​​The Male-stilts here, there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocates part Permanent Comment, part impermanence, ego-attachment and the world is often still for a sentient class. and impermanence for a sentient being different from the four arguments. That policy arises due to the touch (of the roots). 47. This Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocates Huu Bien Bien, the world mortgage is boundless with four arguments. That policy arises due to the contact (of the roots). 48. Monks, here there are subjects, Brahmin advocates Wei argument. When asked about this issue or another, use the rhetoric like an eel with the four arguments. That policy arises due to the contact (of the roots). 49. This Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, advocates No humanism, accept the ego and the world by inhuman beings with two arguments. That policy develops touch (of the senses). 50. The Male-stilts here, there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, discussing the primitive past, the opinion of the primitive past, y just about the primitive past, suggesting many ideas. The difference between the eighteen arguments. That policy arises due to the contact (of the roots). 51. The Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects Huu idea after death, accept ego after death with sixteen comments. That policy arises due to the contact (of the roots). 52. The Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocates No idea after death, accept no ego after death with eight arguments. That policy arises due to the contact (of the roots). 53. The Male-stilts here, there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects Non-Huu Thought Non-thought after death, accept non-non-idealistic non-thoughtless ego after death with eight comments. . That policy arises due to the contact (of the roots). 54. The Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects advocate Paragraphs, attachment to the destruction, destruction, destruction of the sentient species with seven arguments. That policy arises due to the contact (of the roots). 55. This Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocates Current Nirvana, attaching to the present Nirvana of sentient beings with five arguments. That policy arises due to the touch (of the roots). 56. The Male-stilts here, there are Sa-subjects, Brahmins, discussing the future, the idea of ​​the future, just about the future, suggesting many different views with forty four arguments. That policy arises due to the contact (of the roots). 57. The Male-stilts here, there are Sa-subjects, Brahmins, discussing the primitive past, discussing the future, discussing the past and the future, the opinion of the minimal past and the future, referring to the primordial past and the future, proposing many views other than the sixty-two arguments. That policy arises due to the contact (of the roots). 58. This Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, advocates Permanent residence, accept the ego and the world is often longer with four arguments. These people can not feel the above guidelines, if there is no emotion. 59. The Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocates part Permanent Comment, part impermanence, ego-attachment and the world, is often still for a class of friends love and impermanence for a sentient class are different from the four arguments. These people can not feel the above guidelines, if there is no emotion. 60. This Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocates Huu Bien Bien, the world mortgage is boundless with four arguments. These people can not feel the above guidelines, if there is no emotion. 61. This Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocacy Wei argues. When asked about this issue or another, use the rhetoric like an eel with the four arguments. These people can not feel the above guidelines, if there is no emotion. 62. Hey, monks, Here comes the Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, advocates No-cause, accept the ego and the world by inhuman birth with two arguments. They can not feel the above guidelines, if there is no emotion. 63. The Male-stilts here, there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, discussing the primitive past, the opinion of the primitive past, y just about the primitive past, suggesting many ideas. The difference between the eighteen arguments. These people can not feel the above guidelines, if there is no emotion. 64. The Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects Huu idea after death, accept ego after death with sixteen comments. They can not feel the above guidelines, if there is no emotion. 65. This Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocates No idea after death, accept no ego after death with eight arguments accepted. They can not feel the above guidelines, if there is no emotion. 66. This Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects Phi Huu Thoughtless thought after death, accept non-non-idealistic non-thoughtless ego after death with eight comments. They can not feel the above guidelines, if there is no emotion. 67. The Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocate Paragraphs, attachment to the destruction, destruction, destruction of the sentient species with seven arguments. They cannot feel the above undertakings, if there is no emotion. 68. The Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocates At present Nirvana, the current attachment to Nirvana of sentient beings with five arguments. They can not feel the above guidelines, if there is no emotion. 69. Monks, here there are Sa-subjects, Brahmin, discussing the future, opinion about the future, y just about the future, proposing many different views with forty-four arguments. They can not feel the above guidelines, if there is no emotion. 70. The Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Brahmins, discussing the primitive past, discussing the future, discussing the past and the future, the opinion of the minimal past and the future, referring to the primordial past and the future, proposing many views other than the sixty-two arguments. These people can not feel the above guidelines, if there is no emotion. 71. The Male-stilts, here there are Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, the policy of Permanent residence, accept the ego and the world is often longer with four arguments; the Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subject advocates part Permanent residence, part impermanence; Sa-subjects, Brahmins, advocacy of the fallacy; the Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects, advocate Indecent reason; The Sa-subjects, Brahmins, discussing the primitive past, the Sa-subjects, the Brahmins advocating Righteous thoughts after death, the Sa-subjects, the Brahmins advocates Ideology after death; the Sa-subjects, Bà-la-subjects advocate Phi Hưutought Non-thoughtless after death; the Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects advocate Paragraphs; the Sa-subjects, Ba-la-subjects current policy Nirvana; The Sa-subjects, Brahmins discuss the primitive past; Sa-subjects, Brahmins discuss the future, the view of the primordial past and the future, rely on the primordial past and the future, suggesting many different views with sixty-two treatises. challenge. All these people have feelings (the above guidelines) due to contact through the six senses. Due to conditions with sensations, craving arises; due to attachment, attachment arises; due to predestined attachment and friendship arises; due to predestined affinity, arising arises, by predestined birth, old age, death, sorrow, sorrow, compassion, suffering, favor, brain arises. This Male-stilts, when the Male-stilts like to know the start, the elimination, the sweetness, the danger and the departure of the six places of origin, he will have an understanding beyond the things. on. 72. The Male-stilts, there are Sa-subjects, Brahmins who discuss the primitive past, or discuss the future, or discuss the past and the future, the opinion of the minimal past and the future, depending on the primordial past and the future, suggesting many different views, all of whom are covered by these nets of these sixty-two arguments, though they leap up. , they are still covered in this area. The Male-stilts, as well as skilled fishermen or fishermen, swung nets on the surface of a small lake with narrow eyes. He thought: " The mango was cut off, all the mangoes attached to that branch had the same fate as the other branch. Like this, the Male-stilts, the body of the Tathagata still exists, but what leads to another life has been cut off. When this person's body existed in the gods' time, and humans can see him. When the body dies together in the devas' time and the humans cannot see it. 74. When he heard that, Venerable Ananda white Germany The Ton: - Miraculously, white World Religion! Fortunately, Bach The Ton! What is this dharma called, Bai Thế Tôn? Hey Ananda, this method is called "Loi Vong", so behold; called "Phap Hammock", so be that way to worship; called "Pham Vong", so be that way to worship; called "Sword Hammock", so be that way to worship; called "Supreme Victory", so keep it. The Religion theory so. The Female-stilts joyfully accept the teachings of World Religion. While this sutra is legend, a thousand worlds are trembling.END=NAM MO SHAKYAMUNI BUDDHA.( 3 TIMES ).GOLDEN AMITABHA MONASTERY=VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST NUN=THICH CHAN TANH.AUSTRALIA,SYDNEY.16/3/2021.VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY=VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST NUN=THICH CHAN TANH.