ANATAN.VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY=THICH CHAN TANH.
V Russia is a doctrine in Buddhism that scholars East West, metal collar must be recognized as outstanding and unique in thinking humanity . While most of even the cardinals of religion , the ideology as well as the philosophers are all grand theory of self, under the form or forms of the other, the Buddha has just presented a true totally opposed , and broke all the reasons ambiguity of the ontology . He did not hesitate to deny the so-called Atman of Indian ideologies , especially of Brahmanism. He frankly called the ego illusory, illusory, without an absolute or unchanging entity .
The following scriptures in Samyutta Nikàya have turned upside down often in essays, paragraphs of argument andinhumanity :
"One day , Kassapa Taoist came to ask the Buddha :
- White Buddha , affordable suffering by themselves created?
Buddha answered :
- Not that, Kassapa .
- Bach Duc The Ton , or is suffering created by others ?
- Not that, Kassapa .
- Bach Duc The Religion , or is suffering just because of himself created by others ?
- Kassapa , this is not so.
Kassapa Taoist asked again:
- Bach Duc The Religion , perhaps suffering randomly arises?
- This Kassapa , Tathagata does not advocate like that.
- Bach Duc The Blessed One , could He teach without suffering?
- Not so, Kassapa , Tathagata confirm with suffering .
- White Buddha , affordable You do not see and do not know suffering?
- This Kassapa, indeed As Tathagata once saw and knew suffering ".
At that time , Kassapa was extremely surprised , because since ancient times, everyone thought that the Buddha taught: Those who create evil karma must suffer suffering. Today the Buddha himself denied all the things we always believed .
Because they have not understood the word teaching magic of Buddha should ascetic Kassapa respectfully asked:
- White Buddha , one thing he taught suffering not because we created, not by others to make up, not by random arises , on the one hand he confirmed with distressed and he himself had experienced suffering . It is inconceivable , respectfully ask the Blessed One to open his compassion for his disciples .
The Blessed One replied:
- This Kassapa , who said that the action is the person who receives the result is saying that the suffering of a being created by the beings themselves. That is just common sense . Whoever said that one person acts, another person reaps the fruits is to say that the suffering of a living being created by other beings . That is just the ant .
This Kassapa , not in two wings is that the Tathagata said: "Since being dominated by greed , hatred , delusion that now formed, which is the root of all suffering . The anti- greed, anger and delusion that is, destroying the dynamics of forming karma and all suffering must end ".
We try to learn passages in order to perceive the words teaching profound of Buddha . First again, Buddhism rejectsthe theory is often at or often is advocated human or inside humans have an ego eternal immutable , after death also exists forever . On the other hand, Buddhism also denies both the passage of the annihilation or the fragment of opinion advocated after death is all, so the creators who are not able to reap the fruit is.
So if you say that the person who created the karma is the one who reaps the fruit, it means that at the time of creating the kamma and the reaping of the fruit, the person is still one, nothing has changed, it has not changed, usually, constant , this Buddhism is called ordinary view .
For example, a person named A creates an unwholesome karma , after he dies he is fallen into misery, in the form of a animal b, for example. If it is said that the person who created the evil karma will reap the result of suffering, then here it has been proved wrong, because it is clear that the name A creates the karma that beings B harvests.
But if karma sure that people who are not reap undertakings ie paragraph is because that person act no longer existed and the reaper was a sentient beings totally different. This was also proved that wrong .
For example, a person is sentenced to 10 years of hardship for committing a crime , but if he escapes the area before the execution of the sentence. It was not until 10 years later that law enforcement officers caught. At that time he was old and completely changed, so it was difficult to realize that he was the one who broke the law before. However, when investigated thoroughly, he was still imprisoned as the verdict was judged. Because he couldn't argue that when he broke the law was another person and now was another person.
Both arguments about ego above are the Buddha for the boundary is , that is the judgment under look -sided : when in one aspect of this and saw the self sustainability , in a different plane to see is Extermination .
So what is the non-selfless doctrine of Buddha ?
Buddhism discovers anatta does not mean that there is no self , but one that has no reality because of constantchange and always "becomes something that is not itself" . Without reality, there is no permanent , unchanging ego or self . Many scholars study the teachings Buddha , after recognition without the author falls harmlessly off mortgage into a so-called true self because of misunderstandings that: "All beings have Buddha nature " that Buddha nature is the true self endures unchanging , understand how it turns out from rejection period is over to cling to often is . If security has true self ie the Buddha nature is permanent , regardless variable is because stars Business Prajna taught Buddha nature is: "Any birth, eternal , no structure, impurity , no increase, no decrease ...". Has real being , immortality is something permanent , unchanging And Suppose that that is permanent , unchanging , it itself is in a relative circle with annihilation, shift . So we should not give Buddha the name of the true self for false self . Buddhahood (Buddhacarita ) understood properly is sensible that each beings can so to find out the truth . The clearest expression of the Buddha nature is the wisdom of mindfulness -awareness or insight .
We also do not think that "we always become something other than ourselves " as mentioned above is synonymous with annihilation .
Buddhism recognizes that when A becomes B, B becomes C, then A, B and C have no entities . But do not say that A is completely different from B, other than C because it is an ant paragraph , nor does it say that A is like B, like C or in other words A, B, C is only one, not changing , because that is common sense. .
The self in Buddhism is just a combination of the five aggregates, ie the five elements of materiality, feeling, perception, volition , and consciousness. In the Five Aggregates , the Buddha likens the five elements that constitute the ego as follows:
1) Phenupindūpana ṁ rupa ṁ ): in terms of materiality , the human body is in harmony and dissolved like the drifting foam which is not oriented.
2) Life as water cells (vedanā bubbulūpamā): the miserable sensations of body and mind will destroy abnormalities like bubbles on the water.
3) Ideas as a virtual image (maricukapama Sanna): perception as the fake scenes that travelers often find in the desert, just the illusion of sight .
4) Act as frost (sankhārā kadalāpamā): the good and evil effects are not as solid as the non- core soft plants , easy to bend in the wind.
5) Consciousness as Virtual Art (mayupamavinnana M ): the consciousness of the human kaleidoscope like games demon arts . According to Buddhism the transformation of consciousness is 16 times faster than the transformation of matter .
The five aggregates , being mistaken as ego , are made up of uncertain factors , so it is uncertain and has no entitybecause it is always mutated. But variation does not mean that it completely changes in a random way, but changes according to the law of cause and effect . B of A and is the result of C, so they are not the same nor different, but relatedto each other intimately . Because there is A, there is B, because there is B that has C. If there is no A then B and C are also not available. (Imasmi ṁ sati, ida ṁ hoti, imasmi ṁ asati, ida ṁ na hoti). Thus ego is just a process of change of name and form according to the bond contact causality that we can understand His followers Buddhaghosa that: "No ego karma has no ego reap that only a constant line of karma ".
And the motivation for the constant flow of karma is greed, hatred, and ignorance as the Buddha taught in the above passage "Because of being dominated by greed, anger, and ignorance, it is the cause of all suffering . the killing three people was destroyed dynamics formation of the industry and all suffering ended. "
In short , what we just a phenomenon of the mind - born - physical , not an ego everlasting , eternal ; nor is it an ordinary fall in the name of the Great Falls or Buddha Nature as many people believe. END=NAM MO SAKYAMUNI BUDDHA.( 3 TIMES ).VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST NUN=THICH CHAN TANH.GOLDEN AMITABHA MONASTERY=AUSTRALIA,SYDNEY.10/6/2019.


No comments:
Post a Comment