Dao Vo Ngam Giai Pa Giảiisambhidāmagga
II-DISCUSSION ON VIEWPOINTS
NOTICE OF INTEGRATION
In this treatise, the main types of false views mentioned in the Sutta are divided into groups and discussed under five headings or sections. The headings are:
i. definition of false views,
ii. These false views are built on what foundation
iii. the way through which the wrong view holds
iv. Misleading views can be classified by type
v. the way of operating the wrong view
There is the last part, that is:
vi. the way out of the wrong view
In these sections, the classification has many overlaps and differences.
The above five main parts operate in the sense roughly as follows:
(i) misinterpretation is the characteristic of a false perspective, as the assertion of 'me', 'my', 'my self' is aroused from (ii) the five assemblies, then (iii) ) It acts like thick bush, hard to escape. (iv) For example, it is the wrong view of the ego (sakkayadiṭṭhi ) which (v) misinterprets the five assemblies because of taking them as objects . (vi) Escape from the wrong point is to tell the path of the path.
The vague and vague details are all in this main model. Any conceived conception can be analyzed by this method.
Not all major facts about the wrong view in the Bible are discussed here; for example, a detailed description of the viewpoint of the ego of certain gurus says in Sāmaññaphala (Sa subjects) of Dīgha Nikāya ( Dutta No. 2). The reason is that this treatise does not have the purpose of describing the points that have been raised, but aims to provide a way by which any misconceptions can be classified; and because it follows the examples in the first product of Dīgha Nikāya and the 102th ofMajjhima Nikāya .
[DISCUSSION OF VIEWPOINT] « Diṭṭhikathā »
[In brief]
1. [135] What is the point of view? How many types of platforms of opinion? How many types of obsession because of views?How many types of views? How many types of misinterpretation are possible because of views? What is the fundamental eradication of opinion?
I. What is the point of view? Misunderstanding because misinterpretation is the point.
II. How many types of platforms of opinion? There are eight types.
III. How many types of obsession because of views? There are 18 types.
IV. How many types of views? There are 16 types.
V. How many types of misinterpretation are possible because of views? There are 300 types.
VI. What is the fundamental eradication of opinion? The path of entry is the destruction of the point of view.
[Part I]
2. The point is to misunderstand because what is wrong explanation?
Misunderstanding because of misinterpreting this object : 'This is mine, this is me, this is my ego' (S xii 62, 5) is the wrong view. Misunderstood because misinterpret experience thus: 'This is mine, this is mine, this is my self' is the view ... misunderstood because misinterpreted perception ... [and so with 198 ideas of 201 ideas listed in Luan I d. 5, except for the last three ability to influence (super), until] ... [136-8]. Misunderstanding because of old misinterpretation and death like this: 'This is mine, this is me, this is my ego' is the wrong view.
The wrong view is misunderstanding because of wrong explanation like that.
[Part II]
3. What are the eight basic types of views ?
The gathering is the cornerstone of views, ignorance is the basis of perspective, emotional ... perception ... mind towards the object ... no scrutiny * ... you evil ..., learning from paganism is the foundation of perspective.
These are eight types of foundations of perspective.
[Part III]
5. What are the eighteen types of obsession because of opinion ?
Any point of view is the source that leads to false views, dense forest views, bindings of views, arrows of viewpoint, restraint of views, obstacles of views and dangers of underground points, the tendency to fall asleep to the point of view, the scorching of the point of view, the fever (enthusiasm) of the viewpoint, the knot of viewpoint, cling to the viewpoint, misinterpreting the point of view, misunderstanding because of the point .
This is eighteen types of obsession for perspective. [139]
[Part IV]
6. What are sixteen types of views ?
That is:
i. satisfactory point of view (pleasure)
ii. viewpoint of self,
iii. false views,
iv. accept ego, *
v. Eternal perspective based on accepting ego
vi. The point of killing is based on accepting self
vii. finite views
viii. finite past views
ix. finite future perspective
x. Mandatory perspective [causing damage]
xi. The view is bound to the 'I' conceit.
xii. the view that is tied to my 'self'
xiii. The view is linked to the policy of ego
xiv. views associated with advocates about the world
xv. existing opinion [eternal]
xvi. opinion does not exist [annihilation]
These are sixteen types of views.
[Part V]
7. Through satisfactory point of view, there are wrong explanations according to how many aspects?
From the point of view of self, is there any wrong explanation according to many aspects?
... through false views, ...?
... through the point of accepting ego, ...?
... through the eternal view based on accepting ego, ...?
... from the point of view of killing based on accepting ego, ...?
... through finite point of view, ...?
... through finite past views, ...?
... through the finite future perspective, ...?
... through the binding point [causing damage], ...?
... through the point of binding with falling 'I', ...?
... through the perspective of being tied to my 'self', ...?
... through the viewpoint associated with the policy of ego, ...?
... through the viewpoint associated with advocates about the world, ...?
... through the viewpoint of being [eternal], ...?
From the point of view that does not exist [the removal], is there any wrong explanation according to many aspects?
From a satisfactory point of view, there is a misinterpretation in 35 aspects.
From the point of view of self, there is a false explanation in 20 aspects.
Through a false perspective, there is a false explanation in 10 aspects.
... through the egoistic point of view, misinterpreted in 20 aspects.
... from a permanent point of view based on egoism, there is a misinterpretation in 15 aspects.
... from the point of view of cessation based on accepting ego, there is a misinterpretation in 5 aspects.
... through a finite point of view, there is a false explanation of 50 aspects.
... through the finite past viewpoint, there is a false explanation in 18 aspects.
... through a finite future perspective, there is a false explanation in 44 aspects.
... from a binding point of view, there is a false explanation in 18 aspects.
... from the point of view of binding to the 'I' side, there is a false explanation in 18 aspects.
... through the viewpoint of 'My' conquest, there is a false explanation in 18 aspects.
... from the point of view associated with the policies of the ego, there is a misinterpretation in 20 aspects. [140]
... from the point of view associated with the policy of the world, there are false explanations in 8 aspects.
... from the point of view of existence, there is a misinterpretation in one aspect.
From a point of view that does not exist, there is a misinterpretation in one aspect.
(i)
8. From a satisfied point of view (pleasure), what is the wrong explanation in 35 aspects ?
(1) 'Any touch and bliss which arises due to the object is satisfied of the object' (S iii 28), and any misleading awareness and any misinterpretation [about satisfying That satisfaction] is a false view. That view is not satisfying, that satisfaction is not a point of view; The point is one and satisfying is another; The view [with] satisfaction is called a satisfactory attitude.
9. Satisfaction view (pleasure) is a wrong view; Wrong views are mistaken views. He has a wrong view that is wrong in his opinion. Do not practice with, loitering or devout people in the wrong view. Why not? Because his position has been contaminated.
10. Any desire to have a point of view is not a point of view, and the point of view is not greed; perspective is one and greed is another; The view [with] greed is called greed. The person with that view and the greed is the one who has [the desire to have] the burning view. Giving the offering to the person [the desire to have] that burning view does not bring great blessings or great benefit. Why not? Because his position has been contaminated.
11. The point of satisfaction (pleasure) is the wrong view; people with false views will be born in two places, that is: hell or animal realm. When a person has a wrong view, the actions of the mouth and mouth are executed and completed according to that false view, and any intention, aspiration, aspiration and any fruit-making behavior of he is all the states that lead to undesired, unfulfilled, unhappy things to welcome, to bring harm, and lead to suffering. Why? Because his position has been contaminated.
12. As when the seeds of nimba or kosataki seeds or bitter melon seeds are sown in wet soil and the seeds suck up any solid or liquid organic fertilizer there, [141] all lead to bitterness, to the substance sour, unsatisfactory. Why? Because the seed has been defiled, so too, the wrong person will be born in two places; ... [repeat as above] ... Why is that? Because his position has been contaminated.
13. Satisfaction point (pleasure) is a wrong view. Misleading views are sources that lead to dense viewpoints and forests, [repeating as in e. 5] ... misunderstandings because of views.
14-17. (2) - (5) Any lost and blissful thing arises due to the experience ... [and so on, repeat again. 8 for the remaining four sets].
18-23. (6) - (11) Any lost and blissful thing arises because it depends on the eye ... [and so on, with the other senses].
24-29. (12) - (17) Any bliss which arises due to the object of the eye ... [and so on, with each object of each other sense].
30-35. (18) - (23) Any touch and bliss that arises due to depending on eye awareness ... [and so on, with each remaining awareness of 6 identities].
36-41. (24) - (29) Any touch and bliss arises due to depending on the touch of the eye ... [and so, with every touch in each of the remaining six senses].
42-47. (30) - (35) Any touch and bliss that arises due to the feeling of contact in the eyes of the birth ... [and so, with each of the six types of sensations remaining].
The point of satisfaction (pleasure) is the wrong view. The wrong view is the source that leads to the viewpoints and forests of viewpoints, [repeating as at the end of the d. 9] ... misunderstandings because of views. [143]
48. [Such a false view] is a bondage to the mind obsessed with 18 aspects [starting from the source leading to the views]. [But] there are bindings that are also misleading, and those that are not views.
What are the wrong views? The [misleading] viewpoint for eternal existence falls, and misunderstandings about gender and rituals. These are also false views.
Which ties are not views? The bindings of sexual desire, of opposition, of conceit (pride), of skepticism, of desire to become, of envy, of ignorance, of tendency to fall asleep, of ignorance. .. These bindings are not views.
Through a satisfactory point of view (pleasure), there is a misinterpretation in 35 aspects.
(ii)
49. From the point of view of self, is there any wrong explanation according to many aspects ?
Here a secular layman * does not respect the saints, knows nothing of the True Dharma of the Saints, is not trained to follow the True Dharma of the Saints, does not respect the sage, ignorant of the True Dharma of the sages, not to practice according to the True Dharma of the sages,
(1) regard the object as a self, or (2) for an object with an object, or (3) an object in the ego, or (4) falling in an object; or (5) consider experience to be an ego, or (6) to experience an ego, or (7) experience in self, or (8) to fall in experience; or (9) regard perception as self, or (10) for a self-conscious self, or (11) perceive in self, or (12) fall in awareness; or (13) consider creating a mood as a self, or (14) for a self-created ego, or (15) creating a mood in the ego, or (16) falling in creating a mood; or (17) perceive as self, or (18) for consciousness to fall, or (19) stay in self, or (20) fall in consciousness. (read S iii 46f.)
* 'secular' means creating many gonorrhea, misperceptions; 'ignorance' means not having the opportunity to learn the scriptures, not knowing the attainment of high attainment [ Asḷ 348-349].
50. (1) How does he consider an object to be a fall? Here is someone who considers the subject of meditation with the earth like this. what we are, the subject of meditation by earth is that ', and he sees the same meditation subject as the earth and the falls.Just as the person who saw the flame of the lamp lit and its fire color was the same, like 'What is the fire, [144] is the color of fire; What is the color of fire, the flame is that ', so, there is a viewer here ... the same.
The point of view is misunderstanding because of wrong explanation. The point of view is not the foundation and the foundation is not the point; The point is one, the foundation is another. This view [along with] the foundation is the first kind of perspective on falling into a body.
51. The views of self are false views, ... [repeating 9-13].
52. [Such a false view] is a binding for the mind ... [repeating. 48].
53-55. There are people who consider the subject of meditation with water to fall ... [as in dd 50-52].
56-58. There are people who consider the subject of meditation by fire to fall ...
59-61. There are people who consider the subject of meditation by wind to fall ...
62-64. There are people who consider the subject of green meditation to fall ...
65-67. There are people who consider the subject of yellow meditation to fall ...
68-70. There are people who consider the red meditation subject to fall ...
71-73. Here some people consider the subject of white meditation to fall ...
He considers the object to be like that.
Here there are people who consider experience ... awareness ... to create the mood ... consciousness is falling. He thought that 'This is my ego, but this self of mine has an object thanks to this object' and considers an object like that. Like a shady tree, so can he say 'This is a tree, this is a shade; a tree is one, shade is another; but this tree is shady thanks to that shade 'and thus considers trees shady, so too, there are people who see ... there are objects.
The point of view is misunderstanding because of misinterpretation. The point of view is not the foundation and the foundation is not the point; The point is one, the foundation is another. This view [along with] the foundation is the second kind of view of falling into the body.
75. The views of self are wrong views ...
76. [Such a false view] is a bondage to the mind ...
He considers falling objects like that. [145]
77. (3) How does he consider the object in the self? Here there are people who consider experience ... awareness ... to create the mood ... consciousness is falling. He thinks that 'This is my ego, but this object is in that ego and so sees the object in the ego.Just like a flower with incense, so can he say 'This is a flower, this is a incense; flowers are one, incense is another; but this incense is in this flower ', and thus considers the incense in the flower, too, there is a person who sees ... the object in the ego.
Misunderstanding because misinterpretation is the point. The point of view is not the foundation and the foundation is not the point; The point is one, the foundation is another. This view [along with] the foundation is the third type of view of falling into the body.
78. The views of self are false views ...
79. [Such a false view] is a binding for the mind ...
He considers the object to be like that.
80. (4) How does he consider falling in objects? Here there are people who consider experience ... awareness ... to create the mood ... consciousness is falling. He thinks that 'This is my ego, but my self is in this object and so on falls in the object. Just like a gem in a box, so can he say 'This is a gem, this is a box; gem is one, the box is another; but this gem is in this box ', and so see the gems in the box, too, there are people who see ... falling in objects.
Misunderstanding because misinterpretation is the point of view ... This view [with] the foundation is the fourth type of viewpoint about falling into a body.
81. The views on self are wrong views ...
82. [Such a false view] is a bondage to the mind ...
He considers falling in objects like that.
83. (5) How does he treat experience as self? Here someone sees the experience of being born with contact with the eyes, ... the experience of being born of contact with the ear, ... the experience of being born of contact with the nose, ... the experience of being born of touching the tongue, ... the experience of being born of contact with the body, ... the experience of being born with touch is like falling [146] like this' What is the experience of being born by touching with mind, then I am that; What is self, the experience of being born with touch is that ', and he considers the experience of being born by touching with the same idea and falling. It's like ... [like in e. 50] ... too, there are people watching ... the same.
This view [along with] the foundation is the first kind of perspective on falling to experience as a foundation.
84. The views of self are false views ...
85. [Such a false view] is a binding for the mind ...
He considers experience to be like that.
86-88. (6) How does he consider the experience of self?
There are people here who perceive awareness ... to create a mood ... consciousness ... objects are self. He thinks that 'This is my ego, but this self of mine has experienced with this experience' and thus considers an experienced self. Like ... [completed as at 74-76 with the same example and appropriate changes].
He considers falls as such.
89-91. (7) How does he consider experience in self?
There are people here who perceive awareness ... to create a mood ... consciousness ... objects are self. He thinks that 'This is my ego, but this experience is in this self' and thus considers the experience in self. Like ... [take the example at e. 77].
He considers the experience in such a fall.
92-94. (8) How does he consider falling in experience?
There are people here who perceive awareness ... to create a mood ... consciousness ... objects are self. He thinks that 'This is my ego, but this self is in this experience' and thus considers the ego in experience. Like ... [take the example at e. 80].
He considers falling in experience like that.
95-97. (9) How does he consider awareness as a self? Here, some people perceive being born by contact with the eyes ... being aware of contact with the ears ... being aware of contact with the nose ... perceiving birth by touching the tongue ... receiving consciousness being touched by the body ... the awareness of being born in contact with the mind is falling like this ... [147]
He considers awareness to be like that.
98-100. (10) How does he consider self-awareness?
Here there are people who consider creating the mood ... consciousness ... objects ... experiences are self. He thinks that 'This is my ego, but this self of mine is aware of this awareness' and thus perceives self-awareness. Like...
He sees self-awareness as such.
101-103. (11) How does he consider awareness in self?
Here there are people who consider creating the mood ... consciousness ... objects ... experiences are self. He thinks that 'This is my ego, but this awareness is in this self' and so sees awareness in self. Like...
He considers awareness in such a fall.
104-106. (12) How does he consider falling in awareness?
Here there are people who consider creating the mood ... consciousness ... objects ... experiences are self. He thinks that 'This is my ego, but this self of mine is in this awareness' and thus considers falling in awareness. Like...
He considers falling in awareness to be like that.
107-109. (13) How does he consider creating a mood as a self? There are people who consider the idea of being born by contact with the eyes ... the intention of being touched by the intention is like this ... 'What is the intention of being touched by touching ...' is the same . Like...
He considers creating a mood that falls like that.
110-112. (14) How does he consider falling in mood?
Here there are people who watch ... awareness is self. He thinks that 'This is my ego, but this self of mine has created a mood by creating this mood' and thus considers a self-created mood. Like...
He considers self to create such a mood. [148]
113-115. (15) How does he consider creating a mood in self?
Here there are people who watch ... awareness is self. He thinks that 'This is my ego, but these moods are in this self' and thus consider creating the mood in the self. Like...
He considers creating a mood in such a fall.
116-118. (16) How does he consider the self in creating a mood?
Here there are people who watch ... awareness is self. He thinks that 'This is my ego, but this self of mine is in these moods' and thus considers the self in creating the mood. Like...
He considers the falling in to create such a mood.
119-121. (17) How does he perceive as self? Here someone sees awareness from the eye ... recognizes from the ear ... recognizes from the nose ... recognizes from the tongue ... recognizes from the body ... knowing from the mind is like this "Receiving I know that from what I mean, I am that; What we are is recognizing that the word is that ', and he considers the same sense of intent and self. Like a person who saw the fire of the lamp lit ...
He considers consciousness to be like that.
122-124. (18) How does he consider the awakened self?
Here someone considers the object ... the experience ... the perception ... creates the mood that is falling. He thinks that 'This is my ego, but this self of mine has awakened by this' and thus considers the awakening. It's like having a tree ...
He considers the self to be awake like that.
125-127. (19) How does he perceive being in the self?
Here someone considers the object ... to create the mood that is falling. He thinks that 'This is my ego, but this consciousness is in this ego' and thus awakens in the ego. Like a flower with a fragrance ...
He is awake in that way.
128. (20) How does he consider falling in consciousness?
Here someone considers the object ... to create the mood that is falling. He thought that 'This is my ego, but this ego is in this mode' and thus considers [149] falling in consciousness. Like a gem ... awake in the fall.
He considers falling in consciousness like that.
Misunderstanding because misinterpretation is the point of view ... This view [along with] the foundation is the fourth kind of viewpoint of self-consciousness.
129. The view of self is a wrong view ... [as in đd 9-13] ... misunderstandings because of views.
130. [Such a false view] is a bond for the mind ... [as in e. 48] ... These bindings are not views.
He is awake in that way.
From the point of view of self, there is a false explanation according to these 20 aspects.
(iii)
131. In the wrong view, what are the wrong interpretations in 10 aspects ?
(1) There is no real experiment: this is a platform. Misunderstanding because of misinterpretation due to misconception that this is the point. The point of view is not the foundation and the foundation is not the point; The point is one, the foundation is another. This view [along with] the foundation is the first type of false view with false background. (read D i 86).
132. Misleading views are mistaken views. Who has ... [and so on. 9 until ... ... misunderstood because of the views.
133. [Such a false view] is a bond for the mind ... [and so on. 48 until] ... These bindings are not views.
134-136. (2) No offerings: this is a foundation ...
137-139. (3) No sacrifice: this is a platform ...
140-142. (4) There is no fruit of good and evil behavior: this is a foundation ...
143-145. (5) There is no life: this is a foundation ...
146-148. (6) There is no future: this is a foundation ...
149-151. (7) No mother: this is a platform ...
152-154. (8) No father: this is a platform ...
155-157. (9) There is no biochemical species *: this is a foundation ...
* Opapatika .
158. (10) There are no virtues and brahmans of virtue of self-enlightenment thanks to the direct mind and proclaiming to this world and the other world: this is a foundation ... This view [together] is the tenth false view has a false background.
159. Misleading views are mistaken views. People have ... misunderstandings because of the views.
160. [Such a false view] is a bond for the mind ... These bindings are not views.
Through a false perspective, there is a misinterpretation in these 10 aspects.
(iv)
161. From the point of view of accepting ego, what is the wrong explanation in 20 aspects ?
Here a secular person lacks understanding ... [and so on. 49] ... or (20) fell in consciousness.
162-222. (1) How does he consider an object to be a fall? There are people here ... [repeating VND50-130] ... [150]
From the point of accepting ego, there is a false explanation according to these 20 aspects.
(v)
223. From the point of view of eternity based on self-acceptance, what are the wrong explanations according to 15 aspects ?
Here a secular person lacks understanding ... [and so on. 49] ...
(1) consider an object with an object, or (2) an object in the ego, or (3) falling in an object; or (4) consider self to experience, or (5) experience in self, or (6) fall in experience; or (7) perceive self-awareness, or (8) perceive in self, or (9) fall in awareness; or (10) consider the self to create a mood, or (11) create a mood in the ego, or (12) fall in creating a mood; or (13) consider self-consciousness, or (14) awake in self, or (15) falling in consciousness.
224-284. (1) How does he consider falling objects? There are people here ... [repeating VND 74-82, 86-94, 98-106, 110-118, 122-130] ...
From the permanent point of view based on egoism, there is a misinterpretation in these 15 aspects.
(we)
285. From the point of view of cessation based on accepting ego, is there any misinterpretation in 5 aspects ?
Here a secular person lacks understanding ... [and so on. 49] ... (1) regard the object as self ... or (2) experience is self ... or (3) perceive as self ... or (4) create a state of self. or (5) consciousness is falling.
286-321. (1) How does he consider an object to be a fall? There are people here ... [repeating VND 50-73, 83-85, 95-97, 107-109, 119-121] ...
From the point of view of cessation based on accepting ego, there is misinterpretation in these 5 aspects.
(vii)
322. Through the hypothetical viewpoint [by recognizing or rejecting] finite, is there any misinterpretation in 50 aspects?
Through the hypothetical viewpoint by having a finite view, is there a misinterpretation like this 'This world is lasting' [3] according to many aspects?
Through a hypothetical viewpoint by having a finite view, is there a misinterpretation like this 'This world does not endure' in many respects?
Through the hypothetical viewpoint by finite recognition, ... like this' Is this world at the end [in space]?
... like this 'This world has no end [in space]'?
... like this, 'Soul and body are the same'?
... like this 'Soul is one, body is another'?
... like this, 'Tathagata exists after death'?
... like this, 'Tathagata does not exist after death'?
... like this, 'Tathagata exists and does not exist after death'?
Through the hypothetical viewpoint by looking at finite, is there any misinterpretation such as 'Tathagata does not exist nor does it exist after death' according to many aspects?
Through the hypothetical viewpoint by finite recognition, there is misinterpretation in 5 aspects [each aspect is mentioned in the above 10 cases].
323. Through the hypothetical viewpoint by having a finite view, is there a misinterpretation like this' Where is this world enduring?
(1) Misunderstanding because of misinterpretation like this 'The object is this world and this world is permanent' is a point of view. Finite that assumption, so it is a finite assumption. That view is not the foundation and foundation is not that view; The point is one, the foundation is another. This view [along with] the foundation is the first kind of view that finely assumes like this 'This world is permanent'.
324. The view of finite assumptions is a false view; Wrong views are mistaken views ... [and so on. 9] ...
325. [Such a false view] is a bond for the mind ... [and so on. 46] ... These bindings are not views.
326-328. (2) Misunderstanding because of misinterpreting this 'The experience is this world and this world is permanent' is a point of view ...
329-331. (3) ... like this 'Awareness is this world and this world is permanent' ...
332-334. (4) ... like this, 'Creating the mood is this world and this world is forever' ...
335. (5) ... like this, 'Conscious is this world and this world is permanent' ... [152] This view [with] the foundation is the fifth kind of finite assumption like this 'This world is permanent'.
336-337. The view of finite assumptions is a false view ...
There is misinterpretation in 5 aspects through the viewpoint of finite assumptions like this 'This world is permanent'.
338. Through a hypothetical viewpoint by having a finite view, is there a misinterpretation like this, 'This world does not endure' in five aspects?
(6) Misunderstanding because of misinterpretation like this 'The object is this world and this world is not permanent' is a point of view. Finishing that point of assumption ... This view [along with] the foundation is the first kind of view that assumes finely like this 'This world is not permanent'.
339-340. The view of finite assumptions is a false view ...
341-352. (7) - (10) Misunderstanding because of this misinterpretation 'The experience is this world and this world is not permanent' ... [and so on with the rest of the collections] ...
There is a misinterpretation in 5 respects through a finite assumption like this 'This world is not permanent'.
353. Through a hypothetical viewpoint by having a finite view, is there a misinterpretation like this 'This world has the end' according to five aspects?
(11) Here there is a person who spreads the mind (throughout) to space with a blue limit. He thought that 'This world has the end, is limited', and recognizes that limit. Misunderstanding because of this misinterpretation 'What he has experienced is the foundation and this world' is a point of view. Finite is assumed by that view. That view is not the foundation ... the first view that finite assumptions like this 'The world has the end'.
354-355. The view of finite assumptions is a false view ... These bindings are not views.
356-357. (12) Here there is a person who experiences (throughout) the space with a yellow limit ...
(13) There is a person who spreads the mind (throughout) to a space with a red limit ...
(14) Here there is a person who spreads the mind (throughout) to a space with a white limit ...
(15) Here there are people who spread the mind (all the way) to the limited bright space ...
[153] There is a misinterpretation in 5 aspects through the viewpoint of finite assumptions like this 'The world has the end'.
358. From the hypothetical standpoint by looking at finite, is there a misinterpretation like this 'This world does not end' according to 5 aspects?
There are people who spread their minds (throughout) to the spacious green space. He thought that 'This world has no end, endless', and endless recognition like that. Misunderstanding because of misinterpretation like this' What ... is the first view that finite assumptions like this' This world is not the end '.
359-360. The view of finite assumptions is a false view ... These bindings are not views.
361-372. (17-20) There are people here who spread their mind (wide) to a large yellow space ... red ... white ... bright ...
There is misinterpretation in 5 aspects through the viewpoint of finite assumptions like this 'This world is not the end'.
373. Through the hypothetical viewpoint by having a finite view, is there such misinterpretation as 'Which soul and body is the same' in five aspects?
(21) Misunderstanding because of misinterpretation like this' The object is this soul and body; The same soul and body 'is a point of view. Finite is assumed by that view ... is the first view that finite assumptions like this 'soul and body are the same'.
374-375. The view of finite assumptions is a false view ... These bindings are not views.
376-387. (22) - (25) Misunderstanding because of this misinterpretation 'Experience ... Awareness ... Creating a mood ... This is this soul and body ...
There is a misinterpretation in 5 respects through the viewpoint of finite assumptions like this 'the soul and the body are the same'.
388. Through a hypothetical viewpoint by having a finite interpretation, is there a misinterpretation of 'The soul is one, and the body is another' in five respects?
(26) Misunderstanding because of misinterpretation like this 'The object is this body, and the soul is not this body'; the soul is one, and the body is another 'is a viewpoint. Finite is assumed by that view ... is the first extreme view that this finite assumption 'the soul is one, and the body is another'.
389-390. The view of finite assumptions is a false view ... These bindings are not views.
391-402. (27) - (30) Misinterpreted because of this misinterpretation 'Experience ... Awareness ... Creating a mood ... Conscious is this body, and the soul is not this body .. . '[154]
There is a misinterpretation in five respects through the viewpoint of this finite assumption 'the soul is one, and the body is another'.
403. Through the hypothetical viewpoint by seeing finite, is there such misinterpretation that 'Tathagata exists after death' in five aspects?
(31) Misinterpreted because of this misinterpretation. 'Here, only objects can carry the concept of death; As Tathagata, when the body is disintegrated, exists and exists and arises and arises' is a viewpoint. The finite assumption of that view ... is the first extreme view that finite assumptions such as 'Tathagata exists after death'.
404-405. The view of finite assumptions is a false view ... These bindings are not views.
406-417. (32) - (35) Misinterpreted because of this misinterpretation 'Only experience ... awareness ... creates the mood ... new consciousness brings the idea of death here, ...
There is a misinterpretation in 5 respects through the viewpoint of finite assumptions such as 'Tathagata exists after death'.
418. Through the hypothetical viewpoint by having a finite view, is there such misinterpretation that 'Tathagata does not exist after death' in five aspects?
(36) Misinterpreted because of this misinterpretation. 'Here, only objects bring the idea of death; Tathagata, when the body is disintegrated, is destroyed, lost; Tathagata does not exist after death 'is a point of view. Finite is assumed by that view ... is the first view that finite assumptions such as 'Tathagata does not exist after death'.
419-420. The view of finite assumptions is a false view ... These bindings are not views.
421-432. (37) - (40) Misunderstanding because of this misinterpretation 'Only experience ... awareness ... creates the mood ... new consciousness brings the idea of death here ...
There is misinterpretation in 5 aspects through the viewpoint of finite assumptions such as 'Tathagata does not exist after death'.
433. Through the hypothetical viewpoint by having a finite view, is there such misinterpretation that 'Tathagata exists and does not exist after death' in five aspects?
(41) Misunderstanding because of this misinterpretation. 'Here, only objects can carry the concept of death; As a Tathagata, when the body disintegrates, both exist and do not exist 'is a viewpoint. Finite is assumed by that view ... is the first view that finite assumptions such as 'Tathagata exists and does not exist after death'.
434-435. The view of finite assumptions is a false view ... These bindings are not views.
436-447. (42) - (45) Misinterpreted because of this misinterpretation 'Only experience ... awareness ... creates the mood ... new consciousness brings the idea of death here ...
There is misinterpretation in 5 respects through the viewpoint of finite assumptions such as 'Tathagata exists and does not exist after death'.
448. Through the hypothetical viewpoint by looking at finite, is there any misinterpretation like this, 'Tathagata does not exist nor does it not exist after death' in five aspects? [155]
(46) Misunderstanding because of this misinterpretation. 'Here, only objects can carry the concept of death; Tathagata, when the body disintegrates, neither does it exist nor does it not exist 'is a point of view. The finite assumption of that view ... is the first view that the finite assumption such as 'Tathagata does not exist nor does it not exist after death'.
449-450. The view of finite assumptions is a false view ... These bindings are not views.
451-462. (47) - (50) Misunderstanding because of this misinterpretation 'Only experience ... awareness ... creates the mood ... new consciousness brings the idea of death here ...
There is a misinterpretation in 5 respects through the viewpoint of finite assumptions such as 'Tathagata does not exist nor does it not exist after death'.
There is misinterpretation in 50 aspects through a finite assumption.
(viii)
463. From the point of view, what is the misinterpretation of the finite past in 18 aspects? (Read Brahmajālasutta « D i 40-41» ).
There are four types of people who advocate eternity, four types of people who advocate a partial and non-permanent part, four types of partial and unbounded partial advocates, four types of sophistication who bend like eels, and two kinds of advocates of things happening for no obvious reason.
There is misinterpretation of past finitude in these 18 aspects.
(ix)
464. From what point of view, is there a misinterpretation of the finite future according to 44 aspects? (Read Brahmajālasutta « D i 41-42 » ).
There are sixteen types of advocates who have awareness, eight types of advocates without awareness, eight types of advocates without awareness or without awareness, seven types of advocates of annihilation, and five types of people Nibbana is right here and right now.
There is misinterpretation of the finite future according to these 44 aspects.
(x)
465. From what point of view, is there any misinterpretation in 18 aspects?
Any point of origin is that which leads to points of view, ... [repetition e 5] ... misunderstandings because of opinion.
From the point of view, there is a misinterpretation of interpretation according to these 18 aspects.
(xi)
466. From the point of view, what is the misinterpretation that binds to the 'I' conceit in 18 aspects ?
(1) Misinterpretation because misinterpretation of the eye as 'I' is a binding view of 'I' conceit. That view is not the foundation ... [156] is the first view bound to the 'I' conceit.
467-468. The point of binding to the ego 'I' is the wrong view ... These bindings are not views.
469-470. (2) Misunderstanding because misinterpretation of the eye as 'I' is a binding perspective with the 'I' conceit ...
471-515. (3) ... nose ... (4) ... tongue ... (5) ... body ... (6) ... mind ... (7) tangible object ... (8) ... sound ... (9) ... smell ... (10) ... taste ... (11) ... touch ... (12) ... the mind object ... (13) ... recognizes from the eyes ... (14) ... recognizes from the ear ... (15) ... recognizes from the nose ... (16). .. aware from the tongue ... (17) ... aware from the body ...
516-518. (18) Misunderstanding because the misinterpretation of the word perception is 'I' is a binding view of the 'I' conceit ...
From the point of view, there is a misinterpretation that binds to 'I' in accordance with these 18 aspects.
(xii)
519. From the point of view, what are the misinterpretations associated with 'My' conceit in 18 aspects ?
(1) Misunderstanding because misinterpreting the eye as 'My' is a viewpoint tied to 'my' conceit. That view is not the foundation ... the first view that is tied to my 'self'.
520-521. The point of attachment to 'my' conceit is a false view ... These bindings are not views.
522-524. (2) Misunderstanding because misinterpreting the eye as 'My' is a viewpoint tied to 'my' conceit ...
525-569. (3) ... nose ... [and so on like dd 471-515]
570-572. (18) Misunderstanding because misinterpretation of consciousness is 'My' is a view that is tied to 'my' conception ...
From the point of view, there is misinterpretation tied to 'My' conceit according to these 18 aspects.
(xiii)
573-654. From the point of view, what are the misinterpretations associated with the policy of self in 20 aspects ?
Here a secular person is ignorant ... [repeating as in đđ 49-130] ... [157]
There is misinterpretation associated with advocates about the self in these 20 aspects.
(xiv)
655-657. From the point of view associated with the guidelines on the world, there are misconceptions in 8 aspects ?
(1) Misunderstanding because of misinterpretation like this 'Ego and this world are everlasting' is a viewpoint associated with the policy of the world. That view is not the foundation ... These bindings are not views.
658-660. (2) Misunderstanding because of misinterpretation like this 'Ego and this world are everlasting' is a viewpoint associated with the policy of the world ...
661-663. (3) ... like this 'The ego and this world are both eternal and non-permanent ...'
664-666. (4) ... like this, 'The ego and this world are not permanent and not eternal' ...
667-669. (5) ... like this 'The ego and the world are finite' ... ...
670-672. (6) ... like this 'The ego and this world are infinite' ...
673-675. (7) ... like this 'The ego and this world are both finite and infinite' ...
676-678. (8) ... like this 'The ego and this world are neither finite nor infinite' ...
These bindings are not views.
From the point of view, there is misinterpretation associated with the world in these 8 aspects.
(xv)
679. Misinterpretation by hesitation * is a view of existence [longevity].
* d. 701 is going to say more about this hesitation ( oliyana ).
(xvi)
680. Misinterpretation by going too far * is a point of view that does not exist.
* d. 701 is going to say more about this overdone ( atidhāvana ).
[ CLASSIFICATION CLASSIFICATION ]
681. How many types of views (xv) about existence and how many types of views (xvi) do not exist are (i) misinterpreted in 35 aspects through the point of satisfaction of pleasure (sweetness)?
How many types of views (xv) about existence and how many types of views (xvi) do not exist are (ii) misinterpreted in 20 aspects through the point of view of self?
How many types of perspectives on existence and how many types of exclusion points are misinterpreted in 10 aspects through false views?
How many views about existence ...
How many types of views (xv) about existence and how many types of points of view (xvi) do not exist are (xiv) misinterpreted in 8 aspects through the perspective of linking with the policy of the world?
682. (i) Misinterpretation in 35 aspects through the pleasures of pleasure (sweetness) can [all] be either (xv) or (xvi) viewpoint does not exist.
683. (ii) Misinterpretation according to 20 aspects through the views of the fall is 15 types (xv) the existing viewpoint and 5 categories (xvi) the viewpoint does not exist.
684. (iii) Misinterpretation in 10 aspects through a false perspective is all (xvi) the view does not exist.
685. (iv) Misinterpretation according to 20 aspects through the ego point of view is 15 types (xv) the existing viewpoint and 5 categories (xvi) the view does not exist.
686. (v) Misinterpretation according to 15 aspects through the persistent view based on self-acceptance [158] is all (xvi) the view does not exist.
687. (vi) Misinterpretation according to 5 aspects through the point of view of the cessation based on ego is all (xvi) the view does not exist.
688. (vii) [Misinterpretation according to 50 aspects:]
(1) Misinterpret in 5 aspects through this view of finite assumptions: 'This world is everlasting' is all (xv) the point of existence.
(2) Misinterpret in 5 aspects through this finite assumption view: 'This world is not permanent' is all (xvi) the view does not exist.
689. (3) Misinterpret in 5 aspects through this view of finite assumptions: 'This finite world' can be both [all] (xv) or a positive viewpoint (xvi) point of view does not exist.
(4) Misinterpret according to 5 aspects through this finite assumption view: 'This world is infinite' can be both [all] (xv) or the point of existence is good (xvi) point of view is not Friends
690. (5) Misinterpret in 5 respects through this view of finite assumptions: 'This soul and this body are the same' is all (xvi) the view does not exist.
(6) Misinterpret in 5 aspects through this view of finite assumptions: 'The soul is one, this body is another' is all (xv) the point of existence.
691. (7) Misinterpret according to 5 aspects through this finite assumption viewpoint: 'Existing Tathagata after death' is all (xv) the existential view.
(8) Misinterpret according to 5 aspects through this view of finite assumptions: 'Tathagata does not exist after death' is all (xvi) point of view does not exist.
(9) Misinterpret in 5 respects through this finite assumption: 'Tathagata that exists, does not exist after death' can [all] both (xv) existential view. or (xvi) opinion does not exist.
(10) Misinterpret according to 5 aspects through this view of finite assumptions: 'Tathagata does not exist, nor does it not exist after death' can both be [all] (xv) point of view existing or (xvi) viewpoint does not exist.
692. (viii) Misinterpretation in 18 aspects through the past finite point of view can [all] be both (xv) or a viewpoint of being or (xvi) point of view does not exist.
693. (ix) Misinterpretation according to 44 aspects through the future finite point of view can [all] be both (xv) or the point of existence is (xvi) point of view does not exist.
694. (x) Misinterpretation in 18 aspects through a binding point of view can [all] be either (xv) or a viewpoint of being or (xvi) point of view does not exist.
695. (xi) Misinterpretation in 18 aspects through the perspective of binding to 'I' is all (xvi) the view does not exist.
696. (xii) Misinterpret in 18 aspects the point of view of 'My' is all (xv) the point of view exists.
697. (xiii) Misinterpretation in 20 aspects through the point of connection with the fall is 15 types (xv) the existing viewpoint and 5 categories (xvi) the view does not exist.
698. (xiv) Misinterpretation according to 8 aspects through the perspective of linking to the world can [all] both be (xv) or existent (xvi) point of view does not exist.
699. All viewpoints are (i) a view of satisfying pleasure (sweetness).
All points of view are (ii) views of self.
All views are (iii) false views.
All viewpoints are (iv) egoistic attitudes.
All views are (vii) hypothetical viewpoint [by confirming or rejecting] finite. [159]
All views are (x) binding views.
All viewpoints are (xiii) the point of view associated with the policy of self.
700. Existing viewpoints, and non-existent views:
Those who like reasoning [just] get this pair as the foundation;
Because they do not know about the cessation, It is the place where this world is wrong in awareness. [4]
[Part VI]
701. The monks, there are two types of views, and when the gods and the people are obsessed with them, there is a hesitant, over-tasted taste: only those with wisdom will see it clearly.
'And how are you hesitant? Gods and human beings love being, enjoying being, being happy in being. When teaching the Righteous Dharma to them to stop becoming (being), their minds do not penetrate, insecure, unstable and determined. There is a hesitation like that.
'And how much is the taste? Being ashamed, humiliated and disgusting because it is the ego, they rejoice with not being like this: 'Dear Sir, when this body is broken, this self is cut off, broken, no longer exists after death, it is peace, that is supremacy, that is the truth '. It tastes so great.
'And how does anyone have a label? Here there are monks who see things as they are. After seeing things as they are, he goes into the path to boredom, to the end of it, to destroy the greed for it. Such a person has a clear vision.
'Who, thanks see current calculated exactly as it is
And can overcome the current calculation was
Sure * it is as true
He was liberated because of the desire to become now exhausted
He knows full of what is, so no longer
Desire to become or desire to kill,
Then with the end of becoming what is
That bhikkhu is no longer alive. (It 43) [160]
* Although this verse is taken from Itivuttaka 's 43rd Sutta , the text of Paṭisambhidhāmagga is written as yathābhūte adhimuccanti: it is certainly true. In Itivuttaka , this verse is written yathābhūte vimuccanti butItivuttaka 's commentary says to understand that vimuccanti is adhimuccanti to suit Paṭisambhidhāmagga as I translated. Read Peter Masefield, The Itivuttaka , PTS [Oxford, 2000], page 46, footnote 104.
702. Three types of people have a mistaken view, three types of people have an accurate view.
Three types of people who have a wrong view? Masters of other denominations, their disciples and anyone with wrong views.These are the three types of people who are mistaken.
Three types of people who have an accurate view? Buddhas, His disciples and anyone with right understanding. These are the three types of people with an accurate view.
703.
The ignorant * is known
When he is full of wrath, hatred and arrogance, in his viewpoint Mistake and deceit (Sn 116) A saintly being known as a pure man Who purifies himself from outrage and hatred, the views of those people are accurate and gentle.
* vasala . The English version written outcast is wrong, I fixed it into outcaste and translated it as a miserable person.Read PED page 604.
704. The wrong view has three types; The correct view has three types.
Which three types of views are mistaken? 'This is mine' is a misconception. 'This is me' is a misconception. 'This is my ego' is a mistaken view. These are the three types of misconceptions.
Which three types of views are correct? ' This is not mine ' is an accurate view. ' This is not me ' is an accurate view. ' This is not my ego ' is an accurate view. These are the three types of correct views.
705. What is 'this is mine'? How many views of this type? What types of points are these views associated with?
What perspective is this 'I'? How many views of this type? What types of points are these views associated with?
What point is this 'my ego'? How many views of this type? What types of points are these views associated with?
'This is mine': (viii) a view of past finite. There are 18 views of this type. These views are associated with finite past.
'This is Me': is (ix) perspective on finite future. There are 44 views of this type. These views are associated with finite future types. [161]
'This is my ego': (ii) the concept of self with 20 foundations and opposing views with 20 platforms. This egoistic view leads the sixty-two kinds of views. These views are associated with finite and finite future types?
706. 'The monks, who have found their life in Me, have their views. Among those who have a [righteous view], there are five types of people who find their lifesaving here [in this world], there are five types of people who find their lifesaver [in four scenes Pure world] after giving up this life.
What kind of people found their life here? Is: the person who will reincarnate the most seven times ( sattakkhattuparama ), who is born from one holy family to another holy family ( kolankola ), who is only born once ( ekabījin ), once Back ( sakadagaya ) , and Arahant in this world here and now. These are the five types of people who find their lifesaving here [in this world].
Five types of people who find their lifesaving after giving up this life? Is: the witness of Nibbana in the first part of their next life ( antarāparinibbāyin ), the witness of Nibbana in the second half of their next life ( upahaccaparinibbāyin ), who witness nibbana need not promote ( asaṅkhāraparinibbāyin ), the witness of Nibbana needs to promote ( sasaṅkhāraparinibbāyin ), * who go against the highest divine realm ( uddahaṁsota-akaniṭṭhagāmin ). These are the five types of people who find their lifesaving after renouncing this life (A v 119).
* Both letters asankhara 'do not push' and sasankhara 'to promote' not in the dictionary of PTS PED. Only asaṅkhāra is included in the Critical Pali Dictionary . Read Ñāṇamoli , The Guide , [Oxford, 1977], d. 443/3 and 945, pages 108 and 246. Found in Dhs d. 146. Mr. Buddhaghosa explained this in A ởs page 156 or at The Expositor I, II page 207.
'The monks, who completely believe in Me, all have entered the line. In those who enter the stream, there are five types of people who find their lifesaving here [in this world], there are five types of people who find their lifesaving after giving up this life.
'What are the five types of people who find the end of their lives here? Is: who will reincarnate the most seven times, the one born from this holy family to another holy family, who will only be reborn once, steps Back Once, and the Arahant in this world here and now now. These are the five types of people who find their lifesaving here [in this world].
'Five types of people who find their lifesaving after giving up this life? Is: the Nibbana witness at the beginning of life in their next life, the witness of Nibbana in the second half of the next life in their next life, the witness Nibbana need not push, the witness Nibbana needs to push, who go against the line towards the realms of the highest god. These are the five types of people who find their lifesaving after giving up this life.
'The monks, who completely believe in Me, all have entered the line. In those who enter the stream, there are five types of people who find their lifesaving here [in this world], there are five types of people who find their lifesaving after giving up this life. ' (A v 120).
TERMINATION OF THE DISCUSSION ON VIEWPOINTS. END=NAM MO SAKYAMUNI BUDDHA.(3 TIMES ).VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY=THICH CHAN TANH.VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST NUN=GOLDEN AMITABHA MONASTERY=AUSTRALIA,SYDNEY.2/1/2019.
 |
No comments:
Post a Comment