PHARMACEUTICAL PRESERVATION (Product 1)

CHOOSE DIVERSITY

Product 1

Question : Ly Nhan coast is considered "the spirit of popular true in the world", why break?

A : We all have a habit when it comes to dealing with issues, clinging to the problem. The cause of coast is considered as the main basis of the world in general, the Buddha in particular, but if only stop the birth of death or death of it, without understanding the truth of the cause is also entangled. mistake.

Dharma is the law, the disease for medicine. If the tightening, the drug drops, sick.

Thus, Nagarjuna "destroys the karmic causality" is not a denial of the karmic causality, but it allows us to penetrate the depths of our predestined relationship.

Neither birth nor death

It's not like that either

No one else

Do not come nor go  (1)     

"Eight" is the main platform of the whole Madhyamika. These four treatises cover all the initiation and operation of the dharmas in the world, both in space and time.

With the Buddhist life, Nirvana is the central object. For the Mahayana, attain Nirvana is the whole of the reality of the loss of France, that is not birth. Does not depend on concepts, the inference of consciousness.

In order to attain this goal, we must have a mutation in the deepest part of the mind that can not be distinguished from the mind.

In order to realize this mutation, we must break away from the insights into the norm and the passage, to escape both the notions of yes and no, of gain and loss, etc.

When this mutation is realized, it can be seen that Nibbàna is neither definable nor descriptive. There is nothing to gain, nothing to give up, no passage is not common, no homosexuality, etc. All the treats such as long-short, yin-yang, light-night ... are just the mutual concept of each other only. This is due to the other. Their appearance is not.

Nirvana here is not in the wrong distinction between samsara and nibbana of the bar. You still think there is a true Nibbana opposite birth and death to achieve. And whenever there is a duality, there is no nirvana, no self-realization.

Most of us, when looking at dharmas, do not always be the same as ourselves, but always arise in the concepts of discrimination, inference ... a longitudinal continuity of our consciousness ( by the attachment), which the Buddha called the idea.

But why are there always these ideas?

It is because there is a real self that exists, a self full of emotion and intellect. When there is a real self, a true self, immediately form my own and not my own ... Then the illusion of pre-infection, initiation, Career as binding as cocoon, self-release tied, drift forever in samsara, samsara, suffering.

Nagarjuna uses these  eight words, to show the true nature of the law. And a direct way  to stop our misconceptions of dhammas.

When we look at dhammas without being conditioned by bipedalism - due to the distinction of attachments - we will penetrate the reality of dhammas.

Or say it

Extremely kill the logic

The Buddha bowed

The most advanced of all theories  (2)

Nagarjuna pay homage and praise the Buddha.

"Cause that coast" is the bowl of speechless. The conditions that he preached were the first of all the theories that existed in the world.

The argument has two:

. Desirability, is for the French have a heart attack.

. Comment, is the origin of knowledge on the legal.

Because of these two things, the birth of the word, hope. When the discussion is over, then it is Nibbana (no birth). It is the realization of the reality of the law. This part will be mentioned in the  Quan Quoc .

Here, the thesis will use logic and reality, proving to us that what we think is true, in fact only the name and the empty. That is only the product of consciousness. Just because far away from the wisdom of the unreasonable, leaving the realities that see all the legal birth, death, yes, no. Like walking on a sunny asphalt road, there are far-flung waters that claim to have real water, new arrivals, or just false illusions.

Dhamma is not born

It is not from birth

There is no harmless

Know it is not born  (3)

If the worldly conditions are not due to conditions, they are not out of four cases:

. Arise.

. From the other birth, is the birth.

. From both self and forgiveness, is the birth.

. Nature is born, is inhuman.

No birth : This is what the world has proven. Nothing is born. All are due to many gatherings.

Unborn  : Because not self is not tha.

Q : Someone thinks I can not give birth to a baby, but my mother gave birth. Rice does not produce rice, but because of rice seeds, etc.

A : It can not be said that mother or child born rice seed is born.Because of the birth or the birth of a rice seed, the mother must have a newborn or sprouting condition.

In the case of rice seeds, we see that they are not one, not another. Paddy is the kernel, enough coast to grow rice. The rice has, re-birth of rice seeds, etc. It is the causal relationship, can not be called the birth.

In the case of mother giving birth, not looking at the profound aspects of karmic but only on the surface, we see that mother wants to give birth, not to say birth is born, but must have conditions, enough new born.

Today's advances in science, the birth of a baby without a father and mother, but the need for in vitro fertilization and fertilization, and then inserted into the womb of a woman, full day of birth, ( Even with asexual reproduction, eggs are also needed.Immediately there must be a new condition to have children, not called birth. But if you see from the mother out that called tha, then found out that the house is also said that the birth of a person?

Q : So the above cases are called additive? Since it is from that it is not born, but the same body?

Answer : If you have not, then if you have to, then it must be different, separate. Both are faults, so it can not be positive.

Q : But people say that all things are made by a god.

A : If a god was born, God's image must be there. Does not a shadow cause birth? Again, if the birth is usually in the world, which species is born. Pigs who give birth to pigs. How is God shaped?

And if God has a human form, what animal and animal is born? If there were other births, what is God supposed to be?

Q : God is not born but has the power to create all species.

A : If the power to create all species, why create a world full of contradictions and differences. Rich people are poor, bad people are good, disabled people are sick ... without creating a perfect world, full of beauty? If there is creative power, it must have the power to destroy (ie create the opposite of the original), or at least correct ... Why is the world today full of illness, disaster The prayers are loud, where you are not speaking. Or are you just a product of rich imagination?

Q : You created all sorts of creatures in which the first creature committed the rules he imposed, so he was subjected to punishment.

A : We make the robots according to our will, then go and punish the robots? And if these robots can do other things than our control, then surely we have the power to create them? Besides, we are not God, but we can be wrong. What if God is like us? Is it that we ourselves are magical and virtual to ourselves, to rid ourselves of the discomforts or anxieties of life, and to shirk the responsibility and the consequences of the unworthy things? Only Rebirth, just explain the contradictions, paradoxes only.

Not inhuman : Because the French can not be random. If there is no cause and condition, there is no cause and conditions to destroy, so the law is normal. The universe is nothing ordinary.

If you do not multiply, then no result. If there is no cause that the fruit in the world will be upside down. People from pigs should also, because there is no need to do so.

Not additive : Because neither themselves nor tha.

4 cases are unsuccessful, the owner concluded the conclusion "the French Noble" .

As the nature of the law

Does not exist in grace

Because there is no self

Should not be ignorant  (4)

If the legal realities, which is the nature of nature is not from the coast. For a dhamma is called self-nature, when it meets three conditions: self, single and permanent.

Dhamma in the world is always conditional or by many factors, not self. Again always change the coast so not often.

The science has proven: There is no object in the world to stop.Considering in a closed system, matter and energy do not disappear (neither birth nor death). But things in this closed system always change from one form to another (not permanent).

Let's take an example:

Natural water, the main ingredient is hydrogen and oxygen (not self contained).

Freezing cold, hot evaporation, high atmospheric temperature, low temperature, condensed water vapor cloud (not permanent).

Dhamma is not self-nature is not forgiveness. Because of the nature of self is the nature of tha. If self-nature is not, then Tanh is not.

Self-nature and selflessness. No nature is not born. The Buddha said: "Leave the Tanh Tanh birthless."

Q : In part (3) the dhammas are not self, not forgiveness, not plus, not inhumane, but they see them falling into karmic conditions. Again, in the A-linguistic talk, there are four predestined relationships that arise in the dharmas: Causality, Grace, Grace, Grace. Why are not you born?

Causality, Grace

Charming coast, rise coast

The four conditions

No fifth condition  (5)

A :

It is from charm

From non-coast

Is that good?

Is not that good?  (6)

The master replied by twisting:

. If the fruit is born, it is born from the coast or from the coast.

. That coast has no fruit or coast?

And respond (sections 7 and 8):

Dhamma is fruitful

It is called grace

If the fruit is not born

Why do not you call?  (7)

. Thanks to fruit that the French (factors) create the fruit called charm.

. If the result has not been achieved, the above factors are not called grace, this is called non-coast.

As the vase is from earth, water, fire, color ... that is.

. If the shape of the land, water, fire, color ... called coast.

. If there is no pot, then earth, water, fire, color ... called non-coast.

Summary…

Dependent and fruit are two concepts can not be separated. By this one set up the other, by the other that set this. There is the same, not the same.

As  a  new teacher called  games,  there are   new games called teachers;  There  are  new children called mothers , or vice versa, etc. These terms of interpersonalism do not exist separately. Take one, the other does not make sense and can not exist.

At this point, Duyen and Fruit have lost their rationality compared to reality. If you say yes, it must be born from one that exists before it, but before it is only coast, but non-coast is not fruit. This is the reason why Luận chủ is the result from grace or non-attachment.

It  can not be asserted that the fetus is from birth or from non-attachment.

Because there is new fruit called coast, so Luong master further: Coast that fruit or coast is not fruit?

Fruit in the coast

Yes no, are unsuccessful

Before no, what charm?

Before, why use charm?  (8)

. If predestined in the predicament already available, the grace is useless because of the fruit. As sugar canes are already available, sugar canes are no longer needed to make sugar.

. If in the predestined coast is not the coast of grace. As before sugar cane without sugar (sugar buds) as in sugar-free slices, sugarcane is not multiplication (coast) of sugar. If there is no human but sugar, why not in the line?

Therefore, the result  in the conditions can not confirm whether or not.

The master will break into each coast in four conditions

Natural causes

All dharmas are conditioned by virtue. Cause is the French from which birth. From that birth, from the birth, will be born ... (quoted in the Thuy Nhi comment).

If there is no birth

Neither is not born

There is no birth

There is no grace  (9)

Because of the new fruit called charm, so the coast for this fruit, when the fruit is from the coast? There are several cases:

. If the predestined charm is available, then the grace is useless ... ie no generals are born fruit.

. If the coast is not available, the predestined coast non-coast ... also not find generals to fruit.

. If there is no fruit in the coast, not be. The medium is not the same place, there is different birth and death, light and dark the same place. From no one, there can not be one. Also can not find generals born fruit.

In the above cases, the generals were not born. Fruit is not born, nor is it established. Consequently, the law is not vi. French law should not be immaterial. Neither of us can not exist to be real.

To break the Grace

Fruit if not born

There should not be

How do you kill?

It is not the Sub-grace  (10)

Eight current form with mental states, each thought of birth is always uninterrupted. Behavior of birth and death of it: Meditation before killing do the following grace for postnatal thoughts.

We see:

. If you recite after birth (ie fruit), then the first thought (human) must kill. What is the concept of killing before the same time as the future birth of the concept after, which has the following conditions?

. Thus, the need to have the effect that the first thought must not kill, but the previous thought not kill the next thought is not born.Fruit is not born also has the following.

Therefore, the thesis advised: Fruit is not born, there should be no kill. If (human) kill but also to the coast is often. Incorrect.

The grace coast  (coast grace)

As the Buddhas have said

French micro magic

That is not grace

How are grace  (11)

Do contact with the ceiling (the coast), depending on the place that started thinking business, speech, mind, mind, birth, love ... then the ceiling called grace coast.

Buddha taught: "In the Mahayana, or good or non-sharp, etc., the legal nature of the legal nature. All are not: non-Prime Minister, not charming. Beings by the air before the current, the life expectancy of life in the world, so for the French birth, the craft ... create rotation.

The mind is the true nature of the legal, so not before, immersed in the French.

As gold, everyone is considered precious, born before. But if the desert or hungry countries do not supply, gold does not make sense. The mind is real gold, self nature is not, not precious, not convenient. It is because of grace that is high, used, not before.

Should not grace coast

Break up the coast

Dhammas are not self-nature

So there are no generals

Say that this has

So that's the other

That's not fair  (12)

Due to this law that the other is born. This law increases the other.

Dhamma is not self-nature, only due to dependent origination but see the general, but the general should not say should not say.

The world in a continuous transformation does not stop on each moment. So can not grasp a fixed general of the French.

Like us from birth, growing up, old to death. It is a continuous series of mental and physical changes. We can not really determine which general, at what point is our real minister. So a general can not determine whether, then how to say: "this one has, so that other".

That is just the means of the Buddha that teaches beings. So there is no increase of grace.

summary

In the common cause

Find results can not be

In karmic conditions if not

How come from grace  (13)

In the common cause of personal life : Include sections 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, can not find the fruit was born, stars say from the charm?

Q :

If you do not say grace

Which from the coast arise

Why is not it?

Where is the coast?  (14)

If the coast does not bear fruit, but also grace does not bear fruit.So why only find results from grace without seeing results from non-grace?

(News of the two are not, just see from this one without seeing from the other)

A :

If the result from the charm

It is not self-nature

Words not from the nature of birth

How to be from charm  (15)

The thesis confirmed that the fruit is not from the charm ... because the coast itself not self-nature, has proven above, the coast of each other depending on grace that has, depending on grace, no real nature. It is not self-nature is not born. There are no generals, discussing the fruit from this birth or the other to do.

Fruit is not from charm

Not from non-coast

Because fruit is not available

Coast non-coast also  (16)

Fruit was not from the charm, not from the coast. Because of non-attachment is due to non-charming birth. There is no law coast. It is not the coast nor coast, nor coast.

Fruit and Dependence are two concepts that are interrelated. It is only a product of consciousness. If it is real, then there is no error. (Both at the same time can not say this is the cause of the other - like buffalo horns can not be the cause and effect of each other). If there is precedence there is the obvious, then do not find reasonable personality from the result, as discussed above. It is only because of the harmony that is called. There are no generals.

Q:  If the legal not. Why are they so obvious? The senses still feel correct?

A:  The dharmas have only names (names) and generals (idols) which are not self-nature, so it is not true. Dhamma only by self-mind does not appear, seems to have arisen but not self-nature should say no birth. The Buddha said the dream as illusory, like flower spotted in no. When dreaming everything is clear, can not say no. But just a dream, can not say yes! Our mistake is to enter the real and dream, forget the real dream, attachment to create the rotation of suffering. When suffering pain to find a Nirvana to stay, without realizing the true nature of the law is not, neither birth nor death, neither suffering nor lost ...

If you think that the name and the truth are real: I am me, the house is the house, then you enter the world is the country, then everything is pure water, there is nothing else. For fire with fire, you have the power of fire to not fire, etc. .. So should know the real nature is not, depending on the development.

Also believe that our sensory perceptions are correct, let's take the following example:

Get 3 basins in order: cold - warm - hot. Put two hands in two pots on either side. After giving both hands to the pots of warm water.You will see what you think is warm initially, now different: in the same body, a water bowl, you will have a cold hand one hand hot.

So really this water pot is warm or cold or hot? Do you dare to confirm? So what is the guarantee of our senses, senses, and inferences for the dharmas?

We have been enjoying 3D games. From a pair of eyes, a series of flat images suddenly became the castle of the castle, full of everything in three dimensions. Is the floating image real or not real? With the world we live in, why do not we think it is just a kind of self-consciousness? It's only because of our own view that it wants to float or not. "We see that, we do not see the real, but not real" because away from the mindless.

It is through the senses, the feeling, that we now talk about the emotions that we attribute to our spirit. It is what we seek or avoid in this life: Happiness and suffering.

If a person suffers or suffers for a lifetime, the notion of suffering or happiness does not exist. It becomes natural. However, in life there is no such person, but happiness or serenity is a long sequence of alternations, and hence there are called for these states to distinguish. It is because of this state that it is easy to recognize the other state, even if it is just a preliminary appearance. The key is from where we have these things?

Is it because we have given us a certain circumstance of happiness, and so, when those that go beyond our grasp, the feeling of croaking, raging, upsetting in the heart and we call it suffering? Obviously! Only these regulations lie deep in our consciousness, nourished and formed through the "customs, laws, conventions ..." of society and of the world. And we make it obvious and forbid the head of the whirlwind to accept, without ever asking yourself what is it? where?

What else can we do to have time as we continue to pile up everything else?

So this "spirit" is really true, when placed on our rules. Happiness and suffering will change if our perceptions change, which in our day has changed constantly ... There is probably no time to know this.

One woman said that her husband came to the pagoda to learn how to devote his life to the temple as a precious affair, and that she was happy. On the contrary, a woman thinks that she lacks the attention of her husband and she suffers.

We see the suffering or happiness of the woman, not depending on whether he went to the temple or not. Which is the point of her.The things Buddha calls collectively are delusions ... And whenever they come up with concepts, rules, and perspectives, they are still happy and suffering, Good direction. Since there are rules, there are attachments, there will be times beyond the rules, these attachments. It is the germ of suffering. While still subject to these connotations, it is not possible to escape the illusion.

So do not break ... for what?

And we find fault is not legal or not, legal or not real. The Buddha said, "the French dharma, the general world often." All legal thinking by distinguishing, which France does not distinguish, that is often called. Just because of the attachment and understanding in a certain angle of the French that legal "nature". What we consider to be the essence of dharma is, in fact, created only by correlation with another, nothing is real. France has no real nature, only by the name of the general, on the generals that made the name. If we understand this, we will be less attached to the dhamma. When we do not care about it beautiful or ugly, real or fake, it does not. And the arising of the mind will cease.

Nagarjuna uses logic, reasoning to help us understand the lawless beings. But the sentence "the lawless beings" is not the real nature of the law. The truth of the dharmas can not be defined, the language can not be reached ... As when we talk about love ... "I love you" does not mean love. Even acts of love, concern, scolding ... are not love. And we can not say what love is. But it is through these actions that we recognize "love". Here too, by understanding these explanations, it helps us to recognize the contradiction between concepts and reality, which lessens the attachment, the discrimination, the expectation of the mutation of the mind. New penetration of the realities of the French.

So also by a mind, a scene that holy life, mistrust split.

Mr. Ham Thi said:

Majesty should be seen to kill

Enlightenment is in harmony with the unborn.END=NAM MO SAKYAMUNI BUDDHA.( 3 TIMES ).VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY=THICH CHAN TANH.THE MIND OF ENLIGHTENMENT.VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST NUN=GOLDEN LOTUS MONASTERY=AUSTRALIA,SYDNEY.8/3/2018.