Chapter I  (continued)

2. RESULTS OF DESTRUCTION Lia Arhat (Parihanikatha )

Rate Debate:  An Arhat can damage leaves fruition Arhat.

Explanatory notes:  Because there are several passages like "Monks, there are two measures related to the departure of the monks corrupt were practicing  (1) . Bhikshus five measures related to the passing leaves Members of the monks  (2) ".  should several sects like  Sammitiyas, Vajjputtiyas, Sabbattivadins  and some sects of  Mahasanghika s for that position Arhat can leave fruit Arhat. In this thesis, seconded  Theravadins  questions posed questions to break the wrong conceptions of the sect.

I. - THE APPLICATION OF THE THESIS:

(1) Th: - His notion that an Arhat can damage leaves fruition Arhat is synonymous with the recognition of the following: 1) He can damage leaves no matter where; 2) whether the public; 3) all you Arhat have the potential damage depart fruition Arhat; 4) The Arhat likely damage not only leaves fruition Arhat, but also can damage leaves 4 of 4 direct results; 5) Like a wealthy bourgeois level, if one of the four memory loss material resources, has also called bourgeois level, even if losing all four memory material resources, the people, according to him, will not called bourgeois ranks again.

II.- THE THEORY protested by Tang Thanh COMPARE:

(6) If an Arhat can damage leaves, the three-storey fruition lower church. - No hybrid, hybrid and Project Save Nhat - also likely damage leaves and the corresponding results also leave such damage.

(7) If an Arhat can damage leaves fruition, and only retained the next lower results, then departed in similar damage likely occurred for three low and if your project results the result leaves necrotic save save, the only byproducts.

(8) If an Arhat can damage leaves fruition, acknowledged that was the total extinction of afflictions more than any school property saint, surely you will also leave the fruit necrotic equivalent school property. Why refuse the ability to damage Saints leave school property, (9-13) but accept it only with the Arhat?

(14-20) If an Arhat can damage leaves fruition Arhat, whose noble attainment of the Noble Eightfold Path, the forty-Tu Chanh need, iddhipada, Sleep Apartments, Five forces, Interior useful enlightenment than the school level, then why deny the existence learned sages could damage the berries leave school property?

(21-32) Similarly, if the Four Noble Truths: Suffering, Set, Kill, Path which the Arhat nobler enlightened school three organic results, then why only fruition Arhat necrotic leave?

(33) He can not endorse your Arhat, who make an end to craving and all the other negativity binding, could damage depart fruition Arhat, and while it does from deny that a Stream, he was body is annihilation, results can also damage leaves a Stream, also rejected the other school property level, the level has been skeptical annihilation, the first precept, Love, anger, and ignorance (in cross karma), the level that is no longer reborn in four woeful departure could damage school property results.

(34) Similarly, he again denied that the First steps forward, he has to make an end body is, Doubt, Precept opponent, Ai strong and coarse pitch may damage depart Best results come.

(35) Similarly, he again denied that ranks Any future, he has to make an end body is, Sceptic, the first precept, craving and the International Airport can also leave fruit damage. Replay.

(36) Or admitted ranks Any hybrid can damage leaves fruition, but a Stream, the damage can not leave, or.

(37) First Tier hybrid necrosis can not leave.

(38) Similarly, the most recognized hybrid necrosis can leave fruition, but the level can not be expected to save the fruits, leaves damage.

(39) However, he could not conceive that a Stream, users take Body section is ... can not leave fruition, whereas, for the Arhat level, who annihilation Ai education and all the negativity, but he said that this level can damage leaves Arhat fruit.

(40-44) Similarly, he may yet again the notion that only one type of septic Four storey church can not leave fruition. Meanwhile the other saints can damage their leaves fruition?

(45) He accepted all the pure virtue of an Arhat Career: He has "Then take Tham, cut off from the roots, stems make as Tala, makes it impossible to exist, makes it impossible to re-arise in the future " (1)   and also make an end to all the remaining negativity such as anger, ignorance, conceit ...

(46) He had his enlightenment, the forty-Tu Chanh need, iddhipada, the five-door, five forces, Seven Sense spending.

(47) Persons who have "It leaves participate, shuns terrace, separated from Si", "She has done what to do, put the burden down", "Ultimate Victory," "Breaking the bond of friendship "" He has been freed by the enlightened "," the river fills, spit pile, lowering flags conceit "," the Suffering has comprehended, to ultimate annihilation, Killing substrate realizations, achieved Path Emperor "," People have comprehended fully articulate the significant legal, all legal annihilation due to make an end, realizes the worth enlightened approach, and considerable legal hone hone. " So, how he can he can give that a level Arhat can damage leaves Arhat fruit?

(48) As far as the arguments of his argument, only the "level Arhat of liberation", the damage depart Arhat results, while "Arhat level non-temporal deliverance (1 )  "would not leave fruit damage Arhat.

(49-51) I ask again, have to rank Arhat of liberation, who make an end to all suffering, who was well versed in the path of liberation, who has expressed the legal enlightenment contact A -la-drought direction, the leaves can damage fruition Arhat not?

(52-54) As he has admitted, Arhat level non-temporal liberation, people gathered and show enlightened the aforementioned measures, indestructible leave Arhat fruit. If he admits like to rank Arhat of liberation, who has all the virtues, as Arhat level non-time release, it is this level can not leave the fruit damage you Arhat is.

Thus, very clear on the position attained Arhat, enlightened by the oil also can not leave the fruit damage.

(55) He could cite even the Arhat who have septic leave fruition Arhat not? Was it him  Sariputta ?  Or he  Moggallana ? Or he  Kassapa ? Or he  Kaccayaha ? Or he  Kotthita ? Or he  Panthaka ? With all these persons, he would recognize that the damage could not leave fruition Arhat. 

III. - PROVE FROM BUSINESS ARTICLES:

(56) He said that an Arhat level can damage leaves fruition Arhat. But there must have urged Exalted.

"Tier preaching monk.
The path of high and low
, but the other side,
no two roads
do not think, however,
this Road is just one" ?  (2)

There must have all of this? How wrong he was.

(57) ... Again, there must be the cessation of reincarnation not disturbing? Blessed Are not every theory that "He who has the total extinction of greed, done things to do, there is no afflictions reincarnation, severed ties and no regeneration"?  (3)

(58) ... Again, his argument implies the redo what was done. But this is impossible for the Arhat level, because there have not ever Exalted that theory.

"The monks of mind
Being true liberation.
Not contains employment
Article do not have
as a cornerstone,
not shaken by the wind.
Also the whole department,
Sac, Vi Thanh, Huong, Promotion.
French charity, whatever endearing
no action such people,
mind, not consequences
Depending shop cessation. " (4) 

So there is no redo what was done.

(59) SVSM: - According to him, our concept (4 schools) is a mistake. But is Exalted have urged that: "Hey, lettered monks have taken to the rotten 5 rotten approach for monks witnessed the liberation. What is the year? Preferred working (on the body), preferred talk, preferred to sleep, do not overpower the senses, not knowing disclosed in eating ".  (1)

So an Arhat can damage leaves fruition.

(60) Th: - But the level Arhat can delight in the law did not? If he denies, how that can damage leaves level results were? If he agrees, he must recognize the Arhat level is still dominated and bound by worldly desires. This, of course, he refused.

(61) If an order Arhat septic leave fruition Arhat, as he said, that level is still dominated with Join or golf or Ta is, with such dominance, says further Career Arhat depending newspapers still dominate. If I ask him, Arhat level still contains one of seven measures depending newspapers. (Craving, anger, conceit, wrong view, Doubt, Craving, ignorance) or not? Of course he had to refuse.

(62) Or if in the septic leave fruition, according to him, was still craving ranks, believing soul, the ban on prime skeptical.

(63) In fact, he admitted that an Arhat level is no longer contained, nor destroyed, not total annihilation will not give up, do not loose, not tied, not dispersed nor the convergence, which is just east of the operator is no longer a cause only.

So certainly can not say that "A level Arhat can damage leaves Arhat results are". (2)

3. ISSUES holy life  (Brahmacariyakatha)

Rate Debate:  No holy life on earth gods.

It was captioned:  holy life  (Brahmacariyavasa)  has two meanings: his enlightenment and Renunciation. The gods do not gather the following forms. But early form not impede them, except in the realm of the formless gods. But some of the sect as  Sammitiyas,  do not believe that there is work for enlightenment gods in heavenly realms and realms higher realms and Immaterial World Lust.

(1) Th: - He denied gathered celibate life on earth gods, but he denied that they have physical defects, mental or moral as: Among the gods, have you the fool, you are deaf and dumb, stupid, dumb, dumb people use language (hand gestures) and can not afford to realize the meaning of certain words good or bad. They are people who lack faith in the Buddha, Dharma and Sangha, they could not heed preaching Buddha can not ask questions (to get rid of skepticism) glad to rejoice in his response, the position which create obstacles for others by their actions, by disturbing obstacles, due to the action of the result. They have no faith, no purpose and wisdom, not being able to find the road to St (Sammattam ) with goodness. They are the people who killed his mother, killed his father, murdered sages, Buddha finger prick, harmony Increase break. They are killing, stealing, sexual misconduct, promising language, bisexual damage, harsh, take the evil, evil and wrong preset evil.

(2) On the other hand, he also said that there are also gods and practice the virtues contrary to the above. So, why does he have to say that in the realms of gods no celibate life?

(3)  Sammitiyas : - He kept such stance, would of course he will deny that the gods ordained practice, abandoned the family, wear, bearing bowls, go begging for alms, he also rejects the appearance of a Buddha or the Buddha Omniscient unicorn or two disciples of the Buddha no gods on earth. So where are celibate life?

(4-7), Th: - We all agree that the gods do not have these qualities as the monastic robe, carrying a bowl, but there must be celibate life found only in places where things this appears (the renunciation, carrying bowls ...)? And there must be no holy life where these things are not done? He said that only those places are holy life, but when I asked, "Does anyone new monastic celibate life, and who can not, there is no life ordained celibate?" ... Then he did not agree.

(8) Again, did he say where there are Buddhas only appear where there are celibate life, even where no Buddhas appear, there is no holy life? He hesitated in answering. Born in Lumbini Buddha attained enlightenment under the Bodhi tree at the turning of the wheel of Banares. Do you see there are celibate life while the others do not or what?

(9) I put a question to the contact on the Ganges River valley, where the enlightenment of Buddhas and unicorn

(10) In  Magadhese , where the appearance of the two disciples.

(11) S: - He affirmed that the holy life are gathered in the realm of gods, but he still refused to gods which mindless realm.

Th: - This is just what we have just mentioned and rejected just as in the realm of human cases, including where the holy life, but at the margin can address those uneducated savage, no religious faith, no trust of laymen and laywomen.

(12) S: - When it comes to the holy life on earth Devas, he said that "There are planes there, there is a void." So does this both in the realms of gods appear mindless, and both of which appear in the realms of the Gods mindless and both of which appear in the organic realm great Devas? If not so, where there is the holy life, where they do not have?

Th: - holy life appears only in the realm of organic Devas thought.

(13) Th - He admitted that only celibate life in the human realm.

S: - Only in some places that only, while others are not.

Th: - Did he want to say that at the margin wider place where only the primitive people, where there is no religious faith, no credit men and women, also celibate life? If not, how can he give that the holy life is gathered everywhere? Where in the human realm, there celibate life?

S: - Where the Ganges valley, not places where the border.

(14) S: - But is Exalted has declared: "O Bhikkhus, in three ways. Humans in  Jambudika (Jambudvipa) Sublime than human beings in realms  Uttarakuruca (Uttaràkuru ) the gods in the heavens and thirty three (Path benefit), What are the three? They are heroes, there are concepts and celibate place in this world "?  (1)

There must have all of this? Are texts do not say that, no holy life in the realm of the Gods?

Th: - Is Exalted has not once declared at  Savatthi : "Here, the celibate life is gathered"? And there must be a statement that says that only new Savatthi celibate life, while elsewhere there is no holy life, or what?

(15) Again, steps Any future who make an end to years of "Lower part fetters", but not a total annihilation in "Upper part fetters", while Prince "Here" and reborn "There", where the results of his won arise now: "there" and only there, he conceived it. So how can he deny the holy life on earth gods?

(16) When such a hybrid tier Real reborn "There" (Residential natural pure land) the "There", he was then put the burden down, the "There," he comprehended completely new format Great, the "there" all new except the defilements, and the "there" new anti-imperial comprehended, realized the eternal.Then he explained what to say that "There is no holy life in the realms of gods"?

S: - Because "Here" (the realm of Mankind), he realized the path, and "There" (Residential natural pure land), he was then awarded.

(17) Th - If he accepts whatever rank awarded hybrid "There" by witnessing "Here", he must accept a Stream awarded "Here", by witnessing "There" (realm of gods). Similarly, he must admit most awarded hybrid "Here" (the realm of Mankind) by evangelism "There" (the realm of gods).

Again he said that a Stream awarded "Here" by witness "here" He has to accept the hybrid Tier Real awarded "There" by witnessing "There". Again, he has to accept the hybrid awarded Best Career "here". Therefore, he must accept the same with Real next level awarded "There" by witnessing "There".

(18) If He declared that a hybrid tier Real passed in this world, attaining attainment Arhat settled in the Pure Land, will witness without annihilation with cankers, he must also accept How to cultivate a rank awarded a project to save, future performance or results Nhat Arhat.

Again, if he claimed that a practice to rank awarded a Stream, future results and performance Nhat Arhat, at the same time they make an end to the direct and cankers, he must accept that in cases Any level of hybrid, who had died in this world and enlightened Arhat results in natural migration Pure Land.

(19) He admits that ranks Any future, when reborn "There" has done the work to be done in the celibate life, he also had to admit that the level Arhat was reborn from the world this came from another world and another world to this world within samsara. Of course he refused this. Again, he fails to recognize the virtues of a Real Career Career hybrid refuse this and could not "put the full burden down" when he is reborn "There" (Residential natural Pure Land), then he must accept that there must rank his enlightenment to put the burden down.

(20) Similarly, any other in the attainment of the holy life of any hybrid tier, who is reborn last time, where he comprehended the suffering substrate level, the total extinction of cankers, comprehended Removal Great, realized the eternal, He said that you need to gather in order to attain attainment Arhat (in the realm of the gods as you gods).

On the other hand underground He said that any position in the hybrid completely free, no longer have to gather more (because he said that in the realm of gods no holy life).

(21) S: - Like a chamois injured by arrows, though how far it can run, also collapsed because of the pain, also seems that, whatever steps ahead, by his enlightenment "In here "will awarded" there ".

Th: - The chamois injured by arrows, though how far it can run, eventually have to fall for the pain.But there must rank Real hybrid, while in the witness "Here" and awarded "There", has endured the pain by arrows as the chamois not?

S: - No, can not say like that.

4. ISSUES FiLtration (Odinisokatha)

Rate debate : People gathered gradually eliminate negativity  (1)   (partial)

Explanatory notes : This concept of sect  Sammitiyas  and some other sects, they said that when a Stream and the other saints attained through meditation, we encounter suffering sole, insole ... The exclusion set negativity gradual in nature, meaning that each time a bit.

(1-4)  Theravadins : - As he said, he had this concept because when a people gather to them a Stream, this level of suffering enlightened empire, aprons, paragraph 3 guys take the body is finished, Sceptic , About banning same afflictions prime contact 3 guy this end. Moreover, this level Killing evangelism empire, Emperor Way, also excluded the three months and the related afflictions.

But he should also acknowledge what he denies, that level part of a Stream, a section shall not, in part, the Holy enlightened world, contact The results saved, not even partially, partly contact the note ... the note triangle ventricular hybrid hybrid, hybrid binary the note, also part shall not  (1)   partially full faith in Buddha, Dharma and Sangha, and part is not.

(5-8) Again, according to he said, as a result rank them practice Nhat hybrid substrate, substrate size comprehended, apron, this level Ai eliminate rough, crude and partly Airport afflictions contact. Such a step further evidence Killing sole, insole Way also make an end to these obstacles and portions related afflictions.

Thus he should admit what he denies - was part of Tier Career Best hybrid, and part is not, part of them realize, attain gender Members, and part is not.

(9-12) Again, according to he said, when a level of practice to fully articulate attained Any future Suffering, apron, this Tier are craving annihilation, Golf subtle, and partly related afflictions .Moreover, this level of realization Kill Great, Emperor Way, also make an end to these obstacles and portions related afflictions. So he should also acknowledge what He denies that part holy Tier Career Real hybrid, also part did not, partly realized, prime witness St. About, contact Any future results, and part is not, Middle tier part, the holy Alliance Real Complete. Any refund Sanh Bang, Bang Real Complete Unknown Administrative, Executive Huu Bang Real completed, Shanghai Liu Bang Real Finish  (2)   was partly not.

(13-16) Again, as he said, as a practice to rank attained Arhat, clearly suffering through collective imperialism and empire, this level Sac annihilation Ai, Ai Formless, conceit, Correspondent riches and ignorance and partly related afflictions, this more enlightened level and directed Killing soles soles, also make an end to these obstacles and partly related afflictions.

But he also had to admit - what He rejected - was part of Career Career Arhat, and part is not, in part, the realization, prime witness, to the world of Sacred ranks Arhat while another part is not, part shuns be greed, anger, ignorance, partly "done what to do", "put down the burden," "ultimate attainment", "break all clear required in the property "," liberating knowledge "," fitting tribute spit pile, lowering the flag pride ", partly comprehended Suffering, to ultimate annihilation, enlightened Extinction full soles and practice the Noble Truth, communication during what should be smooth and take what sections need to make an end, to develop what should be developed and awareness of what needs to be aware, and partly not.

(17)  Sammitiyas:  - But if my notion is not rational, why the theory that Buddha "by little and bit by bit, the intellectual pollution purification of oneself in every moment, like grinding hardness silversmiths his gold lace that?  (1)

There must have all of this? Does this text could not prove my conception is rational stars?

(18) Th: - But there is Exalted have urged that:

"He thanks Full
With lucid right view
there are three legal therefore,
been completely abandoned
body and skepticism is
also not the first precept
For four deprivation, in
completely liberated" (2) 

There must have all of this?

(19) Again, do not ever Exalted theory that:

"Monks, when the label law detachment arises ceiling structure with A disciple saints, yet he knows the law engenders must be destroyed. So that legal insight, this level except the three guys finish: The body is, Doubt and About prohibits players "?  (3)

There must have all of this? Therefore, one should not assume that people gathered to gradually purify the negativity.

5. POLLUTION PROBLEMS FiLtration (Jahatikatha)

Rate debate : Qualities  (4)   eliminate craving and aversion.

Rate Annotation : This concept of sect  Sammitiyas  that an ordinary person attained Zen, understand the noble truth and become a Real Career hybrid, purification is craving and hatred while he is just an ordinary person .

(1-2)  Theravadins:  - He said that a purge is craving and Anger as a mortal. Due to purify them, who had purged forever, without remainder, root out the custom attachment and hypnosis, mental purification by Scripture, Sacred Path by purification, purification by means of estate, purification while realizing Any future results. This surely he refused.

If he replaced the word "purification" by the word "Candlesticks" I argued above, and he also refused.

(3-4) A practice to realize Career Real hybrid fruit, he purifies, he suppressed during the practice - On this point we agree. But also ordinary person does that? He also declined (as I was)

(5-6) But if he applied the word "purification", "to compress" (in the sense of his limitations), for ordinary people, he must apply for such steps are practiced to Any hybrid attained.

(7-8) In which way (or by any means) that he said that ordinary people are craving purification and Anger.

Sammitiyas:  - By the path of meditation achieve gender identity  (1)

Th: - Is the path that makes people take beings escape the cycle of birth and rebirth, leading to non-realization of Noble? That route has been Gonorrhea or purification - fetters - Depending newspapers - hindrances - Prime - System blessed - blessed aces - Boc save  (2) , have to clean pollution and defilement are not?

On the other hand, is the way it can not achieve the purification of the pollution that star? He can conceive how about the way that ordinary people are craving purification and Anger?

(9-10), he agreed that the road be gathered to fully articulate Real hybrid fruits also have such characteristics. But he should also accept that the road depending on Lust also have properties like (as he claimed in that path, purify ordinary person like Real hybrid purification steps). But does he admit that path with the opposite characteristics? Thus, by the similarity in the way of reasoning, he should look in the direction opposite qualities practiced by Real next level (for he declared road hybrid Tier estate went to the realization as a human being).

(11) He said that an ordinary person living with the craving, as soon as they become enlightened empire Any future steps. Why not add fruit Arhat? Why just stop here?

He also accepted that a person is the most practiced religion Provision save hybrid, Real hybrid at once, prime 3 equivalent results at once, and with the combination of 3 Promotion, 3 Tho, 3 April, 3 Heart 3 Tin, 3 Need, 3 Niem, 3 Concentration, Tue 3 (of 3 directors).

(12) Or if people are not able to attain the Real Hybrid along this path, the path by which you achieve results that this witness? Is He said that "in the direction of your Real hybrid" is not?

However, he rejects the cessation three guys finish - Body is, Sceptic, Precept Prime - depending on any future direction. He must accept it (because he no longer deny other way that ordinary people make an end to craving and golf, even though it was Buddha declared that by "Path Project saved, she was three months cleanse".

(13) Again, he refused craving Coarse and crude Anger is purified by religion Any future. But he forced to accept it, because there must be Exalted each theory that: "It is best attained by the hybrid reduce craving and raw Golf" or what?  (3)

Finally by his acceptance of the Four Truths attained ordinary person, he is still forced to accept, despite his refusal, when a person realizes the Four Noble Truths, at that time, he also reached Any future fruition.

(14) S: But if my notion he denies, is Exalted has declared that "In the past, religious leaders have the right 6 Duke, with compassion, they have purged anger anymore and with the refusal, they escape from the constraints of craving and their nets were born into the world of Brahma. the disciples of 6 cardinals have also ... "  (1)   . There must have all of this?

(15) Yes, but the Buddha was once theory that "Hey monks, lamas Sunetta, although with such long-life, to live so long, but is not freed from birth, old death, sorrow, lamentation, pain, grief and distress. I said: no freedom from suffering. wherefore? Because that unenlightened, can not enter (Appativedha)  four measures. What four methods? Hey monks, because not enlightened, can not enter the Holy world, because not enlightened, can not enter the Holy of; because there can not enter the Holy enlightened wisdom; because there can not enter the Holy enlightened liberation, O bhikkhus, the events are as follows: when the Holy enlightened world, be able to enter; when St. enlightenment is possible to enter; when St. intellectual enlightenment, be entered; when the Holy liberating enlightenment, is able to import cut bhava is off, the rope gave birth to organic  (conduit)  is annihilation, and is not renewable. "  (2)

There must have all of this? If so, it is not rational to say that "ordinary people are craving purification and Anger".

6. ISSUES ALL EXISTING LEGAL (Sabbamatthitikatha )

Rate debate : All the measures are being a solid.

Explanatory notes : This concept of sect  Sabbatthivadins,  due to the passage accept "Lust is the past, present, future ...", all things past, present, future (arise with the aggregates, of life and personal experience) remained in that state, and thus all measures continue to exist.

Turnaround abstract TIME CONCEPT.

(1)  Theravadins:  - His notion that "all" are present. Therefore, he will tangle in the recognition than others, such as:

All are present everywhere (in the body), at all times, by all means, in all forms, no mixing state, does not exist, also called into existence. Right view, under way nhiá His mistake or Ta is holy, also exist.

(2) Again, take all notions of time, did he assert that the existing past, future and present existence and existence. But the past does not perish, which means over, has changed, spent necrosis, was completely destroyed? Then he said how about the past existence? Again, there must be what the future unborn, not to, no, not passing, not happening, necrosis unspent? Then he said how about the future existence?

Currently, as he confirmed the current existence and what is not consumed, not leave, not fragmented, not over, not to change, not to damage targets, not completely destroyed. He said the past and present, so the past and not be destroyed, not be distracted ..

Again, he said that currently exist, that is currently what is being, is coming, are going through, is appearing, is happening, necrosis is objective; and future, according to him, is also present, so the future is also born, is coming, ... are spending havoc.

Again, he said that the past present and the past has destroyed death, has been distributed ... was completely destroyed. And now exist, so now has destroyed death, has been distributed ... also completely destroyed.

Again, he said that the future existence and future unborn, not to ... undigested damage. And now exist, so the current is not born, not to ... undigested damage.

(3) Does the past still exist Sac? He agreed. But if he expresses this Sac with words like "have consumed", "spent havoc", "changed", "was completely destroyed", he could tell how the existing past Sac? Similarly Sac future, there must be "unborn" ... Matter can be said how about existence?

If said existing current Lust, Lust current mean damage has not been objective, ... and if Sac past still exist, which means past identity has not been damage pepper ... And if Sac currently exists, is liable Sac currently born, becoming, ... and if existing and future Lust, Lust means future are born, is becoming ... again, if past said existing identity, which means excellence, had perished, was first melted, and if said current Sac current identity exists, has perished, has dissipated, ... and if you say that existing and future identity, meaning unborn future identity, and if said current Sac unborn well being ..

(4) Apply the same reasoning for one of the four other aggregates - Feeling, Perception, Action, Soul.

For example, if the past said that the existing consciousness, which means this method has perished, has dissipated, and if said current Consciousness exists, also means that the current Soul has perished, were dashed. ..

And to say that consciousness exists future, which means that this consciousness unborn, not become, and to say that consciousness exists currently, also means that the current consciousness unborn, not become ...

(5) In saying "Lust Aggregates current"  (1)  that any disposition, if he used two words "aggregate" and "current" without distinguishing between them, which means he that both identical, exactly the same.Thus when He said:

- Aggregate is currently killing, denies its current state, he also accepts that aggregate is not in the state of Excellence.

- Similarly, when he said the current aggregate is destroyed, does not deny its current state, he must also accept that the aggregate was not in its current state.

(6) S: - But in saying "white cloth" that any public disposition, he used the words "fabric" and "White" without distinguishing between them, which means that both he identical, exactly the same. Thus when He said:

- "White canvas", if you remove the "white" to go, he had to accept he is no longer a canvas cloth anymore.

- Similarly, when he said "white canvas", if you remove the "fabric" goes, he must also accept no white cloth anymore.

(7) Th: - If He aggregate retains Sac nature, he must also accept, SAV aggregates are permanent, sustainable, unchanged. But he also knows that the truth is the opposite, so it can not be said aggregate retained Sac properties.

(8) retains Nirvana Nirvana status - this means eternal nirvana, sustainable change. Similarly, he also pgai accepted in the case of the aggregate, if he said that aggregate retains its Sac.

Does he explained, because the aggregate remains Sac properties that aggregates are impermanent, unstable, temporary, change? He agreed. So he should admit candidates like about Nirvana when He says: Nirvana retains status as Nirvana ...

(9) If he claims that "The past is present", meaning that the past remains the past state or frozen state, and when he says that "The existing hybrid" He should have said that the hybrid retains future state, and the statement that "now exists", he also said that the current should retain the current status.

(10) One of the confirmation of this will complicate the confirmation to contact other divisions of time.

(11) If the past and present status remained stagnant the past tense to lasting, sustainable and unchanged. And to this point, as he admits is not right.

(12) When he said Nirvana exists and retains the status Nirvana, Nirvana means longevity, sustainability and unchanged. Thus, he must accept that meaning if he confirms similar past like (ie past existence). Or, if he did not think past enduring, sustainable and does not change, He conceived "past and present remain stagnant status" when he conceived of Nirvana, he must also imply Nirvana is impermanent, unstable ...

(13-20) All of the above (9-12) applies equally to the legal past, present and future special called "Five Aggregates":

If past Wake existence, consciousness that remains frozen state similar to the Official Soul current and future. Thus, with one such determination, will make more trouble identifying the same when related to the other two divisions of the time. Again, past cognition exist and remain at standstill, consciousness remains permanent, sustainable and unchanged. Surely he says this is not reasonable.When He said existing Nirvana and remain rational state. When He says Nirvana exists and retains permanent state of nirvana, sustainability does not change, he must accept that if he identified the Soul past likewise. Or if he does not think that the past Consciousness lasting, sustainable and does not change, when he says that Thuc past and present remain stagnant state of Nirvana, He said, He also covers Nirvana is impermanent , unsustainable temporary and change ...

(21) There must be a legal past does not exist? If he agrees, he must renounce his views about the past present. If he says "no past, present" when saying "there is a relationship of past quar" is misleading.

Again, there must be a legal future does not exist. If he agrees, then he must also reject his views on "existing and future", - If he says "no future existence," they say, "there is the existence of the future" is wrong .

(22) There is no future measures then become the present? If he agrees, he must also accept future legal identical to current law. Did he admit it? Then he has to accept a certain approach is the future, and become current. Did he admit to this? Then he has to accept a certain law is not the future, not the present, not the future become, not become current.

Similarly, reasoning as above for "present" and "past" ...

Similarly, for the future, present and past: Does the future is becoming the present, is present becomes the past? If so, he must accept all three measures were identified, and in the process became the alternative method is repeated. If he accepts this, he has to accept the opposite of that is the rational approach.

APPLICATION OF Italy - UNDERSTANDING TIME - TIME has been rectified.

(23) Is it (all of the conditions seen as): Labels, scenery, awareness, light, attention in the past, the present? If he agrees, he has to accept a past who saw the object in the past the label. Similar to all the conditions of the other senses, and in the past such as Turkey, Landscape silence, Turkish official, Nowhere, attention; Billion, Landscape incense, Rate formula, the atmosphere, the attention; Damage, Scene position, Damage, Food, water quality, attention body, emotional scene, consciousness, soil, attention; Italy, the legal landscape, the memorial, Italy animal, attention. For example, in the last case: He had to admit was a scene aware of past measures by conscious past.

(24) Similarly, if the conditions of the present and future perception as labels, scenery, awareness, light, attention, then one can see the future with brand identity futuristic v .. V. ...

(25) If He said that the events of the present and see what other methods exist, and He saw the current Sac v ... v ... with label is also present, if he maintains that the past conditions of the existing perception, he must also say that the labels past, a past Sac see.

(26) Similarly, as above for future conditions of consciousness.

(27) If He refused that label past, past landscape, past and consciousness exists, then one does not see Sac quar past history with labels, as He must also declined, with the the condition of the existing current show, a person does not see the current situation with Label Lust current. Similarly for other foods, too.

(28) The same argument for the future show.

(29) There must be enlightened ( Nanam ) past still exist? If he agrees, he must also accept that it is incumbent upon the knowledge gained by past wisdom. And if he accepts it. He also had to accept that the enlightened always a level that fully articulate Suffering, to ultimate annihilation, attaining Killing base and cultivate the Noble Truth (not by current knowledge).

(30) The same argument applies to the enlightened future.

(31) Is the current enlightened still exist, or have the knowledge quest is represented by the knowledge that? If he agrees, he must accept that enlightened past exists (§ 29) Tue incumbent upon the wisdom expressed by that past. Thus, with the current knowledge, Suffering is comprehended, is to ultimate annihilation, Killing substrate is attained, the Noble Truth is maturing. This is not due to sheer teenage Tue past that all (enlightened) are affected in the attainment of liberation.

(32) The same reasoning is presented to extend transparency to the issues that he enlightened conception of existence.

(33) But he still said that wherever the knowledge of past processes still exist, it can not incumbent upon Tue expression by itself, then, to make sure the process of past wisdom can not be identified by progress - process - existing knowledge is current. Moreover, if he can not perceive Suffering (§ 29-31) with existing knowledge of the past then would he recognize Suffering exists in current knowledge. That is absurd.

(34) Tue Tue current and future also be included in the general reasoning above.

(35) Does the past afflictions Tier Arhat still exist? He agrees ... But there must in the present afflictions Arhat level. Craving, anger, ignorance, conceit, wrong view, Doubt, Kiss downs, rooms booked, heartless, fearless of the past, still exists?

(36) Similarly, he said that section 5 lower fetters disturbing past and still exists for Career Real hybrid, but this ranks right body still is, Sceptic, the first precept, craving, Golf subtle and not, despite corruption and defilement fetters of the past and no longer exist?

(37) Similarly, he said that the past fetters like this, and Ai Rough, rough Golf still exist with most hybrids, but there are still steps to be bound by the fetters, and crude Ai, Rabbit?

(38) Similarly, he said that the past three fetters and greed, anger, and ignorance capable reborn in a woeful still present with a Stream, but there must be a Stream is still bound by the fetters, and the sins that?

(39) Make sure that the ordinary person craving past still exist and have affected people's craving does not? He agreed. So sure, if craving the past is still present with the Arhat level, this level is affordable still affected by past that craving? Similar reasoning for 9 other fetters (35).

(40-42) If he said that still exists mortal afflictions or fetter the past, he must also accept that these afflictions or fetter the past is still present for anyone who attained one of the Bible stories and so the fetters still exist where Noble was in the present.

(43-46) However, if this can not get to a level Arhat, or a Divine Master of the school property, which currently still linked to the negativity or fetters were present useful in the past. Similarly, this can not be for the current ordinary person but still related to the negativity or the fetters that existed in the past.

(47) There must hand the past still exist? Then he has to admit that the hand that held back or let go yet '. Likewise, the foot and toes, a step forward, turn back, knees up, step down, the hungry and thirsty .... Is also exist?

(48) Is the body past still exist? Then he has to admit that the past itself is still standing up, bending, cutting off and septic standards, a prey to the vulture, hawks also prey to the past itself, poisoned weapons, Friendly fire can touch the past. Past relatives still imprisoned by a shackle, shackles, shackles, confined in the villages and cities - cities.

(49) There must be other factors (the relative past) such as; water, fire, wind exists. If he agrees. He must accept each element of the past still manifest themselves part of it.

(50) Is the aggregate of form the past, future and present, still exist? if so, must have three aggregates of matter. And if he said that the Five Aggregates past, future and present existence, He must accept 15 aggregates.

(51) Similarly, he must accept 3 Labels of origin, - 36 Origin.

(52) Similarly, he must accept three perspectives - 54 world.

(53) Similarly, he must accept the label rights 3 - 66 right.

 (54) Is He said that the King cakkavatti in the past, in the future or in the present exists? Thus, it must mean that there are all 3 position cakkavatti live in the same time? Applying this reasoning to the Omniscient Buddha.

 (55) Does the past still exists? He agreed. So there must be existence is the past? He answered, "The existence may be the past, can not be past." But here, his past discrimination may be the past and the past can not, therefore, his conception is flawed and ngia was rejected.

(56) Similarly, he will be complicated if that still exists future existence may be the future, and can not be the future.

(57) The same argument against the current.

(58) Similarly, if he accepts Nirvana existence, but existence could be nirvana, can not be nirvana, this means that Nirvana is or can not be nirvana, is not nirvana is not nirvana or may be nirvana.

(59) S: - There is no mistake to say that "The past is present", "The existing hybrid"?

Th: - Well, say it is wrong.

S: - But is Exalted has not once declared that "Monks, what mortal can Sac past, future, present, under internal or external, gross or subtle, inferior and superior, far or near , is called aggregate. Hey monks, what qualities have Tho what Thought ..... ..... human flesh may have nothing Administrative ..... what human cognition past, future, present in the internal or external belonging, gross or subtle, inferior and superior, far or near, is called Soul aggregates "?  (1)

Thus, make sure the existing past, present and future.

(60) Th: - But is Exalted has not once declared that "Monks, there are 3 categories, language Highway, Highway quotations, competition for highways, no confusion, did not confused, future confusion being the SAMON, Brahmin has rebuked position, What is three? "

a) What color whatsoever over, were annihilated, has turned septic, Matter was recognized as "Forums ever had" was proclaimed as the "Forums had" been competition for the "Forums had" not Matter confirmed that "there" is not confirmed, "there will be." Likewise with the other aggregates.

b) What color Qualities unborn, not existing, that is confirmed is charging. "There will be" Being proclaimed as "will be", is competition for the "I'll be there," Matter is not confirmed, "We have", not confirmed that "there has been." Likewise with the other aggregates.

c) What color Qualities are born, existing, he was recognized as Outstanding "There", was proclaimed as the "There", was competition for the "There", Lust was not confirmed as "Forums had "not been confirmed," there will be. " Likewise with the other aggregates.

O Bhikkhus, there are three categories, language Highway, Highway quotations, competition for highways, no confusion, no confusion before, did not confused, the future is not confused, not being the recluses, three- Hotel la-subject had rebuked.

However, people in Ukkali, the preacher during the rainy season retreat, the commentator're inhumane and ineffective position commentator, the author of the comment you very existence he does not think the Highway 3 languages, quotations reveal, competition for this route is not reprehensible, not worthy of contempt. Wherefore? because they fear reprimand, attack, outrage, criticism?  (2)

 (61) Again, there must monks Phagguna did not once asked the Buddha: "O Blessed labels of Buddhas, past, had passed completely, ended birth and death, reincarnation severed, overcome all suffering, affordable labels that still exist? Or Turkey, tongue, body still exists ". And the Buddha replied: "Hey Phagguna, labels can not exist, as well as whether any sense of past Buddhas exist can not be"?  (1)

Are there texts like that? So, certainly can not say: "The past is present", "future existence."

(62) Again, did he Nandaka had stated that: "Participating in the past, which is bad, now no longer exists, which is a good thing: anger, and ignorance in the past , which is bad, now no longer exists, which is a good thing? "  (2)

Are there texts like that? So make sure not to say that "The past is present".

(63) S: - But is the Buddha did not once declared that "O Bhikkhus, if for real union, have participated; with joy, his affinity place to dwell Soul is growth. It yet officially reside, growth, birth place has mentality. Somewhere there and matter of birth, the place has the Administrative growth. Where does the Administration have growth, that place Huu be reborn in the future. It What is useful in the future rebirth, the place has old birth, death in the future .... It does have to birth, death in the future, I say with sorrow that place, there is suffering, there is the brain. this, Bhikkhus, if for real contact, ... ... of food, with participating practices, with joy, with sorrow .... affinity, there is pain, there is brain "?  (3)

Are there texts like that? then there certainly must not let that "The existing hybrid" star?

(64) Th: - But is Exalted has not once declared that: "O Bhikkhus, if real union, no desire, no joy, no love, no consciousness of that place to dwell growth. It does not have to dwell consciousness, growth was no list Sac place of birth. It does not give birth Sac list, does not have the administrative seat of growth. It does not have Administrative growth, it does not being born there in the future, where there is no future rebirth Friends had no place to birth, death in the future. It does not give birth, aging, death in the future say that place no Sầu , no suffering, no brain. this, bhikkhus, if for real ... contact volition .... consciousness actually, no desire, no joy, no kindness .... no sorrow no pain, no brain "?

Are there texts like that? So make sure not to say that "The existing hybrid".

PAST ISSUES 7. aggregates ( 
Atita Khandhakatha)

Rate debate : Past included in the Aggregate (and Matter) still exists.

Explanatory notes : This notion of sectarian  Sabbatthivadins  that both the past and the future belongs to the aggregates are still present, because of the Aggregates and experience factors continued to hold that status.

(1)  Sabbatthivadins: -  If He confirmed that the past of aggregates - as he conceived - he also had to admit past still exist. This much he refused. Thus the existence of the past, like in the case of the Land and Gender or all three: Aggregates, Land, Gender.  (1)

(2) Again, if he said that in the future include aggregates as he conceived - he also had to admit exists future. This much he refused. Thus, the existence of the future is the same as in the case of the Land and Gender or all three: Aggregates, Land, Gender.

(3) If He said that currently consists of aggregates and present existence, he must also accept that the past is composed of aggregates also exist. For other existing elements (Parish - About) is similar.

(4) Similarly, for future aggregates.

(5) Again, if he said that the past is composed of aggregates - or other factors or the Parish for example - does not exist, then he has to accept the current consists of aggregates as well not exist.

(6) Similarly, hybrid Area consists of Aggregates - Land - About ... and the future does not exist.

(7) Again, if he said that in the past Sac forming Aggregates - Land - About or all three: Aggregates, Land, Gender, and he also had to admit that exist Sac past.

(8) And if he said that in the future will become Sac aggregates ... he also had to admit existence Sac future.

(9) Again, if he said that the current Sac in aggregate with other factors, and now exists, he must also accept that Sac past, including in the aggregate, also exist.

(10) The same argument, replaced "Lust past" with "Lust future."

(11) Again, if he said that the past Sac existence as an aggregates, and the notion that the nature of the past does not exist, he must also accept the current Sac exist as aggregates and existing properties as well not exist.

(12) Similarly, for existing and future identity and the nature of the future does not exist.

(13) Similarly, replacing the word "Lust" by one of the four aggregates. If He said that the past becomes a Soul aggregates, Parish or morality, he also had to accept that consciousness exists past.

(14) Similarly, if he said that creating a futuristic Formula aggregates, He also had to accept that consciousness exists future.

(15) Again, if He says the current Formula aggregates form a, with other factors, and this consciousness exists, He also had to admit that consciousness the past, including in Aggregates, Land and Gender, also exist.

(16) Similarly, for the future Consciousness.

(17) Moreover, if his past claims that consciousness exists as an aggregates, Parish or gender and this method does not exist, he must also accept that consciousness exists as a present ... nor aggregates exist.

(18) Similarly, for the future Consciousness.

 (19)  Theravadins:  - There is no mistake to say that the past and future to include in Aggregates, Land, Gender did not exist?

S: - Well, so is wrong.

Th: - But did the Buddha was once declared "Monks, there are three categories, language Highway, Highway quotations, competition for highways, no confusion, before confused, did not confused, future confusion, the future is not confused, not being the SAMON, Brahmans have rebuked position, how are the three? (1) In every color (or a certain aggregates) what had passed, was annihilated, has turned septic , her identity is confirmed that "there has been" being justified as "'ve ever had" been competition for the "been there" was not confirmed identity is "out there" is not certified as "will be" (2) In every color (or a certain aggregates) is not born, not to exist ... (3) Every color (or a certain aggregates) was born, that existed "?  (1)

There must have all of this? Then make sure that the past and future including the Aggregates, Land, Gender exists.

(20) S - But did the Blessed One has not declared that. "Monks, what flesh-colored past, future, present, under the cabinet or under external, gross or subtle, inferior and superior , far or near, is called the aggregate of form. this, bhikkhus, that everyone has something ... human life has nothing Thought ... what ... human flesh had Administrative what have the past form, ... "  (2 )

There must have all of this?

Th: - Yes.

S: - If so, certainly can not say that "the past and future in the aggregates include" ... does not exist.

8. EXISTING PROBLEMS OF THE PAST AND FUTURE POSITION (Ekaccamatthitikatha)

Rate debate : (i) Partial past existence, in part, no, (ii) the existing part futuristic, part not.

Explanatory notes : This notion of sectarian  Sabbathivadins , especially sectarian  Kassapikas , for that part of the past still exist in the present and the future will certainly exist. Therefore, sex Theravadins  have to ask questions like "Does the past exist ..." to rectify the problem.

(1)  Theravadins : - Are there past existence? He replied, in part past exists and part is not. Then he must confirm (in equivalent terms) partially eradicated, has turned septic, dead, dead completely, but partly it is not eradicated, not turning septic, no death, no completely dead. However, he refused this.

(2) More specifically, he has to admit that the past legal person (good and evil) the ability to achieve results which are not part existent, partly not - he refused it - and the past legal entity capable for achievements and results were, in part, the existence, in part, no, he also rejected this - moreover, without giving legal past results (due to heart happy, identity legal and Nirvana), partly as existent, partly not - this he also refused.  (2)

(3) Again, according to the statement of his past exist side part, that section does exist, in part, no?

Kassapikas:  - The approach of the past but not the present achievements, there are certain methods of the past that have achieved the then non-existent.

Th: - But if he accepts the existence of the law before he also must accept the existence of the following measures, as well as the existence of the law does not give results. Again, if these measures belongs past achievements that do not exist, it can not be the approach of the past is not the present achievements, as well as for measures that do not give fruit (nothing is signed). Again, he said that the measures of the past but not the present achievements, but to the past, such measures can not say that has consumed so? He agreed to this? But he could not say that a state law thaivua both is and destruction.

(4) Does he agree that the legal achievements of the past has not broken off and that even exist? Then he had to accept that the law of the past, achievements have been killed, is still present. Likewise also these past measures do not result still exist.

On the other hand, if he said that the legal achievements of the past, were killed then, no longer exists, he must also accept that the past approach, no achievements, were killed then, well not exist ( here, there is a conflict with his first confirmation). Likewise also for the law not to work.

Or is there must be the law of the past, no achievements, were killed then, even exist? And is the law of the past, have achievements, was killed then, does not exist? Thus, by the way, he also confirmed a few measures of the past, in part already accomplished, in part not yet accomplished, and both were killed then, there is existence, while a part was not existence - he refused this.

(5) K: - There is no mistake to say that "The past is not legal under the quar achievements, still exist"?

Th: - Well, that is silly.

K: - There must be a legal no public events of the past, it will not achieve success for the work?

Th: - Well, true.

K: - If so, certainly not wrong to say that the past approach, not achievement, still exists.

Th: - Admittedly, the law in the past so will achievements to fruit, can yet say that they still exist? He agreed, but certainly they will be fulfilled to the results, we can say that we are doing currently? If he accepts it (the past is the legal measures now, certainly in the current legal standards will be corrupt, does it not exist?

(6) (i) For the question "The future does not exist?", He answered "Part of it exists, in part, no," he admitted one of equivalent terms "part was born, has been formed, that happened, appeared "also partly not. However, he rejected this, based on his statement, there must be certain of any law shall conceive as existent, there are certain measures do not exist? He agreed to this, thus he had to accept that the legal part of the future will not exist while being partial birth method, the future will not exist.

(7) According to his statement (ii) whether the method of the future does exist, but does not approach?He answered, "The future of certain measures (that will be sure), it exists, and the legal uncertainty (not birth) does not exist". Then he denied that the future legal legal uncertainty still exists, although he did accept this clause half ago in his reply. Again, if the legal uncertainty of the future does not exist, then the law must also be certain future does not exist.

He said that these measures will bear certain future as existent, so that He may admit that the future approach to be born again is not reasonable? You agree? So, how can he say that the unborn measures exist?

(8) Or, if the future law will definitely born, unborn, existence, the uncertain legal future unborn, also exist. Or again, if the future law will not be born, unborn, does not exist, He also said that the law had given birth will also not present.

(9) K: - There is no mistake to say that: "The law shall bring forth a certain future as existent"?

Th: - Yeah, like that was a mistake.

K: - But is the future approach will definitely not happen star born?

Th: - Yes.

K: - So, make sure that these measures will bear certain future as existent.

(10) Th: - It must be admitted that the future law, if certain birth, happens, the law does not exist?

K: - Well, the law does exist.

Th: - Admittedly, these measures would occur, the current law does not belong?

K: - No, the law does not fall under the future but the present.

Th: - I repeat the question.

K: - Yes (because if the law did exist, they belong to the present).

Th: - And to admit that the current measures will target damage, there was no legal right to exist?

K: - No, can not say like that.

Th: - But he did admit this other then that.

9. PROBLEMS mindfulness. (Satipatthanakatha)

Rate debate : All measures are Niem origin.

Explanatory notes:  Some sects like  Andhakas  and then  Pubbaseliyas, Aparaseliyas, Rajagirikas and  Siddhatthikas , have the perception that all is legal subjects are perceived by the mind meditative.Do they infer from texts "Saṁyutta mindfulness"  (Satipatthāna - Samyutta ) with the "Monks, I will show the people the onset and cessation of Mindfulness legal origin"  (1)  . To rectify this perception, seconded Theravadins  posed questions.

(1)  Theravadins:  - Are all these measures are perceived not constitute Mindfulness origin?

Andhakas: -  Well, yes.

Th: - If so, he has to admit all be aware of the legal origin constitute mindfulness, right mindfulness, mindfulness force, Mindfulness Enlightenment, mindfulness ... the "only way", "leading to the annihilation "," leading to the realization ", and" not the scene of Gonorrhea Or - fetters - Custom Hypnosis - hindrances - Prime - knots - knots aces - Boc up, he had to accept that all the be aware of the legal form of title 10 as: Reciting the Buddha, Dharma and Sangha, About, For, Meditation, Mindfulness the news agency, pride, Body Contemplation, Reciting the first President of Nirvana "  (2) . But all this he refused.

(2) Again, he must accept the same as in the first identified him, so - well into Niem Origin Origin label, right mindfulness ... Reciting the first President of Nirvana. And if he really accept these things, then he must also accept all legal entities have been aware that my witness statement.

(3) Similarly, for the other four Cabinet origin, year of Foreign Origin, greed, anger, ignorance, conceit, Ta Kien, Sceptic, Kiss downs, rooms booked, heartless, fearless, well into Niem origin.

(4) So there must Mindfulness is mindfulness origin and vice versa. Mindfulness mindfulness is not? If he accepts this, he has to accept that one of the measures is perceived, discussed, also became Mindfulness and mindfulness Origin Origin also became one of his measures.

He refused, So Is He said that each of the legal measures being aware that the Mindfulness origin, or vice versa? He agreed, so he had to admit that it is meditative, but not as Niem Niem origin.

(5) A: - So there is no mistake to say that: "All of Mindfulness legal origin"?

Th: - Well, say this is wrong.

A: - But not by Niem which measures perceived by the stars?

Th: - Yes (so that the legal Mindfulness is awareness).

A: - If so, why he can reject my view that "All are aware that mindfulness legal origin"?

Th: - If we said 'Do that all legal Mindfulness is awareness, there have to be aware of the legal origin of Mindfulness "is not?

Oh yes.

Th: - Due Promotion is aware that the law, does this mean that all the measures called Promotion origin ( phassapatthana ) not? That is his conception. Again, Feeling, Perception, Action, Soul by each legal aggregates that are perceived. Are all methods called Life Origin, Jiang origin, ... no? Therefore, for these things so he must accept.

(6) Again, if his concept is solid, and he must accept these beings regardless if mature and solid Mindfulness Mindfulness is there with him.

Furthermore there must be Exalted has declared that "These men are not entitled to be immortal, the monks, are not carried out personally anniversary  (Paribhunjati ). These men inherit immortality, this the monks, is the implementing body of the operating concept ".  (1)

There must have all of this? He recognized, but not all beings are entitled to be, evolution, practice, develop and mature the concept itself is not legal? He still does not know that they have been so.

(7) Again, there must be Exalted has not once declared that "There is a unique path, the monks, causing visible species is pure, beyond the sorrow, suffering termination benefits, right view achievements, realization of Nibbana. that is four foundations of mindfulness "?  (2)

There must have all of this? He admitted, but there must be "All beings" has one and only one star that road? He was forced to accept that "all beings" can not have a being.

(8) Again, there must be Exalted has declared that "Career cakkavatti When born, the monks, there are seven treasures appear. What is seven? That's the car jewel, jade elephant golden, horse jewel, as the precious pearl, pearl jewel woman, lay golden, golden generals; bhikshus, when rank cakkavatti born, there appeared seven treasures. when as hybrid, grade A -la-drought, the Enlightenment was born, the monks, there are seven treasures appear. What is seven? that's mindfulness enlightenment, enlightenment legal Trach, for enlightenment, Hy enlightenment, an enlightenment Contempt , Concentration enlightenment, and enlightenment Drain. bhikshus when Tathāgata, Arhat level, enlightenment is born with seven treasures appear. "  (1).

There must have all of this? He recognized but to "all measures" to become mindfulness enlightenment factor, a factor of enlightenment when Tathāgata appear? He has said that the mindfulness approach to enlightenment can not be, but he was also forced to accept this.

(9) Finally, if all the measures called Mindfulness legal origin, all that must be equivalent to those of 37 measures as the assistant director: Right Exertion, such as the sufficiency Four, five right, five continents, Interior enlightenment, the Noble Eightfold Path. With this, he admitted affordable?

10. THE EXISTING PROBLEMS OF FRANCE (Hevatthitikatha)

Rate Debate:  The existing law in this state that does not exist in other states.

Explanatory notes:  This concept of sect  Andhakas , and some other sects as  Pubaseliyas  ... They said that all the measures are inherent in a moment like Lust and list of past, present or future, on the other hand is not in the future and the present, nor the future of the past and present. So, all things that exist only in part, and in part, it does not exist. Phai  Theravadins  posed questions to rectify this perception.

(1)  Theravadins -  Does the past still exist?

Andhakas:  - The past is present in this state that does not exist in other states.

Th - According to him, there must past both is and is not present? He refused, and he again confirmed - that he must confirm Tools - And if the past both is and it does not exist, then the "existence" as well as "non-existent" and vice versa, "the does not exist "as well as" existence "," is "is" is not "and vice versa" is not "as well as" is "and institutions of both the same thing, the same meaning, the same contract a corner. Of course he does not accept this is.

(2) Similarly, he said that the future exists only in this state that does not exist in other states. This means that both existing and future, and is not. Here, the conflict proved right in his views.

(3) Similarly, at present exists only in this state that does not exist in other states; and he again fell into such contradiction.

(4) If the past exists only as he had conceived, then they might look like, how does not exist?

A: - The past exists only as the past, does not exist as the future, not the present existence.

Th: - But this is like in His saying, coffee, and no two are the same, and so, he was conflicted as before.

(5-6) Similarly, for the future, and the present, future and present how not exist like? Currently being how and how not exist?

(7) - So there is no mistake to say "past, future or present exists only in this state that does not exist in other states."

Th: - Well, so is wrong.

A: - It must follow Him, past present and future, and the present, future, past and present, and the present, and the present as well as past, present and future - With this affordable He admitted?Therefore, make sure I'm very rational.

(8) Th: - Does Matter exists?

A: - We exist in this state that does not exist in other states.

Th: - Here, he faces obstacles as last time "are the same both existence and non-existence" and therefore, he was conflicted as before.

(9) The same applies for other aggregates 4: Feeling, Perception, Action, Soul.

(10-11) Again, based on the concept of the existing aggregates how and how not exist, when he answered: "One aggregates such as aggregate, existing in a state of Excellence and the four other aggregates do not exist ... "He was also a similar contradiction.

(12) A: - So there is no mistake to say that: "Any public aggregates exist only in one state, but does not exist in other states."

Th: - Well, so is wrong.

A: - But according to him, they said that each existing aggregates in a state like any aggregates in four aggregates (Matter exists in a state such as Waking Life ....). Therefore, I definitely very reasonable to assume that every aggregates exist only in its separate status, which does not exist in other states. END=NAM MO CAKYA MOUNI BUDDHA.( 3 TIMES ).VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY=THICH CHAN TANH.THE MIND OF ENLIGHTENMENT.WORLD VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST ORDER=VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST NUN=GOLDEN LOTUS MONASTERY=AUSTRALIA,SYDNEY.28/10/2016.MHDT.