The meaning of the contested measures taken not in Buddhism.

 

The books, especially books Southern tribe, notes that at the time of the Buddha is not only a unique Buddhist is, on the contrary the Buddha was living in a period of extremely rich tradition includes many philosophical and other beliefs. There are a lot of teachers older and more famous Buddhist masters, such as Ba-la-Mon Jina Mahavira that Buddhist scriptures often say to under the title as Nigantha Nathaputta.
In the special context of the highly developed spiritual movements of the water in time, the war of rhetoric between the leaders and the people who advocate the doctrine also downright openness, wider spread and naturally an incredible way. The scene was chronicled in countless Buddhist and beyond Buddhism. So the position of Buddhism in the context of how he, the Buddha taught the disciples must keep their attitude before the war complex and rational rhetoric carries less colorful beliefs?
1. The outer movements and schools of Buddhism
Books (in this number has significant Samannaphala-sutta) usually refers to the six most important than teachers, teachers don't necessarily advocate a religion by definition usually, but represents many philosophical movements based on the rationalists argue or based on few shades of belief. The movement was classified as follows:
-Trend: do teachers Purana Kassapa advocates. This movement believes that there is no payoff for the executable behavior, no one of any consequence in the only Italian behavior. So this doctrine or movement advocates the random character of the universe, which means all things and events happen by accident , random variable, random and not dependent on conditions. Buddhist books call this doctrine is addhiccasamuppanna-vada, (according to the Digha Nikaya-Nikāya-School).
-Second movements by Makkhali Gosala, masters lived in the same time with Buddha, advocated the theory of fate, destiny or fate, and that these acts always cruel or have no effect on the freed man. The attempt of human behavior and of no effect whatsoever in their current incarnations. They just endure it that long chain until it terminates automatically, then people will achieve final salvation. The current incarnations of each fish may have been decided in advance, does not change. However this trend again advocated the improved and advance sequentially for each regeneration, can form from lower to higher forms, until terminated, (according to the school of Nikaya - Digha-nikaya).
-Trend Ajita Kesakambali masters Tuesday due to server, based on the novel biodegradable, i.e. everything, everything could dissipate or disappear off nothing at all (called annihilism). Buddhist books call this doctrine is ucceda-vada. Doctrine of nowhere or nothingness above was widely popular during the time of the Buddha in the world and is also divided into several tribes, but all said that the practice of no avail, understanding and always keep such an importance would place each of the individuals. According to this doctrine, consisting of four people: soil, water, fire and air. When dead, each component has just since going back to a possible General, corresponding to them in nature: land with soil, water to water, etc., sensory functions, the sense of integration with the space. Each individual will be removed by death, and death will have nothing at all.

-Trend Wednesday advocated novel immortal called sassata-vata, so many different masters home chorus, of which the most famous is the Pakhuda unit Kaccayana. According to this theory the human host is integrated by seven components: land, water, fire, air, excitement, pain and vitality (jiva). Seven separate components that are not born nor destroyed, not originated nor ended, they live independently, not mutual impacts, no change, no customized well no promotion, leave like that to the endless, (according to the Digha nikaya-Nikāya-School).
-Trend Thursday actually consists of many different schools and advocated a system of doctrines under which world is the creation of a Supreme creator deity, Buddhist scriptures called the Supreme Creator who is issara-nimmana-vada. The schools given the definition at least much different about the creator of this and known by many different titles: Maha-Hotel Brama, the winning, the World Owner, author, the creative, the work of creating the destiny, the autonomy, the Father of those who have been born and will be born ... Of teachers advocates to this system is the Acchariyas, Tittiriyas, Chandokas:, Chandavas, Brahmacariyas ..., while the names of the teachers are also used to call us by the host initiator.
-Trend Friday was a fairly strange movements, are also spread in the time of the Buddha. Teachers are best known in this period as Sanjaya Bellatthiputta, he never answered those questions are raised which always run away, using arguments agnosticism (can not understand the absolute) to avoid confrontation , those with questions about topics related to ethics and metaphysics, which also avoids the question is General. According to Sanja Bellatthiputta, the questions and the answers are true and it. relate to what cannot be determined, it is impossible to describe and impossible to explain. It is common for him as a threaded needle through the two outer edge of fabric.
2. The attitude of the Buddha
Don't know the books South with full description and notes all the time or not doctrine, but said a transparent way that the Buddha did not advocate random variables, destiny, eternity, nothingness, creation, agnosticism. The remarkable thing is just in the first episode of Tibetan Scriptures (i.e. menstruation Brahmajala-sutta) has raised facts Buddha rejected 62 doctrine of contemporary masters. Among the 62 he had 23 doctrine doctrine advocating the fall (atman), also known as the I, the us, and among the rest of the doctrine have many theories postulate the eternity or Live.
Buddha said: « any one of 62 point of views [mentioned] are shown in the top of the can anyone bring the notion of human personality (sakkaya-ditthi), but when this mistake had no concept, no longer will the cling to her views again » ( Sammyutta-nikaya). The above sayings of the Buddha mean? Means that the Buddha wanted to allude to his ignorance in every human individual, the ignorance about the existence of the mind, the ego, the ego. People express things through the ignorance and assigned to individual human characteristics such as types of school exist, nothingness, an post, destiny, the consequences or the works of sacred creativity etc. The project will give rise to different perspectives. Worse is each individuals not themselves convey these views to their own, but also sought to impose for the other guys. The imposition for others the expression of ego, the self, his opinion is the source of all the files.
Buddha vigilant we have to avoid the war's mismanagement because of three reasons as follows:
-The second reason: the different perspectives, credulity or faith of each person and the rational argument will not have the benefit of all, not practical and not help us look into the matter, so the Buddha is not so interested in things like that.
In the middle of business ( Culamalunkyaputta-sutta), the story of a disciple of Buddha names Malunkyaputta as follows. Malunkyaputta sitting meditation alone fellowship course the following questions appear in first setback: «live universe infinite or not live forever? The universe has a limit or no limit? The principle of life in General with body or is the principle of life is one thing and the body is something else? etc».
Malunkyaputta sailings to find the Buddha to ask. The Buddha preaching to Malunkyaputta as follows: « This Malunkyaputta, although there is a perspective according to which the universe and have a perspective [else] according to which the universe is not infinite, but most had to understand that before birth, have elderly, have died, have had, mourn, there are pains, the terrible and desperate. [For] Ta, Ta [only] faculty [for kids] about the end of things in this world, in this life. Thus, this Malunkuyaputta, please keep in mind what we preach, right as we preach and what we don't preach, we don't correct faculty ...». Buddha replies to each topic a, Malunkyaputta but of criticizing out here a typical sentence related to the universe. Because setting again constant of the books, if drawn out would make the article too long.
-The second reason: Buddha help us ward off the only reason or rational argument brought to those opposing do arise out of these endless debates. The metaphysical theory usually brought to the skylight dogma requires both trust to accept, or taken to the explore the full range of arguments is prop or article. The argument then is not the practical experience by each person made, so can't help us evaluate this argument rather one other argument.
Science progress based on theory, when a theory stand has not been destroyed then the understanding because he brings to the hypothesis still has value, when a hypothesis being xụp pour then the understanding based on the theory that he also lost value. Of rational argumentation, a perspective because a individuals giving also is just one perspective as the other perspective. If we cling to a perspective will somehow brought to the debate or argue. If as the cling her to become too strong will can lead to segregation and discrimination, bigotry and lack of tolerance, the consequences led to the wars of religion and conflict as happened in Western history.
-The third reason: Buddha we hold an attitude « neutral » or rather « stand out every perspective », not to let any one perspective would interfere with the progression of my mind. Not the main perspective «stand out» interferes, the cling of me on this or other point of views have directly to embarrass me on the spiritual progression. Events cling will create ignorance makes mind dulling.
Cling to any opinion (dhamma tanha) is a Buddhist thing prohibition. Transcend every opinion is freedom. One of the possible forms of meditation technique is not looking «all» interpretation things and events, and not the expression of the feeling of feeling on the body and the mind presence of mind, and that was how the application to the Buddha's teaching on the word reality here : stand out every expression and every viewpoint. The feeling of empathy is feeling, there is no difference between a feeling of excitement and feel a sense of feeling miserable or hard-all mixed up. There is no difference between a perspective called the «right» and a perspective called «wrong», a perspective is a perspective.
The following is a specific example. Through the usual arguments, I believe that the views advocated «has the existence of the ego», IE I have something fallen , as a wrong perspective (miccha ditthi), left reverse perspective i.e., anatta, which means no I (anatta vada) will have to be a perspective «true». But in fact should understand this: believe that without the existence of the ego, or believe are true perspective without the ego are «not right» casual, just avoid believe there self. The finesse is in place to avoid factions credulity is one fall. Believe or not believe is two extremes of duality, the two extremes will be expressed as two antagonistic perspectives, avoid standing out or up on both points of view. That is the meaning and the purpose of avoiding the war rhetoric in Buddhism.
The experience made in Buddhism
Buddhism avoid these perspectives based on the rational argumentation and the expression is not derived from personal experience, as the debates «metaphysical», but kh ng that Buddhism didn't reach the transcendental knowledge. Experience by ourselves for Buddhists is not only based on the feel of sensory consciousness and sensibility but also based on the understanding of sensory hyper-sensibility», ««Super mind», an understanding and intuition prevail, thanks to the long term, such as the get to know about the next life before , about the rebirth after death, awareness of authentic versions of this world, about the nature of all objects and events. The experience and intuition, that is the ultimate goal of Buddhist practice.
In the sutta — Sangarava, in the central part, the Buddha distinguishes three types of master chorus three different spiritual trend, listed as follows: the first trend is the God of revelation (revealed by spirit feel) (anussavika), understanding the God of revelation based on Sacred Scriptures called the Bible, such as in the case of teachers She-la-Mon most are belong to da Phệ (Veda). Teachers in the second trend based on the metaphysical concepts based on the rationalists argue (takki vimansi) and the masters themselves argue that they can achieve the knowledge base on the debates and the rational argument. The third tendency consists of teachers achieve understanding by direct experience through the practice of the conscious mind. The Buddha was a Teacher in the third group.
For Buddhists, there is no place for rational perspective as well as the views is the God of revelation. In many books, such as the Kalama sutta- (in-tank For Nikaya), Canki sutta-(in the middle), the Buddhas are always wary of the disciples had to consider, carefully checking by understanding the experience of any one what before accepting or denying. The understanding by direct experience or wisdom because the practice provides different events have a perspective or have a faith, two completely different form can.
The conclusion
The reasoning, resolution, preventive measures are very necessary for science, helping to establish the scientific hypothesis, on the theory that he will build understanding. The hypotheses spill each other to promote the progress and understanding. But according to Buddhism, the insights still subjective insights, formulas and conventions, is duality, cannot be used to describe the real reality of absolute reality.
Avoid the argumentation in Buddhism is to avoid the antagonistic and deadlock due to Professor knowing the duality, the Convention and the rational argumentation. Avoid the antagonistic attitude is not a afraid understanding which is way pass up on understanding to reach the Consulate received directly, and Supreme it. true nature of reality. Understanding it. and paramount she called the Consulate received supernatural (panna). For Buddhism, he symbolizes understanding ranks third in the practice. The first level is the tu world, second rank is designated tu (samadhi), third rank is tu Cafe (vipassana), the pubs, see or clever observation by wisdom. According to the South's intellectual tones help people practice getting to know exactly and directly the four noble truths and anatta of the humans, the result is taken to be the form of the rescue of the A-tier la-Chinese. Northern tribe called the third rank on this is tu wisdom and definition other than a little bit. Northern tribe called the wisdom gained in the third practice ranks supernatural wisdom is known as teaser-la-suite (prajnaparamita), i.e. the receiving person or the direct implementation of emptiness of the human individual and of all the phenomenon from the consciousness to the exterior, the Consulate receive or make emptiness will take to the final release.END=NAM MO CAKYA MOUNI BUDDHA.( 3 TIMES ).VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY=THICH CHAN TANH.THE MIND OF ENLIGHTENMENT.WORLD VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST ORDER=VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST NUN=GOLDEN LOTUS MONASTERY=AUSTRALIA,SYDNEY.22/8/2016.MHDT.