The Buddha and the quiet before the metaphysical questions.

                     

There are a number of questions were raised to question the Buddha, but he does not answer because that is what the question wrong and useless. Viu's questions on the plaque by the rational argument will fall into the pitfalls of conventional understanding, formulas and duality.

Pitfalls will lead to endless debates and questions followed each other, the practice. Many teachers lived simultaneously with the Buddha, i.e. MICRO-century before Christ, there has been many choruses doctrine in Chu areas of metaphysical philosophy. But the Buddha has sheltered for the disciples away from the pitfalls, not by prohibition, argue or explain, that by his silence. There are all kind of question 14, after which the Buddha does not answer:
1. The universe is eternal or not exist?
2. The universe is not eternal live?
3. The universe either live immortal, just not live immortal?
4. The universe thờivừa copper not live immortal nor la not live immortal?
5. The universe has borders?
6. the boundless universe or not?
7. The universe either have limited boundless medium?
8. The universe at the same time is not limited, but nor is there a limit?
9. the life and the body is something the same?
10. Life and body are two different things?
11. A release creatures existing there after death or not?
12. A component is no longer exits exist after death?
13. A spiritual đượcgiải escape is currently retired but do not exist after death?
14. A spiritual đượcgiải escape, at the same time does not exist nor do not exist after death?

 

The above is what business the Cula-Malunkya-sutta did, this Minister presented "The useless question" by a disciple of the Buddha named Malunkyaputta raised to question the Buddha. He did not directly answer the question, but the direction the Malunkyaputta's inquiries into what more practical: the suffering is taking place and what the balls are made for burial to Malunkyaputta disorder in consciousness:
"This Malunkyaputta, although there is a perspective according to which the universe and have a perspective [] according to which the universe is not infinite, but most had to understand that before birth, have elderly, have died, have had, mourn, there are pains, the terrible and desperate. [For] I, I [just] Lecture [for children] about the end of things in this world, in this life. This, therefore, Malunkyaputta, keep in mind what we preach, right as we preach and what we don't preach, we don't properly as the teaching ... "
(Extract of business Malunkya-sutta-Cula, French translation by Mohan Wijayaratna)
Books have copied the story as follows: a person with the name poison laced, but won't weigh arrows and bandaged, only questions about who shot the arrow and what made chord, the apothecary poison out ... If the continued questions like who would die before finding the answers to the questions. Buddha is not an imposing Catholic dogma, also is not a philosopher or scientist to give the explanation about the universe or the metaphysical argument, the Buddha was a spiritual Master instructs him to see a the existence of own chât at the same time the Buddha was also a medical cure for running Wage we escape from misery to find the true and lasting happily. Here is a snippet of the Cula-other Malunkya-sutta reiterated waste characteristics of metaphysical reasoning and nhữngbiện:
"Understanding does not help things for the promotion on the practice, because it's not what interests for peace and enlightenment. What benefit to peace and enlightenment that Buddha preaching to his disciples is the following: the truth of suffering, the origin of suffering, the suffering loạibỏ, the road led to the removal of suffering ".
(Extract of business Malunkya-sutta-Cula, translation of Etienne Lamotte)
Instead of attending the Buddha on the endless argumentation of duality and the Convention, he was pulled back to reality Malunkyaputta to look into the true nature of reality. Buddha gave the disciples Malunkyaputta and for both of us today a real mystery pills, but the Buddha did not mention the size of the universe. When the tablet of the French had in mind, release the toxins of ignorance, the universe will appear with him in a transparent manner, no need to ask the Buddhist Cosmos there are immortal or not.
Silence is a door wide open, is the endless space, rational inquiry is a behavior, a form of duality and bondage. If ponder thoroughly, we will notice the subtle characteristics in the way presented as well as the word of the Buddha's teaching in the books. Such as how to present the question in the Cula-Malunkya-sutta on here, every question to be nêulên sequentially by four questions:
-The universe eternal?
-The universe is not eternal?
-The universe v a immortal just not immortal?
-The universe has just not nor is not immortal immortal?
Nểu just put a single question: has the universe eternal? The question is "flawed", Bollywood lamina will lead to the constant controversy. The second part of the question; the universe is not bấtdiệt or not? Two ways of presenting the question raised antagonistic personality of duality: Yes and no. The third and fourth part of the question: the universe has just immortal while not indestructible, immortal is not nor is not immortal, is how to solve the whole question, the question becomes meaningless. In summary, a question if "full" will have prepared the answer is the same, the silence of Buddha truth incredibly profound.
Let's look at the problem on here under a different aspect. When asked about the Buddhist Cosmos there are immortal or not, Malunkyaputta accidentally entangled in the sins are as follows:
-View the universe as a whole, while the universe is just a mixed structure.
-View the universe existing in a firm manner, but the universe is just the product of impermanence.
-View the universe as an entity outside of the conscious mind, but in fact the universe is just a photo of the conscious mind.
The gross mistake like that shows Malunkyaputta's question is a question wrong. However, as recently presented on this, the third and fourth part of the question concerning questions about the universe are just as strange immortal immortal no medium has also indirectly solve there and not, as the present and not present, i.e. the abuse of language duality.
The question of ownership seems Malunkyaputta, but meaningless, pointless because based on conventional expressions, formulas and antagonistic. Please also evidenced more with scientists and philosophers is the Buddhist truth tuyệtđối, a true true facts of reality, nature escape the illusion, impermanence and fluctuations, the fact he called Buddhist absolute fact of reality. They don't go in search of the truth is relative, identified by the observation, description, measurements, the arguments based on mathematics or the theory of science and not rely on the argument of Rationalist philosophers.
In summary, the silence of Buddha is a method of cut off the process of rational thinking, breaking down conventional personality and verbal formula, including relative understanding of science and rational understanding of the philosopher. Understanding in Buddhism is a direct understanding by experience, discovered by practice and by strengthened spirituality, a supernatural understanding, clarity and absolute. He called understanding intellectual. END=NAM MO SAKYAMUNI BUDDHA.( 3 TIMES ).VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY=THICH CHAN TANH.THE MIND OF ENLIGHTENMENT.WORLD VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST ORDER=VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST NUN=GOLDEN LOTUS MONASTERY=AUSTRALIA,SYDNEY.11/1/2016.